|
Oh deer!
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:55:56 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "Vic Smith" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 12:47:00 -0500, John H. wrote: Ah, something on which we agree! I grew up on fried rabbit. Taste like chicken? Never had it myself, though I've had turtle and squirrel once each. The squirrel wasn't cooked right and was tough and tasteless. The turtle tasted...like chicken. --Vic http://www.recipeland.com/recipe/6378/ Thanks. The link didn't work. But that's good. My doctor told me not to eat rodents. --Vic |
Oh deer!
wrote in message ... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:01:41 -0400, HK wrote: It did to me. Tom said he carried a single action hammerless revolver. I was curious how he cocked it. So there! I thought it was a joke ... sort of like "write only storage" PROM? |
Oh deer!
"Vic Smith" wrote in message
... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:55:56 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Vic Smith" wrote in message . .. On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 12:47:00 -0500, John H. wrote: Ah, something on which we agree! I grew up on fried rabbit. Taste like chicken? Never had it myself, though I've had turtle and squirrel once each. The squirrel wasn't cooked right and was tough and tasteless. The turtle tasted...like chicken. --Vic http://www.recipeland.com/recipe/6378/ Thanks. The link didn't work. Your browser is retarded. |
Oh deer!
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:53:52 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:13:29 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:50:24 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:46:02 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:02:55 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:25:54 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message news:u382e3ts8i22s7a6hjrvd4abtcu8s4o465@4ax. com... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:00:17 -0400, wrote: The winner was always an old sargent who took his time and shot down one per round, with a 2" revolver. I have said for years that the reason is due to 13 round semi-auto hand guns. With a revolver, you only have six - makes you concentrate. One of my favorite gun technique books suggests taking only 6 rounds to the range, no matter what kind of handgun you're shooting. Good idea. All my kids were trained that way. In fact, when my youngest went to the Academy in SC, he noticed that the more bullets they were issues, the more the used them. He took his time, minimum shots and did well. It's the revolver training. I have a 9mm Glock, but I never carry it unless I'm in the woods. For just carrying purposes, it's a .357 mag on a .38 frame. Don't you mean that the other way around? My Highway Patrolman shoots .38's but is a .357 magnum frame (and shoots them!). Nope - just the way I spake it. Wouldn't a gun with a frame built for .38's be somewhat unsafe with a bunch of .357 mags going through it? What part of this is so hard to understand? The gun is a .357 mag built on a .38 frame. Ruger SP101 Hello? Anybody home? You god damned people will agrue about anything. I'm outa here for a while. Morons. No argument exists. I was simply asking a question. I looked for information on the Ruger SP101, but could find nothing saying the frame was built for .38's. Now I'm 'god damned' and a 'moron'. I'm sorry you're ****ed. But, if I said I had a .38 on a .22 frame, wouldn't you wonder a little? |
Oh deer!
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:07:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: Thanks. The link didn't work. Your browser is retarded. Sure it did. But if I let you know that the joke wouldn't work. Assuming you got the joke. Assuming it *was* a joke. --Vic |
Oh deer!
"John H." wrote in message
... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:51:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:20:21 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:53:52 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:13:29 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:50:24 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:46:02 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:02:55 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:25:54 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message news:u382e3ts8i22s7a6hjrvd4abtcu8s4o465 @4ax.com... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:00:17 -0400, wrote: The winner was always an old sargent who took his time and shot down one per round, with a 2" revolver. I have said for years that the reason is due to 13 round semi-auto hand guns. With a revolver, you only have six - makes you concentrate. One of my favorite gun technique books suggests taking only 6 rounds to the range, no matter what kind of handgun you're shooting. Good idea. All my kids were trained that way. In fact, when my youngest went to the Academy in SC, he noticed that the more bullets they were issues, the more the used them. He took his time, minimum shots and did well. It's the revolver training. I have a 9mm Glock, but I never carry it unless I'm in the woods. For just carrying purposes, it's a .357 mag on a .38 frame. Don't you mean that the other way around? My Highway Patrolman shoots .38's but is a .357 magnum frame (and shoots them!). Nope - just the way I spake it. Wouldn't a gun with a frame built for .38's be somewhat unsafe with a bunch of .357 mags going through it? What part of this is so hard to understand? The gun is a .357 mag built on a .38 frame. Ruger SP101 Hello? Anybody home? You god damned people will agrue about anything. I'm outa here for a while. Morons. No argument exists. I was simply asking a question. I looked for information on the Ruger SP101, but could find nothing saying the frame was built for .38's. Look at the top strap, Einstein. Ah, another name-caller! Enlighten me, please. I am certainly no expert on pistols. What is a 'top strap'? Is there one in this photo? http://tinyurl.com/lw55 Yes, there is. See the black grip with the silver screw holding it on? That's actually called the top strap. Those are grip inserts. I've never heard them called 'top straps'. Do they have a stamp on them somewhere saying the frame is a .38 caliber frame? No. You just have to know these things. One high-tech way of knowing is to read a lot. |
Oh deer!
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:20:21 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:53:52 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:13:29 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:50:24 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:46:02 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:02:55 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:25:54 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message news:u382e3ts8i22s7a6hjrvd4abtcu8s4o465@4a x.com... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:00:17 -0400, wrote: The winner was always an old sargent who took his time and shot down one per round, with a 2" revolver. I have said for years that the reason is due to 13 round semi-auto hand guns. With a revolver, you only have six - makes you concentrate. One of my favorite gun technique books suggests taking only 6 rounds to the range, no matter what kind of handgun you're shooting. Good idea. All my kids were trained that way. In fact, when my youngest went to the Academy in SC, he noticed that the more bullets they were issues, the more the used them. He took his time, minimum shots and did well. It's the revolver training. I have a 9mm Glock, but I never carry it unless I'm in the woods. For just carrying purposes, it's a .357 mag on a .38 frame. Don't you mean that the other way around? My Highway Patrolman shoots .38's but is a .357 magnum frame (and shoots them!). Nope - just the way I spake it. Wouldn't a gun with a frame built for .38's be somewhat unsafe with a bunch of .357 mags going through it? What part of this is so hard to understand? The gun is a .357 mag built on a .38 frame. Ruger SP101 Hello? Anybody home? You god damned people will agrue about anything. I'm outa here for a while. Morons. No argument exists. I was simply asking a question. I looked for information on the Ruger SP101, but could find nothing saying the frame was built for .38's. Look at the top strap, Einstein. Ah, another name-caller! Enlighten me, please. I am certainly no expert on pistols. What is a 'top strap'? Is there one in this photo? http://tinyurl.com/lw55 |
Oh deer!
