wrote:
On Aug 7, 1:45 pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
On Aug 7, 12:23 pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
On Aug 7, 12:11 pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
The following performance data was provided by Yamaha.
Performance will vary depending on conditions and load.
Minimum speed is too fast for tuna.
Eisboch
Uh...that's not minimum speed...that's the speed at 1000 rpm. :)
The F350's have a trolling throttle controller, +/- 50 rpm increments
(600 - 1000 rpm range) via the Command Link System.
My F150 runs just fine at 600 rpm, and according to my gps, I can power
the boat forward in still water at under one mph if I want. I assume most
modern outboards can run real slow, except maybe some of the two stroke
engines.
I know. Just trying to be a wise ass.
The Egg Harbor we had couldn't troll slow enough for tuna with both engines
running and in gear. It didn't have trolling valves, so I often had to let
one engine idle in neutral and use the other for the *magic* tuna trolling
speed of about 3 kts.
Eisboch- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Yeah, but you got wafa to make up some more stories
Still delusional, hey, Scotty?
So what was the "server administrative problem," Scotty? Big secret?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Yesterday, you insisted that you already knew.. Of course anyone who
has ever turned on a computer knew with the limited info you had, that
would be imossible. Same with Loogies problem... Both BTW were not any
problem on the client side.. but it's way to complicated for a windoze
hero like you so I won't bother.
Here's a hint.. When I was running the hook for a body shop years ago
my boss told me this.. "If you get a call for a car stalled on the rr
tracks and you know there is a train coming, what's the first thing
you do? Answer me that, and we'll talk.
Send Loogy? :)

Nope...
Are you saying both of you had the same problem on the server side?

Nope

Is there some sort of "stupid" filter on the server? :)

Nope, nothing to do with filters at all... go back to the wrecker
question..


Oh...you want a serious answer.

I'd make sure there was no one in the car and then I'd make sure
everyone stood clear until the train passed.

Alternately, if he hadn't retired, I would have called my father-in-law,
who, with a quick phone call could have ordered the dispatcher to stop
the train immediately. :)

But my first response is my choice: I'd send out Loogy. With any bit of
luck, he'd kiss the train and there would be an instant improvement of
the odds in favor of a better gene pool in the future.

On Aug 7, 1:55*pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
On Aug 7, 1:45 pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
On Aug 7, 12:23 pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
On Aug 7, 12:11 pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...
*Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
news:h5mdnVgKmoX1hQbVnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@comc ast.com...
The following performance data was provided by Yamaha.
Performance will vary depending on conditions and load.
Minimum speed is too fast for tuna.
Eisboch
Uh...that's not minimum speed...that's the speed at 1000 rpm. * :)
The F350's have a trolling throttle controller, +/- 50 rpm increments
(600 - 1000 rpm range) via the Command Link System.
My F150 runs just fine at 600 rpm, and according to my gps, I can power
the boat forward in still water at under one mph if I want. I assume most
modern outboards can run real slow, except maybe some of the two stroke
engines.
I know. *Just trying to be a wise ass.
The Egg Harbor we had couldn't troll slow enough for tuna with both engines
running and in gear. *It didn't have trolling valves, so I often had to let
one engine idle in neutral and use the other for the *magic* tuna trolling
speed of about 3 kts.
Eisboch- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Yeah, but you got wafa to make up some more stories
Still delusional, hey, Scotty?
So what was the "server administrative problem," Scotty? Big secret?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Yesterday, you insisted that you already knew.. Of course anyone who
has ever turned on a computer knew with the limited info you had, that
would be imossible. Same with Loogies problem... Both BTW were not any
problem on the client side.. but it's way to complicated for a windoze
hero like you so I won't bother.
Here's a hint.. When I was running the hook for a body shop years ago
my boss told me this.. "If you get a call for a car stalled on the rr
tracks and you know there is a train coming, what's the first thing
you do? * Answer me that, and we'll talk.
Send Loogy? * :)

Nope...
Are you saying both of you had the same problem on the server side?

Nope

Is there some sort of "stupid" filter on the server? *:)

Nope, nothing to do with filters at all... go back to the wrecker
question..

Oh...you want a serious answer.

If you have one..

I'd make sure there was no one in the car and then I'd make sure
everyone stood clear until the train passed.

Nope..

Alternately, if he hadn't retired, I would have called my father-in-law,
who, with a quick phone call could have ordered the dispatcher to stop
the train immediately. *:)

Bull****...

But my first response is my choice: I'd send out Loogy. With any bit of
luck, he'd kiss the train and there would be an instant improvement of
the odds in favor of a better gene pool in the future.

