On May 6, 7:01 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sun, 06 May 2007 17:37:51 -0500, John H.
wrote:

Haven't looked at Polars or Hydra-Sports yet. Will do it though.

Somebody mentioned Key West. They are nice, but a little spartan
compared to the Polar.

Isn't the Ranger the one that's about 800 lbs overweight?

I didn't mention the resolution to that/

Turns out, no.

It's a long story, but the short of it is that the published weight
ranges for that year (it was the first year model and actually the
third boat built) weren't correct - add in a few pounds for
manufacturing tolerance, it turns out it's not overweight.

They added some springs to the trailer, added larger discs/brakes (no
charge) and all is well.

They do stand behind their products.

So, interested? :)

Not in the boat, but I might want to talk to you about that pine.

On 6 May 2007 19:05:30 -0700, wrote:

On May 6, 7:01 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sun, 06 May 2007 17:37:51 -0500, John H.
wrote:

Haven't looked at Polars or Hydra-Sports yet. Will do it though.

Somebody mentioned Key West. They are nice, but a little spartan
compared to the Polar.

Isn't the Ranger the one that's about 800 lbs overweight?

I didn't mention the resolution to that/

Turns out, no.

It's a long story, but the short of it is that the published weight
ranges for that year (it was the first year model and actually the
third boat built) weren't correct - add in a few pounds for
manufacturing tolerance, it turns out it's not overweight.

They added some springs to the trailer, added larger discs/brakes (no
charge) and all is well.

They do stand behind their products.

So, interested? :)

Not in the boat, but I might want to talk to you about that pine.

So, let's talk.

On May 7, 6:02 am, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:

So, interested? :)

Not in the boat, but I might want to talk to you about that pine.

So, let's talk.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Yup, soon, just have to get the place sorted out, see if I can work
here.