Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 08:35:35 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Vic Smith" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 07:56:41 -0400, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 14:08:30 +0300, Matti Kaki wrote: 60.414 N 25.097 E That's a bit north of Helsinki, Finland. Man, this low transom issue is becoming an international furor. --Vic Did you look at the photos he posted? The boat is just this side of decrepit, and the reason water coming in can get to the battery is because someone removed the hatch that covers the opening in the deck. He'll fit in well here with the rest of the inlanders. I looked. Lotsa old crappy boats out there. You do know I was joking? Probably the Finn was joining in the fun, but I'm not up on Finns and their humor. For the record, I'm not an experienced boater, but given your experience and your comments I have no trouble with your low transom, and I think Tom's is even lower. --Vic I think women worry more about low transoms than men. Eisboch Well...manly men, anyway. |
#22
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 09:52:55 -0400, HK wrote:
wrote: On Sep 5, 8:45 am, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 07:56:41 -0400, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 14:08:30 +0300, Matti Kaki wrote: 60.414 N 25.097 E That's a bit north of Helsinki, Finland. Man, this low transom issue is becoming an international furor. --Vic Did you look at the photos he posted? The boat is just this side of decrepit, and the reason water coming in can get to the battery is because someone removed the hatch that covers the opening in the deck. He'll fit in well here with the rest of the inlanders. I looked. Lotsa old crappy boats out there. You do know I was joking? Probably the Finn was joining in the fun, but I'm not up on Finns and their humor. For the record, I'm not an experienced boater, but given your experience and your comments I have no trouble with your low transom, and I think Tom's is even lower. --Vic Yeah, I realized that, and unlike Chuck, I enjoy jokes at my expense. No one laughs more at me than me. Unfortunately, we have a number of posters here with an "agenda" that includes trying to make trouble for me and a few others. The fact that they don't succeed, haven't succeeded, and never will succeed must cause they a great deal of grief, eh? :} I thought Tom was transomless. Oh...Finns. I worked with one for three years. He had no sense of humor. None.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Make trouble for you? How can the words of internet sock puppets make trouble for you? I think you take these posts a little more serious than you let on. And you of all people should not... Reread my comment. I said they "try," I did not say they succeeded. Most of them are permanent residents of my filters, which only save the headers and the senders' names, not the messages themselves. But a small percentage of their trash is reposted when others make a comment. Of all the jerks who post here regularly, I would say "Dan" and "John Herring" are the saddest sacks. They appear to be completely obsessed with me, and I don't even have nice tits. A 'filter' which saves the headers and the senders' names, but filters the messages. Wow! What would be the purpose in retaining the header and sender's name for those whom you've 'filtered'? Some are obsessed with you because you're such a neat guy with remarkable 'foibles'! |
#23
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 5, 7:08 am, Matti Kaki wrote:
Hello from Finland. I just took a look of a finnish boating magazine from year 1991 and was really allerted. There was a story about US-made boat which could not pass a finnish yachtclub inspection at all. This boat is made by SYLVAN MARINE Lagrande, GA. Model 17VFC / VFC 175 There is very low transom freeboard. If you put a 140 hp engine which you can do according to the U.S. Coast Guard plate, the stern probably takes water inside thru the two holes which probably are supposed to drain the boat not fill it with water. There is no motor well. I can't undestand that this boat has U. S. Coast Guard plate. How is this possible? Here I have some pictures: http://www.mattikaki.fi/starcraft/ -- Matti Kaki at iki dot fi http://www.sci.fi/~oh2bio =========== Location: 60.414 N 25.097 E =========== Navigare Necesse Est - Vivere Non Est Necesse That boat looks like it would, when new have had no problem surpassing the safety calculations as put fourth by the USCG for boats that size. These regulations have served the building community well for a long time. If you guys want to regulate wet feet, that is your problem ![]() that boat was better maintained, it would seem a perfectly good tool for many a fishermen, or family folks, as far as the design is concerened. |
#24
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 10:10:37 -0700, Chuck Gould
