On Mar 9, 7:35?am, Harry Krause wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Mar 9, 5:16?am, JLH wrote:
On 8 Mar 2007 20:06:30 -0800, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:

On Mar 8, 6:47?pm, "JimH" wrote:

If one really didn't shot from shine, they'd think my report on a
visit to a boat factory was a "review". But one would have to be just
about dumber than a barnacle to arrive at that conclusion, so there's
darn little chance of it happening here in the NG. (On the remote
chance that you failed to notice, there *is no* boat to review. Just a
group of molded sections and a partially laid up hull.)
Chuck, what you're implying is a reading comprehension problem.
--
John H

Barnacle: A very low form of marine life that contributes nothing to
the normal operation of a boat and is a PITA simply "along for the
ride". Seems like there will always be a few barnacles. It's fortunate
that we don't have any posters to the NG who are non-contributing
lower life forms simply along for the ride.

But let's examine my egregious screw up:

How would I dare post some boating related content here? Will someobdy
please pray for my poor misguided soul and send me an email informing
me about it? That will give me something to post that would meet with
Jim's approval. I live and die by JimH's opinion of me, and it's so
distressing to see him unhappy or displeased.

Perhaps I should apologize to JimH and his on-line prayer group for
cluttering up the rec.boats board with comments about a visit to a
boat factory. Who gives a durn about boats or how one brand or another
is built? What was I thinking? Anybody know where I can buy a lottery
ticket? Not only would that be the highlight of my week, it would make
interesting, boating related reading. :-)

Perhaps you ought to read some Hemingway. Almost everything you post is
overwritten or overwrought or both. Write shorter sentences. Write
shorter paragraphs. Edit out the fluff.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Never claimed to write like Hemingway. One or two people like my
style. Sorry that you're not among them. :-)

Chuck Gould wrote:
On Mar 9, 7:35?am, Harry Krause wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Mar 9, 5:16?am, JLH wrote:
On 8 Mar 2007 20:06:30 -0800, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:
On Mar 8, 6:47?pm, "JimH" wrote:
If one really didn't shot from shine, they'd think my report on a
visit to a boat factory was a "review". But one would have to be just
about dumber than a barnacle to arrive at that conclusion, so there's
darn little chance of it happening here in the NG. (On the remote
chance that you failed to notice, there *is no* boat to review. Just a
group of molded sections and a partially laid up hull.)
Chuck, what you're implying is a reading comprehension problem.
--
John H
Barnacle: A very low form of marine life that contributes nothing to
the normal operation of a boat and is a PITA simply "along for the
ride". Seems like there will always be a few barnacles. It's fortunate
that we don't have any posters to the NG who are non-contributing
lower life forms simply along for the ride.
But let's examine my egregious screw up:
How would I dare post some boating related content here? Will someobdy
please pray for my poor misguided soul and send me an email informing
me about it? That will give me something to post that would meet with
Jim's approval. I live and die by JimH's opinion of me, and it's so
distressing to see him unhappy or displeased.
Perhaps I should apologize to JimH and his on-line prayer group for
cluttering up the rec.boats board with comments about a visit to a
boat factory. Who gives a durn about boats or how one brand or another
is built? What was I thinking? Anybody know where I can buy a lottery
ticket? Not only would that be the highlight of my week, it would make
interesting, boating related reading. :-)
Perhaps you ought to read some Hemingway. Almost everything you post is
overwritten or overwrought or both. Write shorter sentences. Write
shorter paragraphs. Edit out the fluff.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Never claimed to write like Hemingway. One or two people like my
style. Sorry that you're not among them. :-)


I would assume their is a real knack to write an magazine article that
is interesting enough to get people to pick up the magazine, and meets
the number of words you need to fill out the space available for the
article.

I find your articles as good as any I have seen in any boating mags,
they are better than many I have read.

PS - Can you send me my commission check for keeping this thread running
in rec.boats? You were late on last months commission check. It is
common knowledge that boat mfg'ers will pay mega bucks to have a
magazine article reprinted posted in rec.boats.

On Mar 9, 8:05�am, RJSmithers
wrote:


PS - Can you send me my commission check for keeping this thread running
in rec.boats? *You were late on last months commission check. *It is
common knowledge that boat mfg'ers will pay mega bucks to have a
magazine article reprinted posted in rec.boats.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Right away.

Check for $1,500,000 is enroute. I was late last month because the
Bank of Monopoly got my address confused. They thought I still lived
on St. James Place and my new supply of checks was delayed in arriving
at my new digs, (the dumpster out back of the Electric Company).

