Deja Vu all over again.
 

Here we go again.
Somebody has to teach these flyboys how to read a chart.
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/natio...nfriendly.html

Deja Vu all over again.
 

That news hurts me as much as it hurts anyone. "Friendly fire"
accidents have been happening ever since gunpowder.

I can't say much more....


Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 20:01:11 GMT, Don White
wrote:

Here we go again.
Somebody has to teach these flyboys how to read a chart.
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/natio...nfriendly.html

Hope the rest of the troops are going to be ok.

Although, it can happen even with good, in the clear communications -
believe me, I know.

Deja Vu all over again.
 

"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here we go again.
Somebody has to teach these flyboys how to read a chart.
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/natio...nfriendly.html



Sorry to hear about that Don. I am sure the US pilots involved in this
accident feel worse than you can believe and will have a hard time
forgetting it.

Deja Vu all over again.
 

I deffinately agree about the remorse of the pilots, but with such
limited info, we don't know the facts, wether it was ground fault, mis
info sent, mis info recieved. we just don't know. So I won't draw any
conclusions....yet.

Without laying blame, all I can say is it was and is a terrible
tragedy.
JimH wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here we go again.
Somebody has to teach these flyboys how to read a chart.
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/natio...nfriendly.html



Sorry to hear about that Don. I am sure the US pilots involved in this
accident feel worse than you can believe and will have a hard time
forgetting it.

Deja Vu all over again.
 

JimH wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...
Here we go again.
Somebody has to teach these flyboys how to read a chart.
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/natio...nfriendly.html



Sorry to hear about that Don. I am sure the US pilots involved in this
accident feel worse than you can believe and will have a hard time
forgetting it.

You could be right, Bipolar Boy!

Deja Vu all over again.
 

basskisser wrote:
JimH wrote:

"Don White" wrote in message
...

Here we go again.
Somebody has to teach these flyboys how to read a chart.
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/natio...nfriendly.html



Sorry to hear about that Don. I am sure the US pilots involved in this
accident feel worse than you can believe and will have a hard time
forgetting it.


You could be right, Bipolar Boy!


Insert Kevin's signature phrase here --- "Grow up".

Deja Vu all over again.
 

Don White wrote:
Here we go again.
Somebody has to teach these flyboys how to read a chart.
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/natio...nfriendly.html

1. Seriously, that is an awful tragedy. Every life lost on both sides
of the line is somebody's father, son, mother, daughter, brother,
sister, friend, lover, etc etc etc.
War is absolutely hell.

2. Why not join this group?

http://www.acp-cpa.ca/en/index.html

You might actually be able to make a difference in Canada's foreign
policy by teaming up with like-minded individuals. (You accomplish
nothing by posting your rant in a boating newsgroup).

Deja Vu all over again.
 

Dan Krueger wrote:
basskisser wrote:
JimH wrote:

"Don White" wrote in message
...

Here we go again.
Somebody has to teach these flyboys how to read a chart.
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/natio...nfriendly.html



Sorry to hear about that Don. I am sure the US pilots involved in this
accident feel worse than you can believe and will have a hard time
forgetting it.


You could be right, Bipolar Boy!


Insert Kevin's signature phrase here --- "Grow up".

Not quite bright enough to show some originality, huh?

Deja Vu all over again.
 

Chuck Gould wrote:
Don White wrote:

Here we go again.
Somebody has to teach these flyboys how to read a chart.
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/natio...nfriendly.html


1. Seriously, that is an awful tragedy. Every life lost on both sides
of the line is somebody's father, son, mother, daughter, brother,
sister, friend, lover, etc etc etc.
War is absolutely hell.

2. Why not join this group?

http://www.acp-cpa.ca/en/index.html

You might actually be able to make a difference in Canada's foreign
policy by teaming up with like-minded individuals. (You accomplish
nothing by posting your rant in a boating newsgroup).


Who's ranting Chuck?
You seem to be keeping a close watch on me. The news group might be
better served if you applied your selective brand of justice to the
handful of characters out there in 'your territory' (West Coast) who
could benefit from your special guidance.

Deja Vu all over again.
 

