BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Handicapping Iowa... (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/89621-handicapping-iowa.html)

Eisboch January 7th 08 11:50 AM

Handicapping Iowa...
 

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...

I think you're correct that fear and inability to face their
own or loved ones mortality is behind a lot of religious belief.


For certain personalities, I would agree.

However, belief in an afterlife and belief in a Creator don't
necessarily go hand-in-hand.



I think it's just as difficult to believe in "nothing" as it is to believe
in "something" .... maybe even more difficult. To believe in something is
the default condition of the human mind I suspect, regardless of any
religious brain washing that occurs during a lifetime.

When my head is in logic mode none of the religious teachings and/or
explanations make any sense in terms of creation. I can even understand and
accept the concept of "nothing" after death.

But, where the heck did that super compressed, fantastically dense matter
the size of a sub-atomic particle that exploded as the "Big Bang", resulting
in the universe and everything in it come from? That "nothing" is beyond
my comprehension so far.

Meanwhile, religion serves many people well and I, for one, have no problem
with that. I respect the right to their beliefs.

There's another current issue somewhat related to this, but I'll present
that in another post sometime.

Eisboch



[email protected] January 7th 08 11:57 AM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
On Jan 5, 10:33*am, JG2U wrote:
On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 23:03:01 -0600, Vic Smith





wrote:
On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:34:43 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:


Yep - that one surprized me that's for sure. *What interests me is
that Huckabee would be the ideal Democrat candidate. *What he proposes
isn't conservative Republican in any sense of the word. *I think he
was selected on the strength of his faith and his pro-life stance - in
ever other aspect, he's a Democrat.


He was selected because he exudes decency and leadership.
There is no such thing as "conservative Republican." *That's a term
ideologues use for different purposes, and with different motives.
Don't know what kind of Prez he would be, but I like Huckabee.
I'm not religious, but have no fear of Huckabee.
We share many values.
*Any* major candidate of either party - excepting Guiliani - will be a
vast improvement over those currently in power.
The only one that gives me pause is Obama, because he might have
Snoop Doggy Dog performing at White House events that I could stumble
upon watching television. *I generally don't like rap music. *


--Vic


And he's a proven liar. *Ever seen the speech he gave at that Alabama
church picked apart? *Obama stood in church and lied repeatedly about
his father's and his own life's events, timelines, etc. *All just to
fit in with the occasion and to pander to the congregation.

The guy presents well, but he's a bit slimey. *But pretty much all of
them are. *Some much more than others.

------------------------

The Billary Whitehouse. *The most sold-out in history!
(sorry freakin)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


;) it is open intellectual property... I

[email protected] January 7th 08 11:58 AM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
On Jan 5, 10:33*am, HK wrote:
JG2U wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 02:01:10 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:


If you read all the way to the bottom of the item, you'll see that
your link actually validates my point about some Christians who
describe themselvs as "evangelical" (including the Methodist preacher
quoted)
having difficulty with Romney's Mormon faith.


From your link:
Evangelicals are hugely influential in the Iowa caucuses, making up by
some estimates some 40 percent of Republican caucus-goers. Many of
them, however, have profound reservations about Mr. Romney's Mormon
faith.
Mr. Hurd, the pastor of West Hill United Methodist Church here who
identified himself as an evangelical, said he wrestled with that issue
himself but decided in the end it should not matter in his decision.
"Although they have a theology vastly different from mine, Mormons
generally are good citizens," he said.
Mr. Hurd also offered some insight into where his fellow Alliance
board members are leaning. He said they are mainly divided between Mr.
Romney and Mr. Huckabee, with the latter probably holding the edge.
"A lot of them are troubled by his Mormon religion," he said. "That's
probably the difference."


*******


So there's a statement, by an Iowa pastor describing himself as
"evangelical", confirming that many Christians of his acquaintance are
"troubled by (Romney's) Mormon religion."


Not quite... there are no quotes around evangelical in the article. So
it didn't come out of his mouth, but probably went something like
this:
"Do you evangelize as part of your faith?"
"Yes."
"So would you consider yourself an evangelical Christian?"
"I suppose."


My whole point continues to be that it is the *media* who seems to
find the labels "evangelical" and "fundamentalist" (which *you*
improperly used) important, not Christians themselves.


And also that there are Christians who do not have a problem with the
Mormon faith. *Sure some do, but there are groups who are opposed to
Romney for other reasons as well. *So? *Weird people everywhere.


twisted logic deleted


Huckabee is a perfect match for the GOP base.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


No he is not... you just want him in because your candidates are so
weak...

Reginald P. Smithers III[_9_] January 7th 08 12:05 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
Eisboch wrote:

But, where the heck did that super compressed, fantastically dense matter
the size of a sub-atomic particle that exploded as the "Big Bang", resulting
in the universe and everything in it come from? That "nothing" is beyond
my comprehension so far.


The big bang would definitely qualify as a "greater power".


[email protected] January 7th 08 12:09 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
On Jan 6, 6:01*pm, HK wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 01:01:40 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
"Reggie is Here wrote:


Do you know this person:
*http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/off...personId=14243


Not cool Reg.


What would you expect from Reggie? Coolness?
He's an a**hole, and has been since his first day here under his older
"non-Reggie" identities.

--
George W. Bush - the 43rd Best President Ever!


And yet, you are the only one here who has been caught having a conv
with himself with a spoofed id... Remember the Lobsta' Boat...

JoeSpareBedroom January 7th 08 12:32 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"-rick-" wrote in message
. ..


I think you're correct that fear and inability to face their own or loved
ones mortality is behind a lot of religious belief.


I think you just hit the nail on the head, rick. It's the common thread
throughout all the world's religions.

Eisboch



That, and the fact that some people are very uncomfortable if they don't
have answers to all of life's questions. So, they answer them by assigning
yet another mystery.



