JimH wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
JG2U wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:49:47 -0500, hk wrote:

JG2U wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:16:29 -0500, hk wrote:

JG2U wrote:
News for harry... Clinton wasn't impeached for having sex with a fat
chick.

Oh, and your "filter" is acting up again.
Sure he was. Oh, technically, it was related to "lying under oath"
about sex. Y-A-W-N. The whole business was nothing more than a GOP
witch hunt to "get" Clinton, and wasn't worth even an asterisk.

It was uncovering the tip of an iceberg, and that's just all they
could get him for. He and Monica could have gone at it until they
were both blind, and if he had not committed perjury, there wouold
have been no impeachment. Period.

Had the Repubs not been out to "get" Bill on "something," there would
have been no impeachment, period. After trying for years, all the Repubs
could do was nail him because he lied about sex.

I can hardly wait for the subpoenas and grand juries next year. They
won't be about sex or lying about sex, either.

Thousands of Americans dead, tens of thousands wounded because of
Liberal lies.
You forgot this:

That wouold be great. Their facilitators are Albright, Clinton, Dean,
Berger, Reid, Billary, Pelosi, Biden, and all the other libs who were
beating the war drum for Iraq even before Bush was elected.

Remember this video?

...................thousands died, and for nothing.....................

..............on 9/11.


And since, and all while George W. Bush was captain of the ship.

wrote in message
...
On Jan 25, 8:30 pm, hk wrote:
JG2U wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:49:47 -0500, hk wrote:

JG2U wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:16:29 -0500, hk wrote:

JG2U wrote:
News for harry... Clinton wasn't impeached for having sex with a fat
chick.

Oh, and your "filter" is acting up again.
Sure he was. Oh, technically, it was related to "lying under oath"
about
sex. Y-A-W-N. The whole business was nothing more than a GOP witch
hunt
to "get" Clinton, and wasn't worth even an asterisk.

It was uncovering the tip of an iceberg, and that's just all they
could get him for. He and Monica could have gone at it until they
were both blind, and if he had not committed perjury, there wouold
have been no impeachment. Period.

Had the Repubs not been out to "get" Bill on "something," there would
have been no impeachment, period. After trying for years, all the
Repubs
could do was nail him because he lied about sex.

I can hardly wait for the subpoenas and grand juries next year. They
won't be about sex or lying about sex, either.

Thousands of Americans dead, tens of thousands wounded because of
Liberal
lies.

You forgot this:

That wouold be great. Their facilitators are Albright, Clinton, Dean,
Berger, Reid, Billary, Pelosi, Biden, and all the other libs who were
beating the war drum for Iraq even before Bush was elected.

Remember this video?

Bush and Cheney lied, and thousands died, and for nothing.- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

Blah,blah, blah....... blah, blah... Bush shot back, tough ****.
Why do you think the oil is going up again, now? Who do you think the
oil rich sponsors of terrorism want in office, republicans who shoot
back or democrats who will not? duh, math is constant, one and
one is always two...

=======================


Oil: Which time period are you referring to? Examples: "today", or "the
last 48 hours", that sort of thing.

I've been hittin' the Red Rose tea pretty hard for the past hour, so I'm
pretty ****ed up. I'm not following what you are connecting to the "oil
going up" idea. Can you clarify?

On Jan 25, 9:06*pm, hk wrote:
JimH wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...
JG2U wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:49:47 -0500, hk wrote:

JG2U wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:16:29 -0500, hk wrote:

JG2U wrote:
News for harry... Clinton wasn't impeached for having sex with a fat
chick.

Oh, and your "filter" is acting up again.
Sure he was. Oh, technically, it was related to "lying under oath"
about sex. Y-A-W-N. The whole business was nothing more than a GOP
witch hunt to "get" Clinton, and wasn't worth even an asterisk.

It was uncovering the tip of an iceberg, and that's just all they
could get him for. *He and Monica could have gone at it until they
were both blind, and if he had not committed perjury, there wouold
have been no impeachment. *Period.

