"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:S1YIj.22868$Cj7.18743@pd7urf2no...

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Canuck57 wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
news "Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to bomb the
'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html
Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute window
with only the necessary collateral effects. Fast, decisive and
effective.
The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon technology is
already dead. He is buried in California. He received a state funeral
in 2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more balls
than brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He thought he had that
game to himself.

Probably. But peace in the middle east, not even the US can change that
unless you nuke it from end to end. While the people live there, they
will fight, pure an simple. They have in at least been this way since
the dawn of recorded history. We in the west are not going to change
their culture. Heck, it we leave them alone, Muslims are quite happy
killing other Muslims. (Iraq/Iran). Who knows, maybe Pakistan and India
will have a go at it to drag the Hindu's into it.

I think Bush needed to wipe asses over there for 9/11, his mistake is
keeping us there to long in a cultural war we can't win. Being more
civilized can't do what it takes. That is, whole scale wipe them out.
After all, the Taliban go home to their supportive kids and wives, tutor
another child to wrap a bomb and go out and do Jihad while the coward
stays at home. We in the west don't comprehend this is. The wife, the
son, the brothers, the mothers all be a part of that culture. There are
less victims than there are villains. I don't see the Muslims turning
over Bin Laden, Taliban and the terrorists.

Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to keep
them in line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out. And for Bush,
why is it taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.
Bush's mistakes we
To lie about the reasons for the war (history will remember)
and to be totally ignorant of the factions and history of Iraq.

I am not so sure he lied, certainly not any more tha a Clintion I know, I
did not have sexual relations.... shut, and people are even considering a
Clinton, OMG. The morals and memories deteriorate.

Our mistake was to elect such an ignorant man. He campaigned on his
ignorance, and there were, and still is, people who have no problem with
that.

9/11 was a tough **** spot for anyone in that office. Not really a Bush
fan, but any in that spot would be condemned.


Bush was toasted upstairs way before 9/11. It was obvious as he massacred
the English language. His worshippers found it cute and quaint and elected
him anyway. That's pathetic.

It's only later that the truth comes out:
http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Drug...3985919&page=1

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:S1YIj.22868$Cj7.18743@pd7urf2no...

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Canuck57 wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
news "Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to bomb
the 'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html
Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute window
with only the necessary collateral effects. Fast, decisive and
effective.
The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon technology is
already dead. He is buried in California. He received a state funeral
in 2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more balls
than brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He thought he had
that game to himself.

Probably. But peace in the middle east, not even the US can change
that unless you nuke it from end to end. While the people live there,
they will fight, pure an simple. They have in at least been this way
since the dawn of recorded history. We in the west are not going to
change their culture. Heck, it we leave them alone, Muslims are quite
happy killing other Muslims. (Iraq/Iran). Who knows, maybe Pakistan
and India will have a go at it to drag the Hindu's into it.

I think Bush needed to wipe asses over there for 9/11, his mistake is
keeping us there to long in a cultural war we can't win. Being more
civilized can't do what it takes. That is, whole scale wipe them out.
After all, the Taliban go home to their supportive kids and wives,
tutor another child to wrap a bomb and go out and do Jihad while the
coward stays at home. We in the west don't comprehend this is. The
wife, the son, the brothers, the mothers all be a part of that culture.
There are less victims than there are villains. I don't see the
Muslims turning over Bin Laden, Taliban and the terrorists.

Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to keep
them in line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out. And for
Bush, why is it taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.
Bush's mistakes we
To lie about the reasons for the war (history will remember)
and to be totally ignorant of the factions and history of Iraq.

I am not so sure he lied, certainly not any more tha a Clintion I know, I
did not have sexual relations.... shut, and people are even considering a
Clinton, OMG. The morals and memories deteriorate.

Our mistake was to elect such an ignorant man. He campaigned on his
ignorance, and there were, and still is, people who have no problem with
that.

9/11 was a tough **** spot for anyone in that office. Not really a Bush
fan, but any in that spot would be condemned.


Bush was toasted upstairs way before 9/11. It was obvious as he massacred
the English language. His worshippers found it cute and quaint and elected
him anyway. That's pathetic.

It's only later that the truth comes out:
http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Drug...3985919&page=1

Your point regarding the URL is?

