"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:S1YIj.22868$Cj7.18743@pd7urf2no...

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Canuck57 wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
news "Canuck57" wrote in message
news:gfxHj.5235$Cj7.5047@pd7urf2no...
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here's a little peek inside Iran...before someone decides to bomb
the 'ell out of it.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/photogallerie...ran/index.html
Sounds like the people are nice.

Maybe try a different kind of bombing.

One that targets the top leadership all inside a 5-10 minute window
with only the necessary collateral effects. Fast, decisive and
effective.
The leader responsible for Iran obtaining nuclear weapon technology
is already dead. He is buried in California. He received a state
funeral in 2004.

Iran's leaders are behaving exactly like any leader with more balls
than brains. This is why it bothers George Bush. He thought he had
that game to himself.

Probably. But peace in the middle east, not even the US can change
that unless you nuke it from end to end. While the people live there,
they will fight, pure an simple. They have in at least been this way
since the dawn of recorded history. We in the west are not going to
change their culture. Heck, it we leave them alone, Muslims are quite
happy killing other Muslims. (Iraq/Iran). Who knows, maybe Pakistan
and India will have a go at it to drag the Hindu's into it.

I think Bush needed to wipe asses over there for 9/11, his mistake is
keeping us there to long in a cultural war we can't win. Being more
civilized can't do what it takes. That is, whole scale wipe them out.
After all, the Taliban go home to their supportive kids and wives,
tutor another child to wrap a bomb and go out and do Jihad while the
coward stays at home. We in the west don't comprehend this is. The
wife, the son, the brothers, the mothers all be a part of that
culture. There are less victims than there are villains. I don't see
the Muslims turning over Bin Laden, Taliban and the terrorists.

Just need to wipe out the leaders like Sadam once and awhile to keep
them in line. Get in, get them and then get the hell out. And for
Bush, why is it taking him so long to get Bin Laden?

These 1/2 assed wars are stupid and expensive in lives.
Bush's mistakes we
To lie about the reasons for the war (history will remember)
and to be totally ignorant of the factions and history of Iraq.

I am not so sure he lied, certainly not any more tha a Clintion I know,
I did not have sexual relations.... shut, and people are even
considering a Clinton, OMG. The morals and memories deteriorate.

Our mistake was to elect such an ignorant man. He campaigned on his
ignorance, and there were, and still is, people who have no problem
with that.

9/11 was a tough **** spot for anyone in that office. Not really a Bush
fan, but any in that spot would be condemned.


Bush was toasted upstairs way before 9/11. It was obvious as he massacred
the English language. His worshippers found it cute and quaint and
elected him anyway. That's pathetic.

It's only later that the truth comes out:
http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Drug...3985919&page=1

Your point regarding the URL is?


Paired with his tendency to wreck language when he doesn't have a written
script, I wonder if his drinking did some damage. I know you've heard what
he does to language. How do you explain it? Some says it's carefully
planned, but, for example, his inability to pair plurals doesn't make him
cute and lovable. It makes him look stupid.

If the problem existed when he was a kid, there was certainly enough money
in the family to afford a private speech pathologist. And, if he writes the
way he speaks, there's no way he would've slid through Yale. Lesser colleges
may accept that sort of sloppiness, but not Yale.