Trolling

You are stupid, and useless...

- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"hk" wrote in message
. ..
There was a bit of interest in specifications and performance for the new
Parker 34 with the twin F350s. This is what will be on the Yamaha site
soon:


The following performance data was provided by Yamaha.
Performance will vary depending on conditions and load.

1000 rpm, 6.8 mph, 2.9 gph, 2.37 mpg
1500 rpm, 8.2 mph, 5.1 gph, 1.61 mpg
2000 rpm, 9.7 mph, 9.1 gph, 1.07 mpg
2500 rpm, 12.0 mph, 12.8 gph, .93 mpg
3000 rpm, 19.5 mph, 18.1 gph, 1.08 mpg
3500 rpm, 27.3 mph, 22.9 gph, 1.19 mpg
4000 rpm, 33.2 mph, 26.0 gph, 1.28 mpg
4500 rpm, 37.7 mph, 33.3 gph, 1.13 mpg
5000 rpm, 42.7 mph, 42.3 gph, 1.01 mpg
5500 rpm, 47.7 mph, 52.9 gph, .90 mpg
6000 rpm, 52.6 mph, 67.9 gph, .78 mpg

Time to plane: 5.25 seconds
0 to 30 mph: 8.65 seconds

Test was performed with air temp of 89 degrees, water temp 82 degrees
Wind velocity: 10 to 15 mph
Weight as tested: 16,130 lbs

Prop: Sal****er Series XL, 16 1/4 x 19, Polished Stainless Steel


Interestingly, 4000 rpm is the "cruise" mpg sweet spot for my little
Yamaha F150, too.


Here's a factory-supplied shot of the main cabin of the first production
boat:

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...m_aft2_107.jpg



Minimum speed is too fast for tuna.

Eisboch


How you going to get through the 5 mph zones?

wrote:
On Aug 7, 1:55 pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
On Aug 7, 1:45 pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
On Aug 7, 12:23 pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
On Aug 7, 12:11 pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
The following performance data was provided by Yamaha.
Performance will vary depending on conditions and load.
Minimum speed is too fast for tuna.
Eisboch
Uh...that's not minimum speed...that's the speed at 1000 rpm. :)
The F350's have a trolling throttle controller, +/- 50 rpm increments
(600 - 1000 rpm range) via the Command Link System.
My F150 runs just fine at 600 rpm, and according to my gps, I can power
the boat forward in still water at under one mph if I want. I assume most
modern outboards can run real slow, except maybe some of the two stroke
engines.
I know. Just trying to be a wise ass.
The Egg Harbor we had couldn't troll slow enough for tuna with both engines
running and in gear. It didn't have trolling valves, so I often had to let
one engine idle in neutral and use the other for the *magic* tuna trolling
speed of about 3 kts.
Eisboch- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Yeah, but you got wafa to make up some more stories
Still delusional, hey, Scotty?
So what was the "server administrative problem," Scotty? Big secret?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Yesterday, you insisted that you already knew.. Of course anyone who
has ever turned on a computer knew with the limited info you had, that
would be imossible. Same with Loogies problem... Both BTW were not any
problem on the client side.. but it's way to complicated for a windoze
hero like you so I won't bother.
Here's a hint.. When I was running the hook for a body shop years ago
my boss told me this.. "If you get a call for a car stalled on the rr
tracks and you know there is a train coming, what's the first thing
you do? Answer me that, and we'll talk.
Send Loogy? :)
Nope...
Are you saying both of you had the same problem on the server side?
Nope
Is there some sort of "stupid" filter on the server? :)
Nope, nothing to do with filters at all... go back to the wrecker
question..
Oh...you want a serious answer.

If you have one..
I'd make sure there was no one in the car and then I'd make sure
everyone stood clear until the train passed.

Nope..
Alternately, if he hadn't retired, I would have called my father-in-law,
who, with a quick phone call could have ordered the dispatcher to stop
the train immediately. :)

Bull****...
But my first response is my choice: I'd send out Loogy. With any bit of
luck, he'd kiss the train and there would be an instant improvement of
the odds in favor of a better gene pool in the future.

Trolling

You are stupid, and useless...

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -



Gee, Scotty, if *I* am stupid, where does that put you on the IQ scale?
In the negative numbers?

I still say, the best idea is to send Loogy out there to stop the train
and save the car. It's a win-win.

wrote in message
...
On Aug 7, 1:36 pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:08:58 -0700 (PDT),

wrote:
"If you get a call for a car stalled on the rr
tracks and you know there is a train coming, what's the first thing
you do?