Short Wave Sportfishing January 7th 08 12:37 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 06:50:34 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:

But, where the heck did that super compressed, fantastically dense matter
the size of a sub-atomic particle that exploded as the "Big Bang", resulting
in the universe and everything in it come from? That "nothing" is beyond
my comprehension so far.


I agree.

Somebody had to light the match. :)

Eisboch January 7th 08 12:47 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 06:50:34 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:

But, where the heck did that super compressed, fantastically dense matter
the size of a sub-atomic particle that exploded as the "Big Bang",
resulting
in the universe and everything in it come from? That "nothing" is beyond
my comprehension so far.


I agree.

Somebody had to light the match. :)


Even Einstein couldn't answer that one.

Hey, next time you a chatting with some of your "other world" friends, run
it by them and find out what their take is on the question.

Eisboch



[email protected] January 7th 08 12:50 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
On Jan 7, 7:47*am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in messagenews:m574o31eio7s75uodnjfk8qlqdd3383udp@4ax .com...

On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 06:50:34 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


But, where the heck did that super compressed, fantastically dense matter
the size of a sub-atomic particle that exploded as the "Big Bang",
resulting
in the universe and everything in it come from? * That "nothing" is beyond
my comprehension so far.


I agree.


Somebody had to light the match. *:)


Even Einstein couldn't answer that one.

Hey, next time you a chatting with some of your "other world" friends, run
it by them and find out what their take is on the question.

Eisboch


Heh,,, they think it was Tom.;)

Eisboch January 7th 08 12:52 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 

wrote in message
...
On Jan 7, 7:47 am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in
messagenews:m574o31eio7s75uodnjfk8qlqdd3383udp@4ax .com...

On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 06:50:34 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


But, where the heck did that super compressed, fantastically dense
matter
the size of a sub-atomic particle that exploded as the "Big Bang",
resulting
in the universe and everything in it come from? That "nothing" is beyond
my comprehension so far.


I agree.


Somebody had to light the match. :)


Even Einstein couldn't answer that one.

Hey, next time you a chatting with some of your "other world" friends, run
it by them and find out what their take is on the question.

Eisboch


Heh,,, they think it was Tom.;)


Tomdamm!

Eisboch



HK January 7th 08 12:56 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
wrote:
On Jan 5, 10:33 am, HK wrote:
JG2U wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 02:01:10 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:
If you read all the way to the bottom of the item, you'll see that
your link actually validates my point about some Christians who
describe themselvs as "evangelical" (including the Methodist preacher
quoted)
having difficulty with Romney's Mormon faith.
From your link:
Evangelicals are hugely influential in the Iowa caucuses, making up by
some estimates some 40 percent of Republican caucus-goers. Many of
them, however, have profound reservations about Mr. Romney's Mormon
faith.
Mr. Hurd, the pastor of West Hill United Methodist Church here who
identified himself as an evangelical, said he wrestled with that issue
himself but decided in the end it should not matter in his decision.
"Although they have a theology vastly different from mine, Mormons
generally are good citizens," he said.
Mr. Hurd also offered some insight into where his fellow Alliance
board members are leaning. He said they are mainly divided between Mr.
Romney and Mr. Huckabee, with the latter probably holding the edge.
"A lot of them are troubled by his Mormon religion," he said. "That's
probably the difference."
*******
So there's a statement, by an Iowa pastor describing himself as
"evangelical", confirming that many Christians of his acquaintance are
"troubled by (Romney's) Mormon religion."
Not quite... there are no quotes around evangelical in the article. So
it didn't come out of his mouth, but probably went something like
this:
"Do you evangelize as part of your faith?"
"Yes."
"So would you consider yourself an evangelical Christian?"
"I suppose."
My whole point continues to be that it is the *media* who seems to
find the labels "evangelical" and "fundamentalist" (which *you*
improperly used) important, not Christians themselves.
And also that there are Christians who do not have a problem with the
Mormon faith. Sure some do, but there are groups who are opposed to
Romney for other reasons as well. So? Weird people everywhere.
twisted logic deleted

Huckabee is a perfect match for the GOP base.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


No he is not... you just want him in because your candidates are so
weak...




Are you on consciousness-altering drugs?

In the recently concluded Iowa caucuses, the Democratic candidates
brought more than twice as many voters out on a cold night than the
Republicans. I don't recall the exact count, but I believe the Dems had
about 240,000 Iowans show up for caucus, while the Repugs had only about
115,000. And it was much more difficult and took much more time to vote
in the Democratic caucuses.

If the Democratic candidates were so weak, they wouldn't be outpolling
the Republicans by such a substantial number.

The only *decent* candidate on the GOP side is John McCain. Your hero,
Huckabee the Evangelical, is a foreign policy numnutz. We've already had
seven years of that with Bush. It isn't going to happen again.


[email protected] January 7th 08 12:58 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
On Jan 7, 7:56*am, HK wrote:


Are you on consciousness-altering drugs?


Is that all you ever say?


Billary, the most sold out Whitehouse in history...

JoeSpareBedroom January 7th 08 01:05 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
wrote in message
...
On Jan 7, 7:56 am, HK wrote:


Are you on consciousness-altering drugs?


Is that all you ever say?
====================

He's right, though. The Republican "base" gave us the president who says
things like "Natural gas is hemispheric. I like to call it hemispheric." You
are the base.

Huckabee believes the earth is 6000 years old, and apparently didn't know
humans were primates until recently. You like uneducated fools, so you will
probably vote for him. He won't make you feel smart.



[email protected] January 7th 08 01:20 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
On Jan 7, 8:05*am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jan 7, 7:56 am, HK wrote:



Are you on consciousness-altering drugs?


Is that all you ever say?
====================

He's right, though. The Republican "base" gave us the president who says
things like "Natural gas is hemispheric. I like to call it hemispheric." You
are the base.

Huckabee believes the earth is 6000 years old, and apparently didn't know
humans were primates until recently. You like uneducated fools, so you will
probably vote for him. He won't make you feel smart.


You are out of your frekin' mind... I don't even support Huck, but you
just keep making it up as you go along.

