wrote:
On Jan 9, 8:14 pm, Dan wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 8, 8:32 pm, Dan wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 7, 9:28 pm, Dan wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 7, 8:12 am, "Don White" wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
He's busy at work on your wife's pant drawer.
See, Donnie, I can be as childish as you!
What a piece of **** you are. Now you've brought 2 of my family members
into this.
Didn't you get your knuckles rapped a while back for this same behaviour by
some of the more moderate members ?
He's the lowest of the low lifes here. He's trying to beat JimH's
record for saying nasty, untrue things about people's loved ones.
That's why he's rec.boat's **** boy.
His knuckes can take a good rapping, after all, they've always been
dragging on the ground!
Is that your attempt at humor, Sally? Try again.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
No, **** boy, it's the truth.
You should print this post and hang it on your wall so your husband/wife
and child/children can see Daddy's handiwork! If they are proud, they
are dumber than you, Sally.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Hey, speaking of, **** boy. Why did you act like a bad ass here when I
offered to meet up with you, only to pussy out? Everyone here knows
you don't live anywhere near Miami.
Hey, asshole, I asked you where I live. You didn't respond, Sally. You
pussied out on that one.

I'll meet you at MIA anytime you want.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hi, **** boy! You're too much of a little sissy to trust to go to MIA.
Oh, and you've stated before you live in the Chicago area.

Really, Sally? When did I say that? Go Google.

wrote:


Jim's just a little pussy that hides behind the newsgroup because he
doesn't have any balls to say anything to anyone's face. Hell, he even
uses his kids to inflate his ego, so what do you expect?

Incredible. The Queen of hiding, and lying, about their name now
accuses someone of not talking in person? You are one screwed up girl,
Sally.

"JimH" wrote in message
...

"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"JimH" wrote in message
...

"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"JimH" wrote in message
...

"Tim" wrote in message
...


wrote:
On Jan 3, 7:11?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:20:08 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
That's exactly the $ range I was thinking, Tom. And I know that
the
electronics aren't up to snuff, especially the paper chart! I'll
be
using my stuff if I buy it. I'll look at the problem areas you
suggested, like the rear deck, and like you, I'm a little (more
than a
little!) leery of the motor, that's the main reason I was asking.
I'd
heard of those vintage unEvinrudes blowing up. I like my very old
Evinrude, but in that year range, I'd really rather have a Merc.
Thanks for the input.

The base engine is fine - it's the VRO that is flaky. I replaced
one
of mine on the 393V I owned, but never had another problem. Other
guys
who ran them went through two or three of them. ?It just depended.

Oh, with respect to the hot foot - give it a chance - you can
always
remove it if you decide you don't like it. ?Personally, I'm
ambivilent
about them. I had one once and it didn't really annoy me as much
as I
thought it would.

Good luck with it.

Went up and looked at it last night. Besides the hotfoot, the
hillbilly did quite a lot of..... let's say.... customizing that I
didn't care for. Then he told me that he had replaced the VRO
system,
but when it failed it didn't do any harm "as far as he could tell".
The battery/electrical wiring looked like my 8 year old did it. Now
all of this wouldn't have been bad, I love having a project, but he
wouldn't come down to anywhere near 3 grand so I passed!

The more I looked at it, the more disgusted I was:
http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i3...l/CIMG0341.jpg

Yes, you would certianly thinkt hat if a person was wanting to get a
NADA like value out of it, they would at least have the energy to
clean the thing up and make it presentable. and I see from that red
wire what you're talking about. it does look "patch 'n go" . Yeah,
like I said, if it's good enough for him, then it's good enough for
anybody. Yeah, the validity of the engine would be a huge concern.
especially after reading the comment:

"Then he told me that he had replaced the VRO system, but when it
failed it didn't do any harm "as far as he could tell".

i believe you were wise to balk 'n walk.


The bottom line is that the fact that Booger was interested in it
shows his taste in and knowledge of boats. I would think the boat
would look nice next to his double wide though.


Explain to us just what's wrong with a double wide except there are
some wildly exaggerated connotations connected to it.


sigh

That's probably how much you know about them.


Which trailer park do you live in and have you recently *upgraded* to a
double wide?

I can guarantee you that if you had the privilege of being inside my SO's
parents "triple wide" you would not know is was not a site built home. Not
located in a "trailer" park but on 5 acres on the shore of beautiful lake.