On 9 Mar 2007 08:43:36 -0800, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:

On Mar 9, 8:05?am, RJSmithers
wrote:


PS - Can you send me my commission check for keeping this thread running
in rec.boats? ou were late on last months commission check. t is
common knowledge that boat mfg'ers will pay mega bucks to have a
magazine article reprinted posted in rec.boats.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Right away.

Check for $1,500,000 is enroute. I was late last month because the
Bank of Monopoly got my address confused. They thought I still lived
on St. James Place and my new supply of checks was delayed in arriving
at my new digs, (the dumpster out back of the Electric Company).

Funny you should mention the Bank of Monolopy.

One of my Dad's brothers was a VP at the old Parker Brother's factory
in Salem, MA which developed Monolopy. There actually was a Bank of
Monopoly in the building with a faux valut, faux armed guards and all
the trappings of a real bank. When they did tours, it was the
highlight of the day.

I have pictures around here somewhere that I should scan of that.

On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 11:05:00 -0500, RJSmithers
wrote:

PS - Can you send me my commission check for keeping this thread running
in rec.boats? You were late on last months commission check. It is
common knowledge that boat mfg'ers will pay mega bucks to have a
magazine article reprinted posted in rec.boats.

Check's in the mail.

On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 11:05:00 -0500, RJSmithers
wrote:

Chuck Gould wrote:


I find your articles as good as any I have seen in any boating mags,
they are better than many I have read.

Seconded. But I never read a boat mag. Get all my info from the
illustrious experts here, one and all. Well, almost.....

--Vic

Chuck Gould wrote:
On Mar 9, 7:35?am, Harry Krause wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Mar 9, 5:16?am, JLH wrote:
On 8 Mar 2007 20:06:30 -0800, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:
On Mar 8, 6:47?pm, "JimH" wrote:
If one really didn't shot from shine, they'd think my report on a
visit to a boat factory was a "review". But one would have to be just
about dumber than a barnacle to arrive at that conclusion, so there's
darn little chance of it happening here in the NG. (On the remote
chance that you failed to notice, there *is no* boat to review. Just a
group of molded sections and a partially laid up hull.)
Chuck, what you're implying is a reading comprehension problem.
--
John H
Barnacle: A very low form of marine life that contributes nothing to
the normal operation of a boat and is a PITA simply "along for the
ride". Seems like there will always be a few barnacles. It's fortunate
that we don't have any posters to the NG who are non-contributing
lower life forms simply along for the ride.
But let's examine my egregious screw up:
How would I dare post some boating related content here? Will someobdy
please pray for my poor misguided soul and send me an email informing
me about it? That will give me something to post that would meet with
Jim's approval. I live and die by JimH's opinion of me, and it's so
distressing to see him unhappy or displeased.
Perhaps I should apologize to JimH and his on-line prayer group for
cluttering up the rec.boats board with comments about a visit to a
boat factory. Who gives a durn about boats or how one brand or another
is built? What was I thinking? Anybody know where I can buy a lottery
ticket? Not only would that be the highlight of my week, it would make
interesting, boating related reading. :-)
Perhaps you ought to read some Hemingway. Almost everything you post is
overwritten or overwrought or both. Write shorter sentences. Write
shorter paragraphs. Edit out the fluff.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Never claimed to write like Hemingway. One or two people like my
style. Sorry that you're not among them. :-)



I didn't suggest your writing was like Hemingway's, or that it should
be. I suggested you read some of his writings so that you might learn a
bit about saying more with less. He was the master of that.

On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 11:07:07 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Chuck Gould wrote:
On Mar 9, 7:35?am, Harry Krause wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Mar 9, 5:16?am, JLH wrote:
On 8 Mar 2007 20:06:30 -0800, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:
On Mar 8, 6:47?pm, "JimH" wrote:
If one really didn't shot from shine, they'd think my report on a
visit to a boat factory was a "review". But one would have to be just
about dumber than a barnacle to arrive at that conclusion, so there's
darn little chance of it happening here in the NG. (On the remote
chance that you failed to notice, there *is no* boat to review. Just a
group of molded sections and a partially laid up hull.)
Chuck, what you're implying is a reading comprehension problem.
--
John H
Barnacle: A very low form of marine life that contributes nothing to
the normal operation of a boat and is a PITA simply "along for the
ride". Seems like there will always be a few barnacles. It's fortunate
that we don't have any posters to the NG who are non-contributing
lower life forms simply along for the ride.
But let's examine my egregious screw up:
How would I dare post some boating related content here? Will someobdy
please pray for my poor misguided soul and send me an email informing
me about it? That will give me something to post that would meet with
Jim's approval. I live and die by JimH's opinion of me, and it's so
distressing to see him unhappy or displeased.
Perhaps I should apologize to JimH and his on-line prayer group for
cluttering up the rec.boats board with comments about a visit to a
boat factory. Who gives a durn about boats or how one brand or another
is built? What was I thinking? Anybody know where I can buy a lottery
ticket? Not only would that be the highlight of my week, it would make
interesting, boating related reading. :-)
Perhaps you ought to read some Hemingway. Almost everything you post is
overwritten or overwrought or both. Write shorter sentences. Write
shorter paragraphs. Edit out the fluff.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Never claimed to write like Hemingway. One or two people like my
style. Sorry that you're not among them. :-)



