basskisser wrote:

Dan wrote:

basskisser wrote:


Gene wrote:


On 3 Oct 2006 08:20:46 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:




"Oh, he still checks in.... and I, for one really don't want to *flush*

him out. Last time he came here was, admittedly, simply to try to
destroy the integrity of other posters."


Maybe I should have refreshed your memory.

I spoke directly with him by telephone.

He told me that the only reason he returned to post at rec.boats was
that some posters thought too much of other posters and his intent was
to try to discredit the credibility and reputation of those he
considered too well respected in the eyes of other posters.

I still consider the content and motivations of his posts only
something worthy of being flushed.

I also consider injecting somebody's name (to instigate an altercation
of some kind) into a thread where they had taken no part to be
childish and without merit.


I'm sorry, Gene, but the person who instigated this ALL was JimH. HE is
the one that told lies here about me, and about my family. HE is the
one that said ****ty things about my wife and children. HE is the one
that accused me of beating my wife and my kids. HE is the one that
accused me of growing, smoking, selling, and giving pot to my kids. All
lies, and he knew he didn't have one shred of evidence. THAT is
instigating. I don't think that anyone would take any of that from
someone like him without confrontation. Then he shows his true
cowardice when I told him I'd be in the Cleveland area, even closer to
him, Loraine, in the very near future, and I'd like to show him first,
that I"m not Kevin, second, I'd like to see if he'd be man enough to
say those horrible things about my family to my face.....which, by the
way, he then went into hiding!




You poor, pathetic, *******. Why do you let yourself get all worked up
over words in a freakin' newsgroup? You are anonymous, right? Relax
and find something new to bitch about.


Speaking of pathetic, your name calling is childish and petty.


It must be true if you say it is, right?

Dan wrote:
Don White wrote:

basskisser wrote:

Dan wrote:

basskisser wrote:


JimH wrote:


Gene Kearns wrote in message
...


On 3 Oct 2006 05:02:53 -0700, "basskisser"
wrote:



Gene Kearns wrote:


On 2 Oct 2006 10:17:36 -0700, basskisser penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:




Yes, he's a real JimH in hiding!



Thanks, Bassy.... Skipper couldn't have made a "better"
post.... could
we get a *little* more ON topic and a *little* less personal....?


Gene, you could apply your above well thought out statement to
your own
post, also!



So.... point to ONE post where I have EVER taken a cheap shot at
somebody....

Injecting somebody's name into a post like that is just plain
childish..... if you need that much drama, I think you could
probably
catch some re-runs of Jerry Springer....

What I find ironic in this is that the guy you are trying to call
out
was a victim of Skipper's childish attacks, too.....

Just let it go. It makes YOU look bad.....
--


Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Southport, NC.
http://myworkshop.idleplay.net/
-----------------
www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed*
Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road
-----------------



He follows me around like a puppy dog and injects my names in
threads I do
not even partake in.

Hopefully he will take your advice.




What a stupid statement!! If I am "following you around", then how
am I
injecting your "names" in threads you do not partake in? Which is it?
By the way, I've asked several questions about my impending trip to
your area, please answer them.


Wow! Four whole sentences and not one "grow up", "childish", or the
latest "bubble wrap"?? You must hate having to use restraint when you
post.




I see you use no restraint. Your infatuation with me is kind of cute!


I think Dan has a shine on for you!
He should take his problem to rec.dysfunctional


Another great contribution from Donny and a lesson in Canadian-English,
too! So "shine on" means disgust, right?

Naw... you 'mericans might say..'Dan has a hard on for you'. We
Canadians are a bit more PC.

JohnH wrote:
On 3 Oct 2006 10:59:13 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


Gene wrote:
On 3 Oct 2006 08:20:46 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:



"Oh, he still checks in.... and I, for one really don't want to *flush*

him out. Last time he came here was, admittedly, simply to try to
destroy the integrity of other posters."


Maybe I should have refreshed your memory.

I spoke directly with him by telephone.

He told me that the only reason he returned to post at rec.boats was
that some posters thought too much of other posters and his intent was
to try to discredit the credibility and reputation of those he
considered too well respected in the eyes of other posters.

I still consider the content and motivations of his posts only
something worthy of being flushed.

