....for counsel in the troopergate incident. Good thing, too. She needs one.

Also, there's a rumor that a team of senior GOP lawyers is now in
Alaska, doing what should have been done previously...they're actually
vetting Ms. Palin.

I'd said the odds are no better than even she'll remain on the ticket.

"hk" wrote in message
. ..
...for counsel in the troopergate incident. Good thing, too. She needs
one.

Also, there's a rumor that a team of senior GOP lawyers is now in Alaska,
doing what should have been done previously...they're actually vetting Ms.
Palin.

I'd said the odds are no better than even she'll remain on the ticket.


Gettin sicker.

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
...for counsel in the troopergate incident. Good thing, too. She needs
one.

Also, there's a rumor that a team of senior GOP lawyers is now in Alaska,
doing what should have been done previously...they're actually vetting Ms.
Palin.

I'd said the odds are no better than even she'll remain on the ticket.


Gettin sicker.

Eisboch




Sarah of the 21 Days? :)

On Sep 1, 5:54 pm, hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...
...for counsel in the troopergate incident. Good thing, too. She needs
one.

Also, there's a rumor that a team of senior GOP lawyers is now in Alaska,
doing what should have been done previously...they're actually vetting Ms.
Palin.

I'd said the odds are no better than even she'll remain on the ticket.

Gettin sicker.

Eisboch

Sarah of the 21 Days? :)

I will take Harry's bet, 21 days. What stakes Harry? I propose that
if you are correct, that I never criticize your ideas here again and
that if I am right you never make another political post here.

hk wrote:
wrote:
On Sep 1, 5:54 pm, hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
...for counsel in the troopergate incident. Good thing, too. She needs
one.
Also, there's a rumor that a team of senior GOP lawyers is now in
Alaska,
doing what should have been done previously...they're actually
vetting Ms.
Palin.
I'd said the odds are no better than even she'll remain on the ticket.
Gettin sicker.
Eisboch
Sarah of the 21 Days? :)

I will take Harry's bet, 21 days. What stakes Harry? I propose that
if you are correct, that I never criticize your ideas here again and
that if I am right you never make another political post here.


I didn't offer a bet. I mentioned odds.

No courage of your convictions, eh?

wrote:
On Sep 1, 5:54 pm, hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
...for counsel in the troopergate incident. Good thing, too. She needs
one.
Also, there's a rumor that a team of senior GOP lawyers is now in Alaska,
doing what should have been done previously...they're actually vetting Ms.
Palin.
I'd said the odds are no better than even she'll remain on the ticket.
Gettin sicker.
Eisboch
Sarah of the 21 Days? :)

I will take Harry's bet, 21 days. What stakes Harry? I propose that
if you are correct, that I never criticize your ideas here again and
that if I am right you never make another political post here.


I didn't offer a bet. I mentioned odds.

BAR wrote:
hk wrote:
wrote:
On Sep 1, 5:54 pm, hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
...for counsel in the troopergate incident. Good thing, too. She
needs
one.
Also, there's a rumor that a team of senior GOP lawyers is now in
Alaska,
doing what should have been done previously...they're actually
vetting Ms.
Palin.
I'd said the odds are no better than even she'll remain on the
ticket.
Gettin sicker.
Eisboch
Sarah of the 21 Days? :)

I will take Harry's bet, 21 days. What stakes Harry? I propose that
if you are correct, that I never criticize your ideas here again and
that if I am right you never make another political post here.


I didn't offer a bet. I mentioned odds.

No courage of your convictions, eh?


For me to accept a bet here, something would have to be offered that
interested me. I don't give a damn who posts here or who doesn't.

"hk" wrote in message
...



For me to accept a bet here, something would have to be offered that
interested me. I don't give a damn who posts here or who doesn't.


Does that mean you've released the inmates from your overcrowded Bozo bin?

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...


For me to accept a bet here, something would have to be offered that
interested me. I don't give a damn who posts here or who doesn't.


Does that mean you've released the inmates from your overcrowded Bozo bin?

Eisboch




Not at all. The only one not in there, I think, is JustWait, because of
my affinity for paranoid nutcases in usenet.

On Sep 1, 6:40 pm, hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...

For me to accept a bet here, something would have to be offered that
interested me. I don't give a damn who posts here or who doesn't.

Does that mean you've released the inmates from your overcrowded Bozo bin?

Eisboch

Not at all. The only one not in there, I think, is JustWait, because of
my affinity for paranoid nutcases in usenet.

"Courage of Convictions" cannot be applied to Democrats