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:24:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "Vic Smith" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 12:05:26 -0400, Gene Kearns wrote: On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:41:55 -0400, Reginald P. Smithers III penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Gene Kearns wrote: I agree the wildlife should be able to use any available habitat even if it is our lawn, our lake, our vegetable garden or our flowers. Not with my azaleas, vegetables, and etc. they don't. I live in a rural area and the critters that think they can ravage my little part of the universe (I've let them have about 80% of my property for their use) end up next to my mashed potatoes and green beans. My wife has an extensive garden. She hates rabbits. --Vic Rabbits were put here to cook. They're delicious. Ah, something on which we agree! I grew up on fried rabbit. |
Oh deer!
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:30:24 -0500, John H.
wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:47:33 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: I saw the Border Collies in action once, and they would swim after the geese that lit in the water. The geese would take off after the dog swam a short distance. I guess there's geese and geese, dogs and dogs. --Vic It could also depend on the size of the pond/lake. The geese to which I'm referring would take off and fly to the other side of the water. Poor dog would wear himself out in no time. Yeah, I was thinking along those lines, and forgot to mention the lagoons weren't too wide, maybe 50 yards. But what you said about smart geese might have something to it. I wondered why the geese didn't fly down the lagoon a bit and land again, but they didn't - they just flew off. Might also be the dogs I saw somehow let the geese know something you and me don't understand. I used to be a horseplayer, and have read and believe that a better horse ("classier") can run up on a cheaper horse and just by eyeballing him for a few strides make him give up. Maybe there's a dog/goose version of that. --Vic |
Oh deer!
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:47:33 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:11:43 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:55:36 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:52:12 -0500, John H. wrote: Dogs don't work. My brother had dogs on the golf course he managed. The geese would just fly into the water when the dog came. The dog couldn't swim fast enough to scare the geese. You got the wrong trainer. The dog isn't supposed to chase them into the water. I work with BCs here in and around golf courses and haven't ever had that problem. It's all in how the dogs are trained. The dogs don't 'chase' them into the water, the friggin' geese get smart quick and fly into the friggin' water as soon as they see the dog! There must be some stupid friggin' geese up there! I saw the Border Collies in action once, and they would swim after the geese that lit in the water. The geese would take off after the dog swam a short distance. I guess there's geese and geese, dogs and dogs. --Vic It could also depend on the size of the pond/lake. The geese to which I'm referring would take off and fly to the other side of the water. Poor dog would wear himself out in no time. |
Oh deer!
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:51:46 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 12:47:00 -0500, John H. wrote: Ah, something on which we agree! I grew up on fried rabbit. Taste like chicken? Never had it myself, though I've had turtle and squirrel once each. The squirrel wasn't cooked right and was tough and tasteless. The turtle tasted...like chicken. --Vic Rabbit tastes like rabbit. Squirrel is good if cooked right. We would bread it, fry it to a golden brown, then put it in a covered pan with a little water and bake it for an hour or so. This got them pretty tender. |
Oh deer!
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:51:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:20:21 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:53:52 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:13:29 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:50:24 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:46:02 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:02:55 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:25:54 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message news:u382e3ts8i22s7a6hjrvd4abtcu8s4o465@ 4ax.com... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:00:17 -0400, wrote: The winner was always an old sargent who took his time and shot down one per round, with a 2" revolver. I have said for years that the reason is due to 13 round semi-auto hand guns. With a revolver, you only have six - makes you concentrate. One of my favorite gun technique books suggests taking only 6 rounds to the range, no matter what kind of handgun you're shooting. Good idea. All my kids were trained that way. In fact, when my youngest went to the Academy in SC, he noticed that the more bullets they were issues, the more the used them. He took his time, minimum shots and did well. It's the revolver training. I have a 9mm Glock, but I never carry it unless I'm in the woods. For just carrying purposes, it's a .357 mag on a .38 frame. Don't you mean that the other way around? My Highway Patrolman shoots .38's but is a .357 magnum frame (and shoots them!). Nope - just the way I spake it. Wouldn't a gun with a frame built for .38's be somewhat unsafe with a bunch of .357 mags going through it? What part of this is so hard to understand? The gun is a .357 mag built on a .38 frame. Ruger SP101 Hello? Anybody home? You god damned people will agrue about anything. I'm outa here for a while. Morons. No argument exists. I was simply asking a question. I looked for information on the Ruger SP101, but could find nothing saying the frame was built for .38's. Look at the top strap, Einstein. Ah, another name-caller! Enlighten me, please. I am certainly no expert on pistols. What is a 'top strap'? Is there one in this photo? http://tinyurl.com/lw55 Yes, there is. See the black grip with the silver screw holding it on? That's actually called the top strap. Those are grip inserts. I've never heard them called 'top straps'. Do they have a stamp on them somewhere saying the frame is a .38 caliber frame? |
Oh deer!
Vic Smith wrote:
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:55:52 -0400, HK wrote: Real purty. I sometimes use them but prefer my M5 with ACP's for the heavy action. This is when playing SWAT 4, a terrific game. Did I tell you I live in Morton Grove, IL? They've outlawed bears, cougars and handguns. --Vic So, you keep your Israeli handgun concealed, eh? Went over my head. I don't know much about guns, although years ago I subscribed to Guns and was pretty advanced in my dreaming. But there was this place in Marietta Georgia I stopped once when I drove to Florida with a buddy. Called the Bulletstop. Think it was '85, when the Bears played the Dolphins in the superbowl. Shot clips from an Uzi, and a Thompson. It was fun, but expensive. I think if I ever felt the need to "protect my family" I'd have a Remington 12 autoloader to sleep with, and get a big pillow to keep it under. --Vic Aha. I thought you were referring to a pretty decent Israeli target pistol, made by BUL: http://world.guns.ru/handguns/hg205-e.htm Here's some more views of the X5 I have: http://www.sigsauer.com/Products/Sho...rodu ctid=143 |
Oh deer!