JoeSpareBedroom January 7th 08 01:30 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
wrote in message
...
On Jan 7, 8:05 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jan 7, 7:56 am, HK wrote:



Are you on consciousness-altering drugs?


Is that all you ever say?
====================

He's right, though. The Republican "base" gave us the president who says
things like "Natural gas is hemispheric. I like to call it hemispheric."
You
are the base.

Huckabee believes the earth is 6000 years old, and apparently didn't know
humans were primates until recently. You like uneducated fools, so you
will
probably vote for him. He won't make you feel smart.


You are out of your frekin' mind... I don't even support Huck, but you
just keep making it up as you go along.

=======================


I'll wager that if he's the Republican candidate next November, you'll vote
for him.



HK January 7th 08 01:32 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
wrote:
On Jan 7, 7:56 am, HK wrote:

Are you on consciousness-altering drugs?


Is that all you ever say?


In response to your comment that the Democratic candidates are weak,
implying the Republican candidates have something to offer?

Yeah, I think you are are consciousness-altering drugs.

The only capable candidate on the GOP side is McCain, and while he
likely will win the New Hampshire primary, he hasn't the funds to go
much farther.

I'm pulling for the candidate from Jesusville. Nothing could be better
for the Democrats than a simple-minded, ignorant of foreign policy,
backwards looking evangelical as the Republican nominee.






--
George W. Bush - the 43rd Best President Ever!

Charlie[_2_] January 7th 08 01:44 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
HK wrote:

If there is a rat infestation in "Charle's" garage, it's because he
impregnated a female rat. In his garage.


OK, Shortwave, there you are. An fresh accusation of bestiality from
krause.

Let's see what you do.

-- Charlie

John H.[_3_] January 7th 08 01:59 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 08:32:08 -0500, HK wrote:

wrote:
On Jan 7, 7:56 am, HK wrote:

Are you on consciousness-altering drugs?


Is that all you ever say?


In response to your comment that the Democratic candidates are weak,
implying the Republican candidates have something to offer?

Yeah, I think you are are consciousness-altering drugs.

The only capable candidate on the GOP side is McCain, and while he
likely will win the New Hampshire primary, he hasn't the funds to go
much farther.

I'm pulling for the candidate from Jesusville. Nothing could be better
for the Democrats than a simple-minded, ignorant of foreign policy,
backwards looking evangelical as the Republican nominee.


'Jesusville'?

Does the blatant disrespect make you more endearing to some, Harry?

Not cool.

JimH - This is your hero talking!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

[email protected] January 7th 08 02:13 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
On Jan 7, 8:30*am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jan 7, 8:05 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:





wrote in message


...
On Jan 7, 7:56 am, HK wrote:


Are you on consciousness-altering drugs?


Is that all you ever say?
====================


He's right, though. The Republican "base" gave us the president who says
things like "Natural gas is hemispheric. I like to call it hemispheric."
You
are the base.


Huckabee believes the earth is 6000 years old, and apparently didn't know
humans were primates until recently. You like uneducated fools, so you
will
probably vote for him. He won't make you feel smart.


You are out of your frekin' mind... I don't even support Huck, but you
just keep making it up as you go along.

=======================

I'll wager that if he's the Republican candidate next November, you'll vote
for him.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Uh, you don't have a very good track record when it comes to wagers..
Sorry, but I don't gamble anyway...

HK January 7th 08 02:19 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
wrote:
On Jan 7, 8:30 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jan 7, 8:05 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:





wrote in message
...
On Jan 7, 7:56 am, HK wrote:
Are you on consciousness-altering drugs?
Is that all you ever say?
====================
He's right, though. The Republican "base" gave us the president who says
things like "Natural gas is hemispheric. I like to call it hemispheric."
You
are the base.
Huckabee believes the earth is 6000 years old, and apparently didn't know
humans were primates until recently. You like uneducated fools, so you
will
probably vote for him. He won't make you feel smart.

You are out of your frekin' mind... I don't even support Huck, but you
just keep making it up as you go along.

=======================

I'll wager that if he's the Republican candidate next November, you'll vote
for him.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Uh, you don't have a very good track record when it comes to wagers..
Sorry, but I don't gamble anyway...



Are you sure you didn't gamble your future on this?

http://tinyurl.com/3xcebr








--
George W. Bush - the 43rd Best President Ever!

JoeSpareBedroom January 7th 08 02:39 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
wrote in message
...
On Jan 7, 8:30 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jan 7, 8:05 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:





wrote in message


...
On Jan 7, 7:56 am, HK wrote:


Are you on consciousness-altering drugs?


Is that all you ever say?
====================


He's right, though. The Republican "base" gave us the president who says
things like "Natural gas is hemispheric. I like to call it hemispheric."
You
are the base.


Huckabee believes the earth is 6000 years old, and apparently didn't
know
humans were primates until recently. You like uneducated fools, so you
will
probably vote for him. He won't make you feel smart.


You are out of your frekin' mind... I don't even support Huck, but you
just keep making it up as you go along.

=======================

I'll wager that if he's the Republican candidate next November, you'll
vote
for him.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Uh, you don't have a very good track record when it comes to wagers..
Sorry, but I don't gamble anyway...

=====================


You gamble every time you try to write.



[email protected] January 7th 08 02:42 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
On Jan 7, 9:19*am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 7, 8:30 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message


....
On Jan 7, 8:05 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:


wrote in message
....
On Jan 7, 7:56 am, HK wrote:
Are you on consciousness-altering drugs?
Is that all you ever say?
====================
He's right, though. The Republican "base" gave us the president who says
things like "Natural gas is hemispheric. I like to call it hemispheric.."
You
are the base.
Huckabee believes the earth is 6000 years old, and apparently didn't know
humans were primates until recently. You like uneducated fools, so you
will
probably vote for him. He won't make you feel smart.
You are out of your frekin' mind... I don't even support Huck, but you
just keep making it up as you go along.


