HK wrote:
Tim wrote:
Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread?

Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you
changed it to
1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then
2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers",
3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers"
4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers"
5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new"
6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring"
7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin"
8) "Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra"
9) "More trash from :Jim in Florida"
10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida"
11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida
12) More nastiness from 'Reggie'
13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness
14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences
15) Herring plays kissy-face
16) Herring claims he can't stand himself.
17) Herring: nothng about boats.

Why, Harry?


I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have
filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a
thread like this?

Actully, my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of
which you would claim to be.
I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not
of a person of any type of educational or professional standard.

Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to?

Just a thought




I'm simply altering the headlines to reflect the contents of the
postings. If, for example, Herring or Loogy use an existing thread to go
into "attack mode," then the subject no longer is relevant. I'm adding
relevancy to the posts of the dirtbags, that's all!

I understand that Harry,. but it makes you look like someone with no
intellect, with kindergarten behaviour.

I'm not a *smart* person, but I can't do that...

Gene Kearns wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 13:28:58 -0800 (PST),
penned the following well considered
thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:


|I can't speak for them, but I can for me. I have been laid up for a
|while, and bored too. Sparing with Harry is fun, I think he likes it
|too, what's the harm? a bunch of crazy old men waiting for the snow to
|melt...

I can think of three "harms."

1) Newbies take one look at this (and run away)... they don't know
this has been going on for decades..... and that there really isn't as
much hate flowing as is immediately apparent.... that some of the
"combatants" actually know (and fish and boat with) each other outside
of this little virtual section of life.

2) Even with cabin fever closing in, there must be *something* more
imbued with good karma that all of this sniping.

3) It encourages boatless trolls who have no interest in ever
contributing anything positive or of boating content. Unlike the rest
of you, even with the coming warm weather, they aren't going to become
any more worth reading or responding to than they are, now.

My $.02

--

Thank you, Gene.

I agree 100%

Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...


I'm simply altering the headlines to reflect the contents of the postings.
If, for example, Herring or Loogy use an existing thread to go into
"attack mode," then the subject no longer is relevant. I'm adding
relevancy to the posts of the dirtbags, that's all!


Guess maybe I was wrong.
Surprised, but wrong.

Eisboch



Yes, Richard.
interesting, yet disapointing.

Tim wrote:

HK wrote:
Tim wrote:
Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread?

Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you
changed it to
1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then
2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers",
3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers"
4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers"
5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new"
6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring"
7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin"
8) "Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra"
9) "More trash from :Jim in Florida"
10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida"
11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida
12) More nastiness from 'Reggie'
13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness
14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences
15) Herring plays kissy-face
16) Herring claims he can't stand himself.
17) Herring: nothng about boats.

Why, Harry?


I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have
filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a
thread like this?

Actully, my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of
which you would claim to be.
I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not
of a person of any type of educational or professional standard.

Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to?

Just a thought



I'm simply altering the headlines to reflect the contents of the
postings. If, for example, Herring or Loogy use an existing thread to go
into "attack mode," then the subject no longer is relevant. I'm adding
relevancy to the posts of the dirtbags, that's all!

I understand that Harry,. but it makes you look like someone with no
intellect, with kindergarten behaviour.

I'm not a *smart* person, but I can't do that...


Tell you what...*you* jump on the trashmeisters here every time they
dump, and I'll just sit back and watch.

He can try and spin it any way he wants. When his country called he
turned and ran.
=================================
The "country" didn't call. The Idiot-in-Chief (L BJ) called and sent
58,000 GIs to their deaths and uncounted men wounded and mentally
screwed up.
90% or more of the "country" was violently opposed to the Nam war, but,
no matter, Uncle Lyndon had plenty of cannon fodder to send.

N.L. Eckert wrote:
He can try and spin it any way he wants. When his country called he
turned and ran.
=================================
The "country" didn't call. The Idiot-in-Chief (L BJ) called and sent
58,000 GIs to their deaths and uncounted men wounded and mentally
screwed up.
90% or more of the "country" was violently opposed to the Nam war, but,
no matter, Uncle Lyndon had plenty of cannon fodder to send.



Johnson *and* Nixon. It was the dumbest U.S. military engagement of the
20th Century, and now we are engaged in an equally dumb military
engagement. We never seem to learn.

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:25:11 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:57:19 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 16:06:52 -0500, "secretagent"
wrote:

He was deferred,reclassified 1A,dropped off the list, and blessed by a twist
of fate. Seems like he went to a lot of trouble to stay home with the girls.
And now he finally declares that he is not a draft dodger. I guess we should
believe him. Eh. Harry wouldn't lie, would he?

It was 40+ years ago - a whole different lifetime.

I'm not defending Harry, but get a freakin' life.

Nobody cares anymore.

I got out of the service almost 20 years ago. Yet Harry receives no flak
for his derogatory comments about same, whether mine or anyone else's.

Because it doesn't matter what Harry thinks.

It's as simple as that.

You served honorably, went above and beyond the call making it a
career and rose to Staff command level.

Why should you care what he thinks? He can make all the idiotic
comments he wants - he has no clue what you had to sacrifice or the
effort made to achieve your Staff level rank.

The only way that achievement can be taken away from you is for you to
take it away from yourself. If you react to his taunts, then he wins
and you look foolish.

I was just a grunt - dumbass Marine, but I would think that an officer
and a gentleman would understand when he's being played and just
ignore it.

Then again, maybe not.

Share the wealth, Tom.

I just did.

HooRahhhh!