Had the Repubs not been out to "get" Bill on "something," there would
have been no impeachment, period. After trying for years, all the Repubs
could do was nail him because he lied about sex.

I can hardly wait for the subpoenas and grand juries next year. They
won't be about sex or lying about sex, either.

Thousands of Americans dead, tens of thousands wounded because of
Liberal lies.
You forgot this:

That wouold be great. *Their facilitators are Albright, Clinton, Dean,
Berger, Reid, Billary, Pelosi, Biden, and all the other libs who were
beating the war drum for Iraq even before Bush was elected.

Remember this video?

...................thousands died, and for nothing.....................

..............on 9/11.

And since, and all while George W. Bush was captain of the ship.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And all planned while Clinton was in office. And who really knows how
much Clinton knew, but Bush let him and Berger off the hook, letting
them destroy the info, unchanllenged..

wrote:
On Jan 25, 8:30 pm, hk wrote:
JG2U wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:49:47 -0500, hk wrote:
JG2U wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:16:29 -0500, hk wrote:
JG2U wrote:
News for harry... Clinton wasn't impeached for having sex with a fat
chick.
Oh, and your "filter" is acting up again.
Sure he was. Oh, technically, it was related to "lying under oath" about
sex. Y-A-W-N. The whole business was nothing more than a GOP witch hunt
to "get" Clinton, and wasn't worth even an asterisk.
It was uncovering the tip of an iceberg, and that's just all they
could get him for. He and Monica could have gone at it until they
were both blind, and if he had not committed perjury, there wouold
have been no impeachment. Period.
Had the Repubs not been out to "get" Bill on "something," there would
have been no impeachment, period. After trying for years, all the Repubs
could do was nail him because he lied about sex.
I can hardly wait for the subpoenas and grand juries next year. They
won't be about sex or lying about sex, either.
Thousands of Americans dead, tens of thousands wounded because of Liberal
lies.
You forgot this:
That wouold be great. Their facilitators are Albright, Clinton, Dean,
Berger, Reid, Billary, Pelosi, Biden, and all the other libs who were
beating the war drum for Iraq even before Bush was elected.
Remember this video?
Bush and Cheney lied, and thousands died, and for nothing.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Blah,blah, blah....... blah, blah... Bush shot back, tough ****.
Why do you think the oil is going up again, now? Who do you think the
oil rich sponsors of terrorism want in office, republicans who shoot
back or democrats who will not? duh, math is constant, one and
one is always two...


Bush shot back, but at the wrong targets, and he's still shooting at the
wrong targets.

Those with the oil love Bush. At $100 or close to it a barrel, oil is
selling for four times what it was when Bush presumed office. You think
the oil boys give a rat's ass about who dies in Iraq so long as they are
grossing four times as much per barrel as they did when President
Nincompoop took over?

JG2U wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:30:21 -0500, hk wrote:

JG2U wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:49:47 -0500, hk wrote:

JG2U wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:16:29 -0500, hk wrote:

JG2U wrote:
News for harry... Clinton wasn't impeached for having sex with a fat
chick.

Oh, and your "filter" is acting up again.
Sure he was. Oh, technically, it was related to "lying under oath" about
sex. Y-A-W-N. The whole business was nothing more than a GOP witch hunt
to "get" Clinton, and wasn't worth even an asterisk.

It was uncovering the tip of an iceberg, and that's just all they
could get him for. He and Monica could have gone at it until they
were both blind, and if he had not committed perjury, there wouold
have been no impeachment. Period.

Had the Repubs not been out to "get" Bill on "something," there would
have been no impeachment, period. After trying for years, all the Repubs
could do was nail him because he lied about sex.

I can hardly wait for the subpoenas and grand juries next year. They
won't be about sex or lying about sex, either.

Thousands of Americans dead, tens of thousands wounded because of Liberal
lies.
You forgot this:

That wouold be great. Their facilitators are Albright, Clinton, Dean,
Berger, Reid, Billary, Pelosi, Biden, and all the other libs who were
beating the war drum for Iraq even before Bush was elected.

