"hk" wrote in message
...

Eisboch wrote:


Here we have a perfect example of Harry being Harry. Wayne's post was
informative to the OP's question, and had absolutely no reference to
Harry. Yet, Harry is compelled to respond with a snarky comment. Why?

Eisboch


Next time W'hine responds to a post of mine that has nothing to do with
him, ask W'hine that. Go ahead...make my day.


Virtually every ****ing contest going on in rec.boats is a series of
prompts/responses to some original comment, likely made years ago that
nobody can remember.

I used to scold my kids when they were 4 or 5 years old to stop doing this.

Eisboch

"hk" wrote in message
news
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...

Eisboch wrote:

Here we have a perfect example of Harry being Harry. Wayne's post was
informative to the OP's question, and had absolutely no reference to
Harry. Yet, Harry is compelled to respond with a snarky comment. Why?

Eisboch

Next time W'hine responds to a post of mine that has nothing to do with
him, ask W'hine that. Go ahead...make my day.


Virtually every ****ing contest going on in rec.boats is a series of
prompts/responses to some original comment, likely made years ago that
nobody can remember.

I used to scold my kids when they were 4 or 5 years old to stop doing
this.

Eisboch



The point is, you are quick to jump on my comments, but I don't see you
jumping on W'hine's "snarky" comments aimed in my direction, nor have I
noticed you jumping on similar comments from "The Seven," or from your
buddy SW.



Have you ever considered what is the common denominator?

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...

Eisboch wrote:

Here we have a perfect example of Harry being Harry. Wayne's post was
informative to the OP's question, and had absolutely no reference to
Harry. Yet, Harry is compelled to respond with a snarky comment. Why?

Eisboch

Next time W'hine responds to a post of mine that has nothing to do with
him, ask W'hine that. Go ahead...make my day.


Virtually every ****ing contest going on in rec.boats is a series of
prompts/responses to some original comment, likely made years ago that
nobody can remember.

I used to scold my kids when they were 4 or 5 years old to stop doing this.

Eisboch





The point is, you are quick to jump on my comments, but I don't see you
jumping on W'hine's "snarky" comments aimed in my direction, nor have I
noticed you jumping on similar comments from "The Seven," or from your
buddy SW.

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
news
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...

Eisboch wrote:
Here we have a perfect example of Harry being Harry. Wayne's post was
informative to the OP's question, and had absolutely no reference to
Harry. Yet, Harry is compelled to respond with a snarky comment. Why?

Eisboch
Next time W'hine responds to a post of mine that has nothing to do with
him, ask W'hine that. Go ahead...make my day.

Virtually every ****ing contest going on in rec.boats is a series of
prompts/responses to some original comment, likely made years ago that
nobody can remember.

I used to scold my kids when they were 4 or 5 years old to stop doing
this.

Eisboch


The point is, you are quick to jump on my comments, but I don't see you
jumping on W'hine's "snarky" comments aimed in my direction, nor have I
noticed you jumping on similar comments from "The Seven," or from your
buddy SW.



Have you ever considered what is the common denominator?

Eisboch




Sure. There are a dozen or so "righties" who don't like my political
views, and they try to "bash" me at every opportunity.

But that has nothing to do with what is being discussed he your
complaining about my post about W'Hine when you never complain to W'hine
about his posts concerning me.

"hk" wrote in message
. ..



But that has nothing to do with what is being discussed he your
complaining about my post about W'Hine when you never complain to W'hine
about his posts concerning me.


I concede to your legitimate point, however I would argue that the quantity
of unsolicited/unwarranted snarky comments coming from your end vastly
outnumber those posted by Wayne, SW, me and a few others.

There is a group, members of your famous "Dwarf" club, that regularly take
pot shots at you, but I thought you had them all in your Bozo Bin. So why
engage?

Eisboch

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:48:05 -0400, hk wrote:

If you were a nice guy, D'whine, you'd offer to "convoy" with O'Hara.
After all, you're both in Florida, and you certainly have nothing of
importance to do anymore. Right?

And what exactly is it that you do that is so important WAFA ?

He stands as the model of a Narcissistic Socialist Bigot. He makes you
thankful that you aren't one. That's important.

When you need to say WAFA, there is always a recent Harry post to reply
"WAFA" to. That's important, isn't it?

Perhaps he will respond and tell us why he thinks he is important, but I
doubt it.

