Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#23
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 20:42:40 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: filling either full of mud is one thing, but concerning accuracy, the M-16 's .223 will smoke an "acker" on the range any day... Totally disagree. Given my druthers, I'd take a AK over it's M-16 cousin anyday in close quarters if only for one reason - it's shorter and had much better balance even with the extra half pound of weight. It also will not jam - ever. Fewer parts, quicker disassembly/assembly and in a pinch, you can retrofit all AKs from other AKs. It's simple, effective and easy to maintain. And up to 250 yards, as accurate, or even more accurate, than the M-16 - whatever variant. Now if you want to reach out and touch someone, that's a different story. Close in, AK every time. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Pirates again.... | General | |||
Pirates vs USN | ASA | |||
pirates | ASA | |||
PIRATES! | ASA | |||
Pirates | ASA |