"John H." wrote in message
... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:38:43 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:51:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:20:21 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:oo13e3h766n56tof420chhq3vmd19jvnk3@4ax. com... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:53:52 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:13:29 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:50:24 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:46:02 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:02:55 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:25:54 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message news:u382e3ts8i22s7a6hjrvd4abtcu8s4o4 ... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:00:17 -0400, wrote: The winner was always an old sargent who took his time and shot down one per round, with a 2" revolver. I have said for years that the reason is due to 13 round semi-auto hand guns. With a revolver, you only have six - makes you concentrate. One of my favorite gun technique books suggests taking only 6 rounds to the range, no matter what kind of handgun you're shooting. Good idea. All my kids were trained that way. In fact, when my youngest went to the Academy in SC, he noticed that the more bullets they were issues, the more the used them. He took his time, minimum shots and did well. It's the revolver training. I have a 9mm Glock, but I never carry it unless I'm in the woods. For just carrying purposes, it's a .357 mag on a .38 frame. Don't you mean that the other way around? My Highway Patrolman shoots .38's but is a .357 magnum frame (and shoots them!). Nope - just the way I spake it. Wouldn't a gun with a frame built for .38's be somewhat unsafe with a bunch of .357 mags going through it? What part of this is so hard to understand? The gun is a .357 mag built on a .38 frame. Ruger SP101 Hello? Anybody home? You god damned people will agrue about anything. I'm outa here for a while. Morons. No argument exists. I was simply asking a question. I looked for information on the Ruger SP101, but could find nothing saying the frame was built for .38's. Look at the top strap, Einstein. Ah, another name-caller! Enlighten me, please. I am certainly no expert on pistols. What is a 'top strap'? Is there one in this photo? http://tinyurl.com/lw55 Yes, there is. See the black grip with the silver screw holding it on? That's actually called the top strap. Those are grip inserts. I've never heard them called 'top straps'. Do they have a stamp on them somewhere saying the frame is a .38 caliber frame? No. You just have to know these things. One high-tech way of knowing is to read a lot. Well, here's the site with all the specs and such. Perhaps you could point me to where it says the Ruger SP101 pistol is built on a .38 frame. Or, please point me to anything that says that. I'll admit to not reading a whole lot about pistols. Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know something about pistols. http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use google in your town. That should help you find the information you need. |
Oh deer!
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know something about pistols. http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use google in your town. That should help you find the information you need. Long one of my favorite shooting sites, but you can see the desperation in the right's politics...he's endorsed Tired Old Fred, with the same ideas that brought us...Iraq. |
Oh deer!
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:49:47 -0400, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:55:52 -0400, HK wrote: Real purty. I sometimes use them but prefer my M5 with ACP's for the heavy action. This is when playing SWAT 4, a terrific game. Did I tell you I live in Morton Grove, IL? They've outlawed bears, cougars and handguns. --Vic So, you keep your Israeli handgun concealed, eh? Went over my head. I don't know much about guns, although years ago I subscribed to Guns and was pretty advanced in my dreaming. But there was this place in Marietta Georgia I stopped once when I drove to Florida with a buddy. Called the Bulletstop. Think it was '85, when the Bears played the Dolphins in the superbowl. Shot clips from an Uzi, and a Thompson. It was fun, but expensive. I think if I ever felt the need to "protect my family" I'd have a Remington 12 autoloader to sleep with, and get a big pillow to keep it under. --Vic Aha. I thought you were referring to a pretty decent Israeli target pistol, made by BUL: http://world.guns.ru/handguns/hg205-e.htm Here's some more views of the X5 I have: http://www.sigsauer.com/Products/Sho...rodu ctid=143 No, and I was mistaken in saying M5. Haven't played in a while. Here's a tip sheet description: "Colt M4A1 Carbine Overall : **** Accuracy : ***** Stopping Power : **** Rate Of Fire : **** Recoil : ** Firing Modes : Auto/Semi Rounds Per Clip : 30 This gun seems to be the most popular in most multiplayer games, because of it's stopping power and accuracy, the problem with this though is it's rather nasty recoil, which is pretty much the only problem with the M4, but a nice overall weapon." So you can see what kind of gunman I am. Despite early interests in guns, except for short periods, I've always been a city boy. Different place, I might get interested again. --Vic |
Oh deer!
Vic Smith wrote:
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:49:47 -0400, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:55:52 -0400, HK wrote: Real purty. I sometimes use them but prefer my M5 with ACP's for the heavy action. This is when playing SWAT 4, a terrific game. Did I tell you I live in Morton Grove, IL? They've outlawed bears, cougars and handguns. --Vic So, you keep your Israeli handgun concealed, eh? Went over my head. I don't know much about guns, although years ago I subscribed to Guns and was pretty advanced in my dreaming. But there was this place in Marietta Georgia I stopped once when I drove to Florida with a buddy. Called the Bulletstop. Think it was '85, when the Bears played the Dolphins in the superbowl. Shot clips from an Uzi, and a Thompson. It was fun, but expensive. I think if I ever felt the need to "protect my family" I'd have a Remington 12 autoloader to sleep with, and get a big pillow to keep it under. --Vic Aha. I thought you were referring to a pretty decent Israeli target pistol, made by BUL: http://world.guns.ru/handguns/hg205-e.htm Here's some more views of the X5 I have: http://www.sigsauer.com/Products/Sho...rodu ctid=143 No, and I was mistaken in saying M5. Haven't played in a while. Here's a tip sheet description: "Colt M4A1 Carbine Overall : **** Accuracy : ***** Stopping Power : **** Rate Of Fire : **** Recoil : ** Firing Modes : Auto/Semi Rounds Per Clip : 30 This gun seems to be the most popular in most multiplayer games, because of it's stopping power and accuracy, the problem with this though is it's rather nasty recoil, which is pretty much the only problem with the M4, but a nice overall weapon." It's less than desirable in hot, dusty areas. |
Oh deer!
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:30:38 -0400, HK wrote:
It's less than desirable in hot, dusty areas. SWAT 4 missions are all in commercial/industrial areas. My M4A has never jammed, and I never even oiled it! --Vic |
Oh deer!