wrote: On Sep 5, 6:52?am, HK wrote: wrote: On Sep 5, 8:45 am, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 07:56:41 -0400, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 14:08:30 +0300, Matti Kaki wrote: 60.414 N 25.097 E That's a bit north of Helsinki, Finland. Man, this low transom issue is becoming an international furor. --Vic Did you look at the photos he posted? The boat is just this side of decrepit, and the reason water coming in can get to the battery is because someone removed the hatch that covers the opening in the deck. He'll fit in well here with the rest of the inlanders. I looked. Lotsa old crappy boats out there. You do know I was joking? Probably the Finn was joining in the fun, but I'm not up on Finns and their humor. For the record, I'm not an experienced boater, but given your experience and your comments I have no trouble with your low transom, and I think Tom's is even lower. --Vic Yeah, I realized that, and unlike Chuck, I enjoy jokes at my expense. No one laughs more at me than me. Unfortunately, we have a number of posters here with an "agenda" that includes trying to make trouble for me and a few others. The fact that they don't succeed, haven't succeeded, and never will succeed must cause they a great deal of grief, eh? :} I thought Tom was transomless. Oh...Finns. I worked with one for three years. He had no sense of humor. None.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Make trouble for you? How can the words of internet sock puppets make trouble for you? I think you take these posts a little more serious than you let on. And you of all people should not... Reread my comment. I said they "try," I did not say they succeeded. Most of them are permanent residents of my filters, which only save the headers and the senders' names, not the messages themselves. But a small percentage of their trash is reposted when others make a comment. Of all the jerks who post here regularly, I would say "Dan" and "John Herring" are the saddest sacks. They appear to be completely obsessed with me, and I don't even have nice tits.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You needn't look to far for a sad sack, Krause. Read through this thread. Who was the very first to start making derogatory remarks about other posters? Who, after the first foray, keeps moving the discussion more and more toward personalities and away from the boating subject in the thread? Worse yet, it's not an anomaly. It's your SOP. Ever starve for oxygen up there on your high pedestal? Obviously you never get tired of making nasty cracks about all the people you consider beneath you- and that's pretty well everybody. Chuck, it's only because we *are* beneath him. He just has a few cute little 'foibles' that we should overlook. In this thread he's only attacked you, me, Dan, and the Finns, without provocation. But, that's just 'Harry being Harry' as some here would say! |
#25
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 5, 11:27?am, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 10:10:37 -0700, Chuck Gould wrote: On Sep 5, 6:52?am, HK wrote: wrote: On Sep 5, 8:45 am, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 07:56:41 -0400, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 14:08:30 +0300, Matti Kaki wrote: 60.414 N 25.097 E That's a bit north of Helsinki, Finland. Man, this low transom issue is becoming an international furor. --Vic Did you look at the photos he posted? The boat is just this side of decrepit, and the reason water coming in can get to the battery is because someone removed the hatch that covers the opening in the deck. He'll fit in well here with the rest of the inlanders. I looked. Lotsa old crappy boats out there. You do know I was joking? Probably the Finn was joining in the fun, but I'm not up on Finns and their humor. For the record, I'm not an experienced boater, but given your experience and your comments I have no trouble with your low transom, and I think Tom's is even lower. --Vic Yeah, I realized that, and unlike Chuck, I enjoy jokes at my expense. No one laughs more at me than me. Unfortunately, we have a number of posters here with an "agenda" that includes trying to make trouble for me and a few others. The fact that they don't succeed, haven't succeeded, and never will succeed must cause they a great deal of grief, eh? :} I thought Tom was transomless. Oh...Finns. I worked with one for three years. He had no sense of humor. None.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Make trouble for you? How can the words of internet sock puppets make trouble for you? I think you take these posts a little more serious than you let on. And you of all people should not... Reread my comment. I said they "try," I did not say they succeeded. Most of them are permanent residents of my filters, which only save the headers and the senders' names, not the messages themselves. But a small percentage of their trash is reposted when others make a comment. Of all the jerks who post here regularly, I would say "Dan" and "John Herring" are the saddest sacks. They appear to be completely obsessed with me, and I don't even have nice tits.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You needn't look to far for a sad sack, Krause. Read through this thread. Who was the very first to start making derogatory remarks about other posters? Who, after the first foray, keeps moving the discussion more and more toward personalities and away from the boating subject in the thread? Worse yet, it's not an anomaly. It's your SOP. Ever starve for oxygen up there on your high pedestal? Obviously you never get tired of making nasty cracks about all the people you consider beneath you- and that's pretty well everybody. Chuck, it's only because we *are* beneath him. He just has a few cute little 'foibles' that we should overlook. In this thread he's only attacked you, me, Dan, and the Finns, without provocation. But, that's just 'Harry being Harry' as some here would say!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - A one-trick pony is as tedious as a toothache. |