=======================


I'll wager that if he's the Republican candidate next November, you'll vote
for him.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Uh, you don't have a very good track record when it comes to wagers..
Sorry, but I don't gamble anyway...


Are you sure you didn't gamble your future on this?

http://tinyurl.com/3xcebr

--
Billary, the most sold out Whitehouse in history.

- Show quoted text -



?? Dumb picture, I like this one.

http://www.blackfive.net/photos/unca...3944z004lr.jpg

Did you and your "buddies" wear eye black yesterday at your "private
party"??

HK January 7th 08 02:47 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
wrote:
On Jan 7, 9:19 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 7, 8:30 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Jan 7, 8:05 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Jan 7, 7:56 am, HK wrote:
Are you on consciousness-altering drugs?
Is that all you ever say?
====================
He's right, though. The Republican "base" gave us the president who says
things like "Natural gas is hemispheric. I like to call it hemispheric."
You
are the base.
Huckabee believes the earth is 6000 years old, and apparently didn't know
humans were primates until recently. You like uneducated fools, so you
will
probably vote for him. He won't make you feel smart.
You are out of your frekin' mind... I don't even support Huck, but you
just keep making it up as you go along.
=======================
I'll wager that if he's the Republican candidate next November, you'll vote
for him.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Uh, you don't have a very good track record when it comes to wagers..
Sorry, but I don't gamble anyway...

Are you sure you didn't gamble your future on this?

http://tinyurl.com/3xcebr

--
Billary, the most sold out Whitehouse in history.

- Show quoted text -



?? Dumb picture, I like this one.

http://www.blackfive.net/photos/unca...3944z004lr.jpg

Did you and your "buddies" wear eye black yesterday at your "private
party"??




Naw. I may feed my raccoon neighbors, but that doesn't mean I want to be
one.




--
George W. Bush - the 43rd Best President Ever!

Reginald P. Smithers III[_9_] January 7th 08 02:50 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
wrote:


?? Dumb picture, I like this one.

http://www.blackfive.net/photos/unca...3944z004lr.jpg

Did you and your "buddies" wear eye black yesterday at your "private
party"??


If you were with a friend called Stumpie, you know you would have a good
time.

I do think it is cute that Harry was willing to give up his 50 yr stance
against firearms, ridiculing those who owned a guy as having small
penis's, especially those who like to talk about guns, just to be able
to play with Stumpie.

[email protected] January 7th 08 03:28 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
On Jan 7, 8:05*am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jan 7, 7:56 am, HK wrote:



Are you on consciousness-altering drugs?


Is that all you ever say?
====================

He's right, though. The Republican "base" gave us the president who says
things like "Natural gas is hemispheric. I like to call it hemispheric." You
are the base.

Huckabee believes the earth is 6000 years old, and apparently didn't know
humans were primates until recently. You like uneducated fools, so you will
probably vote for him. He won't make you feel smart.


Huck also said in the last debate that he wanted to do MORE business
with the Arab nations........

JoeSpareBedroom January 7th 08 03:31 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
wrote in message
...
On Jan 7, 8:05 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jan 7, 7:56 am, HK wrote:



Are you on consciousness-altering drugs?


Is that all you ever say?
====================

He's right, though. The Republican "base" gave us the president who says
things like "Natural gas is hemispheric. I like to call it hemispheric."
You
are the base.

Huckabee believes the earth is 6000 years old, and apparently didn't know
humans were primates until recently. You like uneducated fools, so you
will
probably vote for him. He won't make you feel smart.


Huck also said in the last debate that he wanted to do MORE business
with the Arab nations........

====================


What do YOU think about that?



Reginald P. Smithers III[_9_] January 7th 08 03:53 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Jan 7, 8:05 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jan 7, 7:56 am, HK wrote:



Are you on consciousness-altering drugs?

Is that all you ever say?
====================

He's right, though. The Republican "base" gave us the president who says
things like "Natural gas is hemispheric. I like to call it hemispheric."
You
are the base.

Huckabee believes the earth is 6000 years old, and apparently didn't know
humans were primates until recently. You like uneducated fools, so you
will
probably vote for him. He won't make you feel smart.


Huck also said in the last debate that he wanted to do MORE business
with the Arab nations........

====================


What do YOU think about that?



It is the only thing in this entire thread that makes sense.



JoeSpareBedroom January 7th 08 04:06 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message
. ..
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Jan 7, 8:05 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jan 7, 7:56 am, HK wrote:



Are you on consciousness-altering drugs?
Is that all you ever say?
====================

He's right, though. The Republican "base" gave us the president who says
things like "Natural gas is hemispheric. I like to call it hemispheric."
You
are the base.

Huckabee believes the earth is 6000 years old, and apparently didn't
know
humans were primates until recently. You like uneducated fools, so you
will
probably vote for him. He won't make you feel smart.


Huck also said in the last debate that he wanted to do MORE business
with the Arab nations........

====================


What do YOU think about that?


It is the only thing in this entire thread that makes sense.



Members of the Saudi royal family provide direct financial support for
schools run by people who are as crazy as OBL. These schools turn out lots
of young lunatics whose next adventure in life is to travel to countries
like Iraq to attack our troops, and anyone else who doesn't see things their
way. Our military commanders say 60% of foreign fighters come from Saudi
Arabia.

Members of the Saudi royal family receive their money from you and I. We
should be doing as little business with them as possible. Unfortunately, we
can't seem to stop.

Other Arab countries....that's different. Maybe.



BAR January 7th 08 04:48 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
HK wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 7, 8:30 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

...

On Jan 7, 8:05 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:





wrote in message
...

On Jan 7, 7:56 am, HK wrote:
Are you on consciousness-altering drugs?
Is that all you ever say?
====================
He's right, though. The Republican "base" gave us the president who
says
things like "Natural gas is hemispheric. I like to call it
hemispheric."
You
are the base.
Huckabee believes the earth is 6000 years old, and apparently didn't
know
humans were primates until recently. You like uneducated fools, so you
will
probably vote for him. He won't make you feel smart.
You are out of your frekin' mind... I don't even support Huck, but you
just keep making it up as you go along.