Harry Krause wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:

Don White wrote:

Here we go again.
Somebody has to teach these flyboys how to read a chart.
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/natio...nfriendly.html


1. Seriously, that is an awful tragedy. Every life lost on both sides
of the line is somebody's father, son, mother, daughter, brother,
sister, friend, lover, etc etc etc.
War is absolutely hell.

2. Why not join this group?

http://www.acp-cpa.ca/en/index.html

You might actually be able to make a difference in Canada's foreign
policy by teaming up with like-minded individuals. (You accomplish
nothing by posting your rant in a boating newsgroup).


Netcop Alert! Netcop Alert! Whoop! Whoop!


...and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial.
He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to
his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?)
Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected
as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as
partial.

Deja Vu all over again.
 

Harry Krause wrote:


Netcop Alert! Netcop Alert! Whoop! Whoop!


By validating Don's decision to dump his rant in a boating newsgroup
rather than take some actual political action to promote his cause, you
diffuse some energy that might be
useful to the progressive politics you espouse to prefer.

I suppose every group has a bunch of political hacks that pretend to
have some interest in the nominal subject- just enough to justify
hanging around to make regular dumpings of political garbage. Why
should rec.boats be different? But then again, why should a boating
newsgroup, a music newsgroup, a camping newsgroup, a quilting
newsgroup, or a family history newsgroup have to endure polito-bombs
from people too timid to take the subject up with other people well
informed and passionate about their chosen cause or from people too
stupid to locate a proper forum?

The ulitmate conceit could be "I'm so smart and clever that I can
interrupt the on-topic discussions with my political viewpoints, etc,
and most people will think their life is better as a result." I can't
think of any other expalanation for OT postings, particularly those OT
postings deliberately calculated to start long and destructive
arguments.

Think about all the political energy that is wasted in rec.boats. Not
one political opinion has ever changed, but we have started some fights
that won't stop until somebody burns his or her computer or dies. The
politically motivated would be better advised to spend the same amount
of time working for candidates and issues of their choice rather than
delving into childish personal attacks and years-long feuds in a
newsgroup organized for the discussion of boating and boating-related
issues.

But then again, some thrive on the name calling.

(You might want to see a doctor about that case of whooping cough,
Harry).

Deja Vu all over again.
 

Don White wrote:

..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial.
He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to
his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?)
Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected
as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as
partial.

If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off
topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does
the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a
slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get
chastised.

Deja Vu all over again.
 

Don White wrote:


..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial.
He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to
his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?)
Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected
as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as
partial.

Looks like I struck a nerve. Good.

I guess I missed Calif Bill's politically charged OT post.
Do pay more attention, however. I seem to remember discouraging jps in
one of his last political messages here. He not only lives on the "same
coast", he lives in the same city.

If you think that regionality trumps proper procedure in the NG,
fantastic! Please, post your OT political stuff to a NG that is
restricted to your own region. Post your boating-related messages here.

Deja Vu all over again.
 

"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Don White wrote:

..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial.
He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to
his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?)
Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected
as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as
partial.

If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off
topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does
the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a
slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get
chastised.


You never answered my question from yesterday Kevin. Are you still beating
your wife and kids?

Deja Vu all over again.
 

basskisser wrote:


If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off
topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does
the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a
slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get
chastised.

I'm not impartial. And I admit to being more alarmed when a person of
liberal persuasion behaves stupidly than when a person of conservative
persuasion behaves stupidly. The stupid behavior reflects badly upon
the political or philosophical positions the offender is claiming to
support. (Simply because I think there is no room for politics in a
boating newsgroup doesn't mean that I don't have political opinions).

That said, I have a lot more to do every day than hang out in the NG
watching for somebody to do something stupid. Sometimes I comment,
sometimes I don't, and sometimes I'm gone for a while actually using my
boat. (Novel concept, I know).
If you have missed my comments to JimH about some of his political
posts, that's too bad.

As a matter of fact, when any two persons are trading "slanderous,
malicious" posts, the situation is already so far out of control that
virtually everybody *except* the two fools
arguing over the internet has fled the thread.

A friend of mine has proposed a funny tee shirt for dog walkers. It
would read, "My life is controlled by the bowel movements of a dog". We
could have one for OT rec.boaters as well, ""My life is controlled by
the bad behavior of __________" (insert the name of your current NG
antagonist in the blank).

