Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message news ![]() HK wrote: Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 22:16:20 -0500, HK wrote: I tend to agree regarding the inboards, but...what if one of those diesels blows a tranny? :} My starboard tranny had 26 years and maybe 10,000 hours on it before it started to act up. It was actually still functional but showing some signs that it needed work. We should only hope that everything else lasted that long without maintenance. Your problem is not the point. The point is, that with diesels, you sometimes are facing repair bills that add up to more than the cost of a new outboard of the same output. Harry, Diesels definitely make financial sense is if you are putting lots of hours on the engines and plan on keeping the boat/car/truck for a long time. They cost less in fuel and cost substantially less in maintenance $/hrs of use, but you need the high usage to offset the initial cost. The same would apply to a major rebuild. There are very few recreational boaters who can justify diesels engines financially, but Wayne is definitely one of them. Besides, Grand Banks don't come with gas engines. I wonder why. Eisboch |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eisboch wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message news ![]() HK wrote: Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 22:16:20 -0500, HK wrote: I tend to agree regarding the inboards, but...what if one of those diesels blows a tranny? :} My starboard tranny had 26 years and maybe 10,000 hours on it before it started to act up. It was actually still functional but showing some signs that it needed work. We should only hope that everything else lasted that long without maintenance. Your problem is not the point. The point is, that with diesels, you sometimes are facing repair bills that add up to more than the cost of a new outboard of the same output. Harry, Diesels definitely make financial sense is if you are putting lots of hours on the engines and plan on keeping the boat/car/truck for a long time. They cost less in fuel and cost substantially less in maintenance $/hrs of use, but you need the high usage to offset the initial cost. The same would apply to a major rebuild. There are very few recreational boaters who can justify diesels engines financially, but Wayne is definitely one of them. Besides, Grand Banks don't come with gas engines. I wonder why. Eisboch I wonder if you could pull those diesel engines out of the engine room and strap some Etecs onto the transom. You would then triple the amount of storage space you have on the GB. People were surprised the we had GW's on Lake Lanier, I have seen 4 or 5 GB's on the lake, my guess is there are more. Oh we also have a retired working Tug Boat on the lake, that I think was hauled in from the west coast. For a relatively small lake, (getting smaller all the time), you will see a large assortment of ocean going boats. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message news ![]() HK wrote: Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 22:16:20 -0500, HK wrote: I tend to agree regarding the inboards, but...what if one of those diesels blows a tranny? :} My starboard tranny had 26 years and maybe 10,000 hours on it before it started to act up. It was actually still functional but showing some signs that it needed work. We should only hope that everything else lasted that long without maintenance. Your problem is not the point. The point is, that with diesels, you sometimes are facing repair bills that add up to more than the cost of a new outboard of the same output. Harry, Diesels definitely make financial sense is if you are putting lots of hours on the engines and plan on keeping the boat/car/truck for a long time. They cost less in fuel and cost substantially less in maintenance $/hrs of use, but you need the high usage to offset the initial cost. The same would apply to a major rebuild. There are very few recreational boaters who can justify diesels engines financially, but Wayne is definitely one of them. Besides, Grand Banks don't come with gas engines. I wonder why. Eisboch I wonder if you could pull those diesel engines out of the engine room and strap some Etecs onto the transom. You would then triple the amount of storage space you have on the GB. People were surprised the we had GW's on Lake Lanier, I have seen 4 or 5 GB's on the lake, my guess is there are more. Oh we also have a retired working Tug Boat on the lake, that I think was hauled in from the west coast. For a relatively small lake, (getting smaller all the time), you will see a large assortment of ocean going boats. They're waiting for the return of the Great Flood. Same as buying future oceanfront property in Arizona. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 06:52:04 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote: I wonder if you could pull those diesel engines out of the engine room and strap some Etecs onto the transom. BOOYA!!!! |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 06:52:04 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: I wonder if you could pull those diesel engines out of the engine room and strap some Etecs onto the transom. BOOYA!!!! Of course you need the Etecs to get the high torque to get that beast moving. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Boat Equipment -- Quality is Poor | Cruising | |||
Boat Quality/Opinion Sources | General | |||
Boat Quality.... | ASA | |||
Bombardier sells rec vehicle business | General | |||
Icelander Manufacturer | UK Power Boats |