Eisboch wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message
news
HK wrote:
Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 22:16:20 -0500, HK wrote:

I tend to agree regarding the inboards, but...what if one of those
diesels blows a tranny? :}
My starboard tranny had 26 years and maybe 10,000 hours on it before
it started to act up. It was actually still functional but showing
some signs that it needed work. We should only hope that everything
else lasted that long without maintenance.

Your problem is not the point. The point is, that with diesels, you
sometimes are facing repair bills that add up to more than the cost of a
new outboard of the same output.
Harry,
Diesels definitely make financial sense is if you are putting lots of
hours on the engines and plan on keeping the boat/car/truck for a long
time. They cost less in fuel and cost substantially less in maintenance
$/hrs of use, but you need the high usage to offset the initial cost. The
same would apply to a major rebuild.

There are very few recreational boaters who can justify diesels engines
financially, but Wayne is definitely one of them.

Besides, Grand Banks don't come with gas engines. I wonder why.

Eisboch



I wonder if you could pull those diesel engines out of the engine room
and strap some Etecs onto the transom. You would then triple the amount
of storage space you have on the GB.

People were surprised the we had GW's on Lake Lanier, I have seen 4 or 5
GB's on the lake, my guess is there are more.

Oh we also have a retired working Tug Boat on the lake, that I think was
hauled in from the west coast.

For a relatively small lake, (getting smaller all the time), you will
see a large assortment of ocean going boats.