On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 08:16:01 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

On 11/5/2006 7:47 AM, JohnH wrote:
On Sat, 04 Nov 2006 17:25:41 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

On 11/4/2006 5:19 PM, Don White wrote:
JohnH wrote:

Don, I think Chuck was inferring that Harry *had* a lobster boat, not that
he *didn't* have one.

I think I'd be willing to bet a 'toonie' on that one.
Me right...you wrong!


Chuck is ****ed at me because I am annoyed at his petty netcopping here.
The netcoppers remind me of grammar school recess monitors, the ones
everyone wanted to beat the crap out of and sometimes did. Only the
prissy sissies liked the monitors.

How does an offer to write up your boat result in, "Chuck is ****ed at
me..."?


What? Why would I want or need Mr. Advertorial to do a "write-up" for
me? If I wanted a "write-up," I'd write it myself. Without the purple
prose.



That came nowhere close to answering my question.

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 08:16:01 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

On 11/5/2006 7:47 AM, JohnH wrote:
On Sat, 04 Nov 2006 17:25:41 -0500, Harry Krause

wrote:

On 11/4/2006 5:19 PM, Don White wrote:
JohnH wrote:

Don, I think Chuck was inferring that Harry *had* a lobster boat, not
that
he *didn't* have one.

I think I'd be willing to bet a 'toonie' on that one.
Me right...you wrong!


Chuck is ****ed at me because I am annoyed at his petty netcopping
here.
The netcoppers remind me of grammar school recess monitors, the ones
everyone wanted to beat the crap out of and sometimes did. Only the
prissy sissies liked the monitors.

How does an offer to write up your boat result in, "Chuck is ****ed at
me..."?


What? Why would I want or need Mr. Advertorial to do a "write-up" for
me? If I wanted a "write-up," I'd write it myself. Without the purple
prose.



That came nowhere close to answering my question.

It wasn't his offer to to a "write-up" that bothered me . It was his
out-of-the blue admonishment that Harry "come clean" because it's "good for
the soul" in a lecture style. Who cares?

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 08:16:01 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

On 11/5/2006 7:47 AM, JohnH wrote:
On Sat, 04 Nov 2006 17:25:41 -0500, Harry Krause

wrote:

On 11/4/2006 5:19 PM, Don White wrote:
JohnH wrote:

Don, I think Chuck was inferring that Harry *had* a lobster boat, not
that
he *didn't* have one.
I think I'd be willing to bet a 'toonie' on that one.
Me right...you wrong!

Chuck is ****ed at me because I am annoyed at his petty netcopping
here.
The netcoppers remind me of grammar school recess monitors, the ones
everyone wanted to beat the crap out of and sometimes did. Only the
prissy sissies liked the monitors.
How does an offer to write up your boat result in, "Chuck is ****ed at
me..."?

What? Why would I want or need Mr. Advertorial to do a "write-up" for
me? If I wanted a "write-up," I'd write it myself. Without the purple
prose.


That came nowhere close to answering my question.

It wasn't his offer to to a "write-up" that bothered me . It was his
out-of-the blue admonishment that Harry "come clean" because it's "good for
the soul" in a lecture style. Who cares?

Harry cares.

Harry has been cowed lately, the question is why. Typically at this time
of year Harry is spouting off about how bad the Republicans are going to
loose and what the Democrats are going to do once they get back in
control of Congress or the White House.

Why is Harry silent on the political front?

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..


Why is Harry silent on the political front?

Because there's really no one to talk to?

Eisboch