"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:S1YIj.22868$Cj7.18743@pd7urf2no...

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Canuck57 wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
news "Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to bomb
the 'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html
Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute window
with only the necessary collateral effects. Fast, decisive and
effective.
The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon technology
is already dead. He is buried in California. He received a state
funeral in 2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more balls
than brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He thought he had
that game to himself.

Probably. But peace in the middle east, not even the US can change
that unless you nuke it from end to end. While the people live there,
they will fight, pure an simple. They have in at least been this way
since the dawn of recorded history. We in the west are not going to
change their culture. Heck, it we leave them alone, Muslims are quite
happy killing other Muslims. (Iraq/Iran). Who knows, maybe Pakistan
and India will have a go at it to drag the Hindu's into it.

I think Bush needed to wipe asses over there for 9/11, his mistake is
keeping us there to long in a cultural war we can't win. Being more
civilized can't do what it takes. That is, whole scale wipe them out.
After all, the Taliban go home to their supportive kids and wives,
tutor another child to wrap a bomb and go out and do Jihad while the
coward stays at home. We in the west don't comprehend this is. The
wife, the son, the brothers, the mothers all be a part of that
culture. There are less victims than there are villains. I don't see
the Muslims turning over Bin Laden, Taliban and the terrorists.

Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to keep
them in line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out. And for
Bush, why is it taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.
Bush's mistakes we
To lie about the reasons for the war (history will remember)
and to be totally ignorant of the factions and history of Iraq.

I am not so sure he lied, certainly not any more tha a Clintion I know,
I did not have sexual relations.... shut, and people are even
considering a Clinton, OMG. The morals and memories deteriorate.

Our mistake was to elect such an ignorant man. He campaigned on his
ignorance, and there were, and still is, people who have no problem
with that.

9/11 was a tough **** spot for anyone in that office. Not really a Bush
fan, but any in that spot would be condemned.


Bush was toasted upstairs way before 9/11. It was obvious as he massacred
the English language. His worshippers found it cute and quaint and
elected him anyway. That's pathetic.

It's only later that the truth comes out:
http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Drug...3985919&page=1

Your point regarding the URL is?


Paired with his tendency to wreck language when he doesn't have a written
script, I wonder if his drinking did some damage. I know you've heard what
he does to language. How do you explain it? Some says it's carefully
planned, but, for example, his inability to pair plurals doesn't make him
cute and lovable. It makes him look stupid.

If the problem existed when he was a kid, there was certainly enough money
in the family to afford a private speech pathologist. And, if he writes the
way he speaks, there's no way he would've slid through Yale. Lesser colleges
may accept that sort of sloppiness, but not Yale.

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:S1YIj.22868$Cj7.18743@pd7urf2no...

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Canuck57 wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
news "Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to bomb
the 'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html
Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute window
with only the necessary collateral effects. Fast, decisive and
effective.
The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon technology
is already dead. He is buried in California. He received a state
funeral in 2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more balls
than brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He thought he had
that game to himself.

Probably. But peace in the middle east, not even the US can change
that unless you nuke it from end to end. While the people live
there, they will fight, pure an simple. They have in at least been
this way since the dawn of recorded history. We in the west are not
going to change their culture. Heck, it we leave them alone, Muslims
are quite happy killing other Muslims. (Iraq/Iran). Who knows, maybe
Pakistan and India will have a go at it to drag the Hindu's into it.

I think Bush needed to wipe asses over there for 9/11, his mistake is
keeping us there to long in a cultural war we can't win. Being more
civilized can't do what it takes. That is, whole scale wipe them
out. After all, the Taliban go home to their supportive kids and
wives, tutor another child to wrap a bomb and go out and do Jihad
while the coward stays at home. We in the west don't comprehend this
is. The wife, the son, the brothers, the mothers all be a part of
that culture. There are less victims than there are villains. I
don't see the Muslims turning over Bin Laden, Taliban and the
terrorists.

Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to keep
them in line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out. And for
Bush, why is it taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.
Bush's mistakes we
To lie about the reasons for the war (history will remember)
and to be totally ignorant of the factions and history of Iraq.

