Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#81
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#82
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 20:44:31 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:06:06 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: Is it easier to manuever a boat with twin engines with two rudders? What would be the difference if it had one rudder? Or if you have a single engine and two rudders? In close quarters maneuvering it's nice to have the prop wash blasting directly against the rudder, especially important with a single engine boat but useful even with twins. The rudder deflects the prop wash and creates a lateral (rotational) force. So if I read that correctly, and I might not be, using a single rudder would be similar to applying vectored thrust as you do with an outboard, but not so with twin rudders? You get the equivalent of vectored thrust only when moving forward .... not in reverse as in an I/O or outboard. Moving backwards, rudder position has little or no affect on steerage. A single, like the GB, requires use of the "back and fill" technique to back into a slip .... along with a little bit of prop walk ... although on our GB the prop walk isn't much. Rudders on twins, like the Navigator, also only work moving forward, but you use the engines and transmission positions to "steer" the boat backwards ..... similar to how a bobcat is driven. Often, on large boats with twins, you will see the captain standing and facing backwards, with his arms behind his back and hands on the transmission levers. You don't use the helm, nor rarely the throttles unless you get a bit of wind and need to straighten out a bit. Hey .... I assumed you've operated twin inboards on a larger boat before. If you haven't ... come on up to Kingman some day and we'll take the Navigator out and you can give it a whirl. Eisboch |
#83
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:01:17 -0400, HK wrote: As I said previously, I think the smaller GBs have pretty lines. The big ones seem ungainly to me. That's funny, from a distance they all look alike. He's bustin' your balls. Your 49 looks like a bigger version of our 36 and I agree, from 50 to 100 yards you couldn't tell the difference. The previous owner of our GB has his replacement .... a GB 49 sitting at the dock near where I am now sitting on the Navigator. It's a beautiful boat with all the classic lines of a traditional Grand Banks, but with more room and twin engines. A Grand Banks style boat is something that you learn to appreciate and like over time. Once you get beyond the standard "too slow, too much teak, too much upkeep, too old" impressions and start to use it, you begin to appreciate the tradition, quality and most importantly ... the experience of seasoned boatbuilders. There's a major benefit to not making major style changes every year like mass production boats. All the kinks have been worked out over 40 something years. Running a slow GB is simply a different type of boating experience and can be quite enjoyable. Eisboch |
#84
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 06:12:17 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote: Hey .... I assumed you've operated twin inboards on a larger boat before. If you haven't ... come on up to Kingman some day and we'll take the Navigator out and you can give it a whirl. Nope - my experience is strictly with twin outboards on a wide beam Contender. I've been aboard inboard boats with twins, b ut never as Captain. I will probably take you up on that - I'll drop you a note via email. |
#85
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eisboch wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:01:17 -0400, HK wrote: As I said previously, I think the smaller GBs have pretty lines. The big ones seem ungainly to me. That's funny, from a distance they all look alike. He's bustin' your balls. Your 49 looks like a bigger version of our 36 and I agree, from 50 to 100 yards you couldn't tell the difference. The previous owner of our GB has his replacement .... a GB 49 sitting at the dock near where I am now sitting on the Navigator. It's a beautiful boat with all the classic lines of a traditional Grand Banks, but with more room and twin engines. A Grand Banks style boat is something that you learn to appreciate and like over time. Once you get beyond the standard "too slow, too much teak, too much upkeep, too old" impressions and start to use it, you begin to appreciate the tradition, quality and most importantly ... the experience of seasoned boatbuilders. There's a major benefit to not making major style changes every year like mass production boats. All the kinks have been worked out over 40 something years. Running a slow GB is simply a different type of boating experience and can be quite enjoyable. Eisboch When I want to enjoy a slow boat, I take the canoe out for a spin on the river. Not only is it quieter than a GB RV, there's no exhaust smell, you're down at the water's level, and you get a bit of decent exercise, too. |