Deja Vu all over again.
 

Harry Krause wrote:
Those of us who know "something" about boats initiate or comment on
boating posts as we see appropriate. and initiated or comment on other
posts as we see appropriate.

Fantastic. We're closing in on a resolution.

All I need to do now is come to an understanding of how pro-Bush,
anti-Bush, pro-war, anti-war, and political or religious posts of any
kind are "appropriate" in a group organized to discuss recreational
boating.

Clue me in, Harry. :-)

Deja Vu all over again.
 

Harry Krause wrote:

Ahh. I see your problem. You think only posts *you* think appropriate
are appropriate. The second "we" in my sentence doesn't necessarily
refer to "you."


Unfortunatly Harry, I think you've hit the nail on the head.
To me ..it's all or nothing. If we can have long posts on baking
brownies here (and I'm not complaining about that), then I feel that I
can post something that's important to me once in a while...even if it's
non-boating.
BTW I bet at least a few of that group of 30 who were injured are avid
boaters

Deja Vu all over again.
 

JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Don White wrote:

..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial.
He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to
his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?)
Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected
as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as
partial.

If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off
topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does
the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a
slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get
chastised.


You never answered my question from yesterday Kevin. Are you still beating
your wife and kids?

I'm not Kevin, so I don't know whether he is or not. But, if you are
talking to ME, then when you answer my question to you, then I'll
answer. The question was, you have posted the question in a form that
would make one think that you have some knowledge of me beating my wife
and kids. What IS that knowledge? You see, you aren't bright enough to
form it so as to not make you look like you have some evidence of such
ie: "still". If you were a man instead of a little jerkboy, then if you
had some shred of common decency and had knowledge of me doing such,
you'd contact the proper authorities. Or, perhaps you are projecting.
Is that why your wife is sick, from you beating her too much?

Deja Vu all over again.
 

"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Don White wrote:

..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial.
He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to
his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?)
Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected
as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen
as
partial.

If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off
topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does
the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a
slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get
chastised.


You never answered my question from yesterday Kevin. Are you still
beating
your wife and kids?

I'm not Kevin, so I don't know whether he is or not. But, if you are
talking to ME, then when you answer my question to you, then I'll
answer. The question was, you have posted the question in a form that
would make one think that you have some knowledge of me beating my wife
and kids. What IS that knowledge? You see, you aren't bright enough to
form it so as to not make you look like you have some evidence of such
ie: "still". If you were a man instead of a little jerkboy, then if you
had some shred of common decency and had knowledge of me doing such,
you'd contact the proper authorities. Or, perhaps you are projecting.


Going off the deep end again Kevin?

So did you stop beating your wife and kids?

Deja Vu all over again.
 

Harry Krause wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
Those of us who know "something" about boats initiate or comment on
boating posts as we see appropriate. and initiated or comment on other
posts as we see appropriate.

Fantastic. We're closing in on a resolution.

All I need to do now is come to an understanding of how pro-Bush,
anti-Bush, pro-war, anti-war, and political or religious posts of any
kind are "appropriate" in a group organized to discuss recreational
boating.

Clue me in, Harry. :-)



Ahh. I see your problem. You think only posts *you* think appropriate
are appropriate. The second "we" in my sentence doesn't necessarily
refer to "you."

So, I'm probably not beyond help. Please define "recreational boating"
so I can expand my understanding and appreciate just when political bs
is appropriate here. (Or is it whenever one of the usual trolls makes a
personal decision that the pro-Bush, anti-Bush, pro-war, anti-war
comment he or she just *has* to make somehwere should land in
rec.boats?)

Deja Vu all over again.
 

Don White wrote:



Unfortunatly Harry, I think you've hit the nail on the head.
To me ..it's all or nothing. If we can have long posts on baking
brownies here (and I'm not complaining about that), then I feel that I
can post something that's important to me once in a while...even if it's
non-boating.

If a nail has been hit on the head it was wacked by your own guilty
conscience.

