TV off...bad storms...So, who won what last night?
 

TV off...bad storms...So, who won what last night?
 

D.Duck wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message
. ..
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 03:06:53 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Feb 6, 8:37 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Feb 6, 5:39 pm, HK wrote:

Tim wrote:
HK wrote:
Their guess is that the GOP nominees will be
McCain and Huckabee (their nightmare GOP ticket), and that the
best
hope
is to split off entirely and finally from the GOP and form a
third
party.
And for the Dems, what would be your "nightmare ticket", Harry
Either Hillary or Barack in the White House suits me just fine.
You like nightmares??

==========================

Choose your favorite nightmare. They're all bought & paid for. There
are
no
exceptions. Hopefully, you can figure out who's the best scumbag of
the
lot.
When you do, come back and explain how you did it.
No, you'll have to figure that out on your own.

============================

I have a system of sorts. I know every president since Carter has
been on
their knees, blowing the Saudi royal family, which is what got us
into the
**** we're in lately. That eliminates Hillary. Guilt through
association.
Romney never stops smiling. Give that asshole a pair of tacky white
shoes
and he could be selling used cars all day long. He's off the list.
Huckabee
is a disgrace even to some evangelicals. He's off the list. That
leaves
McCain & Obama. Maybe...just maybe they haven't been fondled by the
Saudis,
and in the moment of sanity, they'll do the right thing with that
country.

What would you have them do, oh bright one? Sell oil only to the
Chinese
and Russians?
--
John H
"Mr. Ambassador, remember the 20-30 pages of information hidden from
the 9/11 commission? The information which would've made it clear that
we should've invaded your country, instead of the wrong one? Would you
like that information released to the press?"

"Now, let's talk about the price of oil, shall we?"
Damn that is so simple, I wonder why no one else has thought about it.
If only you and Harry would go to Washington we wouldn't have all of
these problems.


Why would the president who classified the information want to declassify
it, especially since it probably would prove embarrassing not only to
him, but also to his father?
There are going to be years of lawsuits and books to release info being
kept secret by the Bushcrappers. Most of the info has to do with politics,
not national security, and some of it will see the light of day. When it
does, it will only further diminish Bush's low standing among presidents.

I can imagine a history book 50 years from now that describes how Bush
started a war for personal political reasons that ended up killing
hundreds of thousands of people.

There ought to be payback on Bush and Cheney for what they have done to
this country and the world, but, of course, there won't be.

You day "hundreds of thousands of people".

I think to be fair, on the Iraqi side you have to take into account how many
Saddam may have been responsible for if left unchecked. He didn't have an
exemplary track record.

As of the coalition side, a terrible loss.



There is no need to speculate over how many might be dead if Saddam were
still in power. What's the point of that? The point is, Bush's actions
resulted in the deaths of up to hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, and for
what? For Bush's personal political reasons.

TV off...bad storms...So, who won what last night?
 

"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message
. ..
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message
. ..
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 03:06:53 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Feb 6, 8:37 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Feb 6, 5:39 pm, HK wrote:

Tim wrote:
HK wrote:
Their guess is that the GOP nominees will be
McCain and Huckabee (their nightmare GOP ticket), and that the
best
hope
is to split off entirely and finally from the GOP and form a
third
party.
And for the Dems, what would be your "nightmare ticket", Harry
Either Hillary or Barack in the White House suits me just fine.
You like nightmares??

==========================

Choose your favorite nightmare. They're all bought & paid for. There
are
no
exceptions. Hopefully, you can figure out who's the best scumbag of
the
lot.
When you do, come back and explain how you did it.
No, you'll have to figure that out on your own.

============================

I have a system of sorts. I know every president since Carter has
been on
their knees, blowing the Saudi royal family, which is what got us
into the
**** we're in lately. That eliminates Hillary. Guilt through
association.
Romney never stops smiling. Give that asshole a pair of tacky white
shoes
and he could be selling used cars all day long. He's off the list.
Huckabee
is a disgrace even to some evangelicals. He's off the list. That
leaves
McCain & Obama. Maybe...just maybe they haven't been fondled by the
Saudis,
and in the moment of sanity, they'll do the right thing with that
country.

