![]() |
Can I pull this boat?
"hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... What *I* stated was that the U.S. car makers were poorly managed, with overpaid white collar mid and upper management. Many large U.S. corporations grossly overcompensate "management." There have been plenty of news stories about the tens of millions of dollars paid to top execs at the same time the companies they run are failing. Why were they poorly managed if, in the case of GM, they had record corporate profits and paid regular, consistent dividends to the shareholders for most of the past ten years? Plus met all the contractual obligations to current and retired employees? Take care of the business ..... the business will take care of you. It's how it works, and there's nothing wrong with big paychecks for those with the most responsibility. Eisboch Now *that* is funny. Take care of business and business will take care of you. I'm sure that song plays well to the millions of American workers who have lost their jobs because of crappy management, and the millions who have also lost health care benefits, pension benefits, and much more, despite giving all they had to "the business," and of course, let's not forget the millions of American workers who have lost long-held jobs because corporate management determined it would be "cheaper" to build or service their product in China, India, or wherever. Take care of the business for which you work, and, if it gets the chance, the business for which you work will eliminate your job, your health care, your pension. Or it will simply underfund its pension liabilities. Sorry, but I don't believe that "shareholder equity" is any more valuable than "worker equity." What many corporations in this country seem to do best is to discard workers like used paper towels. Note I said many...I did not say all. Oh...and there is something wrong, very wrong, with the huge disparity at many corporations between average pay and "executive" compensation. Well ****e for brains, you can do your part to help the poor American worker by buying American made goods. |
Can I pull this boat?
Eisboch wrote:
It has always been interesting to me that those who complain the most about fat compensation packages are those not earning them. You would expect an exec being paid multiple millions to bitch about it? |
Can I pull this boat?
"hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: It has always been interesting to me that those who complain the most about fat compensation packages are those not earning them. You would expect an exec being paid multiple millions to bitch about it? At that level, his/her compensation was most likely a negotiated package, approved and authorized by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors work for the stockholders. Fun to watch you get fired up so early. Eisboch |
Can I pull this boat?
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: It has always been interesting to me that those who complain the most about fat compensation packages are those not earning them. You would expect an exec being paid multiple millions to bitch about it? At that level, his/her compensation was most likely a negotiated package, approved and authorized by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors work for the stockholders. Fun to watch you get fired up so early. Eisboch I'm not fired up, Richard. I save "fired up" for the work for which I get paid, not usenet newsgroups. |
Can I pull this boat?
"hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: It has always been interesting to me that those who complain the most about fat compensation packages are those not earning them. You would expect an exec being paid multiple millions to bitch about it? At that level, his/her compensation was most likely a negotiated package, approved and authorized by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors work for the stockholders. Fun to watch you get fired up so early. Eisboch I'm not fired up, Richard. I save "fired up" for the work for which I get paid, not usenet newsgroups. You get fired up over producing union flyers and handouts? Richard's right. You are a barrel of laughs. |
Can I pull this boat?
"hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: It has always been interesting to me that those who complain the most about fat compensation packages are those not earning them. You would expect an exec being paid multiple millions to bitch about it? At that level, his/her compensation was most likely a negotiated package, approved and authorized by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors work for the stockholders. Fun to watch you get fired up so early. Eisboch I'm not fired up, Richard. I save "fired up" for the work for which I get paid, not usenet newsgroups. You know what's great about this country ... and a few other free democracies? Freedom. If one is inspired to become rich ..... he/she can. If one is inspired to become famous .... he/she can. If one is inspired to take risks ..... he/she can. If one is inspired to minimize risks .... he/she can. If one is inspired to devote their lives to helping the truly oppressed .... he/she can. The threat to freedom is those who feel they have a duty and obligation to impose *their* way and *their* rules on everybody. Eisboch |
Can I pull this boat?