"John H." wrote in message
... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:08:19 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:38:43 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:51:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:2b33e3lt3kbdqa0rm1i7q2nlgqcckbs1r7@4ax. com... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:20:21 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:oo13e3h766n56tof420chhq3vmd19jvnk3@4a x.com... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:53:52 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:13:29 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:50:24 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:46:02 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:02:55 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:25:54 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message news:u382e3ts8i22s7a6hjrvd4abtcu8s4 ... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:00:17 -0400, wrote: The winner was always an old sargent who took his time and shot down one per round, with a 2" revolver. I have said for years that the reason is due to 13 round semi-auto hand guns. With a revolver, you only have six - makes you concentrate. One of my favorite gun technique books suggests taking only 6 rounds to the range, no matter what kind of handgun you're shooting. Good idea. All my kids were trained that way. In fact, when my youngest went to the Academy in SC, he noticed that the more bullets they were issues, the more the used them. He took his time, minimum shots and did well. It's the revolver training. I have a 9mm Glock, but I never carry it unless I'm in the woods. For just carrying purposes, it's a .357 mag on a .38 frame. Don't you mean that the other way around? My Highway Patrolman shoots .38's but is a .357 magnum frame (and shoots them!). Nope - just the way I spake it. Wouldn't a gun with a frame built for .38's be somewhat unsafe with a bunch of .357 mags going through it? What part of this is so hard to understand? The gun is a .357 mag built on a .38 frame. Ruger SP101 Hello? Anybody home? You god damned people will agrue about anything. I'm outa here for a while. Morons. No argument exists. I was simply asking a question. I looked for information on the Ruger SP101, but could find nothing saying the frame was built for .38's. Look at the top strap, Einstein. Ah, another name-caller! Enlighten me, please. I am certainly no expert on pistols. What is a 'top strap'? Is there one in this photo? http://tinyurl.com/lw55 Yes, there is. See the black grip with the silver screw holding it on? That's actually called the top strap. Those are grip inserts. I've never heard them called 'top straps'. Do they have a stamp on them somewhere saying the frame is a .38 caliber frame? No. You just have to know these things. One high-tech way of knowing is to read a lot. Well, here's the site with all the specs and such. Perhaps you could point me to where it says the Ruger SP101 pistol is built on a .38 frame. Or, please point me to anything that says that. I'll admit to not reading a whole lot about pistols. Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know something about pistols. http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use google in your town. That should help you find the information you need. Actually, I used Google to find the specs I gave you above. I could find nothing on the site you provided saying anything about the SP101 being a .38 frame. I did read that it was designed to be a small, strong .357 Magnum. Help! You haven't read enough. You have no secretary here. Since you have nothing better to do, continue doing your homework, or shut your trap. |
Oh deer!
"John H." wrote in message
... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:18:52 -0400, HK wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "John H." wrote in message Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know something about pistols. http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use google in your town. That should help you find the information you need. Long one of my favorite shooting sites, but you can see the desperation in the right's politics...he's endorsed Tired Old Fred, with the same ideas that brought us...Iraq. Actually, Harry, we're not discussing politics at all. We're discussing the frame used for the Ruger SP101. There is no "we" that includes you until you spend a day or ten reading. Otherwise, you can't possibly know what you're talking about. Is your public library open on weekends? Does the "home" have a shuttle bus that'll bring you there? |
Oh deer!
JimH wrote:
"John H." wrote in message ... Wouldn't a gun with a frame built for .38's be somewhat unsafe with a bunch of .357 mags going through it? What part of this is so hard to understand? The gun is a .357 mag built on a .38 frame. Ruger SP101 Hello? Anybody home? You god damned people will agrue about anything. I'm outa here for a while. Morons. No argument exists. I was simply asking a question. I looked for information on the Ruger SP101, but could find nothing saying the frame was built for .38's. Look at the top strap, Einstein. Ah, another name-caller! Enlighten me, please. I am certainly no expert on pistols. What is a 'top strap'? Is there one in this photo? http://tinyurl.com/lw55 Yes, there is. See the black grip with the silver screw holding it on? That's actually called the top strap. Those are grip inserts. I've never heard them called 'top straps'. Do they have a stamp on them somewhere saying the frame is a .38 caliber frame? No. You just have to know these things. One high-tech way of knowing is to read a lot. Well, here's the site with all the specs and such. Perhaps you could point me to where it says the Ruger SP101 pistol is built on a .38 frame. Or, please point me to anything that says that. I'll admit to not reading a whole lot about pistols. Looks like SW Tom was right. Some folks just want to argue..........about anything.....here. John, maybe there is an rec.arguing NG you can spend your day at. Well, he could go to that newsgroup he's always touting...what is it... ahh a.politics. But he'd only find himself to play with, and he'd surely turn himself down. |
Oh deer!
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:38:43 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:51:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:20:21 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message om... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:53:52 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:13:29 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:50:24 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:46:02 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:02:55 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:25:54 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message news:u382e3ts8i22s7a6hjrvd4abtcu8s4o46 ... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:00:17 -0400, wrote: The winner was always an old sargent who took his time and shot down one per round, with a 2" revolver. I have said for years that the reason is due to 13 round semi-auto hand guns. With a revolver, you only have six - makes you concentrate. One of my favorite gun technique books suggests taking only 6 rounds to the range, no matter what kind of handgun you're shooting. Good idea. All my kids were trained that way. In fact, when my youngest went to the Academy in SC, he noticed that the more bullets they were issues, the more the used them. He took his time, minimum shots and did well. It's the revolver training. I have a 9mm Glock, but I never carry it unless I'm in the woods. For just carrying purposes, it's a .357 mag on a .38 frame. Don't you mean that the other way around? My Highway Patrolman shoots .38's but is a .357 magnum frame (and shoots them!). Nope - just the way I spake it. Wouldn't a gun with a frame built for .38's be somewhat unsafe with a bunch of .357 mags going through it? What part of this is so hard to understand? The gun is a .357 mag built on a .38 frame. Ruger SP101 Hello? Anybody home? You god damned people will agrue about anything. I'm outa here for a while. Morons. No argument exists. I was simply asking a question. I looked for information on the Ruger SP101, but could find nothing saying the frame was built for .38's. Look at the top strap, Einstein. Ah, another name-caller! Enlighten me, please. I am certainly no expert on pistols. What is a 'top strap'? Is there one in this photo? http://tinyurl.com/lw55 Yes, there is. See the black grip with the silver screw holding it on? That's actually called the top strap. Those are grip inserts. I've never heard them called 'top straps'. Do they have a stamp on them somewhere saying the frame is a .38 caliber frame? No. You just have to know these things. One high-tech way of knowing is to read a lot. Well, here's the site with all the specs and such. Perhaps you could point me to where it says the Ruger SP101 pistol is built on a .38 frame. Or, please point me to anything that says that. I'll admit to not reading a whole lot about pistols. |
Oh deer!