I didn't suggest your writing was like Hemingway's, or that it should
be. I suggested you read some of his writings so that you might learn a
bit about saying more with less. He was the master of that.

Harry, it's so strange how your appreciation of Chuck's writing has changed
since the political fighting in the group has gone down!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On Mar 9, 8:47?am, JLH wrote:
On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 11:07:07 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:





Chuck Gould wrote:
On Mar 9, 7:35?am, Harry Krause wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Mar 9, 5:16?am, JLH wrote:
On 8 Mar 2007 20:06:30 -0800, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:
On Mar 8, 6:47?pm, "JimH" wrote:
If one really didn't shot from shine, they'd think my report on a
visit to a boat factory was a "review". But one would have to be just
about dumber than a barnacle to arrive at that conclusion, so there's
darn little chance of it happening here in the NG. (On the remote
chance that you failed to notice, there *is no* boat to review. Just a
group of molded sections and a partially laid up hull.)
Chuck, what you're implying is a reading comprehension problem.
--
John H
Barnacle: A very low form of marine life that contributes nothing to
the normal operation of a boat and is a PITA simply "along for the
ride". Seems like there will always be a few barnacles. It's fortunate
that we don't have any posters to the NG who are non-contributing
lower life forms simply along for the ride.
But let's examine my egregious screw up:
How would I dare post some boating related content here? Will someobdy
please pray for my poor misguided soul and send me an email informing
me about it? That will give me something to post that would meet with
Jim's approval. I live and die by JimH's opinion of me, and it's so
distressing to see him unhappy or displeased.
Perhaps I should apologize to JimH and his on-line prayer group for
cluttering up the rec.boats board with comments about a visit to a
boat factory. Who gives a durn about boats or how one brand or another
is built? What was I thinking? Anybody know where I can buy a lottery
ticket? Not only would that be the highlight of my week, it would make
interesting, boating related reading. :-)
Perhaps you ought to read some Hemingway. Almost everything you post is
overwritten or overwrought or both. Write shorter sentences. Write
shorter paragraphs. Edit out the fluff.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Never claimed to write like Hemingway. One or two people like my
style. Sorry that you're not among them. :-)

I didn't suggest your writing was like Hemingway's, or that it should
be. I suggested you read some of his writings so that you might learn a
bit about saying more with less. He was the master of that.

Harry, it's so strange how your appreciation of Chuck's writing has changed
since the political fighting in the group has gone down!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Actually, Harry is partially correct. A lot of what appears here is
sort of a "stream of consciousness" format. I don't edit, spell check,
etc and some of the sentences run on far too long. It's a tendency I
struggle with in things that actually matter, but the NG is simply
typewritten conversation and a lower standard applies.

On 9 Mar 2007 08:51:59 -0800, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:

Actually, Harry is partially correct. A lot of what appears here is
sort of a "stream of consciousness" format. I don't edit, spell check,
etc and some of the sentences run on far too long. It's a tendency I
struggle with in things that actually matter, but the NG is simply
typewritten conversation and a lower standard applies.

I have a very good friend, known her for years, who is a freelancer in
the medical field. Very sharp and knows her stuff.

I swear to you, we've discussed her articles ad nauseam - she cannot
deliver a 1000 word article in under 2500 words. :) Almost
everything she does has to be broken into two parts.

One time she sent me an article she did about some strange type of
skin cancer and asked me what I thought of it. I replied with my
usual "you've got to gut this and get to the point" so she challenged
me to gut it and still make it meaningful. She would submit both
pieces and see which one was accepted.

I did, I won and she didn't speak to me for two weeks. :)