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: It has always been interesting to me that those who complain the most about fat compensation packages are those not earning them. You would expect an exec being paid multiple millions to bitch about it? At that level, his/her compensation was most likely a negotiated package, approved and authorized by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors work for the stockholders. Fun to watch you get fired up so early. Eisboch I'm not fired up, Richard. I save "fired up" for the work for which I get paid, not usenet newsgroups. You know what's great about this country ... and a few other free democracies? Freedom. If one is inspired to become rich ..... he/she can. If one is inspired to become famous .... he/she can. If one is inspired to take risks ..... he/she can. If one is inspired to minimize risks .... he/she can. If one is inspired to devote their lives to helping the truly oppressed .... he/she can. The threat to freedom is those who feel they have a duty and obligation to impose *their* way and *their* rules on everybody. Eisboch So you *will* be changing political party affiliation, eh? There is no greater threat to freedom in this country than the actions and policies of the Bush Administration and those who support them. |
Can I pull this boat?
On Jul 29, 8:31*pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:24:25 -0400, HK wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:22:27 -0500, SSmokin wrote: I have a 2002 Ford F-150. *5.4, 4x4 Extended Cab. *I’m looking at a 29’ Cheetah offshore (CX-29). *I know that the truck can pull the boat from point A to point B, but what about "out of the water, on a steep ramp"? *Any thoughts? *:o In my opinion, no. I have a 2005 version of that same truck and it will barely tow my Ranger 20' 200 C center console - boat, engine, trailer weigh in at just over 5,000 lbs. *I get 5 mpg on average over 900 miles of towing just last week and the average speed was 50 mph. Do what you will, but you need a bigger truck. Hmmm. Apples and oranges, but when *I pull Yo Ho, I get about 12 mpg with my V8 SUV. I think we are pulling about the same weight, too. Of *course it does. You are the master.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Oh, you know it! Harry is so much better than anyone else, his truck will defy the laws of physics for him!! |
Can I pull this boat?
"hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: It has always been interesting to me that those who complain the most about fat compensation packages are those not earning them. You would expect an exec being paid multiple millions to bitch about it? At that level, his/her compensation was most likely a negotiated package, approved and authorized by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors work for the stockholders. Fun to watch you get fired up so early. Eisboch I'm not fired up, Richard. I save "fired up" for the work for which I get paid, not usenet newsgroups. You know what's great about this country ... and a few other free democracies? Freedom. If one is inspired to become rich ..... he/she can. If one is inspired to become famous .... he/she can. If one is inspired to take risks ..... he/she can. If one is inspired to minimize risks .... he/she can. If one is inspired to devote their lives to helping the truly oppressed .... he/she can. The threat to freedom is those who feel they have a duty and obligation to impose *their* way and *their* rules on everybody. Eisboch So you *will* be changing political party affiliation, eh? There is no greater threat to freedom in this country than the actions and policies of the Bush Administration and those who support them. When the time comes. I'll vote for whomever I think will best preserve the basic, fundamental core values and principles on which this country was formed. I give you this ..... *Both* major political parties seem to have gotten way off course. Or maybe I won't vote. Eisboch |
Can I pull this boat?
"hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: It has always been interesting to me that those who complain the most about fat compensation packages are those not earning them. You would expect an exec being paid multiple millions to bitch about it? At that level, his/her compensation was most likely a negotiated package, approved and authorized by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors work for the stockholders. Fun to watch you get fired up so early. Eisboch I'm not fired up, Richard. I save "fired up" for the work for which I get paid, not usenet newsgroups. You know what's great about this country ... and a few other free democracies? Freedom. If one is inspired to become rich ..... he/she can. If one is inspired to become famous .... he/she can. If one is inspired to take risks ..... he/she can. If one is inspired to minimize risks .... he/she can. If one is inspired to devote their lives to helping the truly oppressed .... he/she can. The threat to freedom is those who feel they have a duty and obligation to impose *their* way and *their* rules on everybody. Eisboch So you *will* be changing political party affiliation, eh? There is no greater threat to freedom in this country than the actions and policies of the Bush Administration and those who support them. What will this pustulated turd brain do after January 20? My guess is he will shift his focus to the new REPUBLICAN president. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com