Remember this video?

Bush and Cheney lied, and thousands died, and for nothing.

Bush was pushed into it by Albright, Clinton, Dean,
Berger, Reid, Billary, Pelosi, Biden, and all the other libs who were
beating the war drum for Iraq. And now they lie and say it was Bush.
Shame on them.


You righties are just piling the b.s. higher and higher.

wrote in message
...
On Jan 25, 9:06 pm, hk wrote:
JimH wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...
JG2U wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:49:47 -0500, hk wrote:

JG2U wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:16:29 -0500, hk
wrote:

JG2U wrote:
News for harry... Clinton wasn't impeached for having sex with a
fat
chick.

Oh, and your "filter" is acting up again.
Sure he was. Oh, technically, it was related to "lying under oath"
about sex. Y-A-W-N. The whole business was nothing more than a GOP
witch hunt to "get" Clinton, and wasn't worth even an asterisk.

It was uncovering the tip of an iceberg, and that's just all they
could get him for. He and Monica could have gone at it until they
were both blind, and if he had not committed perjury, there wouold
have been no impeachment. Period.

Had the Repubs not been out to "get" Bill on "something," there would
have been no impeachment, period. After trying for years, all the
Repubs
could do was nail him because he lied about sex.

I can hardly wait for the subpoenas and grand juries next year. They
won't be about sex or lying about sex, either.

Thousands of Americans dead, tens of thousands wounded because of
Liberal lies.
You forgot this:

That wouold be great. Their facilitators are Albright, Clinton, Dean,
Berger, Reid, Billary, Pelosi, Biden, and all the other libs who were
beating the war drum for Iraq even before Bush was elected.

Remember this video?

...................thousands died, and for nothing.....................

..............on 9/11.

And since, and all while George W. Bush was captain of the ship.- Hide
quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And all planned while Clinton was in office. And who really knows how
much Clinton knew, but Bush let him and Berger off the hook, letting
them destroy the info, unchanllenged..

================


It's great that this issue is so simple, and there's no need for you to
bother reading much of anything about the last 30 years' worth of our
country's history.

Don't you agree that it's great?

On Jan 25, 9:10*pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jan 25, 8:30 pm, hk wrote:





JG2U wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:49:47 -0500, hk wrote:

JG2U wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:16:29 -0500, hk wrote:

JG2U wrote:
News for harry... Clinton wasn't impeached for having sex with a fat
chick.

Oh, and your "filter" is acting up again.
Sure he was. Oh, technically, it was related to "lying under oath"
about
sex. Y-A-W-N. The whole business was nothing more than a GOP witch
hunt
to "get" Clinton, and wasn't worth even an asterisk.

It was uncovering the tip of an iceberg, and that's just all they
could get him for. He and Monica could have gone at it until they
were both blind, and if he had not committed perjury, there wouold
have been no impeachment. Period.

Had the Repubs not been out to "get" Bill on "something," there would
have been no impeachment, period. After trying for years, all the
Repubs
could do was nail him because he lied about sex.

I can hardly wait for the subpoenas and grand juries next year. They
won't be about sex or lying about sex, either.

Thousands of Americans dead, tens of thousands wounded because of
Liberal
lies.

You forgot this:

That wouold be great. Their facilitators are Albright, Clinton, Dean,
Berger, Reid, Billary, Pelosi, Biden, and all the other libs who were
beating the war drum for Iraq even before Bush was elected.

Remember this video?

Bush and Cheney lied, and thousands died, and for nothing.- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

Blah,blah, blah....... blah, blah... * *Bush shot back, tough ****.
Why do you think the oil is going up again, now? Who do you think the
oil rich sponsors of terrorism want in office, republicans who shoot
back or democrats who will not? * * *duh, math is constant, one and
one is always two...

=======================

Oil: Which time period are you referring to? Examples: *"today", or "the
last 48 hours", that sort of thing.

I've been hittin' the Red Rose tea pretty hard for the past hour, so I'm
pretty ****ed up. I'm not following what you are connecting to the "oil
going up" idea. Can you clarify?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

pfffffttttt...

