Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 10,492
Default Yet Another Tragic Case......

On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:03:38 -0500, HK wrote:

It should be mandatory. Period.


So you believe that it is a proper role of government to protect
people from themselves?

What do you do when they take away your unsafe, low transom boat?

(for your own good, of course)



Ever the a**, eh, Dwayne?


Just answer my question Hairy. I believe there's a legitimate
philosophical issue at stake:

Do you believe that it is a proper role of government to protect
people from themselves?

  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,515
Default Yet Another Tragic Case......

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:03:38 -0500, HK wrote:

It should be mandatory. Period.

So you believe that it is a proper role of government to protect
people from themselves?

What do you do when they take away your unsafe, low transom boat?

(for your own good, of course)



Ever the a**, eh, Dwayne?


Just answer my question Hairy. I believe there's a legitimate
philosophical issue at stake:

Do you believe that it is a proper role of government to protect
people from themselves?



Slight detour: Kids learn both good and bad habits from their parents. Even
the stupidest parents might wear seat belts if they were afraid of being
ticketed, and then their kids see them doing the right thing. I like the
law. And, the cops *do* write a lot of tickets here for failure to use
belts.


  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
HK HK is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: May 2007
Posts: 13,347
Default Yet Another Tragic Case......

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:03:38 -0500, HK wrote:

It should be mandatory. Period.
So you believe that it is a proper role of government to protect
people from themselves?

What do you do when they take away your unsafe, low transom boat?

(for your own good, of course)


Ever the a**, eh, Dwayne?

Just answer my question Hairy. I believe there's a legitimate
philosophical issue at stake:

Do you believe that it is a proper role of government to protect
people from themselves?



Slight detour: Kids learn both good and bad habits from their parents. Even
the stupidest parents might wear seat belts if they were afraid of being
ticketed, and then their kids see them doing the right thing. I like the
law. And, the cops *do* write a lot of tickets here for failure to use
belts.




Here, too. I wish the land cops were more aggressive in nailing
litterers, and the water cops were more aggressive in nailing those
damned penis boats with the open exhaust pipes.
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 10,492
Default Yet Another Tragic Case......

On Mon, 03 Dec 2007 12:59:40 -0500, HK wrote:

I wish the land cops were more aggressive in nailing
litterers, and the water cops were more aggressive in nailing those
damned boats with the open exhaust pipes.


We agree on that. I'd like to see boat ramp managers empowered to
nail noisy boats and/or prevent launching

  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Senior Member
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,590
Default Yet Another Tragic Case......

On Dec 3, 9:39 pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 03 Dec 2007 12:59:40 -0500, HK wrote:
I wish the land cops were more aggressive in nailing
litterers, and the water cops were more aggressive in nailing those
damned boats with the open exhaust pipes.


We agree on that. I'd like to see boat ramp managers empowered to
nail noisy boats and/or prevent launching


And marina owners should be able to nail those live aboards before
they dump **** and pee into the rivers on a regular basis... But I
guess the noise of a passing boat is much more disruptive


  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
HK HK is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: May 2007
Posts: 13,347
Default Yet Another Tragic Case......

Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:03:38 -0500, HK wrote:

It should be mandatory. Period.
So you believe that it is a proper role of government to protect
people from themselves?

What do you do when they take away your unsafe, low transom boat?

(for your own good, of course)


Ever the a**, eh, Dwayne?


Just answer my question Hairy. I believe there's a legitimate
philosophical issue at stake:

Do you believe that it is a proper role of government to protect
people from themselves?



Sure. I ain't no loonitarian. I believe in helmet laws, seat belts, a
really effective, hard-working FDA (not a Bush FDA), a really effective,
hard-working OSHA (not a Bush OSHA), et cetera.

  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
BAR BAR is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,728
Default Yet Another Tragic Case......

HK wrote:
Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:03:38 -0500, HK wrote:

It should be mandatory. Period.
So you believe that it is a proper role of government to protect
people from themselves?
What do you do when they take away your unsafe, low transom boat?

(for your own good, of course)


Ever the a**, eh, Dwayne?


Just answer my question Hairy. I believe there's a legitimate
philosophical issue at stake:

Do you believe that it is a proper role of government to protect
people from themselves?



Sure. I ain't no loonitarian. I believe in helmet laws, seat belts, a
really effective, hard-working FDA (not a Bush FDA), a really effective,
hard-working OSHA (not a Bush OSHA), et cetera.


Does the FDA and OSHA magically become good the day a Democrat is sworn
into the office of the president?
  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
HK HK is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: May 2007
Posts: 13,347
Default Yet Another Tragic Case......

BAR wrote:
HK wrote:
Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:03:38 -0500, HK wrote:

It should be mandatory. Period.
So you believe that it is a proper role of government to protect
people from themselves? What do you do when they take away your
unsafe, low transom boat?

(for your own good, of course)


Ever the a**, eh, Dwayne?

Just answer my question Hairy. I believe there's a legitimate
philosophical issue at stake:

Do you believe that it is a proper role of government to protect
people from themselves?



Sure. I ain't no loonitarian. I believe in helmet laws, seat belts, a
really effective, hard-working FDA (not a Bush FDA), a really
effective, hard-working OSHA (not a Bush OSHA), et cetera.


Does the FDA and OSHA magically become good the day a Democrat is sworn
into the office of the president?



Nope. But they get better, and spend a bit more time protecting the
public, and not the GOP corporate benefactors.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tragic and Difficult Boating Lesson... thunder General 1 March 20th 06 04:45 PM
Tragic and Difficult Boating Lesson... DSK General 0 March 20th 06 02:33 PM
local tragic news gonefishiing ASA 1 October 19th 04 04:19 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017