#86
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "HK" wrote in message . .. When I want to enjoy a slow boat, I take the canoe out for a spin on the river. Not only is it quieter than a GB RV, there's no exhaust smell, you're down at the water's level, and you get a bit of decent exercise, too. Nothing wrong with that .... I often do the same with my Kayak. Only difference is, I can carry the Kayak with me where ever I go, I can return to the GB and get dry when it starts to rain, cook up something to eat and catch a nice, afternoon nap in the aft cabin. Try that in your canoe. Eisboch |
#87
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message . .. When I want to enjoy a slow boat, I take the canoe out for a spin on the river. Not only is it quieter than a GB RV, there's no exhaust smell, you're down at the water's level, and you get a bit of decent exercise, too. Nothing wrong with that .... I often do the same with my Kayak. Only difference is, I can carry the Kayak with me where ever I go, I can return to the GB and get dry when it starts to rain, cook up something to eat and catch a nice, afternoon nap in the aft cabin. Try that in your canoe. Eisboch Ahh, I keep my canoe out at the Shenandoah, at a friend's little farm. When I return from canoeing, I can warm up by the fire, cook anything I please, and take a nap in the hammock on the screened porch, or crawl into one of the beds. |
#88
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message . .. When I want to enjoy a slow boat, I take the canoe out for a spin on the river. Not only is it quieter than a GB RV, there's no exhaust smell, you're down at the water's level, and you get a bit of decent exercise, too. Nothing wrong with that .... I often do the same with my Kayak. Only difference is, I can carry the Kayak with me where ever I go, I can return to the GB and get dry when it starts to rain, cook up something to eat and catch a nice, afternoon nap in the aft cabin. Try that in your canoe. Eisboch Ahh, I keep my canoe out at the Shenandoah, at a friend's little farm. When I return from canoeing, I can warm up by the fire, cook anything I please, and take a nap in the hammock on the screened porch, or crawl into one of the beds. Why does this make me think of Goldilocks and the three old bears? -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#89
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 08:09:57 -0400, "Jim" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message . .. When I want to enjoy a slow boat, I take the canoe out for a spin on the river. Not only is it quieter than a GB RV, there's no exhaust smell, you're down at the water's level, and you get a bit of decent exercise, too. Nothing wrong with that .... I often do the same with my Kayak. Only difference is, I can carry the Kayak with me where ever I go, I can return to the GB and get dry when it starts to rain, cook up something to eat and catch a nice, afternoon nap in the aft cabin. Try that in your canoe. Eisboch Ahh, I keep my canoe out at the Shenandoah, at a friend's little farm. When I return from canoeing, I can warm up by the fire, cook anything I please, and take a nap in the hammock on the screened porch, or crawl into one of the beds. Why does this make me think of Goldilocks and the three old bears? Starring Harry as Goldilocks? Sure would explain a lot. :) |
#90
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message . .. When I want to enjoy a slow boat, I take the canoe out for a spin on the river. Not only is it quieter than a GB RV, there's no exhaust smell, you're down at the water's level, and you get a bit of decent exercise, too. Nothing wrong with that .... I often do the same with my Kayak. Only difference is, I can carry the Kayak with me where ever I go, I can return to the GB and get dry when it starts to rain, cook up something to eat and catch a nice, afternoon nap in the aft cabin. Try that in your canoe. Eisboch Ahh, I keep my canoe out at the Shenandoah, at a friend's little farm. When I return from canoeing, I can warm up by the fire, cook anything I please, and take a nap in the hammock on the screened porch, or crawl into one of the beds. Why does this make me think of Goldilocks and the three old bears? Yep. We "gots" bears, too. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Help! How do I get rid of this oder in my boat! | Boat Building | |||
Help! How do I get rid of this oder on my boat! | Cruising | |||
Shipyard Pictures | ASA | |||
Tiger Woods settles lawsuit with the shipyard that built one of his yachts... | General | |||
LA CEIBA SHIPYARD HONDURAS | Cruising |