Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:28:33 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:25:59 GMT, basskisser
wrote:

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:22:59 GMT, Dan
wrote:

and they are huge...
Do not.

And you love me.
Do so.

And you suck.

Ah crap - I screwed it up.

Oh well....sorry guys - it was going to be funny. :)
It was an excellent parody of the two of them.

Harry Krause wrote:
On 12/19/2006 6:42 AM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:28:33 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:25:59 GMT, basskisser
wrote:

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:22:59 GMT, Dan
wrote:

and they are huge...
Do not.

And you love me.
Do so.

And you suck.
Ah crap - I screwed it up.

Oh well....sorry guys - it was going to be funny. :)
It was an excellent parody of the two of them.



Still the facilitating a**hole, hey, "Reggie"?

Why would Tom need to be facilitated? It is best if I go back to
ignoring you.

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 07:21:31 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

On 12/19/2006 6:42 AM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:28:33 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:25:59 GMT, basskisser
wrote:

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:22:59 GMT, Dan
wrote:

and they are huge...
Do not.

And you love me.
Do so.

And you suck.
Ah crap - I screwed it up.

Oh well....sorry guys - it was going to be funny. :)
It was an excellent parody of the two of them.



Still the facilitating a**hole, hey, "Reggie"?


Still the name-calling, imaginary boat having a**hole, eh, Harry?

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 07:31:40 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

On 12/19/2006 7:27 AM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
On 12/19/2006 6:42 AM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:28:33 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:25:59 GMT, basskisser
wrote:

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:22:59 GMT, Dan
wrote:

and they are huge...
Do not.

And you love me.
Do so.

And you suck.
Ah crap - I screwed it up.

Oh well....sorry guys - it was going to be funny. :)
It was an excellent parody of the two of them.


Still the facilitating a**hole, hey, "Reggie"?

Why would Tom need to be facilitated? It is best if I go back to
ignoring you.


It would be even better if you and the rest of the non-boating,
right-wing a**holes found some other newsgroup to plague.

Harry, you're such a neat guy that no one notices your name-calling!
--
John H

*Have a great Christmas and a spectacular New Year!*

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 07:38:10 -0500, JohnH wrote:

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 07:31:40 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

On 12/19/2006 7:27 AM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
On 12/19/2006 6:42 AM, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:28:33 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:25:59 GMT, basskisser
wrote:

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:22:59 GMT, Dan
wrote:

and they are huge...
Do not.

And you love me.
Do so.

And you suck.
Ah crap - I screwed it up.

Oh well....sorry guys - it was going to be funny. :)
It was an excellent parody of the two of them.


Still the facilitating a**hole, hey, "Reggie"?

Why would Tom need to be facilitated? It is best if I go back to
ignoring you.


It would be even better if you and the rest of the non-boating,
right-wing a**holes found some other newsgroup to plague.

Harry, you're such a neat guy that no one notices your name-calling!

It's that whiney voice he uses...

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

It was an excellent parody of the two of them.

Reggie, I thought you were fighting FOR the harmony of this newsgroup?
If so, then why the childish and petty insults?

basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

It was an excellent parody of the two of them.

Reggie, I thought you were fighting FOR the harmony of this newsgroup?
If so, then why the childish and petty insults?

This was not an insult or childish, if you can not figure out that Tom
was doing a parody of the two of you, you need to look up the
definition of parody and reread your post. You just got finished
telling Tom that you can take and enjoy a joke, so obviously you did not
view it as an insult.

I would hope that you would see how silly your post look, and Dan would
get bored with egging you on. It looks like you are the number one
poster in rec.boats, but it seems well over 50% of the exact same
comments over and over.

basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:


It was an excellent parody of the two of them.


Reggie, I thought you were fighting FOR the harmony of this newsgroup?
If so, then why the childish and petty insults?


Our Mr. Smithes has really slipped over to the liability side of the
newsgroup ledger sheet.
At one time his MO was to ask endless barbed questions trying to get
others to trip up & hang themselves. Now he's just a common troll and
agitator.
Pity!

Don White wrote:

Don, When Chuck chastised you for trolling and being an agitator you
became all insulted. You stated you enjoy the trolls and name calling
and all the sheriffs should leave. Now we have Bassy cut and pasting
articles, just so he can tell everyone they are childish and stupid, and
you immediately jump to his defense, because that is the NG you enjoy.

I made the observation that Tom had started an excellent parody of the
two major contributors to our current flamefest, and you immediately
become incensed, because you are concerned that they may take a break
from their trolls and you will not be able to nip at their heels. What
would you do if you could not say "Yah Boy, you tell 'em".

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

It was an excellent parody of the two of them.

Reggie, I thought you were fighting FOR the harmony of this newsgroup?
If so, then why the childish and petty insults?

This was not an insult or childish, if you can not figure out that Tom
was doing a parody of the two of you, you need to look up the
definition of parody and reread your post.

If you have read my responses to Tom, you'd know I fully realize it was
a joke, and told him so.

You just got finished
telling Tom that you can take and enjoy a joke, so obviously you did not
view it as an insult.

No, just your diabtribe. You meant it as an insult and you know it.
Don't give people here that *who me* crap, most here are smarter than
that.

I would hope that you would see how silly your post look, and Dan would
get bored with egging you on. It looks like you are the number one
poster in rec.boats, but it seems well over 50% of the exact same
comments over and over.

How silly my posts look? No matter what I post, be it on topic and
informative, or not, there is Dan stalking me. I find it funny how you
instantly blame every damned thing that happens in this newsgroup on
me! You never, ever lay blame on the people, such as Dan, that start
and keep up this horse****.