"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...

"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to bomb the
'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html

Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute window with
only the necessary collateral effects. Fast, decisive and effective.



The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon technology is
already dead. He is buried in California. He received a state funeral in
2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more balls than
brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He thought he had that game to
himself.

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
news
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...

"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to bomb the
'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html

Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute window with
only the necessary collateral effects. Fast, decisive and effective.

The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon technology is
already dead. He is buried in California. He received a state funeral in
2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more balls than
brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He thought he had that game to
himself.

Probably. But peace in the middle east, not even the US can change that
unless you nuke it from end to end. While the people live there, they will
fight, pure an simple. They have in at least been this way since the dawn
of recorded history. We in the west are not going to change their culture.
Heck, it we leave them alone, Muslims are quite happy killing other Muslims.
(Iraq/Iran). Who knows, maybe Pakistan and India will have a go at it to
drag the Hindu's into it.

I think Bush needed to wipe asses over there for 9/11, his mistake is
keeping us there to long in a cultural war we can't win. Being more
civilized can't do what it takes. That is, whole scale wipe them out.
After all, the Taliban go home to their supportive kids and wives, tutor
another child to wrap a bomb and go out and do Jihad while the coward stays
at home. We in the west don't comprehend this is. The wife, the son, the
brothers, the mothers all be a part of that culture. There are less victims
than there are villains. I don't see the Muslims turning over Bin Laden,
Taliban and the terrorists.

Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to keep them in
line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out. And for Bush, why is it
taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.

On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 04:44:31 GMT, "Canuck57"
wrote:


Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to keep them in
line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out. And for Bush, why is it
taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.


Why is it taking the FBI so long to capture the ten most wanted?
--
John *H*
(Not the other one!)

John H. wrote:
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 04:44:31 GMT, "Canuck57"
wrote:


Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to keep them in
line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out. And for Bush, why is it
taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.


Why is it taking the FBI so long to capture the ten most wanted?


There's just no end to the rationalizations Bush-shippers will provide
for the failures of their Great Leader.

"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:PUEHj.7061$rd2.5592@pd7urf3no...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
news
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...

"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to bomb the
'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html

Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute window with
only the necessary collateral effects. Fast, decisive and effective.

The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon technology is
already dead. He is buried in California. He received a state funeral in
2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more balls than
brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He thought he had that game
to himself.

Probably. But peace in the middle east, not even the US can change that
unless you nuke it from end to end. While the people live there, they
will fight, pure an simple. They have in at least been this way since the
dawn of recorded history. We in the west are not going to change their
culture. Heck, it we leave them alone, Muslims are quite happy killing
other Muslims. (Iraq/Iran). Who knows, maybe Pakistan and India will have
a go at it to drag the Hindu's into it.

I think Bush needed to wipe asses over there for 9/11, his mistake is
keeping us there to long in a cultural war we can't win. Being more
civilized can't do what it takes. That is, whole scale wipe them out.
After all, the Taliban go home to their supportive kids and wives, tutor
another child to wrap a bomb and go out and do Jihad while the coward
stays at home. We in the west don't comprehend this is. The wife, the
son, the brothers, the mothers all be a part of that culture. There are
less victims than there are villains. I don't see the Muslims turning
over Bin Laden, Taliban and the terrorists.

Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to keep them
in line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out. And for Bush, why is
it taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.



Why Saddam? He had nothing to do with 9/11? Why not concentrate on the
correct country instead? Can you name that country?

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
Why Saddam? He had nothing to do with 9/11? Why not concentrate on the
correct country instead? Can you name that country?


Yeah but..isn't that country run by Bushs' buddies...or BFF as the teeny
boppers would say.
I get a kick of that picture of George skipping along holding the kings
hand.

"Don White" wrote in message
...
Yeah but..isn't that country run by Bushs' buddies...or BFF as the teeny
boppers would say.
I get a *kick of that picture* of George skipping along holding the kings
hand.

should be..*kick out of that picture*

Canuck57 wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
news
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to bomb the
'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html
Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute window with
only the necessary collateral effects. Fast, decisive and effective.
The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon technology is
already dead. He is buried in California. He received a state funeral in
2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more balls than
brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He thought he had that game to
himself.

Probably. But peace in the middle east, not even the US can change that
unless you nuke it from end to end. While the people live there, they will
fight, pure an simple. They have in at least been this way since the dawn
of recorded history. We in the west are not going to change their culture.
Heck, it we leave them alone, Muslims are quite happy killing other Muslims.
(Iraq/Iran). Who knows, maybe Pakistan and India will have a go at it to
drag the Hindu's into it.

I think Bush needed to wipe asses over there for 9/11, his mistake is
keeping us there to long in a cultural war we can't win. Being more
civilized can't do what it takes. That is, whole scale wipe them out.
After all, the Taliban go home to their supportive kids and wives, tutor
another child to wrap a bomb and go out and do Jihad while the coward stays
at home. We in the west don't comprehend this is. The wife, the son, the
brothers, the mothers all be a part of that culture. There are less victims
than there are villains. I don't see the Muslims turning over Bin Laden,
Taliban and the terrorists.

Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to keep them in
line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out. And for Bush, why is it
taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.


Bush's mistakes we
To lie about the reasons for the war (history will remember)
and to be totally ignorant of the factions and history of Iraq.

Our mistake was to elect such an ignorant man. He campaigned on his
ignorance, and there were, and still is, people who have no problem with
that.

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Canuck57 wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
news
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to bomb the
'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html
Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute window
with only the necessary collateral effects. Fast, decisive and
effective.
The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon technology is
already dead. He is buried in California. He received a state funeral in
2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more balls than
brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He thought he had that game
to himself.

Probably. But peace in the middle east, not even the US can change that
unless you nuke it from end to end. While the people live there, they
will fight, pure an simple. They have in at least been this way since
the dawn of recorded history. We in the west are not going to change
their culture. Heck, it we leave them alone, Muslims are quite happy
killing other Muslims. (Iraq/Iran). Who knows, maybe Pakistan and India
will have a go at it to drag the Hindu's into it.

I think Bush needed to wipe asses over there for 9/11, his mistake is
keeping us there to long in a cultural war we can't win. Being more
civilized can't do what it takes. That is, whole scale wipe them out.
After all, the Taliban go home to their supportive kids and wives, tutor
another child to wrap a bomb and go out and do Jihad while the coward
stays at home. We in the west don't comprehend this is. The wife, the
son, the brothers, the mothers all be a part of that culture. There are
less victims than there are villains. I don't see the Muslims turning
over Bin Laden, Taliban and the terrorists.

Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to keep them
in line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out. And for Bush, why
is it taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.
Bush's mistakes we
To lie about the reasons for the war (history will remember)
and to be totally ignorant of the factions and history of Iraq.

Our mistake was to elect such an ignorant man. He campaigned on his
ignorance, and there were, and still is, people who have no problem with
that.


"still are people"

Not a slam, but an illustration of how pervasive a thing like Bush can be.
And I do mean "thing".

On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 11:18:48 -0700, Jim wrote:



Bush's mistakes we
To lie about the reasons for the war (history will remember)
and to be totally ignorant of the factions and history of Iraq.

Our mistake was to elect such an ignorant man. He campaigned on his
ignorance, and there were, and still is, people who have no problem with
that.

Being wrong probably makes you feel good, so I won't argue your points.
--
John *H*
(Not the other one!)