D.Duck wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...
"Tim" wrote in message
...

wrote:
On Jan 3, 7:11?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:20:08 -0800 (PST), wrote:
That's exactly the $ range I was thinking, Tom. And I know that the
electronics aren't up to snuff, especially the paper chart! I'll be
using my stuff if I buy it. I'll look at the problem areas you
suggested, like the rear deck, and like you, I'm a little (more than
a
little!) leery of the motor, that's the main reason I was asking. I'd
heard of those vintage unEvinrudes blowing up. I like my very old
Evinrude, but in that year range, I'd really rather have a Merc.
Thanks for the input.
The base engine is fine - it's the VRO that is flaky. I replaced one
of mine on the 393V I owned, but never had another problem. Other guys
who ran them went through two or three of them. ?It just depended.

Oh, with respect to the hot foot - give it a chance - you can always
remove it if you decide you don't like it. ?Personally, I'm ambivilent
about them. I had one once and it didn't really annoy me as much as I
thought it would.

Good luck with it.
Went up and looked at it last night. Besides the hotfoot, the
hillbilly did quite a lot of..... let's say.... customizing that I
didn't care for. Then he told me that he had replaced the VRO system,
but when it failed it didn't do any harm "as far as he could tell".
The battery/electrical wiring looked like my 8 year old did it. Now
all of this wouldn't have been bad, I love having a project, but he
wouldn't come down to anywhere near 3 grand so I passed!
The more I looked at it, the more disgusted I was:
http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i3...l/CIMG0341.jpg

Yes, you would certianly thinkt hat if a person was wanting to get a
NADA like value out of it, they would at least have the energy to
clean the thing up and make it presentable. and I see from that red
wire what you're talking about. it does look "patch 'n go" . Yeah,
like I said, if it's good enough for him, then it's good enough for
anybody. Yeah, the validity of the engine would be a huge concern.
especially after reading the comment:

"Then he told me that he had replaced the VRO system, but when it
failed it didn't do any harm "as far as he could tell".

i believe you were wise to balk 'n walk.

The bottom line is that the fact that Booger was interested in it shows
his taste in and knowledge of boats. I would think the boat would look
nice next to his double wide though.


Explain to us just what's wrong with a double wide except there are some
wildly exaggerated connotations connected to it.

The biggest problem is that a double wide is not as big as a triple wide.

On Jan 10, 8:26*pm, Dan wrote:
wrote:

Jim's just a little pussy that hides behind the newsgroup because he
doesn't have any balls to say anything to anyone's face. Hell, he even
uses his kids to inflate his ego, so what do you expect?

Incredible. *The Queen of hiding, and lying, about their name now
accuses someone of not talking in person? *You are one screwed up girl,
Sally.

I've told you over and over, **** boy, I'll meet you anywhere anytime.

On Jan 11, 4:33*am, "D.Duck" wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message

...







"D.Duck" wrote in message
m...

"JimH" wrote in message
.. .

"D.Duck" wrote in message
news:roGdnYp1ffKH2xvanZ2dnUVZ_tGonZ2d@giganews. com...

"JimH" wrote in message
.. .

"Tim" wrote in message
...

wrote:
On Jan 3, 7:11?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:20:08 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
That's exactly the $ range I was thinking, Tom. And I know that
the
electronics aren't up to snuff, especially the paper chart! I'll
be
using my stuff if I buy it. I'll look at the problem areas you
suggested, like the rear deck, and like you, I'm a little (more
than a
little!) leery of the motor, that's the main reason I was asking.
I'd
heard of those vintage unEvinrudes blowing up. I like my very old
Evinrude, but in that year range, I'd really rather have a Merc..
Thanks for the input.

The base engine is fine - it's the VRO that is flaky. I replaced
one
of mine on the 393V I owned, but never had another problem. Other
guys
who ran them went through two or three of them. ?It just depended.

Oh, with respect to the hot foot - give it a chance - you can
always
remove it if you decide you don't like it. ?Personally, I'm
ambivilent
about them. I had one once and it didn't really annoy me as much
as I
thought it would.

Good luck with it.

Went up and looked at it last night. Besides the hotfoot, the
hillbilly did quite a lot of..... let's say.... customizing that I
didn't care for. Then he told me that he had replaced the VRO
system,
but when it failed it didn't do any harm "as far as he could tell"..
The battery/electrical wiring looked like my 8 year old did it. Now
all of this wouldn't have been bad, I love having a project, but he
wouldn't come down to anywhere near 3 grand so I passed!