=======================

I'll wager that if he's the Republican candidate next November,
you'll vote
for him.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Uh, you don't have a very good track record when it comes to wagers..
Sorry, but I don't gamble anyway...



Are you sure you didn't gamble your future on this?

http://tinyurl.com/3xcebr


You anti business idiots should go live in a cage.



Calif Bill January 8th 08 03:21 AM

Handicapping Iowa...
 

"HK" wrote in message
...
wrote:
On Jan 5, 10:33 am, HK wrote:
JG2U wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 02:01:10 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:
If you read all the way to the bottom of the item, you'll see that
your link actually validates my point about some Christians who
describe themselvs as "evangelical" (including the Methodist preacher
quoted)
having difficulty with Romney's Mormon faith.
From your link:
Evangelicals are hugely influential in the Iowa caucuses, making up by
some estimates some 40 percent of Republican caucus-goers. Many of
them, however, have profound reservations about Mr. Romney's Mormon
faith.
Mr. Hurd, the pastor of West Hill United Methodist Church here who
identified himself as an evangelical, said he wrestled with that issue
himself but decided in the end it should not matter in his decision.
"Although they have a theology vastly different from mine, Mormons
generally are good citizens," he said.
Mr. Hurd also offered some insight into where his fellow Alliance
board members are leaning. He said they are mainly divided between Mr.
Romney and Mr. Huckabee, with the latter probably holding the edge.
"A lot of them are troubled by his Mormon religion," he said. "That's
probably the difference."
*******
So there's a statement, by an Iowa pastor describing himself as
"evangelical", confirming that many Christians of his acquaintance are
"troubled by (Romney's) Mormon religion."
Not quite... there are no quotes around evangelical in the article. So
it didn't come out of his mouth, but probably went something like
this:
"Do you evangelize as part of your faith?"
"Yes."
"So would you consider yourself an evangelical Christian?"
"I suppose."
My whole point continues to be that it is the *media* who seems to
find the labels "evangelical" and "fundamentalist" (which *you*
improperly used) important, not Christians themselves.
And also that there are Christians who do not have a problem with the
Mormon faith. Sure some do, but there are groups who are opposed to
Romney for other reasons as well. So? Weird people everywhere.
twisted logic deleted
Huckabee is a perfect match for the GOP base.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


No he is not... you just want him in because your candidates are so
weak...




Are you on consciousness-altering drugs?

In the recently concluded Iowa caucuses, the Democratic candidates brought
more than twice as many voters out on a cold night than the Republicans. I
don't recall the exact count, but I believe the Dems had about 240,000
Iowans show up for caucus, while the Repugs had only about 115,000. And it
was much more difficult and took much more time to vote in the Democratic
caucuses.

If the Democratic candidates were so weak, they wouldn't be outpolling the
Republicans by such a substantial number.

The only *decent* candidate on the GOP side is John McCain. Your hero,
Huckabee the Evangelical, is a foreign policy numnutz. We've already had
seven years of that with Bush. It isn't going to happen again.


Most of that is how the Dem's set up their caucuses.



HK January 8th 08 03:23 AM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
Calif Bill wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
wrote:
On Jan 5, 10:33 am, HK wrote:
JG2U wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 02:01:10 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:
If you read all the way to the bottom of the item, you'll see that
your link actually validates my point about some Christians who
describe themselvs as "evangelical" (including the Methodist preacher
quoted)
having difficulty with Romney's Mormon faith.
From your link:
Evangelicals are hugely influential in the Iowa caucuses, making up by
some estimates some 40 percent of Republican caucus-goers. Many of
them, however, have profound reservations about Mr. Romney's Mormon
faith.
Mr. Hurd, the pastor of West Hill United Methodist Church here who
identified himself as an evangelical, said he wrestled with that issue
himself but decided in the end it should not matter in his decision.
"Although they have a theology vastly different from mine, Mormons
generally are good citizens," he said.
Mr. Hurd also offered some insight into where his fellow Alliance
board members are leaning. He said they are mainly divided between Mr.
Romney and Mr. Huckabee, with the latter probably holding the edge.
"A lot of them are troubled by his Mormon religion," he said. "That's
probably the difference."
*******
So there's a statement, by an Iowa pastor describing himself as
"evangelical", confirming that many Christians of his acquaintance are
"troubled by (Romney's) Mormon religion."
Not quite... there are no quotes around evangelical in the article. So
it didn't come out of his mouth, but probably went something like
this:
"Do you evangelize as part of your faith?"
"Yes."
"So would you consider yourself an evangelical Christian?"
"I suppose."
My whole point continues to be that it is the *media* who seems to
find the labels "evangelical" and "fundamentalist" (which *you*
improperly used) important, not Christians themselves.
And also that there are Christians who do not have a problem with the
Mormon faith. Sure some do, but there are groups who are opposed to
Romney for other reasons as well. So? Weird people everywhere.
twisted logic deleted
Huckabee is a perfect match for the GOP base.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
No he is not... you just want him in because your candidates are so
weak...



Are you on consciousness-altering drugs?

In the recently concluded Iowa caucuses, the Democratic candidates brought
more than twice as many voters out on a cold night than the Republicans. I
don't recall the exact count, but I believe the Dems had about 240,000
Iowans show up for caucus, while the Repugs had only about 115,000. And it
was much more difficult and took much more time to vote in the Democratic
caucuses.

If the Democratic candidates were so weak, they wouldn't be outpolling the
Republicans by such a substantial number.

The only *decent* candidate on the GOP side is John McCain. Your hero,
Huckabee the Evangelical, is a foreign policy numnutz. We've already had
seven years of that with Bush. It isn't going to happen again.


Most of that is how the Dem's set up their caucuses.