Make sure your tow truck is not attached to the car and stand well
clear.

nope.... try again.. Remember, the train is not "here" but you know
it's coming

Get the video camera out.

On Aug 7, 2:00*pm, wrote:
On Aug 7, 1:55*pm, hk wrote:





wrote:
On Aug 7, 1:45 pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
On Aug 7, 12:23 pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
On Aug 7, 12:11 pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...
*Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
news:h5mdnVgKmoX1hQbVnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@comc ast.com...
The following performance data was provided by Yamaha.
Performance will vary depending on conditions and load.
Minimum speed is too fast for tuna.
Eisboch
Uh...that's not minimum speed...that's the speed at 1000 rpm. * :)
The F350's have a trolling throttle controller, +/- 50 rpm increments
(600 - 1000 rpm range) via the Command Link System.
My F150 runs just fine at 600 rpm, and according to my gps, I can power
the boat forward in still water at under one mph if I want. I assume most
modern outboards can run real slow, except maybe some of the two stroke
engines.
I know. *Just trying to be a wise ass.
The Egg Harbor we had couldn't troll slow enough for tuna with both engines
running and in gear. *It didn't have trolling valves, so I often had to let
one engine idle in neutral and use the other for the *magic* tuna trolling
speed of about 3 kts.
Eisboch- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Yeah, but you got wafa to make up some more stories
Still delusional, hey, Scotty?
So what was the "server administrative problem," Scotty? Big secret?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Yesterday, you insisted that you already knew.. Of course anyone who
has ever turned on a computer knew with the limited info you had, that
would be imossible. Same with Loogies problem... Both BTW were not any
problem on the client side.. but it's way to complicated for a windoze
hero like you so I won't bother.
Here's a hint.. When I was running the hook for a body shop years ago
my boss told me this.. "If you get a call for a car stalled on the rr
tracks and you know there is a train coming, what's the first thing
you do? * Answer me that, and we'll talk.
Send Loogy? * :)

Nope...
Are you saying both of you had the same problem on the server side?

Nope

Is there some sort of "stupid" filter on the server? *:)

Nope, nothing to do with filters at all... go back to the wrecker
question..

Oh...you want a serious answer.

If you have one..



I'd make sure there was no one in the car and then I'd make sure
everyone stood clear until the train passed.

Nope..



Alternately, if he hadn't retired, I would have called my father-in-law,
who, with a quick phone call could have ordered the dispatcher to stop
the train immediately. *:)

Bull****...



But my first response is my choice: I'd send out Loogy. With any bit of
luck, he'd kiss the train and there would be an instant improvement of
the odds in favor of a better gene pool in the future.

Trolling

You are stupid, and useless...

- Hide quoted text -





- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

That's our great humanitarian, wishing people dead.

Calif Bill wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
There was a bit of interest in specifications and performance for the new
Parker 34 with the twin F350s. This is what will be on the Yamaha site
soon:


The following performance data was provided by Yamaha.
Performance will vary depending on conditions and load.

1000 rpm, 6.8 mph, 2.9 gph, 2.37 mpg
1500 rpm, 8.2 mph, 5.1 gph, 1.61 mpg
2000 rpm, 9.7 mph, 9.1 gph, 1.07 mpg
2500 rpm, 12.0 mph, 12.8 gph, .93 mpg
3000 rpm, 19.5 mph, 18.1 gph, 1.08 mpg
3500 rpm, 27.3 mph, 22.9 gph, 1.19 mpg
4000 rpm, 33.2 mph, 26.0 gph, 1.28 mpg
4500 rpm, 37.7 mph, 33.3 gph, 1.13 mpg
5000 rpm, 42.7 mph, 42.3 gph, 1.01 mpg
5500 rpm, 47.7 mph, 52.9 gph, .90 mpg
6000 rpm, 52.6 mph, 67.9 gph, .78 mpg

Time to plane: 5.25 seconds
0 to 30 mph: 8.65 seconds

Test was performed with air temp of 89 degrees, water temp 82 degrees
Wind velocity: 10 to 15 mph
Weight as tested: 16,130 lbs

Prop: Sal****er Series XL, 16 1/4 x 19, Polished Stainless Steel


Interestingly, 4000 rpm is the "cruise" mpg sweet spot for my little
Yamaha F150, too.


Here's a factory-supplied shot of the main cabin of the first production
boat:

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...m_aft2_107.jpg


Minimum speed is too fast for tuna.