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"hk" wrote in message
. ..



But that has nothing to do with what is being discussed he your
complaining about my post about W'Hine when you never complain to W'hine
about his posts concerning me.


I concede to your legitimate point, however I would argue that the
quantity of unsolicited/unwarranted snarky comments coming from your end
vastly outnumber those posted by Wayne, SW, me and a few others.

There is a group, members of your famous "Dwarf" club, that regularly take
pot shots at you, but I thought you had them all in your Bozo Bin. So why
engage?

Eisboch

He won't answer that.

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..


But that has nothing to do with what is being discussed he your
complaining about my post about W'Hine when you never complain to W'hine
about his posts concerning me.


I concede to your legitimate point, however I would argue that the quantity
of unsolicited/unwarranted snarky comments coming from your end vastly
outnumber those posted by Wayne, SW, me and a few others.

There is a group, members of your famous "Dwarf" club, that regularly take
pot shots at you, but I thought you had them all in your Bozo Bin. So why
engage?

Eisboch



Thank you.

I dispute your second point. The quantity of incomings is much higher
than the quantity of my outgoings, as it were. The *quality* of
outgoings, however, is much, much higher, which is why you think there
is more of them. :) (Well, that's my opinion!)

The bozo bin is operating very well, but, alas, sometimes someone whose
posts I do read will pick up a post from someone I don't, and I'll get
to see a few of these. Apparently, almost no one comments on the posts
of Loogy, FloridaJim, DK, et cetera. I know this because my filter
catches headers and I see a significant number of headers in there from
those particular shlemiels. Poor Loogy! :) So much effort (for him), so
little return.

"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
news
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...

Eisboch wrote:
Here we have a perfect example of Harry being Harry. Wayne's post
was informative to the OP's question, and had absolutely no reference
to Harry. Yet, Harry is compelled to respond with a snarky comment.
Why?

Eisboch
Next time W'hine responds to a post of mine that has nothing to do
with him, ask W'hine that. Go ahead...make my day.

Virtually every ****ing contest going on in rec.boats is a series of
prompts/responses to some original comment, likely made years ago that
nobody can remember.

I used to scold my kids when they were 4 or 5 years old to stop doing
this.

Eisboch


The point is, you are quick to jump on my comments, but I don't see you
jumping on W'hine's "snarky" comments aimed in my direction, nor have I
noticed you jumping on similar comments from "The Seven," or from your
buddy SW.



Have you ever considered what is the common denominator?

Eisboch


Sure. There are a dozen or so "righties" who don't like my political
views, and they try to "bash" me at every opportunity.


Did you ever stop to consider the way you present your political vews? How
about the tone and choice of words when you try to discredit the leadership
that you don't agree with?

In my book dissent is fine if presented in a civil manner. Wishing
leadership dead on one hand and then promoting social reform on the other
just doesn't wash.



But that has nothing to do with what is being discussed he your
complaining about my post about W'Hine when you never complain to W'hine
about his posts concerning me.

D.Duck wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
news Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...

Eisboch wrote:
Here we have a perfect example of Harry being Harry. Wayne's post
was informative to the OP's question, and had absolutely no reference
to Harry. Yet, Harry is compelled to respond with a snarky comment.
Why?

Eisboch
Next time W'hine responds to a post of mine that has nothing to do
with him, ask W'hine that. Go ahead...make my day.
Virtually every ****ing contest going on in rec.boats is a series of
prompts/responses to some original comment, likely made years ago that
nobody can remember.

I used to scold my kids when they were 4 or 5 years old to stop doing
this.

Eisboch

The point is, you are quick to jump on my comments, but I don't see you
jumping on W'hine's "snarky" comments aimed in my direction, nor have I
noticed you jumping on similar comments from "The Seven," or from your
buddy SW.


Have you ever considered what is the common denominator?

Eisboch

Sure. There are a dozen or so "righties" who don't like my political
views, and they try to "bash" me at every opportunity.


Did you ever stop to consider the way you present your political vews? How
about the tone and choice of words when you try to discredit the leadership
that you don't agree with?

In my book dissent is fine if presented in a civil manner. Wishing
leadership dead on one hand and then promoting social reform on the other
just doesn't wash.


I wish Bush a long, happy inebriated retirement. I wish he'd start
tomorrow. It is true, though, that I hope Cheney drops dead the day
after he leaves office. Natural causes. Lack of heart.