What? Twice as many dems as repugs showed up because they were
motivated, not because they had to. Are you drinking from Zell Miller's
cup again?

Calif Bill January 8th 08 04:47 AM

Handicapping Iowa...
 

"HK" wrote in message
...
Calif Bill wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
wrote:
On Jan 5, 10:33 am, HK wrote:
JG2U wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 02:01:10 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:
If you read all the way to the bottom of the item, you'll see that
your link actually validates my point about some Christians who
describe themselvs as "evangelical" (including the Methodist
preacher
quoted)
having difficulty with Romney's Mormon faith.
From your link:
Evangelicals are hugely influential in the Iowa caucuses, making up
by
some estimates some 40 percent of Republican caucus-goers. Many of
them, however, have profound reservations about Mr. Romney's Mormon
faith.
Mr. Hurd, the pastor of West Hill United Methodist Church here who
identified himself as an evangelical, said he wrestled with that
issue
himself but decided in the end it should not matter in his decision.
"Although they have a theology vastly different from mine, Mormons
generally are good citizens," he said.
Mr. Hurd also offered some insight into where his fellow Alliance
board members are leaning. He said they are mainly divided between
Mr.
Romney and Mr. Huckabee, with the latter probably holding the edge.
"A lot of them are troubled by his Mormon religion," he said.
"That's
probably the difference."
*******
So there's a statement, by an Iowa pastor describing himself as
"evangelical", confirming that many Christians of his acquaintance
are
"troubled by (Romney's) Mormon religion."
Not quite... there are no quotes around evangelical in the article.
So
it didn't come out of his mouth, but probably went something like
this:
"Do you evangelize as part of your faith?"
"Yes."
"So would you consider yourself an evangelical Christian?"
"I suppose."
My whole point continues to be that it is the *media* who seems to
find the labels "evangelical" and "fundamentalist" (which *you*
improperly used) important, not Christians themselves.
And also that there are Christians who do not have a problem with the
Mormon faith. Sure some do, but there are groups who are opposed to
Romney for other reasons as well. So? Weird people everywhere.
twisted logic deleted
Huckabee is a perfect match for the GOP base.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
No he is not... you just want him in because your candidates are so
weak...


Are you on consciousness-altering drugs?

In the recently concluded Iowa caucuses, the Democratic candidates
brought more than twice as many voters out on a cold night than the
Republicans. I don't recall the exact count, but I believe the Dems had
about 240,000 Iowans show up for caucus, while the Repugs had only about
115,000. And it was much more difficult and took much more time to vote
in the Democratic caucuses.

If the Democratic candidates were so weak, they wouldn't be outpolling
the Republicans by such a substantial number.

The only *decent* candidate on the GOP side is John McCain. Your hero,
Huckabee the Evangelical, is a foreign policy numnutz. We've already had
seven years of that with Bush. It isn't going to happen again.


Most of that is how the Dem's set up their caucuses.



What? Twice as many dems as repugs showed up because they were motivated,
not because they had to. Are you drinking from Zell Miller's cup again?


You drunk or all the lead from yesterdays shooting got to you? They run
their caucuses different.



John H.[_3_] January 8th 08 12:56 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 20:47:19 -0800, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
...
Calif Bill wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
wrote:
On Jan 5, 10:33 am, HK wrote:
JG2U wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 02:01:10 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:
If you read all the way to the bottom of the item, you'll see that
your link actually validates my point about some Christians who
describe themselvs as "evangelical" (including the Methodist
preacher
quoted)
having difficulty with Romney's Mormon faith.
From your link:
Evangelicals are hugely influential in the Iowa caucuses, making up
by
some estimates some 40 percent of Republican caucus-goers. Many of
them, however, have profound reservations about Mr. Romney's Mormon
faith.
Mr. Hurd, the pastor of West Hill United Methodist Church here who
identified himself as an evangelical, said he wrestled with that
issue
himself but decided in the end it should not matter in his decision.
"Although they have a theology vastly different from mine, Mormons
generally are good citizens," he said.
Mr. Hurd also offered some insight into where his fellow Alliance
board members are leaning. He said they are mainly divided between
Mr.
Romney and Mr. Huckabee, with the latter probably holding the edge.
"A lot of them are troubled by his Mormon religion," he said.
"That's
probably the difference."
*******
So there's a statement, by an Iowa pastor describing himself as
"evangelical", confirming that many Christians of his acquaintance
are
"troubled by (Romney's) Mormon religion."
Not quite... there are no quotes around evangelical in the article.
So
it didn't come out of his mouth, but probably went something like
this:
"Do you evangelize as part of your faith?"
"Yes."
"So would you consider yourself an evangelical Christian?"
"I suppose."
My whole point continues to be that it is the *media* who seems to
find the labels "evangelical" and "fundamentalist" (which *you*
improperly used) important, not Christians themselves.
And also that there are Christians who do not have a problem with the
Mormon faith. Sure some do, but there are groups who are opposed to
Romney for other reasons as well. So? Weird people everywhere.
twisted logic deleted
Huckabee is a perfect match for the GOP base.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
No he is not... you just want him in because your candidates are so
weak...


Are you on consciousness-altering drugs?

In the recently concluded Iowa caucuses, the Democratic candidates
brought more than twice as many voters out on a cold night than the
Republicans. I don't recall the exact count, but I believe the Dems had
about 240,000 Iowans show up for caucus, while the Repugs had only about
115,000. And it was much more difficult and took much more time to vote
in the Democratic caucuses.

If the Democratic candidates were so weak, they wouldn't be outpolling
the Republicans by such a substantial number.

The only *decent* candidate on the GOP side is John McCain. Your hero,
Huckabee the Evangelical, is a foreign policy numnutz. We've already had
seven years of that with Bush. It isn't going to happen again.


Most of that is how the Dem's set up their caucuses.



What? Twice as many dems as repugs showed up because they were motivated,
not because they had to. Are you drinking from Zell Miller's cup again?


You drunk or all the lead from yesterdays shooting got to you? They run
their caucuses different.