I also consider injecting somebody's name (to instigate an altercation
of some kind) into a thread where they had taken no part to be
childish and without merit.

I'm sorry, Gene, but the person who instigated this ALL was JimH. HE is
the one that told lies here about me, and about my family. HE is the
one that said ****ty things about my wife and children. HE is the one
that accused me of beating my wife and my kids. HE is the one that
accused me of growing, smoking, selling, and giving pot to my kids. All
lies, and he knew he didn't have one shred of evidence. THAT is
instigating. I don't think that anyone would take any of that from
someone like him without confrontation. Then he shows his true
cowardice when I told him I'd be in the Cleveland area, even closer to
him, Loraine, in the very near future, and I'd like to show him first,
that I"m not Kevin, second, I'd like to see if he'd be man enough to
say those horrible things about my family to my face.....which, by the
way, he then went into hiding!

Can we, now, return to the subject of boating.
Sure! I'm putting a new floor in mine as we speak!

If JimH is as bad as you say, why do you continue to have discourse with
him?

Simple, the balls in his court. An apology for all the lies and
allegations he's made about me and my family would be the correct way
for a MAN to handle it. But, he's not one.

On 4 Oct 2006 16:44:34 -0700, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:

Every time I look at that video I wonder what kind of boat, if any,
could survive an encounter with a wave like that.

Almost any, up to the moment it began to break. It didn't seem
unworkably steep until it hit the backflow in the shallows near the
beach.

I think it depends where you are on the face of the wave. The top
portion gets incredibly steep even before it begins to break,
approaching vertical in my estimation. It is easy to picture a boat
falling off into a capsize or pitchpole before the crest actually
rolls over. Wave crests break in the open ocean all the time although
the vast majority are a lot less dramatic than this one.

Gene Kearns wrote:
On 4 Oct 2006 10:14:55 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


Gene wrote:
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 14:17:27 GMT, "Jim" wrote:


I don't think garage floor epoxy has the necessary UV inhibitors. I'd
probably use a good marine deck paint as a top coat.
Jim


I'm not sure UV inhibitors are all that important for wood....
especially if recovered with carpet.
--
Gene, I'm not going to cover it with carpet this time. The paint has an
additive to make it a non-slip surface. You can get it in a bunch of
colors. Because it says it's okay to use on pool decks, etc, I'd think
it would have UV inhibitors, but for all I know about paint, that may
not be true!

From the description, like you, I suspect that it is UV safe....
--
Thanks for the input! I realize it won't last forever, but, I'm not
going to own her too much longer! I'm hoping to turn her into a nice
Triton or Nitro!

On 5 Oct 2006 05:24:27 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 3 Oct 2006 10:59:13 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


Gene wrote:
On 3 Oct 2006 08:20:46 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:



"Oh, he still checks in.... and I, for one really don't want to *flush*

him out. Last time he came here was, admittedly, simply to try to
destroy the integrity of other posters."


Maybe I should have refreshed your memory.

I spoke directly with him by telephone.

He told me that the only reason he returned to post at rec.boats was
that some posters thought too much of other posters and his intent was
to try to discredit the credibility and reputation of those he
considered too well respected in the eyes of other posters.

I still consider the content and motivations of his posts only
something worthy of being flushed.

I also consider injecting somebody's name (to instigate an altercation
of some kind) into a thread where they had taken no part to be
childish and without merit.

I'm sorry, Gene, but the person who instigated this ALL was JimH. HE is
the one that told lies here about me, and about my family. HE is the
one that said ****ty things about my wife and children. HE is the one
that accused me of beating my wife and my kids. HE is the one that
accused me of growing, smoking, selling, and giving pot to my kids. All
lies, and he knew he didn't have one shred of evidence. THAT is
instigating. I don't think that anyone would take any of that from
someone like him without confrontation. Then he shows his true
cowardice when I told him I'd be in the Cleveland area, even closer to
him, Loraine, in the very near future, and I'd like to show him first,
that I"m not Kevin, second, I'd like to see if he'd be man enough to
say those horrible things about my family to my face.....which, by the
way, he then went into hiding!

Can we, now, return to the subject of boating.
Sure! I'm putting a new floor in mine as we speak!

