Dan wrote:
HK wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:


Ok, if you don't want to learn anything, it is fine with me.



I have no interest in advice from you. Save yourself the time and
what little energy it takes, and don't offer me any.



Try this, Krause: Don't respond!


Here's yet another of the many daily attacks from "Dan",
a frequent rec.boats poster, and if you count them up, you will see how
little he adds here in boating/fishing content or interesting reading.

On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 19:23:01 -0400, HK wrote:

Here's yet another of the many daily attacks from "Dan",
a frequent rec.boats poster, and if you count them up, you will see how
little he adds here in boating/fishing content or interesting reading.

You might want to check the Terms of Service (TOS) for your internet
service provider. Knee jerk auto responses might be construed as a
violation depending on the TOS language and who is interpreting it.

Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 19:23:01 -0400, HK wrote:

Here's yet another of the many daily attacks from "Dan",
a frequent rec.boats poster, and if you count them up, you will see how
little he adds here in boating/fishing content or interesting reading.

You might want to check the Terms of Service (TOS) for your internet
service provider. Knee jerk auto responses might be construed as a
violation depending on the TOS language and who is interpreting it.


Ahhh. Are you offering me advice or are you sticking up for the kinds of
posts Dan puts up here?

HK wrote:
Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 19:23:01 -0400, HK wrote:

Here's yet another of the many daily attacks from "Dan",
a frequent rec.boats poster, and if you count them up, you will see
how little he adds here in boating/fishing content or interesting
reading.

You might want to check the Terms of Service (TOS) for your internet
service provider. Knee jerk auto responses might be construed as a
violation depending on the TOS language and who is interpreting it.


Ahhh. Are you offering me advice or are you sticking up for the kinds of
posts Dan puts up here?

Harry Krause,
I think he is saying that your auto response is silly and might be
construed as a violation of your TOS, but I could be wrong.

On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 21:39:06 -0400, HK wrote:

You might want to check the Terms of Service (TOS) for your internet
service provider. Knee jerk auto responses might be construed as a
violation depending on the TOS language and who is interpreting it.


Ahhh. Are you offering me advice or are you sticking up for the kinds of
posts Dan puts up here?

Frankly you and Dan and John are becoming a bit tedious.

Just my 2 cents worth: Why not just stick to a well worded flame once
in awhile if you must?

Right now you're all sounding like Bertie the Bunyip. Remeber him?

http://groups.google.com/groups/sear...ip&qt_s=Search

Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 21:39:06 -0400, HK wrote:

You might want to check the Terms of Service (TOS) for your internet
service provider. Knee jerk auto responses might be construed as a
violation depending on the TOS language and who is interpreting it.

Ahhh. Are you offering me advice or are you sticking up for the kinds of
posts Dan puts up here?

Frankly you and Dan and John are becoming a bit tedious.

Just my 2 cents worth: Why not just stick to a well worded flame once
in awhile if you must?

Right now you're all sounding like Bertie the Bunyip. Remeber him?

http://groups.google.com/groups/sear...ip&qt_s=Search



I suggest you spend a day doing something worthwhile and count up the
"number of insults" Herring or Dan or Reggie toss, compared to the
number I toss, or, even better, the division between "insults" and
content-based posts of your favorite participants.

HK wrote:
Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 21:39:06 -0400, HK wrote:

You might want to check the Terms of Service (TOS) for your internet
service provider. Knee jerk auto responses might be construed as a
violation depending on the TOS language and who is interpreting it.

Ahhh. Are you offering me advice or are you sticking up for the kinds
of posts Dan puts up here?

Frankly you and Dan and John are becoming a bit tedious.

Just my 2 cents worth: Why not just stick to a well worded flame once
in awhile if you must?

Right now you're all sounding like Bertie the Bunyip. Remeber him?

http://groups.google.com/groups/sear...ip&qt_s=Search



I suggest you spend a day doing something worthwhile and count up the
"number of insults" Herring or Dan or Reggie toss, compared to the
number I toss, or, even better, the division between "insults" and
content-based posts of your favorite participants.

Harry,
I have to correct you on this, I don't think I have ever insulted you
are called you names.

On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:56:07 -0400, HK wrote:

I suggest you spend a day doing something worthwhile and count up the
"number of insults" Herring or Dan or Reggie toss, compared to the
number I toss, or, even better, the division between "insults" and
content-based posts of your favorite participants.

Who cares? Insults beget more insults.

On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:50:24 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

Just my 2 cents worth: Why not just stick to a well worded flame once
in awhile if you must?

As a compatriot of some of the past Usenet greats, Gharlane of Eddore,
Deacon, James Boe (once Usenet's #1 on the Usenet's Top Ten Most
Wanted) and a participant in alt.fan.tom-servo flame fests, this bunch
is pretty sad in the flame department. :)

Someday, when I get around to it - assuming that I even want to get
around to it, I plan on writing the definitive history of Usenet and
some of the all time flame war greats.

Sadly, I will have to have somebody else write my chapter. :)

Ah - those were the days.

On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 10:04:30 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:50:24 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

Just my 2 cents worth: Why not just stick to a well worded flame once
in awhile if you must?

As a compatriot of some of the past Usenet greats, Gharlane of Eddore,
Deacon, James Boe (once Usenet's #1 on the Usenet's Top Ten Most
Wanted) and a participant in alt.fan.tom-servo flame fests, this bunch
is pretty sad in the flame department. :)

Someday, when I get around to it - assuming that I even want to get
around to it, I plan on writing the definitive history of Usenet and
some of the all time flame war greats.

Sadly, I will have to have somebody else write my chapter. :)

Ah - those were the days.