#26
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 14:08:30 +0300, Matti Kaki penned the following
well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Hello from Finland. I just took a look of a finnish boating magazine from year 1991 and was really allerted. There was a story about US-made boat which could not pass a finnish yachtclub inspection at all. This boat is made by SYLVAN MARINE Lagrande, GA. Model 17VFC / VFC 175 There is very low transom freeboard. If you put a 140 hp engine which you can do according to the U.S. Coast Guard plate, the stern probably takes water inside thru the two holes which probably are supposed to drain the boat not fill it with water. There is no motor well. I can't undestand that this boat has U. S. Coast Guard plate. How is this possible? Here I have some pictures: http://www.mattikaki.fi/starcraft/ Think about it..... in 1991 a 20 year old boat was still floating.... in spite of horrendous Finnish alteration, preventive maintenance, and repair. Seems more like a testament to the superb quality of American design and workmanship than anything else. Seems to me that the USCG got it right! -- Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepage http://pamandgene.idleplay.net/ Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats ----------------- www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed* Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road ----------------- |
#27
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don White wrote:
"John H." wrote in message ... Chuck, it's only because we *are* beneath him. He just has a few cute little 'foibles' that we should overlook. In this thread he's only attacked you, me, Dan, and the Finns, without provocation. But, that's just 'Harry being Harry' as some here would say! John...your behaviour is outrageous. You throw as many digs at Harry as he sends your way...maybe more since Harry only responds after seeing your shots through a 3rd party. A lot of your digs are 'freebies' when everyone else ignores you. I thought Herring was buying a new boat...why is trying to stir up more crap here? |
#28
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chuck Gould wrote:
You needn't look to far for a sad sack, Krause. Thank you, Mr. Sack. |
#29
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gene Kearns wrote:
On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 14:08:30 +0300, Matti Kaki penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Hello from Finland. I just took a look of a finnish boating magazine from year 1991 and was really allerted. There was a story about US-made boat which could not pass a finnish yachtclub inspection at all. This boat is made by SYLVAN MARINE Lagrande, GA. Model 17VFC / VFC 175 There is very low transom freeboard. If you put a 140 hp engine which you can do according to the U.S. Coast Guard plate, the stern probably takes water inside thru the two holes which probably are supposed to drain the boat not fill it with water. There is no motor well. I can't undestand that this boat has U. S. Coast Guard plate. How is this possible? Here I have some pictures: http://www.mattikaki.fi/starcraft/ Think about it..... in 1991 a 20 year old boat was still floating.... in spite of horrendous Finnish alteration, preventive maintenance, and repair. Seems more like a testament to the superb quality of American design and workmanship than anything else. Seems to me that the USCG got it right! how did it get to finland? towed over by a bayliner? |
#30
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 14:46:36 -0300, "Don White"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . Chuck, it's only because we *are* beneath him. He just has a few cute little 'foibles' that we should overlook. In this thread he's only attacked you, me, Dan, and the Finns, without provocation. But, that's just 'Harry being Harry' as some here would say! John...your behaviour is outrageous. You throw as many digs at Harry as he sends your way...maybe more since Harry only responds after seeing your shots through a 3rd party. A lot of your digs are 'freebies' when everyone else ignores you. Hi Don! How's that new boat doing? Have you been out in it yet? Some more pictures of the boat and your dog would be cool! You'll note that I said nothing derogatory about Harry in the above post. So get back to being sociable and tell us more about your boat! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Coast Guard Boat Limon Costa Rica | Tall Ship Photos | |||
US Coast Guard - Boat Crew Seamanship Manual | Cruising | |||
Coast Guard reports | Cruising | |||
Changes to several Coast Guard broadcasts 6/15/05 | Cruising | |||
Cdn. Coast Guard: Wow | General |