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:08:19 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:38:43 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:51:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message om... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:20:21 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:oo13e3h766n56tof420chhq3vmd19jvnk3@4ax .com... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:53:52 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:13:29 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:50:24 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:46:02 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:02:55 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:25:54 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message news:u382e3ts8i22s7a6hjrvd4abtcu8s4o ... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:00:17 -0400, wrote: The winner was always an old sargent who took his time and shot down one per round, with a 2" revolver. I have said for years that the reason is due to 13 round semi-auto hand guns. With a revolver, you only have six - makes you concentrate. One of my favorite gun technique books suggests taking only 6 rounds to the range, no matter what kind of handgun you're shooting. Good idea. All my kids were trained that way. In fact, when my youngest went to the Academy in SC, he noticed that the more bullets they were issues, the more the used them. He took his time, minimum shots and did well. It's the revolver training. I have a 9mm Glock, but I never carry it unless I'm in the woods. For just carrying purposes, it's a .357 mag on a .38 frame. Don't you mean that the other way around? My Highway Patrolman shoots .38's but is a .357 magnum frame (and shoots them!). Nope - just the way I spake it. Wouldn't a gun with a frame built for .38's be somewhat unsafe with a bunch of .357 mags going through it? What part of this is so hard to understand? The gun is a .357 mag built on a .38 frame. Ruger SP101 Hello? Anybody home? You god damned people will agrue about anything. I'm outa here for a while. Morons. No argument exists. I was simply asking a question. I looked for information on the Ruger SP101, but could find nothing saying the frame was built for .38's. Look at the top strap, Einstein. Ah, another name-caller! Enlighten me, please. I am certainly no expert on pistols. What is a 'top strap'? Is there one in this photo? http://tinyurl.com/lw55 Yes, there is. See the black grip with the silver screw holding it on? That's actually called the top strap. Those are grip inserts. I've never heard them called 'top straps'. Do they have a stamp on them somewhere saying the frame is a .38 caliber frame? No. You just have to know these things. One high-tech way of knowing is to read a lot. Well, here's the site with all the specs and such. Perhaps you could point me to where it says the Ruger SP101 pistol is built on a .38 frame. Or, please point me to anything that says that. I'll admit to not reading a whole lot about pistols. Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know something about pistols. http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use google in your town. That should help you find the information you need. Actually, I used Google to find the specs I gave you above. I could find nothing on the site you provided saying anything about the SP101 being a ..38 frame. I did read that it was designed to be a small, strong .357 Magnum. Help! |
Oh deer!
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:18:52 -0400, HK wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "John H." wrote in message Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know something about pistols. http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use google in your town. That should help you find the information you need. Long one of my favorite shooting sites, but you can see the desperation in the right's politics...he's endorsed Tired Old Fred, with the same ideas that brought us...Iraq. Actually, Harry, we're not discussing politics at all. We're discussing the frame used for the Ruger SP101. |
Oh deer!
"John H." wrote in message
... On Fri, 7 Sep 2007 15:39:32 -0400, "JimH" ask wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... Wouldn't a gun with a frame built for .38's be somewhat unsafe with a bunch of .357 mags going through it? What part of this is so hard to understand? The gun is a .357 mag built on a .38 frame. Ruger SP101 Hello? Anybody home? You god damned people will agrue about anything. I'm outa here for a while. Morons. No argument exists. I was simply asking a question. I looked for information on the Ruger SP101, but could find nothing saying the frame was built for .38's. Look at the top strap, Einstein. Ah, another name-caller! Enlighten me, please. I am certainly no expert on pistols. What is a 'top strap'? Is there one in this photo? http://tinyurl.com/lw55 Yes, there is. See the black grip with the silver screw holding it on? That's actually called the top strap. Those are grip inserts. I've never heard them called 'top straps'. Do they have a stamp on them somewhere saying the frame is a .38 caliber frame? No. You just have to know these things. One high-tech way of knowing is to read a lot. Well, here's the site with all the specs and such. Perhaps you could point me to where it says the Ruger SP101 pistol is built on a .38 frame. Or, please point me to anything that says that. I'll admit to not reading a whole lot about pistols. Looks like SW Tom was right. Some folks just want to argue..........about anything.....here. John, maybe there is an rec.arguing NG you can spend your day at. I've argued about nothing. I'm simply trying to find something saying that a Ruger .357 Magnum pistol was built on a .38 frame. No, you're not trying to find anything. You're trying to get other people to do the work for you. You want a secretary? Hire one. Otherwise, keep reading. |
Oh deer!
"John H." wrote in message
... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:46:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:18:52 -0400, HK wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "John H." wrote in message Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know something about pistols. http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use in your town. That should help you find the information you need. Long one of my favorite shooting sites, but you can see the desperation in the right's politics...he's endorsed Tired Old Fred, with the same ideas that brought us...Iraq. Actually, Harry, we're not discussing politics at all. We're discussing the frame used for the Ruger SP101. There is no "we" that includes you until you spend a day or ten reading. Otherwise, you can't possibly know what you're talking about. Is your public library open on weekends? Does the "home" have a shuttle bus that'll bring you there? See previous answer to you. And, see answer to JimH. And, see answer to Harry. You guys have a lot of words to say, but none have shown anything that says the Ruger SP101, a .357 Magnum revolver, was built on a .38 frame. I can't believe that of you five people, *none* of you would come up with the proof, if it exists, simply to prove me wrong...although I've not asserted that it *wasn't* built on a .38 frame. So, if someone else has knowledge, they are required to dredge up sources for you, while you sit on your wet diaper and watch television. Not a chance. |
Oh deer!
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:46:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:18:52 -0400, HK wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "John H." wrote in message Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know something about pistols. http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use in your town. That should help you find the information you need. Long one of my favorite shooting sites, but you can see the desperation in the right's politics...he's endorsed Tired Old Fred, with the same ideas that brought us...Iraq. Actually, Harry, we're not discussing politics at all. We're discussing the frame used for the Ruger SP101. There is no "we" that includes you until you spend a day or ten reading. Otherwise, you can't possibly know what you're talking about. Is your public library open on weekends? Does the "home" have a shuttle bus that'll bring you there? See previous answer to you. And, see answer to JimH. And, see answer to Harry. You guys have a lot of words to say, but none have shown anything that says the Ruger SP101, a .357 Magnum revolver, was built on a .38 frame. I can't believe that of you five people, *none* of you would come up with the proof, if it exists, simply to prove me wrong...although I've not asserted that it *wasn't* built on a .38 frame. So, if someone else has knowledge, they are required to dredge up sources for you, while you sit on your wet diaper and watch television. Not a chance. Why is Herring "answering" me? He and that other douchebag, Reggie Retardo, are not on my "read" or "respond" list. Hell, my email filter has Herring and his aliases *blacklisted." |
Oh deer!