I am not so sure he lied, certainly not any more tha a Clintion I know,
I did not have sexual relations.... shut, and people are even
considering a Clinton, OMG. The morals and memories deteriorate.

Our mistake was to elect such an ignorant man. He campaigned on his
ignorance, and there were, and still is, people who have no problem
with that.

9/11 was a tough **** spot for anyone in that office. Not really a
Bush fan, but any in that spot would be condemned.


Bush was toasted upstairs way before 9/11. It was obvious as he
massacred the English language. His worshippers found it cute and quaint
and elected him anyway. That's pathetic.

It's only later that the truth comes out:
http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Drug...3985919&page=1

Your point regarding the URL is?


Paired with his tendency to wreck language when he doesn't have a written
script, I wonder if his drinking did some damage. I know you've heard what
he does to language. How do you explain it? Some says it's carefully
planned, but, for example, his inability to pair plurals doesn't make him
cute and lovable. It makes him look stupid.

If the problem existed when he was a kid, there was certainly enough money
in the family to afford a private speech pathologist. And, if he writes
the way he speaks, there's no way he would've slid through Yale. Lesser
colleges may accept that sort of sloppiness, but not Yale.

I don't know if alcohol or drug abuse can be blamed in his case or not, it
would be pure speculation.

I do know that my public speaking sure wouldn't sound like some great orator
and I've never abused any substance except maybe peanut butter and jelly
sandwiches.

"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:S1YIj.22868$Cj7.18743@pd7urf2no...

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Canuck57 wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
news "Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to bomb
the 'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html
Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute
window with only the necessary collateral effects. Fast, decisive
and effective.
The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon technology
is already dead. He is buried in California. He received a state
funeral in 2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more balls
than brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He thought he had
that game to himself.

Probably. But peace in the middle east, not even the US can change
that unless you nuke it from end to end. While the people live
there, they will fight, pure an simple. They have in at least been
this way since the dawn of recorded history. We in the west are not
going to change their culture. Heck, it we leave them alone, Muslims
are quite happy killing other Muslims. (Iraq/Iran). Who knows,
maybe Pakistan and India will have a go at it to drag the Hindu's
into it.

I think Bush needed to wipe asses over there for 9/11, his mistake
is keeping us there to long in a cultural war we can't win. Being
more civilized can't do what it takes. That is, whole scale wipe
them out. After all, the Taliban go home to their supportive kids
and wives, tutor another child to wrap a bomb and go out and do
Jihad while the coward stays at home. We in the west don't
comprehend this is. The wife, the son, the brothers, the mothers
all be a part of that culture. There are less victims than there are
villains. I don't see the Muslims turning over Bin Laden, Taliban
and the terrorists.

Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to keep
them in line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out. And for
Bush, why is it taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.
Bush's mistakes we
To lie about the reasons for the war (history will remember)
and to be totally ignorant of the factions and history of Iraq.

I am not so sure he lied, certainly not any more tha a Clintion I
know, I did not have sexual relations.... shut, and people are even
considering a Clinton, OMG. The morals and memories deteriorate.

Our mistake was to elect such an ignorant man. He campaigned on his
ignorance, and there were, and still is, people who have no problem
with that.

9/11 was a tough **** spot for anyone in that office. Not really a
Bush fan, but any in that spot would be condemned.


Bush was toasted upstairs way before 9/11. It was obvious as he
massacred the English language. His worshippers found it cute and
quaint and elected him anyway. That's pathetic.

It's only later that the truth comes out:
http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Drug...3985919&page=1

Your point regarding the URL is?


Paired with his tendency to wreck language when he doesn't have a written
script, I wonder if his drinking did some damage. I know you've heard
what he does to language. How do you explain it? Some says it's carefully
planned, but, for example, his inability to pair plurals doesn't make him
cute and lovable. It makes him look stupid.

If the problem existed when he was a kid, there was certainly enough
money in the family to afford a private speech pathologist. And, if he
writes the way he speaks, there's no way he would've slid through Yale.
Lesser colleges may accept that sort of sloppiness, but not Yale.

I don't know if alcohol or drug abuse can be blamed in his case or not, it
would be pure speculation.

I do know that my public speaking sure wouldn't sound like some great
orator and I've never abused any substance except maybe peanut butter and
jelly sandwiches.