Go back and read my response to your OT post. Notice:

1) I empathized with your distress
2) I offered a positive suggestion about a group you might want to join
that could change the foreign policy of your country.
3) I observed that posting your complaint to a boating NG was a waste
of time.

I don't see where I posted, "What the hell are you doing, Don, putting
political BS in the NG?! Don't do this! Stop this!" etc. Harry's
hypersensitivity to any suggestion that we try to observe the common
courtesy of remaining on topic in a dedicated forum evoked a "whoop
whoop", and sucked you right in.

Because you know your post to a boating NG will do nothing to change
the foreign policy of Canada (and because you know it was ill-advised)
your own emotional reaction
created posts about "sticking to your own coast", etc.

I'm sure your distress in genuine, as was my suggestion that you look
into the Canadian peace activists group.

Sorry about your troops. Really.
You and Harry can carry on if you like, but I've wasted enough time on
this.

Deja Vu all over again.
 

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...

Don White wrote:



Unfortunatly Harry, I think you've hit the nail on the head.
To me ..it's all or nothing. If we can have long posts on baking
brownies here (and I'm not complaining about that), then I feel that I
can post something that's important to me once in a while...even if it's
non-boating.

If a nail has been hit on the head it was wacked by your own guilty
conscience.

Go back and read my response to your OT post. Notice:

1) I empathized with your distress
2) I offered a positive suggestion about a group you might want to join
that could change the foreign policy of your country.
3) I observed that posting your complaint to a boating NG was a waste
of time.

I don't see where I posted, "What the hell are you doing, Don, putting
political BS in the NG?! Don't do this! Stop this!" etc. Harry's
hypersensitivity to any suggestion that we try to observe the common
courtesy of remaining on topic in a dedicated forum evoked a "whoop
whoop", and sucked you right in.

Because you know your post to a boating NG will do nothing to change
the foreign policy of Canada (and because you know it was ill-advised)
your own emotional reaction
created posts about "sticking to your own coast", etc.

I'm sure your distress in genuine, as was my suggestion that you look
into the Canadian peace activists group.

Sorry about your troops. Really.
You and Harry can carry on if you like, but I've wasted enough time on
this.


Chuck, you and JohnH need to stop the netcopping and let the NG find it's
own direction. You don't own the group and the 2 of you cause more problems
with the netcopping than if you just ignored the OT posts.

Deja Vu all over again.
 

On 6 Sep 2006 09:04:22 -0700, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:


basskisser wrote:


If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off
topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does
the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a
slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get
chastised.

I'm not impartial. And I admit to being more alarmed when a person of
liberal persuasion behaves stupidly than when a person of conservative
persuasion behaves stupidly. The stupid behavior reflects badly upon
the political or philosophical positions the offender is claiming to
support. (Simply because I think there is no room for politics in a
boating newsgroup doesn't mean that I don't have political opinions).

That said, I have a lot more to do every day than hang out in the NG
watching for somebody to do something stupid. Sometimes I comment,
sometimes I don't, and sometimes I'm gone for a while actually using my
boat. (Novel concept, I know).
If you have missed my comments to JimH about some of his political
posts, that's too bad.

As a matter of fact, when any two persons are trading "slanderous,
malicious" posts, the situation is already so far out of control that
virtually everybody *except* the two fools
arguing over the internet has fled the thread.

A friend of mine has proposed a funny tee shirt for dog walkers. It
would read, "My life is controlled by the bowel movements of a dog". We
could have one for OT rec.boaters as well, ""My life is controlled by
the bad behavior of __________" (insert the name of your current NG
antagonist in the blank).

Nice response.
--
******************************************
***** Hope your day is great! *****
******************************************

John

Deja Vu all over again.
 

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...

(((Nanny stuff snipped)))

Sorry about your troops. Really.
You and Harry can carry on if you like, but I've wasted enough time on
this.


Yur darn tootin you have!

Deja Vu all over again.
 

JimH wrote:


Chuck, you and JohnH need to stop the netcopping and let the NG find it's
own direction. You don't own the group and the 2 of you cause more problems
with the netcopping than if you just ignored the OT posts.

When one participates in a group called "rec.boats" the direction of
the group is predefined. Of course nobody owns the group. Some people
are free to post as much ridiculous, OT, inflammatory and personal
attack nonsense here as they want to- and others are free to comment
that it might be inappropriate to do so.

