Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 07:13:25 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message news ![]() Diesels definitely make financial sense is if you are putting lots of hours on the engines and plan on keeping the boat/car/truck for a long time. They cost less in fuel and cost substantially less in maintenance $/hrs of use, but you need the high usage to offset the initial cost. Last May I decided I didn't need a big pickup truck anymore so I traded in a '05 Ford 4x4 Superduty diesel F-350 crew cab for a '07 Ford Ranger 4x4 extended cab with a 4.0L gas engine. The 325 hp diesel truck weighed over 7,000 lbs and got 17 mpg around town and 19-20 mpg on the highway. The Ranger, at about half the weight and with just over 200 hp gets poorer mileage, in both around town and highway driving. If my 7.3 had not been totaled, I'd still be driving it. This F-150 with the 5.4 Triton, 3.85 "tow" package sucks in gas milage and in horsepower. I hate it. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Boat Equipment -- Quality is Poor | Cruising | |||
Boat Quality/Opinion Sources | General | |||
Boat Quality.... | ASA | |||
Bombardier sells rec vehicle business | General | |||
Icelander Manufacturer | UK Power Boats |