I've heard that rationalization many times before. I don't buy it.

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:S1YIj.22868$Cj7.18743@pd7urf2no...

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Canuck57 wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
news "Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to
bomb the 'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html
Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute
window with only the necessary collateral effects. Fast,
decisive and effective.
The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon
technology is already dead. He is buried in California. He
received a state funeral in 2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more
balls than brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He thought
he had that game to himself.

Probably. But peace in the middle east, not even the US can change
that unless you nuke it from end to end. While the people live
there, they will fight, pure an simple. They have in at least been
this way since the dawn of recorded history. We in the west are
not going to change their culture. Heck, it we leave them alone,
Muslims are quite happy killing other Muslims. (Iraq/Iran). Who
knows, maybe Pakistan and India will have a go at it to drag the
Hindu's into it.

I think Bush needed to wipe asses over there for 9/11, his mistake
is keeping us there to long in a cultural war we can't win. Being
more civilized can't do what it takes. That is, whole scale wipe
them out. After all, the Taliban go home to their supportive kids
and wives, tutor another child to wrap a bomb and go out and do
Jihad while the coward stays at home. We in the west don't
comprehend this is. The wife, the son, the brothers, the mothers
all be a part of that culture. There are less victims than there
are villains. I don't see the Muslims turning over Bin Laden,
Taliban and the terrorists.

Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to
keep them in line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out. And
for Bush, why is it taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.
Bush's mistakes we
To lie about the reasons for the war (history will remember)
and to be totally ignorant of the factions and history of Iraq.

I am not so sure he lied, certainly not any more tha a Clintion I
know, I did not have sexual relations.... shut, and people are even
considering a Clinton, OMG. The morals and memories deteriorate.

Our mistake was to elect such an ignorant man. He campaigned on his
ignorance, and there were, and still is, people who have no problem
with that.

9/11 was a tough **** spot for anyone in that office. Not really a
Bush fan, but any in that spot would be condemned.


Bush was toasted upstairs way before 9/11. It was obvious as he
massacred the English language. His worshippers found it cute and
quaint and elected him anyway. That's pathetic.

It's only later that the truth comes out:
http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Drug...3985919&page=1

Your point regarding the URL is?


Paired with his tendency to wreck language when he doesn't have a
written script, I wonder if his drinking did some damage. I know you've
heard what he does to language. How do you explain it? Some says it's
carefully planned, but, for example, his inability to pair plurals
doesn't make him cute and lovable. It makes him look stupid.

If the problem existed when he was a kid, there was certainly enough
money in the family to afford a private speech pathologist. And, if he
writes the way he speaks, there's no way he would've slid through Yale.
Lesser colleges may accept that sort of sloppiness, but not Yale.

I don't know if alcohol or drug abuse can be blamed in his case or not,
it would be pure speculation.

I do know that my public speaking sure wouldn't sound like some great
orator and I've never abused any substance except maybe peanut butter and
jelly sandwiches.


I've heard that rationalization many times before. I don't buy it.

What the heck did I rationalize, PBJ?

"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:S1YIj.22868$Cj7.18743@pd7urf2no...

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Canuck57 wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
news "Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to
bomb the 'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html
Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute
window with only the necessary collateral effects. Fast,
decisive and effective.
The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon
technology is already dead. He is buried in California. He
received a state funeral in 2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more
balls than brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He thought
he had that game to himself.

Probably. But peace in the middle east, not even the US can
change that unless you nuke it from end to end. While the people
live there, they will fight, pure an simple. They have in at
least been this way since the dawn of recorded history. We in the
west are not going to change their culture. Heck, it we leave them
alone, Muslims are quite happy killing other Muslims. (Iraq/Iran).
Who knows, maybe Pakistan and India will have a go at it to drag
the Hindu's into it.

I think Bush needed to wipe asses over there for 9/11, his mistake
is keeping us there to long in a cultural war we can't win. Being
more civilized can't do what it takes. That is, whole scale wipe
them out. After all, the Taliban go home to their supportive kids
and wives, tutor another child to wrap a bomb and go out and do
Jihad while the coward stays at home. We in the west don't
comprehend this is. The wife, the son, the brothers, the mothers
all be a part of that culture. There are less victims than there
are villains. I don't see the Muslims turning over Bin Laden,
Taliban and the terrorists.

Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to
keep them in line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out.
And for Bush, why is it taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.
Bush's mistakes we
To lie about the reasons for the war (history will remember)
and to be totally ignorant of the factions and history of Iraq.

I am not so sure he lied, certainly not any more tha a Clintion I
know, I did not have sexual relations.... shut, and people are even
considering a Clinton, OMG. The morals and memories deteriorate.

Our mistake was to elect such an ignorant man. He campaigned on
his ignorance, and there were, and still is, people who have no
problem with that.

9/11 was a tough **** spot for anyone in that office. Not really a
Bush fan, but any in that spot would be condemned.


Bush was toasted upstairs way before 9/11. It was obvious as he
massacred the English language. His worshippers found it cute and
quaint and elected him anyway. That's pathetic.

It's only later that the truth comes out:
http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Drug...3985919&page=1

Your point regarding the URL is?


Paired with his tendency to wreck language when he doesn't have a
written script, I wonder if his drinking did some damage. I know you've
heard what he does to language. How do you explain it? Some says it's
carefully planned, but, for example, his inability to pair plurals
doesn't make him cute and lovable. It makes him look stupid.

If the problem existed when he was a kid, there was certainly enough
money in the family to afford a private speech pathologist. And, if he
writes the way he speaks, there's no way he would've slid through Yale.
Lesser colleges may accept that sort of sloppiness, but not Yale.

I don't know if alcohol or drug abuse can be blamed in his case or not,
it would be pure speculation.

I do know that my public speaking sure wouldn't sound like some great
orator and I've never abused any substance except maybe peanut butter
and jelly sandwiches.


I've heard that rationalization many times before. I don't buy it.

What the heck did I rationalize, PBJ?


I thought you were suggesting that he may be brilliant, but his public
speaking is a separate skill that's indicative of nothing.

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:S1YIj.22868$Cj7.18743@pd7urf2no...
"Jim" wrote in message
...
Canuck57 wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
news "Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to
bomb the 'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html
Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute
window with only the necessary collateral effects. Fast,
decisive and effective.
The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon
technology is already dead. He is buried in California. He
received a state funeral in 2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more
balls than brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He thought
he had that game to himself.
Probably. But peace in the middle east, not even the US can
change that unless you nuke it from end to end. While the people
live there, they will fight, pure an simple. They have in at
least been this way since the dawn of recorded history. We in the
west are not going to change their culture. Heck, it we leave them
alone, Muslims are quite happy killing other Muslims. (Iraq/Iran).
Who knows, maybe Pakistan and India will have a go at it to drag
the Hindu's into it.

I think Bush needed to wipe asses over there for 9/11, his mistake
is keeping us there to long in a cultural war we can't win. Being
more civilized can't do what it takes. That is, whole scale wipe
them out. After all, the Taliban go home to their supportive kids
and wives, tutor another child to wrap a bomb and go out and do
Jihad while the coward stays at home. We in the west don't
comprehend this is. The wife, the son, the brothers, the mothers
all be a part of that culture. There are less victims than there
are villains. I don't see the Muslims turning over Bin Laden,
Taliban and the terrorists.

Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to
keep them in line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out.
And for Bush, why is it taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.
Bush's mistakes we
To lie about the reasons for the war (history will remember)
and to be totally ignorant of the factions and history of Iraq.
I am not so sure he lied, certainly not any more tha a Clintion I
know, I did not have sexual relations.... shut, and people are even
considering a Clinton, OMG. The morals and memories deteriorate.

Our mistake was to elect such an ignorant man. He campaigned on
his ignorance, and there were, and still is, people who have no
problem with that.
9/11 was a tough **** spot for anyone in that office. Not really a
Bush fan, but any in that spot would be condemned.

Bush was toasted upstairs way before 9/11. It was obvious as he
massacred the English language. His worshippers found it cute and
quaint and elected him anyway. That's pathetic.

It's only later that the truth comes out:
http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Drug...3985919&page=1
Your point regarding the URL is?

Paired with his tendency to wreck language when he doesn't have a
written script, I wonder if his drinking did some damage. I know you've
heard what he does to language. How do you explain it? Some says it's
carefully planned, but, for example, his inability to pair plurals
doesn't make him cute and lovable. It makes him look stupid.