What would you have them do, oh bright one? Sell oil only to the
Chinese
and Russians?
--
John H

"Mr. Ambassador, remember the 20-30 pages of information hidden from
the 9/11 commission? The information which would've made it clear that
we should've invaded your country, instead of the wrong one? Would you
like that information released to the press?"

"Now, let's talk about the price of oil, shall we?"
Damn that is so simple, I wonder why no one else has thought about it.
If only you and Harry would go to Washington we wouldn't have all of
these problems.



Why would the president who classified the information want to declassify
it, especially since it probably would prove embarrassing not only to
him, but also to his father?

Well as soon as the democrats are in power we can get the cost of oil down
to $32/barrel.

On behalf of the entire nation, I want to thank you.


You never saw me say that. As others have advised you, try reading slower.

TV off...bad storms...So, who won what last night?
 

hk wrote:
D.Duck wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in
message . ..
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 03:06:53 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message
...

On Feb 6, 8:37 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...

On Feb 6, 5:39 pm, HK wrote:

Tim wrote:
HK wrote:
Their guess is that the GOP nominees will be
McCain and Huckabee (their nightmare GOP ticket), and that
the best
hope
is to split off entirely and finally from the GOP and form a
third
party.
And for the Dems, what would be your "nightmare ticket", Harry
Either Hillary or Barack in the White House suits me just fine.
You like nightmares??

==========================

Choose your favorite nightmare. They're all bought & paid for.
There are
no
exceptions. Hopefully, you can figure out who's the best
scumbag of the
lot.
When you do, come back and explain how you did it.
No, you'll have to figure that out on your own.

============================

I have a system of sorts. I know every president since Carter
has been on
their knees, blowing the Saudi royal family, which is what got
us into the
**** we're in lately. That eliminates Hillary. Guilt through
association.
Romney never stops smiling. Give that asshole a pair of tacky
white shoes
and he could be selling used cars all day long. He's off the
list. Huckabee
is a disgrace even to some evangelicals. He's off the list. That
leaves
McCain & Obama. Maybe...just maybe they haven't been fondled by
the Saudis,
and in the moment of sanity, they'll do the right thing with
that country.

What would you have them do, oh bright one? Sell oil only to the
Chinese
and Russians?
--
John H
"Mr. Ambassador, remember the 20-30 pages of information hidden
from the 9/11 commission? The information which would've made it
clear that we should've invaded your country, instead of the wrong
one? Would you like that information released to the press?"

"Now, let's talk about the price of oil, shall we?"
Damn that is so simple, I wonder why no one else has thought about
it. If only you and Harry would go to Washington we wouldn't have
all of these problems.


Why would the president who classified the information want to
declassify it, especially since it probably would prove embarrassing
not only to him, but also to his father?
There are going to be years of lawsuits and books to release info
being kept secret by the Bushcrappers. Most of the info has to do
with politics, not national security, and some of it will see the
light of day. When it does, it will only further diminish Bush's low
standing among presidents.

I can imagine a history book 50 years from now that describes how
Bush started a war for personal political reasons that ended up
killing hundreds of thousands of people.

There ought to be payback on Bush and Cheney for what they have done
to this country and the world, but, of course, there won't be.

You day "hundreds of thousands of people".

I think to be fair, on the Iraqi side you have to take into account
how many Saddam may have been responsible for if left unchecked. He
didn't have an exemplary track record.

As of the coalition side, a terrible loss.


There is no need to speculate over how many might be dead if Saddam were
still in power. What's the point of that? The point is, Bush's actions
resulted in the deaths of up to hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, and for
what? For Bush's personal political reasons.


Harry,
Instead of saying "...resulted in the deaths of up to hundreds of
thousands of Iraqis" it would be just as accurate to say ... "resulted
in the deaths of up to hundreds of millions of Iraqis". The way you
worded that sentence it doesn't matter what number you use, it is still
a true statement.

