On Fri, 11 May 2007 10:16:46 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007 08:26:13 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007 07:46:37 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

Tom Francis wrote:
Just because.
That's it? I hang around because once in a while there's a nugget of
useful info here and because a few of the other posters are
entertaining in a positive way (like you, for example).
I'm honored - I think. :)
And of course, because a few of the "other" posters provide a window
into the sociology of deviants.
Yep - know what you mean.

All them Global Warming types and liberals.

~~ sigh ~~
That would be "lib'rals" to you social luddites.

Lib'ral This, Luddite Boy. :)


No one combines tackiness and unrefined as delightfully as you!


mmmm.. Tom + delightful??

I am nothing if not delightful.

That's quite a combination.

At least I'm not Canadian. :)

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 11 May 2007 10:16:46 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007 08:26:13 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007 07:46:37 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

Tom Francis wrote:
Just because.
That's it? I hang around because once in a while there's a nugget of
useful info here and because a few of the other posters are
entertaining in a positive way (like you, for example).
I'm honored - I think. :)
And of course, because a few of the "other" posters provide a window
into the sociology of deviants.
Yep - know what you mean.

All them Global Warming types and liberals.

~~ sigh ~~
That would be "lib'rals" to you social luddites.

Lib'ral This, Luddite Boy. :)


No one combines tackiness and unrefined as delightfully as you!


mmmm.. Tom + delightful??

I am nothing if not delightful.

That's quite a combination.

At least I'm not Canadian. :)

If your next election goes badly you may wish you were. Hold onto that
Halman 20..it may be your ticket in.

On Fri, 11 May 2007 12:50:53 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 11 May 2007 10:16:46 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007 08:26:13 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007 07:46:37 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

Tom Francis wrote:
Just because.
That's it? I hang around because once in a while there's a nugget of
useful info here and because a few of the other posters are
entertaining in a positive way (like you, for example).
I'm honored - I think. :)
And of course, because a few of the "other" posters provide a window
into the sociology of deviants.
Yep - know what you mean.

All them Global Warming types and liberals.

~~ sigh ~~
That would be "lib'rals" to you social luddites.

Lib'ral This, Luddite Boy. :)


No one combines tackiness and unrefined as delightfully as you!


mmmm.. Tom + delightful??

I am nothing if not delightful.

That's quite a combination.

At least I'm not Canadian. :)

If your next election goes badly you may wish you were. Hold onto that
Halman 20..it may be your ticket in.

Trust me on this - even if a Democrat was elected President, I
wouldn't move to Canada.

Fiji maybe, Canada - no way. :)

At least I'm not Canadian.

Ouch man isn't that hitting a little below the belt.

On 11 May 2007 14:39:32 -0700, Bill
wrote:

At least I'm not Canadian.

Ouch man isn't that hitting a little below the belt.

Standing joke....

Ouch man isn't that hitting a little below the belt.

Standing joke....

Well all erectly postured Canadians are but isn't considered impolite
to stare at the guy that obviously has some disability?

On 11 May 2007 15:24:09 -0700, Bill
wrote:

Ouch man isn't that hitting a little below the belt.

Standing joke....

Well all erectly postured Canadians are but isn't considered impolite
to stare at the guy that obviously has some disability?

Good point.

"Bill" wrote in message
oups.com...
Ouch man isn't that hitting a little below the belt.

Standing joke....

Well all erectly postured Canadians are but isn't considered impolite
to stare at the guy that obviously has some disability?


Whew! Maybe you should come up here and finish your elementary school
education.

Whew! Maybe you should come up here and finish your elementary school
education.

If I had a Canadian education then I would think it's okay to stare at
disabled people? No Thanks, I'm mean but damn that's just wrong.

On 11 May 2007 16:25:36 -0700, Bill
wrote:

Whew! Maybe you should come up here and finish your elementary school
education.

If I had a Canadian education then I would think it's okay to stare at
disabled people? No Thanks, I'm mean but damn that's just wrong.

Yeah.

However, what if you are a disabled person staring at a disabled
person?