If appeals to remain on-topic make some individual posters
uncomfortable, so be it.

Deja Vu all over again.
 

On 6 Sep 2006 10:50:06 -0700, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:


JimH wrote:


Chuck, you and JohnH need to stop the netcopping and let the NG find it's
own direction. You don't own the group and the 2 of you cause more problems
with the netcopping than if you just ignored the OT posts.

When one participates in a group called "rec.boats" the direction of
the group is predefined. Of course nobody owns the group. Some people
are free to post as much ridiculous, OT, inflammatory and personal
attack nonsense here as they want to- and others are free to comment
that it might be inappropriate to do so.

If appeals to remain on-topic make some individual posters
uncomfortable, so be it.

I'm wondering how long Jimmy's last apology to you, for this behavior,
lasted. Not long, I don't think.
--
******************************************
***** Hope your day is great! *****
******************************************

John

Deja Vu all over again.
 

JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Don White wrote:

..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial.
He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to
his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?)
Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected
as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen
as
partial.

If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off
topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does
the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a
slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get
chastised.


You never answered my question from yesterday Kevin. Are you still
beating
your wife and kids?

I'm not Kevin, so I don't know whether he is or not. But, if you are
talking to ME, then when you answer my question to you, then I'll
answer. The question was, you have posted the question in a form that
would make one think that you have some knowledge of me beating my wife
and kids. What IS that knowledge? You see, you aren't bright enough to
form it so as to not make you look like you have some evidence of such
ie: "still". If you were a man instead of a little jerkboy, then if you
had some shred of common decency and had knowledge of me doing such,
you'd contact the proper authorities. Or, perhaps you are projecting.


Going off the deep end again Kevin?

So did you stop beating your wife and kids?

Projecting again? Is your wife really sick or does she have internal
injuries from you beating her? Jim, you truly are nothing but a piece
of ****. Your posts here prove you are such a low life. Again, you
slimeball, SHOW ME SOME EVIDENCE that I've ever beat my wife or kids.
HAVE ANY?? You are such a pathetic **** stain that you hide behind
usenet like a scared little baby. I tried to meet up with you, you
didn't have the balls, little man. BUT you certainly have when you're
behind usenet. What happened to you apologizing to the group as a whole
for your actions? I guess that went the way of MOST of your bipolar
rants.
Now, go beat your wife. Maybe you'll have to sell THIS boat.....

Deja Vu all over again.
 

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On 6 Sep 2006 10:50:06 -0700, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:


JimH wrote:


Chuck, you and JohnH need to stop the netcopping and let the NG find
it's
own direction. You don't own the group and the 2 of you cause more
problems
with the netcopping than if you just ignored the OT posts.

When one participates in a group called "rec.boats" the direction of
the group is predefined. Of course nobody owns the group. Some people
are free to post as much ridiculous, OT, inflammatory and personal
attack nonsense here as they want to- and others are free to comment
that it might be inappropriate to do so.

If appeals to remain on-topic make some individual posters
uncomfortable, so be it.

I'm wondering how long Jimmy's last apology to you, for this behavior,
lasted. Not long, I don't think.
--
******************************************
***** Hope your day is great! *****
******************************************

John


Is this the type of post you condone Chuck? Seems like you
netcops/sheriffs protect each others back. ;-)

Deja Vu all over again.
 

JohnH wrote:
On 6 Sep 2006 10:50:06 -0700, "Chuck Gould"
wrote:


JimH wrote:


Chuck, you and JohnH need to stop the netcopping and let the NG find it's
own direction. You don't own the group and the 2 of you cause more problems
with the netcopping than if you just ignored the OT posts.

When one participates in a group called "rec.boats" the direction of
the group is predefined. Of course nobody owns the group. Some people
are free to post as much ridiculous, OT, inflammatory and personal
attack nonsense here as they want to- and others are free to comment
that it might be inappropriate to do so.

If appeals to remain on-topic make some individual posters
uncomfortable, so be it.

