wrote:
On May 17, 10:28 pm, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On May 17, 6:22 pm, (Richard Casady)
wrote:

On Sat, 17 May 2008 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:
[Snippo]
That's tough **** and you will get no sympathy at wreckboats. We all
know you richly deserved it. We can always tell by the whining, the
****ing and the moaning. If you can't take a joke carry a crying towel
and be quiet.
Casady
On the contrary. Several here on and off line get the point. Argueably
it is a valid point to any thinking observer of the cast of characters
who has been here (wrecked boats) as long as you have, even if they
don't agree with me. Your disagreement, or failure to understand my
point of view, does not make it any less valid. But you can slap me
around here a little if it makes you feel good... don't remember ever
taking a cheap shot at you, but maybe I did. Anyway, you go boy, sorry
to have wasted your bandwidth....

---------------------------------------------------------------------------*--------------------

I'm sorry you got into this situation Scotty, as I always felt you had good
and interesting contributions to make.
I hope you aren't being influenced and thus judged by the 'company' you keep
lately.

I am being judged because I won't hold my nose just to be where
everyone else is. Any one of a hundred other posters here could have
started a group and I would have been on board, but anybody who has
been here as long as I know that inevedibly this new "monitor" is not
someone known for having the capacity to be "moderate" at all.
Certainly I have personally been victim to his selective internet
policing here at rec.boats more times over the years than I can count
as have many of you. If you want to participate in a group where
posters are subject to selective enforcement, so be it. I will leave
the name calling to them. That is all that is left of me over there. A
quick visit tells me that although my post is gone, the pigpile of
back pats continues, with the final post coming down to the standard
insults focused on my grammar and spelling. Same old, same old.. Just
with Chuck and Harry running the show now that is scarey...

For those of us who are still here, you should go over and just check
out the roster and some of the posters who you never thought would
stand for all of that. At the same time, if they really got it, they
might just be stuck here with us too I swear it has something to do
with boatshoes

Good to see you checking in though, how is that little Skiff working
out, is it wet yet this year?

By for now..


D'oh. I'm not running anything at the other place. I'm just someone who
read the rules, signed up and post.

You were "judged" not for the excuses you are offering up here, but
because your post went way over the line, violated the rules you agreed
to abide by and because you taunted the moderator into killfiling your
account.

Everything you have posted about the incident is nothing more than
rationalization.

There are many reasons why some posters find the atmosphere at the other
place more pleasant than it is here. I like it because photos of
interest can be posted directly, and because I can avoid even *seeing*
posts relating to other peoples' grandchildren, bad amateur guitar
playing, diaperboat cruises, home-brewed beer, NASCAR, nonsensical
comments about computer operating systems, and the rest of the flotsam
and jetsam that passes for "rec.boats" these days.

Hey...this is *your* newsgroup and the newsgroup of your buddies here. I
just pop in on occasion for the giggles.

On Sat, 17 May 2008 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why
a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the
thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this
is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not
even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed
off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were
friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to
question the character of folks who have stood back and not said
anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like
another pet peeve of mine

I haven't had the time to keep up with the shenanigans here and there.
When I saw the post about the deleted post on Boatingforum this
morning I came here to see who did it if only because this is the
logical place for something like that to be initiated.

Now that I know it was you, I'm a little disappointed.

Your outsized indignation is misplaced. Yes there have been some
attempts by certain members of Boatingforum to present negative
commentary on what went on, and apparently still goes on, here, but as
a general rule, it's been pretty civilized and while not riveting, it
has been genial even among those who are deadly enemies here.

What bothers me is that you, of all people, should know better. This
outrage you are exhibiting is silly and childish. Boatingforum is not
an extension of rec.boats and rec.boats is not a part of Boatingforum.
While they share some participants in common, they are seperate
entities and should be treated as such. The fact that some common
participants hold views that are anathema to participants in either
forum isn't relevant to anything.

And I've seen this in action on Boatingforum. Somebody in the course
of discussion will mention that the moon is white and immediately the
usual suspects will "correct" that because the moon isn't white, it's
off-white and dash off an email to Chuck proclaiming offense, high
crimes and misdemeanors.

What I would suggest is that you just ignore it and move on. It has
nothing to do with you and your participation here. Fits of pique and
contumely on Boatingforum are for those who participate there to
control. In general, it has been controlled.

It's Chuck's forum. He can do what he wishes with it. There are
issues there that I don't like, including some of the thinly veiled
snark fests, incriminations and other nonsense, but on the whole, it's
been a decent attempt at Chuck's concept of civilized discussion
centered around a shared hobby/business.