TV off...bad storms...So, who won what last night?
 

"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message
. ..

There is no need to speculate over how many might be dead if Saddam were
still in power. What's the point of that? The point is, Bush's actions
resulted in the deaths of up to hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, and for
what? For Bush's personal political reasons.


Harry,
Instead of saying "...resulted in the deaths of up to hundreds of
thousands of Iraqis" it would be just as accurate to say ... "resulted in
the deaths of up to hundreds of millions of Iraqis". The way you worded
that sentence it doesn't matter what number you use, it is still a true
statement.



Who cares, as long as we're bringing democracy to the Middle East, right?

"Consultative Council or Majlis al-Shura (150 members and a chairman
appointed by the monarch for four-year terms); note - though the Council of
Ministers announced in October 2003 its intent to introduce elections for
half of the members of local and provincial assemblies and a third of the
members of the national Consultative Council or Majlis al-Shura,
incrementally over a period of four to five years, to date no such elections
have been held or announced."

Maybe the country described above should be our next stop.

TV off...bad storms...So, who won what last night?
 

"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message
. ..
hk wrote:
D.Duck wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in
message . ..
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 03:06:53 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Feb 6, 8:37 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Feb 6, 5:39 pm, HK wrote:

Tim wrote:
HK wrote:
Their guess is that the GOP nominees will be
McCain and Huckabee (their nightmare GOP ticket), and that the
best
hope
is to split off entirely and finally from the GOP and form a
third
party.
And for the Dems, what would be your "nightmare ticket", Harry
Either Hillary or Barack in the White House suits me just fine.
You like nightmares??

==========================

Choose your favorite nightmare. They're all bought & paid for.
There are
no
exceptions. Hopefully, you can figure out who's the best scumbag
of the
lot.
When you do, come back and explain how you did it.
No, you'll have to figure that out on your own.

============================

I have a system of sorts. I know every president since Carter has
been on
their knees, blowing the Saudi royal family, which is what got us
into the
**** we're in lately. That eliminates Hillary. Guilt through
association.
Romney never stops smiling. Give that asshole a pair of tacky
white shoes
and he could be selling used cars all day long. He's off the list.
Huckabee
is a disgrace even to some evangelicals. He's off the list. That
leaves
McCain & Obama. Maybe...just maybe they haven't been fondled by
the Saudis,
and in the moment of sanity, they'll do the right thing with that
country.

What would you have them do, oh bright one? Sell oil only to the
Chinese
and Russians?
--
John H
"Mr. Ambassador, remember the 20-30 pages of information hidden from
the 9/11 commission? The information which would've made it clear
that we should've invaded your country, instead of the wrong one?
Would you like that information released to the press?"

"Now, let's talk about the price of oil, shall we?"
Damn that is so simple, I wonder why no one else has thought about
it. If only you and Harry would go to Washington we wouldn't have all
of these problems.


Why would the president who classified the information want to
declassify it, especially since it probably would prove embarrassing
not only to him, but also to his father?
There are going to be years of lawsuits and books to release info being
kept secret by the Bushcrappers. Most of the info has to do with
politics, not national security, and some of it will see the light of
day. When it does, it will only further diminish Bush's low standing
among presidents.

I can imagine a history book 50 years from now that describes how Bush
started a war for personal political reasons that ended up killing
hundreds of thousands of people.

There ought to be payback on Bush and Cheney for what they have done to
this country and the world, but, of course, there won't be.

You day "hundreds of thousands of people".

I think to be fair, on the Iraqi side you have to take into account how
many Saddam may have been responsible for if left unchecked. He didn't
have an exemplary track record.

As of the coalition side, a terrible loss.


There is no need to speculate over how many might be dead if Saddam were
still in power. What's the point of that? The point is, Bush's actions
resulted in the deaths of up to hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, and for
what? For Bush's personal political reasons.


Harry,
Instead of saying "...resulted in the deaths of up to hundreds of
thousands of Iraqis" it would be just as accurate to say ... "resulted in
the deaths of up to hundreds of millions of Iraqis". The way you worded
that sentence it doesn't matter what number you use, it is still a true
statement.