If JimH is as bad as you say, why do you continue to have discourse with
him?

Simple, the balls in his court. An apology for all the lies and
allegations he's made about me and my family would be the correct way
for a MAN to handle it. But, he's not one.

So, if the ball's in his court, then the discourse between you will cease?
Have you thought of simply putting him in a killfile and ignoring him? It's
a good idea.

basskisser wrote:
JohnH wrote:

On 3 Oct 2006 10:59:13 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


Gene wrote:

On 3 Oct 2006 08:20:46 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:



"Oh, he still checks in.... and I, for one really don't want to *flush*

him out. Last time he came here was, admittedly, simply to try to
destroy the integrity of other posters."


Maybe I should have refreshed your memory.

I spoke directly with him by telephone.

He told me that the only reason he returned to post at rec.boats was
that some posters thought too much of other posters and his intent was
to try to discredit the credibility and reputation of those he
considered too well respected in the eyes of other posters.

I still consider the content and motivations of his posts only
something worthy of being flushed.

I also consider injecting somebody's name (to instigate an altercation
of some kind) into a thread where they had taken no part to be
childish and without merit.

I'm sorry, Gene, but the person who instigated this ALL was JimH. HE is
the one that told lies here about me, and about my family. HE is the
one that said ****ty things about my wife and children. HE is the one
that accused me of beating my wife and my kids. HE is the one that
accused me of growing, smoking, selling, and giving pot to my kids. All
lies, and he knew he didn't have one shred of evidence. THAT is
instigating. I don't think that anyone would take any of that from
someone like him without confrontation. Then he shows his true
cowardice when I told him I'd be in the Cleveland area, even closer to
him, Loraine, in the very near future, and I'd like to show him first,
that I"m not Kevin, second, I'd like to see if he'd be man enough to
say those horrible things about my family to my face.....which, by the
way, he then went into hiding!


Can we, now, return to the subject of boating.

Sure! I'm putting a new floor in mine as we speak!

If JimH is as bad as you say, why do you continue to have discourse with
him?


Simple, the balls in his court. An apology for all the lies and
allegations he's made about me and my family would be the correct way
for a MAN to handle it. But, he's not one.


Get over it.

JohnH wrote:

On 5 Oct 2006 05:24:27 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


JohnH wrote:

On 3 Oct 2006 10:59:13 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


Gene wrote:

On 3 Oct 2006 08:20:46 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:



"Oh, he still checks in.... and I, for one really don't want to *flush*

him out. Last time he came here was, admittedly, simply to try to
destroy the integrity of other posters."


Maybe I should have refreshed your memory.

I spoke directly with him by telephone.

He told me that the only reason he returned to post at rec.boats was
that some posters thought too much of other posters and his intent was
to try to discredit the credibility and reputation of those he
considered too well respected in the eyes of other posters.

I still consider the content and motivations of his posts only
something worthy of being flushed.

I also consider injecting somebody's name (to instigate an altercation
of some kind) into a thread where they had taken no part to be
childish and without merit.

I'm sorry, Gene, but the person who instigated this ALL was JimH. HE is
the one that told lies here about me, and about my family. HE is the
one that said ****ty things about my wife and children. HE is the one
that accused me of beating my wife and my kids. HE is the one that
accused me of growing, smoking, selling, and giving pot to my kids. All
lies, and he knew he didn't have one shred of evidence. THAT is
instigating. I don't think that anyone would take any of that from
someone like him without confrontation. Then he shows his true
cowardice when I told him I'd be in the Cleveland area, even closer to
him, Loraine, in the very near future, and I'd like to show him first,
that I"m not Kevin, second, I'd like to see if he'd be man enough to
say those horrible things about my family to my face.....which, by the
way, he then went into hiding!


Can we, now, return to the subject of boating.

Sure! I'm putting a new floor in mine as we speak!

If JimH is as bad as you say, why do you continue to have discourse with
him?

Simple, the balls in his court. An apology for all the lies and
allegations he's made about me and my family would be the correct way
for a MAN to handle it. But, he's not one.


So, if the ball's in his court, then the discourse between you will cease?
Have you thought of simply putting him in a killfile and ignoring him? It's
a good idea.

