On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:14:58 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 11:09:17 -0500, Charlie
wrote:

HK wrote:

Perhaps if *you* had a sex life, you wouldn't be so concerned about
Clinton's.

krause, there are people who have morals. Sadly, you do not. The above
statement demonstrates that.

"Intelligence, wit, judgment, and the other talents of the mind,
however they may be named, or courage, resolution, perseverance, as
qualities of temperament, are undoubtedly good and desirable in many
respects; but these gifts of nature may also become extremely bad and
mischievous if the will which is to make use of them, and which,
therefore, constitutes what is called character, is not good."

Immanuel Kant

As defined above I don't see Harry as a moral charlatan - if anything
the exact opposite.

Then again, I'm a moron - what do I know. :)

"...these gifts...may ...become..bad...if the will...is not good."

Show me the 'good will'. I've seen plenty of the bad.
--
John H