A bunch of young folks showed up from other states hoping to get laid.l
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

John H.[_3_] January 8th 08 01:43 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 08:16:54 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 07:56:24 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 20:47:19 -0800, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
...
Calif Bill wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
wrote:
On Jan 5, 10:33 am, HK wrote:
JG2U wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 02:01:10 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:
If you read all the way to the bottom of the item, you'll see that
your link actually validates my point about some Christians who
describe themselvs as "evangelical" (including the Methodist
preacher
quoted)
having difficulty with Romney's Mormon faith.
From your link:
Evangelicals are hugely influential in the Iowa caucuses, making up
by
some estimates some 40 percent of Republican caucus-goers. Many of
them, however, have profound reservations about Mr. Romney's Mormon
faith.
Mr. Hurd, the pastor of West Hill United Methodist Church here who
identified himself as an evangelical, said he wrestled with that
issue
himself but decided in the end it should not matter in his decision.
"Although they have a theology vastly different from mine, Mormons
generally are good citizens," he said.
Mr. Hurd also offered some insight into where his fellow Alliance
board members are leaning. He said they are mainly divided between
Mr.
Romney and Mr. Huckabee, with the latter probably holding the edge.
"A lot of them are troubled by his Mormon religion," he said.
"That's
probably the difference."
*******
So there's a statement, by an Iowa pastor describing himself as
"evangelical", confirming that many Christians of his acquaintance
are
"troubled by (Romney's) Mormon religion."
Not quite... there are no quotes around evangelical in the article.
So
it didn't come out of his mouth, but probably went something like
this:
"Do you evangelize as part of your faith?"
"Yes."
"So would you consider yourself an evangelical Christian?"
"I suppose."
My whole point continues to be that it is the *media* who seems to
find the labels "evangelical" and "fundamentalist" (which *you*
improperly used) important, not Christians themselves.
And also that there are Christians who do not have a problem with the
Mormon faith. Sure some do, but there are groups who are opposed to
Romney for other reasons as well. So? Weird people everywhere.
twisted logic deleted
Huckabee is a perfect match for the GOP base.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
No he is not... you just want him in because your candidates are so
weak...


Are you on consciousness-altering drugs?

In the recently concluded Iowa caucuses, the Democratic candidates
brought more than twice as many voters out on a cold night than the
Republicans. I don't recall the exact count, but I believe the Dems had
about 240,000 Iowans show up for caucus, while the Repugs had only about
115,000. And it was much more difficult and took much more time to vote
in the Democratic caucuses.

If the Democratic candidates were so weak, they wouldn't be outpolling
the Republicans by such a substantial number.

The only *decent* candidate on the GOP side is John McCain. Your hero,
Huckabee the Evangelical, is a foreign policy numnutz. We've already had
seven years of that with Bush. It isn't going to happen again.


Most of that is how the Dem's set up their caucuses.


What? Twice as many dems as repugs showed up because they were motivated,
not because they had to. Are you drinking from Zell Miller's cup again?

You drunk or all the lead from yesterdays shooting got to you? They run
their caucuses different.

A bunch of young folks showed up from other states hoping to get laid.l



So, you are saying that Young Republicans are Asexual?


They don't have to hop on a bus and go to Iowa in hopes of getting laid.
They do quite well at home.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

HK January 8th 08 01:56 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 08:43:06 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 08:16:54 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 07:56:24 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 20:47:19 -0800, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
Calif Bill wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
wrote:
On Jan 5, 10:33 am, HK wrote:
JG2U wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 02:01:10 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:
If you read all the way to the bottom of the item, you'll see that
your link actually validates my point about some Christians who
describe themselvs as "evangelical" (including the Methodist
preacher
quoted)
having difficulty with Romney's Mormon faith.
From your link:
Evangelicals are hugely influential in the Iowa caucuses, making up
by
some estimates some 40 percent of Republican caucus-goers. Many of
them, however, have profound reservations about Mr. Romney's Mormon
faith.
Mr. Hurd, the pastor of West Hill United Methodist Church here who
identified himself as an evangelical, said he wrestled with that
issue
himself but decided in the end it should not matter in his decision.
"Although they have a theology vastly different from mine, Mormons
generally are good citizens," he said.
Mr. Hurd also offered some insight into where his fellow Alliance
board members are leaning. He said they are mainly divided between
Mr.
Romney and Mr. Huckabee, with the latter probably holding the edge.
"A lot of them are troubled by his Mormon religion," he said.
"That's
probably the difference."
*******
So there's a statement, by an Iowa pastor describing himself as
"evangelical", confirming that many Christians of his acquaintance
are
"troubled by (Romney's) Mormon religion."
Not quite... there are no quotes around evangelical in the article.
So
it didn't come out of his mouth, but probably went something like
this:
"Do you evangelize as part of your faith?"
"Yes."
"So would you consider yourself an evangelical Christian?"
"I suppose."
My whole point continues to be that it is the *media* who seems to
find the labels "evangelical" and "fundamentalist" (which *you*
improperly used) important, not Christians themselves.
And also that there are Christians who do not have a problem with the
Mormon faith. Sure some do, but there are groups who are opposed to
Romney for other reasons as well. So? Weird people everywhere.
twisted logic deleted
Huckabee is a perfect match for the GOP base.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
No he is not... you just want him in because your candidates are so
weak...

Are you on consciousness-altering drugs?

In the recently concluded Iowa caucuses, the Democratic candidates
brought more than twice as many voters out on a cold night than the
Republicans. I don't recall the exact count, but I believe the Dems had
about 240,000 Iowans show up for caucus, while the Repugs had only about
115,000. And it was much more difficult and took much more time to vote
in the Democratic caucuses.

If the Democratic candidates were so weak, they wouldn't be outpolling
the Republicans by such a substantial number.

The only *decent* candidate on the GOP side is John McCain. Your hero,
Huckabee the Evangelical, is a foreign policy numnutz. We've already had
seven years of that with Bush. It isn't going to happen again.