He's incapable of that. He lives for controversy.

Dan

Dan wrote:
basskisser wrote:
JohnH wrote:

On 3 Oct 2006 10:59:13 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


Gene wrote:

On 3 Oct 2006 08:20:46 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:



"Oh, he still checks in.... and I, for one really don't want to *flush*

him out. Last time he came here was, admittedly, simply to try to
destroy the integrity of other posters."


Maybe I should have refreshed your memory.

I spoke directly with him by telephone.

He told me that the only reason he returned to post at rec.boats was
that some posters thought too much of other posters and his intent was
to try to discredit the credibility and reputation of those he
considered too well respected in the eyes of other posters.

I still consider the content and motivations of his posts only
something worthy of being flushed.

I also consider injecting somebody's name (to instigate an altercation
of some kind) into a thread where they had taken no part to be
childish and without merit.

I'm sorry, Gene, but the person who instigated this ALL was JimH. HE is
the one that told lies here about me, and about my family. HE is the
one that said ****ty things about my wife and children. HE is the one
that accused me of beating my wife and my kids. HE is the one that
accused me of growing, smoking, selling, and giving pot to my kids. All
lies, and he knew he didn't have one shred of evidence. THAT is
instigating. I don't think that anyone would take any of that from
someone like him without confrontation. Then he shows his true
cowardice when I told him I'd be in the Cleveland area, even closer to
him, Loraine, in the very near future, and I'd like to show him first,
that I"m not Kevin, second, I'd like to see if he'd be man enough to
say those horrible things about my family to my face.....which, by the
way, he then went into hiding!


Can we, now, return to the subject of boating.

Sure! I'm putting a new floor in mine as we speak!

If JimH is as bad as you say, why do you continue to have discourse with
him?


Simple, the balls in his court. An apology for all the lies and
allegations he's made about me and my family would be the correct way
for a MAN to handle it. But, he's not one.


Get over it.
Damn, your school girl infatuation with me is on the verge of stalking.
It's getting down right strange.....

Dan wrote:
JohnH wrote:

On 5 Oct 2006 05:24:27 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


JohnH wrote:

On 3 Oct 2006 10:59:13 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


Gene wrote:

On 3 Oct 2006 08:20:46 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:



"Oh, he still checks in.... and I, for one really don't want to *flush*

him out. Last time he came here was, admittedly, simply to try to
destroy the integrity of other posters."


Maybe I should have refreshed your memory.

I spoke directly with him by telephone.

He told me that the only reason he returned to post at rec.boats was
that some posters thought too much of other posters and his intent was
to try to discredit the credibility and reputation of those he
considered too well respected in the eyes of other posters.

I still consider the content and motivations of his posts only
something worthy of being flushed.

I also consider injecting somebody's name (to instigate an altercation
of some kind) into a thread where they had taken no part to be
childish and without merit.

I'm sorry, Gene, but the person who instigated this ALL was JimH. HE is
the one that told lies here about me, and about my family. HE is the
one that said ****ty things about my wife and children. HE is the one
that accused me of beating my wife and my kids. HE is the one that
accused me of growing, smoking, selling, and giving pot to my kids. All
lies, and he knew he didn't have one shred of evidence. THAT is
instigating. I don't think that anyone would take any of that from
someone like him without confrontation. Then he shows his true
cowardice when I told him I'd be in the Cleveland area, even closer to
him, Loraine, in the very near future, and I'd like to show him first,
that I"m not Kevin, second, I'd like to see if he'd be man enough to
say those horrible things about my family to my face.....which, by the
way, he then went into hiding!


Can we, now, return to the subject of boating.

Sure! I'm putting a new floor in mine as we speak!

If JimH is as bad as you say, why do you continue to have discourse with
him?

Simple, the balls in his court. An apology for all the lies and
allegations he's made about me and my family would be the correct way
for a MAN to handle it. But, he's not one.


So, if the ball's in his court, then the discourse between you will cease?
Have you thought of simply putting him in a killfile and ignoring him? It's
a good idea.

He's incapable of that. He lives for controversy.

Dan

Sung to the the tune of Carly Simon's "Anticipation"

Infatuation......
Infatuation.......
It's making Dan crazy....
It's driving him crazy......