If the problem existed when he was a kid, there was certainly enough
money in the family to afford a private speech pathologist. And, if he
writes the way he speaks, there's no way he would've slid through Yale.
Lesser colleges may accept that sort of sloppiness, but not Yale.
I don't know if alcohol or drug abuse can be blamed in his case or not,
it would be pure speculation.

I do know that my public speaking sure wouldn't sound like some great
orator and I've never abused any substance except maybe peanut butter
and jelly sandwiches.

I've heard that rationalization many times before. I don't buy it.
What the heck did I rationalize, PBJ?


I thought you were suggesting that he may be brilliant, but his public
speaking is a separate skill that's indicative of nothing.




Politics and possible brain damage aside, it will be nice to have
someone in the White House next year who is able to *speak* the mother
tongue, eh? :)

"HK" wrote in message
...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:S1YIj.22868$Cj7.18743@pd7urf2no...
"Jim" wrote in message
...
Canuck57 wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
news "Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to
bomb the 'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html
Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute
window with only the necessary collateral effects. Fast,
decisive and effective.
The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon
technology is already dead. He is buried in California. He
received a state funeral in 2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more
balls than brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He
thought he had that game to himself.
Probably. But peace in the middle east, not even the US can
change that unless you nuke it from end to end. While the
people live there, they will fight, pure an simple. They have
in at least been this way since the dawn of recorded history.
We in the west are not going to change their culture. Heck, it
we leave them alone, Muslims are quite happy killing other
Muslims. (Iraq/Iran). Who knows, maybe Pakistan and India will
have a go at it to drag the Hindu's into it.

I think Bush needed to wipe asses over there for 9/11, his
mistake is keeping us there to long in a cultural war we can't
win. Being more civilized can't do what it takes. That is,
whole scale wipe them out. After all, the Taliban go home to
their supportive kids and wives, tutor another child to wrap a
bomb and go out and do Jihad while the coward stays at home. We
in the west don't comprehend this is. The wife, the son, the
brothers, the mothers all be a part of that culture. There are
less victims than there are villains. I don't see the Muslims
turning over Bin Laden, Taliban and the terrorists.

Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to
keep them in line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out.
And for Bush, why is it taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.
Bush's mistakes we
To lie about the reasons for the war (history will remember)
and to be totally ignorant of the factions and history of Iraq.
I am not so sure he lied, certainly not any more tha a Clintion I
know, I did not have sexual relations.... shut, and people are
even considering a Clinton, OMG. The morals and memories
deteriorate.

Our mistake was to elect such an ignorant man. He campaigned on
his ignorance, and there were, and still is, people who have no
problem with that.
9/11 was a tough **** spot for anyone in that office. Not really
a Bush fan, but any in that spot would be condemned.

Bush was toasted upstairs way before 9/11. It was obvious as he
massacred the English language. His worshippers found it cute and
quaint and elected him anyway. That's pathetic.

It's only later that the truth comes out:
http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Drug...3985919&page=1
Your point regarding the URL is?

Paired with his tendency to wreck language when he doesn't have a
written script, I wonder if his drinking did some damage. I know
you've heard what he does to language. How do you explain it? Some
says it's carefully planned, but, for example, his inability to pair
plurals doesn't make him cute and lovable. It makes him look stupid.

If the problem existed when he was a kid, there was certainly enough
money in the family to afford a private speech pathologist. And, if
he writes the way he speaks, there's no way he would've slid through
Yale. Lesser colleges may accept that sort of sloppiness, but not
Yale.
I don't know if alcohol or drug abuse can be blamed in his case or
not, it would be pure speculation.

I do know that my public speaking sure wouldn't sound like some great
orator and I've never abused any substance except maybe peanut butter
and jelly sandwiches.

I've heard that rationalization many times before. I don't buy it.
What the heck did I rationalize, PBJ?


I thought you were suggesting that he may be brilliant, but his public
speaking is a separate skill that's indicative of nothing.


Politics and possible brain damage aside, it will be nice to have someone
in the White House next year who is able to *speak* the mother tongue, eh?
:)
Hopefully not a forked tongue. ;)