Most of that is how the Dem's set up their caucuses.

What? Twice as many dems as repugs showed up because they were motivated,
not because they had to. Are you drinking from Zell Miller's cup again?
You drunk or all the lead from yesterdays shooting got to you? They run
their caucuses different.

A bunch of young folks showed up from other states hoping to get laid.l

So, you are saying that Young Republicans are Asexual?

They don't have to hop on a bus and go to Iowa in hopes of getting laid.
They do quite well at home.


So, you are saying they are "stick in the muds" with no drive or
curiosity about the outside world?




Young Republicans in search of sex "do quite well at home."

:}


Vice is nice, but incest is best?


Well, for Republicans, I suppose it beats hanging out at the men's room.

John H.[_3_] January 8th 08 02:06 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 08:47:48 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 08:43:06 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 08:16:54 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 07:56:24 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 20:47:19 -0800, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


snipped

You drunk or all the lead from yesterdays shooting got to you? They run
their caucuses different.

A bunch of young folks showed up from other states hoping to get laid.l


So, you are saying that Young Republicans are Asexual?


They don't have to hop on a bus and go to Iowa in hopes of getting laid.
They do quite well at home.


So, you are saying they are "stick in the muds" with no drive or
curiosity about the outside world?


Outside world? Iowa?

I've been across Iowa north-south and east-west, by car and by motorcycle.
I can honestly say, the best way is by fast jet.

Where do you live that you'd call Iowa the 'outside world'?
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Reginald P. Smithers III[_9_] January 8th 08 02:07 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
HK wrote:



Young Republicans in search of sex "do quite well at home."

:}


Vice is nice, but incest is best?


Why do all of your sexual references focus in on bestiality, incest and
young girls.




Well, for Republicans, I suppose it beats hanging out at the men's room.


BAR January 8th 08 02:17 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
HK wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 08:43:06 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 08:16:54 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 07:56:24 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 20:47:19 -0800, "Calif Bill"

wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
Calif Bill wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
wrote:
On Jan 5, 10:33 am, HK wrote:
JG2U wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 02:01:10 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:
If you read all the way to the bottom of the item, you'll
see that
your link actually validates my point about some Christians
who
describe themselvs as "evangelical" (including the
Methodist preacher
quoted)
having difficulty with Romney's Mormon faith.
From your link:
Evangelicals are hugely influential in the Iowa caucuses,
making up by
some estimates some 40 percent of Republican caucus-goers.
Many of
them, however, have profound reservations about Mr.
Romney's Mormon
faith.
Mr. Hurd, the pastor of West Hill United Methodist Church
here who
identified himself as an evangelical, said he wrestled with
that issue
himself but decided in the end it should not matter in his
decision.
"Although they have a theology vastly different from mine,
Mormons
generally are good citizens," he said.
Mr. Hurd also offered some insight into where his fellow
Alliance
board members are leaning. He said they are mainly divided
between Mr.
Romney and Mr. Huckabee, with the latter probably holding
the edge.
"A lot of them are troubled by his Mormon religion," he
said. "That's
probably the difference."
*******
So there's a statement, by an Iowa pastor describing
himself as
"evangelical", confirming that many Christians of his
acquaintance are
"troubled by (Romney's) Mormon religion."
Not quite... there are no quotes around evangelical in the
article. So
it didn't come out of his mouth, but probably went something
like
this:
"Do you evangelize as part of your faith?"
"Yes."
"So would you consider yourself an evangelical Christian?"
"I suppose."
My whole point continues to be that it is the *media* who
seems to
find the labels "evangelical" and "fundamentalist" (which *you*
improperly used) important, not Christians themselves.
And also that there are Christians who do not have a problem
with the
Mormon faith. Sure some do, but there are groups who are
opposed to
Romney for other reasons as well. So? Weird people
everywhere.
twisted logic deleted
Huckabee is a perfect match for the GOP base.- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -
No he is not... you just want him in because your candidates
are so
weak...

Are you on consciousness-altering drugs?

In the recently concluded Iowa caucuses, the Democratic
candidates brought more than twice as many voters out on a cold
night than the Republicans. I don't recall the exact count, but
I believe the Dems had about 240,000 Iowans show up for caucus,
while the Repugs had only about 115,000. And it was much more
difficult and took much more time to vote in the Democratic
caucuses.

If the Democratic candidates were so weak, they wouldn't be
outpolling the Republicans by such a substantial number.

The only *decent* candidate on the GOP side is John McCain.
Your hero, Huckabee the Evangelical, is a foreign policy
numnutz. We've already had seven years of that with Bush. It
isn't going to happen again.

Most of that is how the Dem's set up their caucuses.

What? Twice as many dems as repugs showed up because they were
motivated, not because they had to. Are you drinking from Zell
Miller's cup again?
You drunk or all the lead from yesterdays shooting got to you?
They run their caucuses different.
A bunch of young folks showed up from other states hoping to get
laid.l

So, you are saying that Young Republicans are Asexual?
They don't have to hop on a bus and go to Iowa in hopes of getting laid.
They do quite well at home.


So, you are saying they are "stick in the muds" with no drive or
curiosity about the outside world?




Young Republicans in search of sex "do quite well at home."

:}


Vice is nice, but incest is best?


Well, for Republicans, I suppose it beats hanging out at the men's room.


Did they make you take the medical sterilization as a condition of parole?

HK January 8th 08 02:22 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
BAR wrote:

Did they make you take the medical sterilization as a condition of parole?



And you're so clever you quit high school to join the Marines, eh?



--
George W. Bush - the 43rd Best President Ever!

John H.[_3_] January 8th 08 02:35 PM

Handicapping Iowa...
 
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 08:56:15 -0500, HK wrote:



Young Republicans in search of sex "do quite well at home."

:}


Vice is nice, but incest is best?


Well, for Republicans, I suppose it beats hanging out at the men's room.


Very cool, Harry.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com