"JG2U" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:30:21 -0500, hk wrote:

JG2U wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:49:47 -0500, hk wrote:

JG2U wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:16:29 -0500, hk wrote:

JG2U wrote:
News for harry... Clinton wasn't impeached for having sex with a fat
chick.

Oh, and your "filter" is acting up again.
Sure he was. Oh, technically, it was related to "lying under oath"
about
sex. Y-A-W-N. The whole business was nothing more than a GOP witch
hunt
to "get" Clinton, and wasn't worth even an asterisk.

It was uncovering the tip of an iceberg, and that's just all they
could get him for. He and Monica could have gone at it until they
were both blind, and if he had not committed perjury, there wouold
have been no impeachment. Period.

Had the Repubs not been out to "get" Bill on "something," there would
have been no impeachment, period. After trying for years, all the
Repubs
could do was nail him because he lied about sex.

I can hardly wait for the subpoenas and grand juries next year. They
won't be about sex or lying about sex, either.

Thousands of Americans dead, tens of thousands wounded because of
Liberal
lies.

You forgot this:

That wouold be great. Their facilitators are Albright, Clinton, Dean,
Berger, Reid, Billary, Pelosi, Biden, and all the other libs who were
beating the war drum for Iraq even before Bush was elected.

Remember this video?


Bush and Cheney lied, and thousands died, and for nothing.

Bush was pushed into it by Albright, Clinton, Dean,
Berger, Reid, Billary, Pelosi, Biden, and all the other libs who were
beating the war drum for Iraq. And now they lie and say it was Bush.
Shame on them.

================


Bush's statements, in chronological order, we

"Right now, Iraq is expanding and improving facilities that were used for
the production of biological weapons."

United Nations address, September 12, 2002

"Iraq has stockpiled biological and chemical weapons, and is rebuilding the
facilities used to make more of those weapons."

"We have sources that tell us that Saddam Hussein recently authorized Iraqi
field commanders to use chemical weapons -- the very weapons the dictator
tells us he does not have."

Radio address, October 5, 2002

"The Iraqi regime . . . possesses and produces chemical and biological
weapons. It is seeking nuclear weapons."

"We know that the regime has produced thousands of tons of chemical agents,
including mustard gas, sarin nerve gas, VX nerve gas."

"We've also discovered through intelligence that Iraq has a growing fleet of
manned and unmanned aerial vehicles that could be used to disperse chemical
or biological weapons across broad areas. We're concerned that Iraq is
exploring ways of using these UAVS for missions targeting the United
States."

"The evidence indicates that Iraq is reconstituting its nuclear weapons
program. Saddam Hussein has held numerous meetings with Iraqi nuclear
scientists, a group he calls his "nuclear mujahideen" -- his nuclear holy
warriors. Satellite photographs reveal that Iraq is rebuilding facilities at
sites that have been part of its nuclear program in the past. Iraq has
attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes and other equipment
needed for gas centrifuges, which are used to enrich uranium for nuclear
weapons."

Cincinnati, Ohio speech, October 7, 2002

"Our intelligence officials estimate that Saddam Hussein had the materials
to produce as much as 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent."

State of the Union Address, January 28, 2003

"Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that
the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal
weapons ever devised."

Address to the nation, March 17, 2003

wrote in message
...
On Jan 25, 9:10 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jan 25, 8:30 pm, hk wrote:





JG2U wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:49:47 -0500, hk wrote:

JG2U wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:16:29 -0500, hk
wrote:

JG2U wrote:
News for harry... Clinton wasn't impeached for having sex with a
fat
chick.

Oh, and your "filter" is acting up again.
Sure he was. Oh, technically, it was related to "lying under oath"
about
sex. Y-A-W-N. The whole business was nothing more than a GOP witch
hunt
to "get" Clinton, and wasn't worth even an asterisk.

It was uncovering the tip of an iceberg, and that's just all they
could get him for. He and Monica could have gone at it until they
were both blind, and if he had not committed perjury, there wouold
have been no impeachment. Period.