On Fri, 7 Sep 2007 15:39:32 -0400, "JimH" ask wrote:
"John H." wrote in message ... Wouldn't a gun with a frame built for .38's be somewhat unsafe with a bunch of .357 mags going through it? What part of this is so hard to understand? The gun is a .357 mag built on a .38 frame. Ruger SP101 Hello? Anybody home? You god damned people will agrue about anything. I'm outa here for a while. Morons. No argument exists. I was simply asking a question. I looked for information on the Ruger SP101, but could find nothing saying the frame was built for .38's. Look at the top strap, Einstein. Ah, another name-caller! Enlighten me, please. I am certainly no expert on pistols. What is a 'top strap'? Is there one in this photo? http://tinyurl.com/lw55 Yes, there is. See the black grip with the silver screw holding it on? That's actually called the top strap. Those are grip inserts. I've never heard them called 'top straps'. Do they have a stamp on them somewhere saying the frame is a .38 caliber frame? No. You just have to know these things. One high-tech way of knowing is to read a lot. Well, here's the site with all the specs and such. Perhaps you could point me to where it says the Ruger SP101 pistol is built on a .38 frame. Or, please point me to anything that says that. I'll admit to not reading a whole lot about pistols. Looks like SW Tom was right. Some folks just want to argue..........about anything.....here. John, maybe there is an rec.arguing NG you can spend your day at. I've argued about nothing. I'm simply trying to find something saying that a Ruger .357 Magnum pistol was built on a .38 frame. If I were arguing, I'd say that Tom's statement might have been a little in error. But, I'm not saying that at all. Let's see, five different people have called me names or made derogatory comments because I asked a question. Wow! |
Oh deer!
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:42:27 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:08:19 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:38:43 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message om... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:51:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:2b33e3lt3kbdqa0rm1i7q2nlgqcckbs1r7@4ax .com... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:20:21 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:oo13e3h766n56tof420chhq3vmd19jvnk3@4 ax.com... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:53:52 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:13:29 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:50:24 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:46:02 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:02:55 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:25:54 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message news:u382e3ts8i22s7a6hjrvd4abtcu8s ... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:00:17 -0400, wrote: The winner was always an old sargent who took his time and shot down one per round, with a 2" revolver. I have said for years that the reason is due to 13 round semi-auto hand guns. With a revolver, you only have six - makes you concentrate. One of my favorite gun technique books suggests taking only 6 rounds to the range, no matter what kind of handgun you're shooting. Good idea. All my kids were trained that way. In fact, when my youngest went to the Academy in SC, he noticed that the more bullets they were issues, the more the used them. He took his time, minimum shots and did well. It's the revolver training. I have a 9mm Glock, but I never carry it unless I'm in the woods. For just carrying purposes, it's a .357 mag on a .38 frame. Don't you mean that the other way around? My Highway Patrolman shoots .38's but is a .357 magnum frame (and shoots them!). Nope - just the way I spake it. Wouldn't a gun with a frame built for .38's be somewhat unsafe with a bunch of .357 mags going through it? What part of this is so hard to understand? The gun is a .357 mag built on a .38 frame. Ruger SP101 Hello? Anybody home? You god damned people will agrue about anything. I'm outa here for a while. Morons. No argument exists. I was simply asking a question. I looked for information on the Ruger SP101, but could find nothing saying the frame was built for .38's. Look at the top strap, Einstein. Ah, another name-caller! Enlighten me, please. I am certainly no expert on pistols. What is a 'top strap'? Is there one in this photo? http://tinyurl.com/lw55 Yes, there is. See the black grip with the silver screw holding it on? That's actually called the top strap. Those are grip inserts. I've never heard them called 'top straps'. Do they have a stamp on them somewhere saying the frame is a .38 caliber frame? No. You just have to know these things. One high-tech way of knowing is to read a lot. Well, here's the site with all the specs and such. Perhaps you could point me to where it says the Ruger SP101 pistol is built on a .38 frame. Or, please point me to anything that says that. I'll admit to not reading a whole lot about pistols. Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know something about pistols. http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use google in your town. That should help you find the information you need. Actually, I used Google to find the specs I gave you above. I could find nothing on the site you provided saying anything about the SP101 being a .38 frame. I did read that it was designed to be a small, strong .357 Magnum. Help! You haven't read enough. You have no secretary here. Since you have nothing better to do, continue doing your homework, or shut your trap. In other words, you know of nothing that says the Ruger SP101, a .357 Magnum revolver, was built on a .38 frame. Well, why did you bother to enter the discussion at all? |
Oh deer!
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:46:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:18:52 -0400, HK wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "John H." wrote in message Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know something about pistols. http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use google in your town. That should help you find the information you need. Long one of my favorite shooting sites, but you can see the desperation in the right's politics...he's endorsed Tired Old Fred, with the same ideas that brought us...Iraq. Actually, Harry, we're not discussing politics at all. We're discussing the frame used for the Ruger SP101. There is no "we" that includes you until you spend a day or ten reading. Otherwise, you can't possibly know what you're talking about. Is your public library open on weekends? Does the "home" have a shuttle bus that'll bring you there? See previous answer to you. And, see answer to JimH. And, see answer to Harry. You guys have a lot of words to say, but none have shown anything that says the Ruger SP101, a .357 Magnum revolver, was built on a .38 frame. I can't believe that of you five people, *none* of you would come up with the proof, if it exists, simply to prove me wrong...although I've not asserted that it *wasn't* built on a .38 frame. But, I won't make any derogatory statements about any of you. |
Oh deer!
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:16:03 -0400, HK wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:46:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:18:52 -0400, HK wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "John H." wrote in message Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know something about pistols. http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use in your town. That should help you find the information you need. Long one of my favorite shooting sites, but you can see the desperation in the right's politics...he's endorsed Tired Old Fred, with the same ideas that brought us...Iraq. Actually, Harry, we're not discussing politics at all. We're discussing the frame used for the Ruger SP101. There is no "we" that includes you until you spend a day or ten reading. Otherwise, you can't possibly know what you're talking about. Is your public library open on weekends? Does the "home" have a shuttle bus that'll bring you there? See previous answer to you. And, see answer to JimH. And, see answer to Harry. You guys have a lot of words to say, but none have shown anything that says the Ruger SP101, a .357 Magnum revolver, was built on a .38 frame. I can't believe that of you five people, *none* of you would come up with the proof, if it exists, simply to prove me wrong...although I've not asserted that it *wasn't* built on a .38 frame. So, if someone else has knowledge, they are required to dredge up sources for you, while you sit on your wet diaper and watch television. Not a chance. Why is Herring "answering" me? He and that other douchebag, Reggie Retardo, are not on my "read" or "respond" list. Hell, my email filter has Herring and his aliases *blacklisted." I answer you because you address me. That's simple. You address me because you read my posts. That's also simple. Your 'filter' is about as real as your lobsta boat. That's very simple! |
Oh deer!
