wrote:
On May 17, 6:22 pm, (Richard Casady)
wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2008 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT),

wrote:

[Snippo]

That's tough **** and you will get no sympathy at wreckboats. We all
know you richly deserved it. We can always tell by the whining, the
****ing and the moaning. If you can't take a joke carry a crying towel
and be quiet.

Casady

On the contrary. Several here on and off line get the point. Argueably
it is a valid point to any thinking observer of the cast of characters
who has been here (wrecked boats) as long as you have, even if they
don't agree with me. Your disagreement, or failure to understand my
point of view, does not make it any less valid. But you can slap me
around here a little if it makes you feel good... don't remember ever
taking a cheap shot at you, but maybe I did. Anyway, you go boy, sorry
to have wasted your bandwidth....


You seem confused, Scott. You were "banned" precisely for the reasons
Chuck stated here. It had nothing to do with anything other than the
really obnoxious post you put up. I told you earlier today that Chuck
had reasonable and posted rules of behavior, and that you chose to
violate a number of them and and then end your post with a taunt.

On Sat, 17 May 2008 19:35:51 -0400, HK wrote:

wrote:
On May 17, 6:22 pm, (Richard Casady)
wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2008 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT),

wrote:

[Snippo]

That's tough **** and you will get no sympathy at wreckboats. We all
know you richly deserved it. We can always tell by the whining, the
****ing and the moaning. If you can't take a joke carry a crying towel
and be quiet.

Casady

On the contrary. Several here on and off line get the point. Argueably
it is a valid point to any thinking observer of the cast of characters
who has been here (wrecked boats) as long as you have, even if they
don't agree with me. Your disagreement, or failure to understand my
point of view, does not make it any less valid. But you can slap me
around here a little if it makes you feel good... don't remember ever
taking a cheap shot at you, but maybe I did. Anyway, you go boy, sorry
to have wasted your bandwidth....


You seem confused, Scott. You were "banned" precisely for the reasons
Chuck stated here. It had nothing to do with anything other than the
really obnoxious post you put up. I told you earlier today that Chuck
had reasonable and posted rules of behavior, and that you chose to
violate a number of them and and then end your post with a taunt.

What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas.

Unless Vegas is Chuck's Place.

Stay away, Harry. You're not wanted. This is a pile of ****, remember?
--
John *H*