| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#12
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Metallurgy can be defective sometimes. I used SS bolts on my Mercruiser
starter-not likely to snap even if you reefed on the torque. Had a shock absorber once that snapped the upper stud a while after installation. Poor metallurgy. Your bolt failed at a stress riser point, right where the thread ends. This is right where a torque failure would occur. JR Larry W wrote: Just a heads-up to anyone replacing a starter in an I/O Mercrusier. I've replaced dozens of Mercrusier starters and I always use the best new starters available from the same supplier. I've never had a premature failure of the starter itself. I replaced one in a 3.0 about a month ago and it was the first starter that came with new mounting bolts. Customer called Sunday with a complaint that the starter was making a funny noise. Turns out the long mounting bolt had failed/sheared off (see link below). There was nothing unusual about the install and I know I didn't over tighten it. Luckily, with the help of an angle drill, mirror and an ez-out, I was able to make everyone happy but I am going to rethink using supplied bolts. http://www.rovatune.com/starterbolt.jpg Larry -- -------------------------------------------------------------- Home Page: http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| is this a starter problem (new boater needs help) | General | |||
| Mercrusier Alpha problem, seeking advice | General | |||
| Mercruiser Starter Problem | Boat Building | |||
| 9.9 kicker mounting problem | General | |||
| 115 mercury starter problem | General | |||