"John H." wrote in message
... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:06:01 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:46:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:18:52 -0400, HK wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "John H." wrote in message Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know something about pistols. http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use in your town. That should help you find the information you need. Long one of my favorite shooting sites, but you can see the desperation in the right's politics...he's endorsed Tired Old Fred, with the same ideas that brought us...Iraq. Actually, Harry, we're not discussing politics at all. We're discussing the frame used for the Ruger SP101. There is no "we" that includes you until you spend a day or ten reading. Otherwise, you can't possibly know what you're talking about. Is your public library open on weekends? Does the "home" have a shuttle bus that'll bring you there? See previous answer to you. And, see answer to JimH. And, see answer to Harry. You guys have a lot of words to say, but none have shown anything that says the Ruger SP101, a .357 Magnum revolver, was built on a .38 frame. I can't believe that of you five people, *none* of you would come up with the proof, if it exists, simply to prove me wrong...although I've not asserted that it *wasn't* built on a .38 frame. So, if someone else has knowledge, they are required to dredge up sources for you, while you sit on your wet diaper and watch television. Not a chance. Doug, I'm thinking there are no sources saying the Ruger SP101, .357 Magnum revolver, was built on a .38 frame. I've looked at a couple dozen sites. I did find that the SP101 was built as a .22 calibre. So it's possible to buy a Ruger .22 on a .357 Magnum frame, but I could find nothing stating the .357 was built on a .38 frame. Do you reckon Ruger is keeping it hidden from the public. You're all done with with, John. You are over it. Way over it. If you want to continue, go ask the question in rec.guns. |
Oh deer!
"John H." wrote in message
... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 22:35:05 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:06:01 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:46:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:vud3e35ejb0itjhrvv90pdgk3ue3arjn9r@4ax. com... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:18:52 -0400, HK wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "John H." wrote in message Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know something about pistols. http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use in your town. That should help you find the information you need. Long one of my favorite shooting sites, but you can see the desperation in the right's politics...he's endorsed Tired Old Fred, with the same ideas that brought us...Iraq. Actually, Harry, we're not discussing politics at all. We're discussing the frame used for the Ruger SP101. There is no "we" that includes you until you spend a day or ten reading. Otherwise, you can't possibly know what you're talking about. Is your public library open on weekends? Does the "home" have a shuttle bus that'll bring you there? See previous answer to you. And, see answer to JimH. And, see answer to Harry. You guys have a lot of words to say, but none have shown anything that says the Ruger SP101, a .357 Magnum revolver, was built on a .38 frame. I can't believe that of you five people, *none* of you would come up with the proof, if it exists, simply to prove me wrong...although I've not asserted that it *wasn't* built on a .38 frame. So, if someone else has knowledge, they are required to dredge up sources for you, while you sit on your wet diaper and watch television. Not a chance. Doug, I'm thinking there are no sources saying the Ruger SP101, .357 Magnum revolver, was built on a .38 frame. I've looked at a couple dozen sites. I did find that the SP101 was built as a .22 calibre. So it's possible to buy a Ruger .22 on a .357 Magnum frame, but I could find nothing stating the .357 was built on a .38 frame. Do you reckon Ruger is keeping it hidden from the public. You're all done with with, John. You are over it. Way over it. If you want to continue, go ask the question in rec.guns. Let's see, first it was countersteering, now it's a .357 Magnum on a .38 frame. Sounds like you couldn't support your statements. Hell, you didn't even know what a grip insert was! Did I or did I not just teach you that you were all done here? Go change your diaper. |
Oh deer!
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:06:01 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:46:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:18:52 -0400, HK wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "John H." wrote in message Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know something about pistols. http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use in your town. That should help you find the information you need. Long one of my favorite shooting sites, but you can see the desperation in the right's politics...he's endorsed Tired Old Fred, with the same ideas that brought us...Iraq. Actually, Harry, we're not discussing politics at all. We're discussing the frame used for the Ruger SP101. There is no "we" that includes you until you spend a day or ten reading. Otherwise, you can't possibly know what you're talking about. Is your public library open on weekends? Does the "home" have a shuttle bus that'll bring you there? See previous answer to you. And, see answer to JimH. And, see answer to Harry. You guys have a lot of words to say, but none have shown anything that says the Ruger SP101, a .357 Magnum revolver, was built on a .38 frame. I can't believe that of you five people, *none* of you would come up with the proof, if it exists, simply to prove me wrong...although I've not asserted that it *wasn't* built on a .38 frame. So, if someone else has knowledge, they are required to dredge up sources for you, while you sit on your wet diaper and watch television. Not a chance. Doug, I'm thinking there are no sources saying the Ruger SP101, .357 Magnum revolver, was built on a .38 frame. I've looked at a couple dozen sites. I did find that the SP101 was built as a .22 calibre. So it's possible to buy a Ruger .22 on a .357 Magnum frame, but I could find nothing stating the ..357 was built on a .38 frame. Do you reckon Ruger is keeping it hidden from the public. |
Oh deer!
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 22:35:05 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:06:01 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:46:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message om... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:18:52 -0400, HK wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "John H." wrote in message Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know something about pistols. http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use in your town. That should help you find the information you need. Long one of my favorite shooting sites, but you can see the desperation in the right's politics...he's endorsed Tired Old Fred, with the same ideas that brought us...Iraq. Actually, Harry, we're not discussing politics at all. We're discussing the frame used for the Ruger SP101. There is no "we" that includes you until you spend a day or ten reading. Otherwise, you can't possibly know what you're talking about. Is your public library open on weekends? Does the "home" have a shuttle bus that'll bring you there? See previous answer to you. And, see answer to JimH. And, see answer to Harry. You guys have a lot of words to say, but none have shown anything that says the Ruger SP101, a .357 Magnum revolver, was built on a .38 frame. I can't believe that of you five people, *none* of you would come up with the proof, if it exists, simply to prove me wrong...although I've not asserted that it *wasn't* built on a .38 frame. So, if someone else has knowledge, they are required to dredge up sources for you, while you sit on your wet diaper and watch television. Not a chance. Doug, I'm thinking there are no sources saying the Ruger SP101, .357 Magnum revolver, was built on a .38 frame. I've looked at a couple dozen sites. I did find that the SP101 was built as a .22 calibre. So it's possible to buy a Ruger .22 on a .357 Magnum frame, but I could find nothing stating the .357 was built on a .38 frame. Do you reckon Ruger is keeping it hidden from the public. You're all done with with, John. You are over it. Way over it. If you want to continue, go ask the question in rec.guns. Let's see, first it was countersteering, now it's a .357 Magnum on a .38 frame. Sounds like you couldn't support your statements. Hell, you didn't even know what a grip insert was! |
Oh deer!