Had the Repubs not been out to "get" Bill on "something," there would
have been no impeachment, period. After trying for years, all the
Repubs
could do was nail him because he lied about sex.

I can hardly wait for the subpoenas and grand juries next year. They
won't be about sex or lying about sex, either.

Thousands of Americans dead, tens of thousands wounded because of
Liberal
lies.

You forgot this:

That wouold be great. Their facilitators are Albright, Clinton, Dean,
Berger, Reid, Billary, Pelosi, Biden, and all the other libs who were
beating the war drum for Iraq even before Bush was elected.

Remember this video?

Bush and Cheney lied, and thousands died, and for nothing.- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

Blah,blah, blah....... blah, blah... Bush shot back, tough ****.
Why do you think the oil is going up again, now? Who do you think the
oil rich sponsors of terrorism want in office, republicans who shoot
back or democrats who will not? duh, math is constant, one and
one is always two...

=======================

Oil: Which time period are you referring to? Examples: "today", or "the
last 48 hours", that sort of thing.

I've been hittin' the Red Rose tea pretty hard for the past hour, so I'm
pretty ****ed up. I'm not following what you are connecting to the "oil
going up" idea. Can you clarify?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

pfffffttttt...

====================


Great. You type these things and hit the "send" button before making sure
you can explain them. You must be embarrassed, although you will pretend
that you somehow "won".

"JG2U" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 01:05:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"JG2U" wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:44:45 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"JG2U" wrote in message
m...
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:55:10 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"BAR" wrote in message
news:MLWdnS7E37GyoAfanZ2dnUVZ_ojinZ2d@comcas t.com...
wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:24:18 -0500, Kippered wrote:


Harry, it's not the sex. I know this is, for you, especially hard
to
understand. The guy *perjured* himself. That means lying. Believe
it
or
not, most folks consider that wrong. Of course, you and your buddy
find
nothing wrong with that because it gains you notoriety, and some
probably think it's right cool. But it isn't.

Uh, perjury and lying are not the same thing. Clinton was guilty
of
one, but we was not guilty of the other.

Don't you remember Bill pointing his finger at us and saying "I did
not
have sex with that woman, Monica Lewinski!" Let's ask the wives if a
blow
job is sex or not before you parse Bill's answer.


I wonder if it's illegal for presidents to have sex with anyone they
want,
wherever they want.

I said ILLEGAL.


Yes, it IS illegal. A president can not have sex with anyone they
want, wherever they want. Period.

Do you think they can? If so, explain how.


I might be wrong, but I don't think it's illegal. You sound pretty sure
of
it, though. Do you recall where you heard or read that?

As far as my explaining "how", that's really a subject better discussed
with
your dad.


You *are* wrong. Anyone? OK, your ex-wife. Anywhere? Town Square
at noon. Illegal on two counts, rape (unless she's easy) and indecent
exposure.

Hell, you made the rules. You made it too easy.

Anyway, being pres does NOT let you have sex with anyone, anywhere you
choose. You know that. You've now been taught why. ;-)

Bye


You knew I meant "consenting adults", but you're now using that
technicality
to wiggle out of proving your legal theory. You also knew I meant that the
act would not happen in the place where it would be illegal for ANYONE.
You're also using that as an excuse to not prove your point.

I can't (and wouldn't want to) read your mind. I can't help that your
statement was poorly defined. My statement your original
statement stands as true.


Prove that it was illegal for Clinton to have sex with Lewinski. Do it
now.

Unless he coerced her, that was not illegal. Unethical, sleazy,
immoral, indicative of his moral values, proof of his lack of a moral
compass, proving him to ba a risk to national security, YES. Illegal,
no. It was the purgery that was illegal. But I never said otherwise.
You know that.




Great. We agree. It wasn't illegal. Now, you can agree that the fake saints
asked him the infamous question only for political gain. There were no
***SINCERE*** concerns about blackmail or national security. Only a child
pretends that the president cannot make a problem like that vanish.