Finally, give it a rest. If you have a need to start a fight over
some silly thing or another, just drop me an email and I'll come back
in a different quise and give you a run for your money.

On May 18, 8:40*am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2008 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT),

wrote:
I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why
a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the
thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this
is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not
even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed
off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were
friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to
question the character of folks who have stood back and not said
anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like
another pet peeve of mine

I haven't had the time to keep up with the shenanigans here and there.
When I saw the post about the deleted post on Boatingforum this
morning I came here to see who did it if only because this is the
logical place for something like that to be initiated.

Now that I know it was you, I'm a little disappointed.

Your outsized indignation is misplaced. Yes there have been some
attempts by certain members of Boatingforum to present negative
commentary on what went on, and apparently still goes on, here, but as
a general rule, it's been pretty civilized and while not riveting, it
has been genial even among those who are deadly enemies here.

What bothers me is that you, of all people, should know better. *This
outrage you are exhibiting is silly and childish. *Boatingforum is not
an extension of rec.boats and rec.boats is not a part of Boatingforum.
While they share some participants in common, they are seperate
entities and should be treated as such. *The fact that some common
participants hold views that are anathema to participants in either
forum isn't relevant to anything.

And I've seen this in action on Boatingforum. *Somebody in the course
of discussion will mention that the moon is white and immediately the
usual suspects will "correct" that because the moon isn't white, it's
off-white and dash off an email to Chuck proclaiming offense, high
crimes and misdemeanors.

What I would suggest is that you just ignore it and move on. It has
nothing to do with you and your participation here. *Fits of pique and
contumely on Boatingforum are for those who participate there to
control. *In general, it has been controlled.

It's Chuck's forum. *He can do what he wishes with it. *There are
issues there that I don't like, including some of the thinly veiled
snark fests, incriminations and other nonsense, but on the whole, it's
been a decent attempt at Chuck's concept of civilized discussion
centered around a shared hobby/business.

Finally, give it a rest. *If you have a need to start a fight over
some silly thing or another, just drop me an email and I'll come back
in a different quise and give you a run for your money.

Again, you miss the point. We were here nicely minding our own
business. Chuck asked me not to mention other groups here and I
accomodated him here. Then Harry comes over here calling us names, we
still stay out of it.. then I go to Chuckies and find a whole thread
directed toward us being allowed to thrive there, full of lies and
misrepresentations. I asked a question to Chuckie as to how it could
stand, and he binned my post, allowed the pigpile to continue anyway,
and even joined in himself with his same old same old insults of his
own... You can have it, you can justify it any way you want.. The guy
is unfair and you not only know it, but obviously accept it with held
nose.. good for you...

wrote:

Again, you miss the point. We were here nicely minding our own
business. Chuck asked me not to mention other groups here and I
accomodated him here. Then Harry comes over here calling us names, we
still stay out of it.. then I go to Chuckies and find a whole thread
directed toward us being allowed to thrive there, full of lies and
misrepresentations. I asked a question to Chuckie as to how it could
stand, and he binned my post, allowed the pigpile to continue anyway,
and even joined in himself with his same old same old insults of his
own... You can have it, you can justify it any way you want.. The guy
is unfair and you not only know it, but obviously accept it with held
nose.. good for you...



yada yada yada yada


You got banned because you broke the rules and virtually asked to be
banned.


There's nothing more to it, no matter how many times you try to
rationalize it.

On May 18, 9:42*am, HK wrote:
wrote:
Again, you miss the point. We were here nicely minding our own
business. Chuck asked me not to mention other groups here and I
accomodated him here. Then Harry comes over here calling us names, we
still stay out of it.. then I go to Chuckies and find a whole thread
directed toward us being allowed to thrive there, full of lies and
misrepresentations. I asked a question to Chuckie as to how it could
stand, and he binned my post, allowed the pigpile to continue anyway,
and even joined in himself with his same old same old insults of his
own... You can have it, you can justify it any way you want.. The guy
is unfair and you not only know it, but obviously accept it with held
nose.. good for you...

yada yada yada yada

You got banned because you broke the rules and virtually asked to be
banned.

There's nothing more to it, no matter how many times you try to
rationalize it.

Go back to licking boat shoes.. I think someone stepped in seagull
poo, "over there"...

wrote:
On May 18, 9:42 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
Again, you miss the point. We were here nicely minding our own
business. Chuck asked me not to mention other groups here and I
accomodated him here. Then Harry comes over here calling us names, we
still stay out of it.. then I go to Chuckies and find a whole thread
directed toward us being allowed to thrive there, full of lies and
misrepresentations. I asked a question to Chuckie as to how it could
stand, and he binned my post, allowed the pigpile to continue anyway,
and even joined in himself with his same old same old insults of his
own... You can have it, you can justify it any way you want.. The guy
is unfair and you not only know it, but obviously accept it with held
nose.. good for you...
yada yada yada yada

You got banned because you broke the rules and virtually asked to be
banned.