Kinda like the ads that state, X, as low as $9.95. :-)

TV off...bad storms...So, who won what last night?
 

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message
. ..

There is no need to speculate over how many might be dead if Saddam were
still in power. What's the point of that? The point is, Bush's actions
resulted in the deaths of up to hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, and for
what? For Bush's personal political reasons.

Harry,
Instead of saying "...resulted in the deaths of up to hundreds of
thousands of Iraqis" it would be just as accurate to say ... "resulted in
the deaths of up to hundreds of millions of Iraqis". The way you worded
that sentence it doesn't matter what number you use, it is still a true
statement.



Who cares, as long as we're bringing democracy to the Middle East, right?

"Consultative Council or Majlis al-Shura (150 members and a chairman
appointed by the monarch for four-year terms); note - though the Council of
Ministers announced in October 2003 its intent to introduce elections for
half of the members of local and provincial assemblies and a third of the
members of the national Consultative Council or Majlis al-Shura,
incrementally over a period of four to five years, to date no such elections
have been held or announced."

Maybe the country described above should be our next stop.




I wonder why ReggieTurd keeps addressing questions or making suggestions
to me?

What an ass.

TV off...bad storms...So, who won what last night?
 

"hk" wrote in message
. ..
D.Duck wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in
message . ..
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 03:06:53 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Feb 6, 8:37 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Feb 6, 5:39 pm, HK wrote:

Tim wrote:
HK wrote:
Their guess is that the GOP nominees will be
McCain and Huckabee (their nightmare GOP ticket), and that the
best
hope
is to split off entirely and finally from the GOP and form a
third
party.
And for the Dems, what would be your "nightmare ticket", Harry
Either Hillary or Barack in the White House suits me just fine.
You like nightmares??

==========================

Choose your favorite nightmare. They're all bought & paid for.
There are
no
exceptions. Hopefully, you can figure out who's the best scumbag
of the
lot.
When you do, come back and explain how you did it.
No, you'll have to figure that out on your own.

============================

I have a system of sorts. I know every president since Carter has
been on
their knees, blowing the Saudi royal family, which is what got us
into the
**** we're in lately. That eliminates Hillary. Guilt through
association.
Romney never stops smiling. Give that asshole a pair of tacky white
shoes
and he could be selling used cars all day long. He's off the list.
Huckabee
is a disgrace even to some evangelicals. He's off the list. That
leaves
McCain & Obama. Maybe...just maybe they haven't been fondled by the
Saudis,
and in the moment of sanity, they'll do the right thing with that
country.

What would you have them do, oh bright one? Sell oil only to the
Chinese
and Russians?
--
John H
"Mr. Ambassador, remember the 20-30 pages of information hidden from
the 9/11 commission? The information which would've made it clear
that we should've invaded your country, instead of the wrong one?
Would you like that information released to the press?"

"Now, let's talk about the price of oil, shall we?"
Damn that is so simple, I wonder why no one else has thought about it.
If only you and Harry would go to Washington we wouldn't have all of
these problems.


Why would the president who classified the information want to
declassify it, especially since it probably would prove embarrassing
not only to him, but also to his father?
There are going to be years of lawsuits and books to release info being
kept secret by the Bushcrappers. Most of the info has to do with
politics, not national security, and some of it will see the light of
day. When it does, it will only further diminish Bush's low standing
among presidents.

I can imagine a history book 50 years from now that describes how Bush
started a war for personal political reasons that ended up killing
hundreds of thousands of people.

There ought to be payback on Bush and Cheney for what they have done to
this country and the world, but, of course, there won't be.

You day "hundreds of thousands of people".

I think to be fair, on the Iraqi side you have to take into account how
many Saddam may have been responsible for if left unchecked. He didn't
have an exemplary track record.

As of the coalition side, a terrible loss.

There is no need to speculate over how many might be dead if Saddam were
still in power. What's the point of that? The point is, Bush's actions
resulted in the deaths of up to hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, and for
what? For Bush's personal political reasons.