Eisboch


How you going to get through the 5 mph zones?





Duh...you knock the RPMs down to whatever engine speed produces 5 mph or
less.

Good god...

On Aug 7, 2:05*pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Aug 7, 1:36 pm, Wayne.B wrote:

On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:08:58 -0700 (PDT),

wrote:
"If you get a call for a car stalled on the rr
tracks and you know there is a train coming, what's the first thing
you do?

Make sure your tow truck is not attached to the car and stand well
clear.

nope.... try again.. Remember, the train is not "here" but you know
it's coming

Get the video camera out.

Nope.. but since a few are playing, let's go with another hint..
Consider the train a red herring....

"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Calif Bill wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
There was a bit of interest in specifications and performance for the
new Parker 34 with the twin F350s. This is what will be on the Yamaha
site soon:


The following performance data was provided by Yamaha.
Performance will vary depending on conditions and load.

1000 rpm, 6.8 mph, 2.9 gph, 2.37 mpg
1500 rpm, 8.2 mph, 5.1 gph, 1.61 mpg
2000 rpm, 9.7 mph, 9.1 gph, 1.07 mpg
2500 rpm, 12.0 mph, 12.8 gph, .93 mpg
3000 rpm, 19.5 mph, 18.1 gph, 1.08 mpg
3500 rpm, 27.3 mph, 22.9 gph, 1.19 mpg
4000 rpm, 33.2 mph, 26.0 gph, 1.28 mpg
4500 rpm, 37.7 mph, 33.3 gph, 1.13 mpg
5000 rpm, 42.7 mph, 42.3 gph, 1.01 mpg
5500 rpm, 47.7 mph, 52.9 gph, .90 mpg
6000 rpm, 52.6 mph, 67.9 gph, .78 mpg

Time to plane: 5.25 seconds
0 to 30 mph: 8.65 seconds

Test was performed with air temp of 89 degrees, water temp 82 degrees
Wind velocity: 10 to 15 mph
Weight as tested: 16,130 lbs

Prop: Sal****er Series XL, 16 1/4 x 19, Polished Stainless Steel


Interestingly, 4000 rpm is the "cruise" mpg sweet spot for my little
Yamaha F150, too.


Here's a factory-supplied shot of the main cabin of the first
production boat:

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...m_aft2_107.jpg


Minimum speed is too fast for tuna.

Eisboch


How you going to get through the 5 mph zones?



Duh...you knock the RPMs down to whatever engine speed produces 5 mph or
less.

Good god...




Almost 7 mph at 1000 rpm may not allow a 5 mph speed.

Calif Bill wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Calif Bill wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
There was a bit of interest in specifications and performance for the
new Parker 34 with the twin F350s. This is what will be on the Yamaha
site soon:


The following performance data was provided by Yamaha.
Performance will vary depending on conditions and load.

1000 rpm, 6.8 mph, 2.9 gph, 2.37 mpg
1500 rpm, 8.2 mph, 5.1 gph, 1.61 mpg
2000 rpm, 9.7 mph, 9.1 gph, 1.07 mpg
2500 rpm, 12.0 mph, 12.8 gph, .93 mpg
3000 rpm, 19.5 mph, 18.1 gph, 1.08 mpg
3500 rpm, 27.3 mph, 22.9 gph, 1.19 mpg
4000 rpm, 33.2 mph, 26.0 gph, 1.28 mpg
4500 rpm, 37.7 mph, 33.3 gph, 1.13 mpg
5000 rpm, 42.7 mph, 42.3 gph, 1.01 mpg
5500 rpm, 47.7 mph, 52.9 gph, .90 mpg
6000 rpm, 52.6 mph, 67.9 gph, .78 mpg

Time to plane: 5.25 seconds
0 to 30 mph: 8.65 seconds

Test was performed with air temp of 89 degrees, water temp 82 degrees
Wind velocity: 10 to 15 mph
Weight as tested: 16,130 lbs

Prop: Sal****er Series XL, 16 1/4 x 19, Polished Stainless Steel


Interestingly, 4000 rpm is the "cruise" mpg sweet spot for my little
Yamaha F150, too.


Here's a factory-supplied shot of the main cabin of the first
production boat:

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...m_aft2_107.jpg

Minimum speed is too fast for tuna.

Eisboch

How you going to get through the 5 mph zones?


Duh...you knock the RPMs down to whatever engine speed produces 5 mph or
less.

Good god...




Almost 7 mph at 1000 rpm may not allow a 5 mph speed.



Bull****. The engines easily slow down to 600 rpm, at least.