The more I looked at it, the more disgusted I was:
http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i3...l/CIMG0341.jpg

Yes, you would certianly thinkt hat if a person was wanting to get a
NADA like value out of it, they would at least have the energy *to
clean the thing up and make it presentable. and I see from that red
wire what you're talking about. *it does look "patch 'n go" *. Yeah,
like I said, if it's good enough for him, then it's good enough for
anybody. *Yeah, the validity of the engine would be a huge concern.

wrote:
On Jan 10, 8:26 pm, Dan wrote:
wrote:

Jim's just a little pussy that hides behind the newsgroup because he
doesn't have any balls to say anything to anyone's face. Hell, he even
uses his kids to inflate his ego, so what do you expect?
Incredible. The Queen of hiding, and lying, about their name now
accuses someone of not talking in person? You are one screwed up girl,
Sally.

I've told you over and over, **** boy, I'll meet you anywhere anytime.


Dan is one of the ranking right-wing cowards here.

"HK" wrote in message
...
wrote:
On Jan 10, 8:26 pm, Dan wrote:
wrote:

Jim's just a little pussy that hides behind the newsgroup because he
doesn't have any balls to say anything to anyone's face. Hell, he even
uses his kids to inflate his ego, so what do you expect?
Incredible. The Queen of hiding, and lying, about their name now
accuses someone of not talking in person? You are one screwed up girl,
Sally.

I've told you over and over, **** boy, I'll meet you anywhere anytime.


Dan is one of the ranking right-wing cowards here.


He's only here to spread his crap............. best place for him is the
septic tank.

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
D.Duck wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...
"Tim" wrote in message
...

wrote:
On Jan 3, 7:11?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:20:08 -0800 (PST), wrote:
That's exactly the $ range I was thinking, Tom. And I know that the
electronics aren't up to snuff, especially the paper chart! I'll be
using my stuff if I buy it. I'll look at the problem areas you
suggested, like the rear deck, and like you, I'm a little (more than
a
little!) leery of the motor, that's the main reason I was asking.
I'd
heard of those vintage unEvinrudes blowing up. I like my very old
Evinrude, but in that year range, I'd really rather have a Merc.
Thanks for the input.
The base engine is fine - it's the VRO that is flaky. I replaced one
of mine on the 393V I owned, but never had another problem. Other
guys
who ran them went through two or three of them. ?It just depended.

Oh, with respect to the hot foot - give it a chance - you can always
remove it if you decide you don't like it. ?Personally, I'm
ambivilent
about them. I had one once and it didn't really annoy me as much as I
thought it would.

Good luck with it.
Went up and looked at it last night. Besides the hotfoot, the
hillbilly did quite a lot of..... let's say.... customizing that I
didn't care for. Then he told me that he had replaced the VRO system,
but when it failed it didn't do any harm "as far as he could tell".
The battery/electrical wiring looked like my 8 year old did it. Now
all of this wouldn't have been bad, I love having a project, but he
wouldn't come down to anywhere near 3 grand so I passed!
The more I looked at it, the more disgusted I was:
http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i3...l/CIMG0341.jpg

Yes, you would certianly thinkt hat if a person was wanting to get a
NADA like value out of it, they would at least have the energy to
clean the thing up and make it presentable. and I see from that red
wire what you're talking about. it does look "patch 'n go" . Yeah,
like I said, if it's good enough for him, then it's good enough for
anybody. Yeah, the validity of the engine would be a huge concern.
especially after reading the comment:

"Then he told me that he had replaced the VRO system, but when it
failed it didn't do any harm "as far as he could tell".

i believe you were wise to balk 'n walk.

The bottom line is that the fact that Booger was interested in it shows
his taste in and knowledge of boats. I would think the boat would
look nice next to his double wide though.


Explain to us just what's wrong with a double wide except there are some
wildly exaggerated connotations connected to it.

The biggest problem is that a double wide is not as big as a triple wide.


Great observation. 8-)

wrote:
On Jan 10, 8:26 pm, Dan wrote:
wrote:

Jim's just a little pussy that hides behind the newsgroup because he
doesn't have any balls to say anything to anyone's face. Hell, he even
uses his kids to inflate his ego, so what do you expect?
Incredible. The Queen of hiding, and lying, about their name now
accuses someone of not talking in person? You are one screwed up girl,
Sally.

I've told you over and over, **** boy, I'll meet you anywhere anytime.

MIA...When, Sally?