No "up to" in your original statement.

"I can imagine a history book 50 years from now that describes how Bush
started a war for personal political reasons that ended up killing
hundreds of thousands of people."

TV off...bad storms...So, who won what last night?
 

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message
. ..
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message
. ..
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 03:06:53 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Feb 6, 8:37 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Feb 6, 5:39 pm, HK wrote:

Tim wrote:
HK wrote:
Their guess is that the GOP nominees will be
McCain and Huckabee (their nightmare GOP ticket), and that the
best
hope
is to split off entirely and finally from the GOP and form a
third
party.
And for the Dems, what would be your "nightmare ticket", Harry
Either Hillary or Barack in the White House suits me just fine.
You like nightmares??

==========================

Choose your favorite nightmare. They're all bought & paid for. There
are
no
exceptions. Hopefully, you can figure out who's the best scumbag of
the
lot.
When you do, come back and explain how you did it.
No, you'll have to figure that out on your own.

============================

I have a system of sorts. I know every president since Carter has
been on
their knees, blowing the Saudi royal family, which is what got us
into the
**** we're in lately. That eliminates Hillary. Guilt through
association.
Romney never stops smiling. Give that asshole a pair of tacky white
shoes
and he could be selling used cars all day long. He's off the list.
Huckabee
is a disgrace even to some evangelicals. He's off the list. That
leaves
McCain & Obama. Maybe...just maybe they haven't been fondled by the
Saudis,
and in the moment of sanity, they'll do the right thing with that
country.

What would you have them do, oh bright one? Sell oil only to the
Chinese
and Russians?
--
John H
"Mr. Ambassador, remember the 20-30 pages of information hidden from
the 9/11 commission? The information which would've made it clear that
we should've invaded your country, instead of the wrong one? Would you
like that information released to the press?"

"Now, let's talk about the price of oil, shall we?"
Damn that is so simple, I wonder why no one else has thought about it.
If only you and Harry would go to Washington we wouldn't have all of
these problems.


Why would the president who classified the information want to declassify
it, especially since it probably would prove embarrassing not only to
him, but also to his father?
Well as soon as the democrats are in power we can get the cost of oil down
to $32/barrel.

On behalf of the entire nation, I want to thank you.


You never saw me say that. As others have advised you, try reading slower.



Well if you think $32 a barrel is too low, what price would you be able
to negotiate? As long as you can use this powerful information to
offset the laws of supply and demand, I on behalf of the entire nation,
would like to thank you.

TV off...bad storms...So, who won what last night?
 

HK wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in
message . ..

There is no need to speculate over how many might be dead if Saddam
were still in power. What's the point of that? The point is, Bush's
actions resulted in the deaths of up to hundreds of thousands of
Iraqis, and for what? For Bush's personal political reasons.

Harry,
Instead of saying "...resulted in the deaths of up to hundreds of
thousands of Iraqis" it would be just as accurate to say ...
"resulted in the deaths of up to hundreds of millions of Iraqis".
The way you worded that sentence it doesn't matter what number you
use, it is still a true statement.



Who cares, as long as we're bringing democracy to the Middle East, right?

"Consultative Council or Majlis al-Shura (150 members and a chairman
appointed by the monarch for four-year terms); note - though the
Council of Ministers announced in October 2003 its intent to introduce
elections for half of the members of local and provincial assemblies
and a third of the members of the national Consultative Council or
Majlis al-Shura, incrementally over a period of four to five years, to
date no such elections have been held or announced."

Maybe the country described above should be our next stop.



I wonder why ReggieTurd keeps addressing questions or making suggestions
to me?

What an ass.

Harry,
I find it easier to address my comments directly to you, instead of
pretending to have you filtered, and then making snide personal insults.
I love to make a comment and then wait to see how you handle it when
no one quotes my comment in a response. You still responding to my
post, sometimes by starting a new post that address the issue I raised.
No one really believes you use a filter anymore than you own a lobster
boat or are married to a Dr. Dr., so why bother.