+1

On Mar 5, 7:22*am, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:38:59 -0800 (PST),
wrote:





On Mar 4, 8:29*pm, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:01:04 -0500, HK wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 13:28:58 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Mar 4, 4:25 pm, "JimH" wrote:
"secretagent" wrote in message

m...

"John H." wrote in message
om...
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:38:18 -0500, HK wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:04:45 -0500, HK wrote:
N.L. Eckert wrote:
Lots of people who were eligible in the Viet Nam era had high draft
lottery numbers and simply weren't called up. DUH!
If that were the case, wouldn't he have said so? Harry asserts that
his
name was "removed from the list".
Not that I am a fan of harry's, but I don't see why Harry owes you or
anybody else an explanation.
==================================
He once told me that he had a college deferment and that kept him off
the list for that time. *That was the case with a lot of people at
the
time, including my district manager. And, you know what? *I don't
blame
them one damn bit!! * I would have avoided that war as quickly as
anyone. *Our Idiot-in-Chief took us into one of the worst wars
imaginable and the expected the youth of the country to go fight it.
And for what?? * There was no winner, *only a lot of losers.....
Yep...I was II-S for a while. But then I graduated, and my draft
status
*changed to I-A. But then...fate intervened. I certainly never
"dodged"
the draft.
Harry, did you not earlier say that only the stupid got drafted?
Dear Dumb John:
You got drafted, right? Your question, therefore, is asked and answered.
It must suck to be so embarrassed that you have to snip three-fourths of
a
post before replying.
--
***** Hope your day is better than decent! *****
* * * * *John H
He was deferred,reclassified 1A,dropped off the list, and blessed by a
twist of fate. Seems like he went to a lot of trouble to stay home with
the girls. And now he finally declares that he is not a draft dodger. I
guess we should believe him. Eh. Harry wouldn't lie, would he?
I am not defending Harry but I have to ask this question to you, Booger,
Herring and Reggie....

Why the hell are you guys so obsessed about him and his past/present life?
I can understand 3rd graders engaged in that behavior, but not grown men.
You are all making an ass of yourself. *Grow up.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
I can't speak for them, but I can for me. I have been laid up for a
while, and bored too. Sparing with Harry is fun, I think he likes it
too, what's the harm? a bunch of crazy old men waiting for the snow to
melt...

Sparring with soft butter is much more fun, and more mentally stimulating.

We just *know* where you slather on that soft butter, and there is no
question for you it is more stimulating.

Do you three think of nothing else?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

To suggest that I have ever engaged in the sexually perverted insults
thrown around here is dishonest, nothing less... I thought you were
better than that...

You don't qualify to be one of the 'you three' mentioned! That comment was
to Harry and his two sidekicks, who manage to find sexual innuendos in
aircraft carriers.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I looked at the posts a bunch of times, only saw me and two otheres..
But I understand now.. did not think I had gotten so gross with any of
my folly

On Mar 5, 8:23*am, wrote:
On Mar 4, 10:27*pm, wrote:





On Mar 4, 10:05*pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here

wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 4, 8:00 pm, "JimH" wrote:

*"It's not what someone calls you, it's what you answer to...". Think
about it...
=========

Scott, you have a perverse view on the reason this NG exists. *To you it is
a playground where arguing and personally attacking members here is
acceptable.

That sort of thinking is what led this NG into the gutter.

Gotta go.............time to see if I can entice my wife to turn off
American Idol............. *

Uh, no I don't. I rarely argue, I try to debate. Personal attacks are
not my forte either (except for drunken joe who I truly dislike).. I
do however respect the freedom of speech of others here...

I do think it is funny that JimH who has made up lies about Chuck
posting his home phone number just so he could argue and launch a
personal attach on Chuck is lecturing you about arguing. * Even when
many people stated that Chuck never posted his telephone, JimH just kept
on lying, only when someone posted a photo of the original web page that
was saved on his server, did JimH suddenly decide to apologize.

* JimH, the guy who insisted Harry was stalking him and making personal
threats to him and his wife, is now wondering if personal attacking
members is acceptable. *While Harry has made many derogatory comments,
about many people, he never stalked JimH nor made any threats to him or
his wife. *This is the guy who wants to slap your wrist about having a
lively debate.

JimH the guy who has pulled Bassy/Loogy strings for years and many
hundreds of post, by making insulting and derogatory personal comments
about Bassy/Loggy's wife and family, now wants to play the martyr, and
make more lies about other people insulting his wife.

It is funny watching JimH, he really is an interesting "character".- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Dude really did all that, holy ****....??- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yes, he did, and worse. How ya feeling, by the way?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I think I might have finally broken the infection. Lungs started
clearing yesterday for the first time in over a month. I feel like I
am getting a breath again.. I am still pretty shell shocked though,
afraid to go outside in the rain and **** today.. I really shouldn't
have worked at the stables, man I really miss it...

On Mar 5, 8:28*am, Tim wrote:
Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread?

Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you
changed it to
1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then
2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers",
3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers"
4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers"
5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new"
6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring"
7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin"
8) *"Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra"
9) *"More trash from :Jim in Florida"
10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida"
11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida
12) More nastiness from 'Reggie'
13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness
14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences
15) Herring plays kissy-face
16) Herring claims he can't stand himself.
17) Herring: nothng about *boats.

Why, Harry?

I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have
filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a
thread like this?

Actully, *my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of
which you would claim to be.
I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not
of a person of any type of educational or professional standard.

Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to?

Just a thought

Probably my fault, I did the "ChinaSpam" to one of Harrys political
posts last week. Didn't want to, but I couldn't help myself