There's nothing more to it, no matter how many times you try to
rationalize it.

Go back to licking boat shoes.. I think someone stepped in seagull
poo, "over there"...


You got banned because you broke the rules. But feel free to rationalize
ad infinitum.

On Sun, 18 May 2008 06:38:19 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

Finally, give it a rest. *If you have a need to start a fight over
some silly thing or another, just drop me an email and I'll come back
in a different quise and give you a run for your money.

Again, you miss the point. We were here nicely minding our own
business. Chuck asked me not to mention other groups here and I
accomodated him here. Then Harry comes over here calling us names, we
still stay out of it.. then I go to Chuckies and find a whole thread
directed toward us being allowed to thrive there, full of lies and
misrepresentations. I asked a question to Chuckie as to how it could
stand, and he binned my post, allowed the pigpile to continue anyway,
and even joined in himself with his same old same old insults of his
own... You can have it, you can justify it any way you want.. The guy
is unfair and you not only know it, but obviously accept it with held
nose.. good for you...

Have it your way Zorro.

On May 18, 3:49*pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2008 06:38:19 -0700 (PDT),





wrote:
Finally, give it a rest. *If you have a need to start a fight over
some silly thing or another, just drop me an email and I'll come back
in a different quise and give you a run for your money.

Again, you miss the point. We were here nicely minding our own
business. Chuck asked me not to mention other groups here and I
accomodated him here. Then Harry comes over here calling us names, we
still stay out of it.. then I go to Chuckies and find a whole thread
directed toward us being allowed to thrive there, full of lies and
misrepresentations. I asked a question to Chuckie as to how it could
stand, and he binned my post, allowed the pigpile to continue anyway,
and even joined in himself with his same old same old insults of his
own... You can have it, you can justify it any way you want.. The guy
is unfair and you not only know it, but obviously accept it with held
nose.. good for you...

Have it your way Zorro.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Not knowing the story of Zorro, I don't follow the reference.. oh
well...

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2008 06:38:19 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:


Finally, give it a rest. If you have a need to start a fight over
some silly thing or another, just drop me an email and I'll come back
in a different quise and give you a run for your money.

Again, you miss the point. We were here nicely minding our own
business. Chuck asked me not to mention other groups here and I
accomodated him here. Then Harry comes over here calling us names, we
still stay out of it.. then I go to Chuckies and find a whole thread
directed toward us being allowed to thrive there, full of lies and
misrepresentations. I asked a question to Chuckie as to how it could
stand, and he binned my post, allowed the pigpile to continue anyway,
and even joined in himself with his same old same old insults of his
own... You can have it, you can justify it any way you want.. The guy
is unfair and you not only know it, but obviously accept it with held
nose.. good for you...


Have it your way Zorro.

The problem with shortpants, as nice a guy as he seems, is that he was
an enabler of krause's nasty behavior for a long, long time, until,
until, krause finally ****ed *him* off and then shortpants called him a
nasty name.

In other words, it ain't so until I say it's so, because I'm a nice guy.

It's no different now that he's at another place making excuses again.

-- Charlie

Charlie wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2008 06:38:19 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:


Finally, give it a rest. If you have a need to start a fight over
some silly thing or another, just drop me an email and I'll come back
in a different quise and give you a run for your money.

Again, you miss the point. We were here nicely minding our own
business. Chuck asked me not to mention other groups here and I
accomodated him here. Then Harry comes over here calling us names, we
still stay out of it.. then I go to Chuckies and find a whole thread
directed toward us being allowed to thrive there, full of lies and
misrepresentations. I asked a question to Chuckie as to how it could
stand, and he binned my post, allowed the pigpile to continue anyway,
and even joined in himself with his same old same old insults of his
own... You can have it, you can justify it any way you want.. The guy
is unfair and you not only know it, but obviously accept it with held
nose.. good for you...


Have it your way Zorro.

The problem with shortpants, as nice a guy as he seems, is that he was
an enabler of krause's nasty behavior for a long, long time, until,
until, krause finally ****ed *him* off and then shortpants called him a
nasty name.

In other words, it ain't so until I say it's so, because I'm a nice guy.

It's no different now that he's at another place making excuses again.

-- Charlie

Let's not forget the days when HK and JimH were bitter enemies. I guess
when two schoolyard punks get their asses kicked enough, they learn to
form a little gang. Add the Canadian and the Three Stooges were born.