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 23:00:33 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 22:35:05 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:06:01 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message om... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:46:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:vud3e35ejb0itjhrvv90pdgk3ue3arjn9r@4ax .com... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:18:52 -0400, HK wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "John H." wrote in message Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know something about pistols. http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use in your town. That should help you find the information you need. Long one of my favorite shooting sites, but you can see the desperation in the right's politics...he's endorsed Tired Old Fred, with the same ideas that brought us...Iraq. Actually, Harry, we're not discussing politics at all. We're discussing the frame used for the Ruger SP101. There is no "we" that includes you until you spend a day or ten reading. Otherwise, you can't possibly know what you're talking about. Is your public library open on weekends? Does the "home" have a shuttle bus that'll bring you there? See previous answer to you. And, see answer to JimH. And, see answer to Harry. You guys have a lot of words to say, but none have shown anything that says the Ruger SP101, a .357 Magnum revolver, was built on a .38 frame. I can't believe that of you five people, *none* of you would come up with the proof, if it exists, simply to prove me wrong...although I've not asserted that it *wasn't* built on a .38 frame. So, if someone else has knowledge, they are required to dredge up sources for you, while you sit on your wet diaper and watch television. Not a chance. Doug, I'm thinking there are no sources saying the Ruger SP101, .357 Magnum revolver, was built on a .38 frame. I've looked at a couple dozen sites. I did find that the SP101 was built as a .22 calibre. So it's possible to buy a Ruger .22 on a .357 Magnum frame, but I could find nothing stating the .357 was built on a .38 frame. Do you reckon Ruger is keeping it hidden from the public. You're all done with with, John. You are over it. Way over it. If you want to continue, go ask the question in rec.guns. Let's see, first it was countersteering, now it's a .357 Magnum on a .38 frame. Sounds like you couldn't support your statements. Hell, you didn't even know what a grip insert was! Did I or did I not just teach you that you were all done here? Go change your diaper. Y'all just can't stand being wrong! Hell, it's no big deal to say, "Whoops, I was wrong." But I guess that when you've called someone a god damned guy and a moron, not to mention the comments you and Harry and JimH manage, it's pretty tough. Trust me, Doug, if a site proving your point existed, you'd be shoving it down my throat! And no, I'm not all alone. You persist in answering. The others read but know better than to answer, 'cause they can't find anything either! |
Oh deer!
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:58:14 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote: You could take a proactive approach and let your property return to a wild state. I have done just that. I have three acres and have let about 2.5 acres revert to the natural state, including a pond. I have a lot of wildlife and have the opportunity to observe them..... without feeding them. Sounds like a good plan. No one really needs more than a half acre or so for house and lawn. |
Oh deer!
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:18:39 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "Vic Smith" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:05:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: Careful. You sound like some "folks" who think anyone who reads and learns is an elitist. Hmm. Typical educated cop response. --Vic Quota? Nah. I can write as many tickets as I want. Ahhhhhh Joey is a cop? ROFLMAO Did you tell all your buddies here how you lost a HALF MILLION DOLLARS to me? -- Scott in Florida About all I can say for the United States Senate is that it opens with a prayer and closes with an investigation. Will Rogers (1879 - 1935) |
Oh deer!
"John H." wrote in message
... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 23:00:33 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 22:35:05 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:06:01 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:r3h3e3h2vt0tmbfm2lbfmvpcof8kavoaq1@4ax. com... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:46:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:vud3e35ejb0itjhrvv90pdgk3ue3arjn9r@4a x.com... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:18:52 -0400, HK wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "John H." wrote in message Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know something about pistols. http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use in your town. That should help you find the information you need. Long one of my favorite shooting sites, but you can see the desperation in the right's politics...he's endorsed Tired Old Fred, with the same ideas that brought us...Iraq. Actually, Harry, we're not discussing politics at all. We're discussing the frame used for the Ruger SP101. There is no "we" that includes you until you spend a day or ten reading. Otherwise, you can't possibly know what you're talking about. Is your public library open on weekends? Does the "home" have a shuttle bus that'll bring you there? See previous answer to you. And, see answer to JimH. And, see answer to Harry. You guys have a lot of words to say, but none have shown anything that says the Ruger SP101, a .357 Magnum revolver, was built on a .38 frame. I can't believe that of you five people, *none* of you would come up with the proof, if it exists, simply to prove me wrong...although I've not asserted that it *wasn't* built on a .38 frame. So, if someone else has knowledge, they are required to dredge up sources for you, while you sit on your wet diaper and watch television. Not a chance. Doug, I'm thinking there are no sources saying the Ruger SP101, .357 Magnum revolver, was built on a .38 frame. I've looked at a couple dozen sites. I did find that the SP101 was built as a .22 calibre. So it's possible to buy a Ruger .22 on a .357 Magnum frame, but I could find nothing stating the .357 was built on a .38 frame. Do you reckon Ruger is keeping it hidden from the public. You're all done with with, John. You are over it. Way over it. If you want to continue, go ask the question in rec.guns. Let's see, first it was countersteering, now it's a .357 Magnum on a .38 frame. Sounds like you couldn't support your statements. Hell, you didn't even know what a grip insert was! Did I or did I not just teach you that you were all done here? Go change your diaper. Y'all just can't stand being wrong! Hell, it's no big deal to say, "Whoops, I was wrong." But I guess that when you've called someone a god damned guy and a moron, not to mention the comments you and Harry and JimH manage, it's pretty tough. Trust me, Doug, if a site proving your point existed, you'd be shoving it down my throat! And no, I'm not all alone. You persist in answering. The others read but know better than to answer, 'cause they can't find anything either! Are you always this lazy? This is strange, coming from a guy who used to bitch about his students being less than wonderful. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:42 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com