Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:10:00 +0000, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
If they call the indian nation, Native Americans do they call the indian nation in Canada Native Canadians? Whoops - PC Police just reminded me - First Americans. Same question applies though. First Nations, I believe. Which leads me to, how come we, in the US, are "Americans", and all those others in North and South America, aren't? |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 12:13:34 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
I don't know. I am an Eisboch. And a Force of Nature. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:22:34 -0000, wrote: On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:10:00 +0000, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: If they call the indian nation, Native Americans do they call the indian nation in Canada Native Canadians? Whoops - PC Police just reminded me - First Americans. Same question applies though. First Nations, I believe. That's it. Well, that answers that. Which leads me to, how come we, in the US, are "Americans", and all those others in North and South America, aren't? I suspect that because we live in the United State of America. Somehow Nicaraguan American doesn't work. Which brings up another point. Why is it we have to identify and quantify ourselves as Polish American, Irish American or African American? Even better - why would a person of 50% mixed heritage - say Obama - choose to identify himself as black as opposed to white? Because in this country most whiteys would call Obama black. This is still a nation that defines people by the color of their skin. Incidentally, I identify myself as a "Yankee" on those rare occasions when I am asked. I mostly stopped identifying myself as an "American" when the idiot took over the White House seven years ago. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
HK wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:22:34 -0000, wrote: On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:10:00 +0000, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: If they call the indian nation, Native Americans do they call the indian nation in Canada Native Canadians? Whoops - PC Police just reminded me - First Americans. Same question applies though. First Nations, I believe. That's it. Well, that answers that. Which leads me to, how come we, in the US, are "Americans", and all those others in North and South America, aren't? I suspect that because we live in the United State of America. Somehow Nicaraguan American doesn't work. Which brings up another point. Why is it we have to identify and quantify ourselves as Polish American, Irish American or African American? Even better - why would a person of 50% mixed heritage - say Obama - choose to identify himself as black as opposed to white? Because in this country most whiteys would call Obama black. This is still a nation that defines people by the color of their skin. Having lived all across this country and being exposed to many people of varying races and ethnic heritages it has always amazed me that people from north of the Mason Dixon line have a need to always state the race of the person they are talking about. Why do I see you in the statment above Harry? Incidentally, I identify myself as a "Yankee" on those rare occasions when I am asked. I mostly stopped identifying myself as an "American" when the idiot took over the White House seven years ago. You can't help yourself can you? |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 17:08:57 +0000, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
Why is it we have to identify and quantify ourselves as Polish American, Irish American or African American? Do we? I mean, we are a nation of immigrants, but most people I know call themselves plain American in conversation. Even better - why would a person of 50% mixed heritage - say Obama - choose to identify himself as black as opposed to white? Plessy v. Ferguson comes to mind. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 17:39:36 -0000, wrote: On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 17:08:57 +0000, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: Why is it we have to identify and quantify ourselves as Polish American, Irish American or African American? Do we? I mean, we are a nation of immigrants, but most people I know call themselves plain American in conversation. If we don't, then why do hospital admitting forms include a question about what your ethnic heritage is? Around here we have Polish/Irish/Armenian/Greek/Italian American clubs which restrict membership to those of that heritage. Even better - why would a person of 50% mixed heritage - say Obama - choose to identify himself as black as opposed to white? Plessy v. Ferguson comes to mind. I understand your comment as it stands, but it's still not relevant. Why, in this day and age, would a person of 50/50% race composition call themselves one or the other? Say it wasn't Obama - say it was Jane Doe who was 50% Asian/50% African. Some Japanese refer to such combos as "kokujin," or something like that. I think it has negative racial overtones, something like the "n" word. I thought you were a Plutonian-American, whereas your fishing buddy is a Uranus-American -- George W. Bush - the 43rd Best President Ever! |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Saturday Football | ASA |