I'm wondering how long Jimmy's last apology to you, for this behavior,
lasted. Not long, I don't think.
--
Bipolar Boy strikes again. If JimH were anywhere near a stand up type
of man, he'd certainly quit accusing me and others of things that
aren't true, were never true, and utterly ridiculous. But, alas, he's
not a man.

Deja Vu all over again.
 

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Don White wrote:

..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial.
He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word
to
his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?)
Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and
connected
as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's
seen
as
partial.

If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off
topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he
does
the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a
slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll
get
chastised.


You never answered my question from yesterday Kevin. Are you still
beating
your wife and kids?

I'm not Kevin, so I don't know whether he is or not. But, if you are
talking to ME, then when you answer my question to you, then I'll
answer. The question was, you have posted the question in a form that
would make one think that you have some knowledge of me beating my wife
and kids. What IS that knowledge? You see, you aren't bright enough to
form it so as to not make you look like you have some evidence of such
ie: "still". If you were a man instead of a little jerkboy, then if you
had some shred of common decency and had knowledge of me doing such,
you'd contact the proper authorities. Or, perhaps you are projecting.


Going off the deep end again Kevin?

So did you stop beating your wife and kids?

Projecting again? Is your wife really sick or does she have internal
injuries from you beating her? Jim, you truly are nothing but a piece
of ****. Your posts here prove you are such a low life. Again, you
slimeball, SHOW ME SOME EVIDENCE that I've ever beat my wife or kids.
HAVE ANY?? You are such a pathetic **** stain that you hide behind
usenet like a scared little baby. I tried to meet up with you, you
didn't have the balls, little man. BUT you certainly have when you're
behind usenet. What happened to you apologizing to the group as a whole
for your actions? I guess that went the way of MOST of your bipolar
rants.
Now, go beat your wife. Maybe you'll have to sell THIS boat.....


Oh my. You need to control your emotions Kevin. Is this the type of anger
that causes you to beat your wife and kids?

Deja Vu all over again.
 

JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Don White wrote:

..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial.
He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word
to
his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?)
Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and
connected
as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's
seen
as
partial.

If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off
topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he
does
the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a
slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll
get
chastised.


You never answered my question from yesterday Kevin. Are you still
beating
your wife and kids?

I'm not Kevin, so I don't know whether he is or not. But, if you are
talking to ME, then when you answer my question to you, then I'll
answer. The question was, you have posted the question in a form that
would make one think that you have some knowledge of me beating my wife
and kids. What IS that knowledge? You see, you aren't bright enough to
form it so as to not make you look like you have some evidence of such
ie: "still". If you were a man instead of a little jerkboy, then if you
had some shred of common decency and had knowledge of me doing such,
you'd contact the proper authorities. Or, perhaps you are projecting.


Going off the deep end again Kevin?

So did you stop beating your wife and kids?

Projecting again? Is your wife really sick or does she have internal
injuries from you beating her? Jim, you truly are nothing but a piece
of ****. Your posts here prove you are such a low life. Again, you
slimeball, SHOW ME SOME EVIDENCE that I've ever beat my wife or kids.
HAVE ANY?? You are such a pathetic **** stain that you hide behind
usenet like a scared little baby. I tried to meet up with you, you
didn't have the balls, little man. BUT you certainly have when you're
behind usenet. What happened to you apologizing to the group as a whole
for your actions? I guess that went the way of MOST of your bipolar
rants.
Now, go beat your wife. Maybe you'll have to sell THIS boat.....


Oh my. You need to control your emotions Kevin. Is this the type of anger
that causes you to beat your wife and kids?

what a petty, shallow, lying, childish low life piece of **** you are.
I hope your sickly wife isn't a low life piece of trash like you are.
Anger, what makes you think I'm angry, Jim? Are you that stupid that
you think you can judge a person's emotions on usenet? Quite the
contrary, I feel sorry for you and your mental condition(s). You've
single handedly ruined this newsgroup, once again. It was on the right
track until you started your idiotic childish bull**** again.

Deja Vu all over again.
 

Chuck Gould wrote:

JimH wrote:


Chuck, you and JohnH need to stop the netcopping and let the NG find it's
own direction. You don't own the group and the 2 of you cause more problems
with the netcopping than if you just ignored the OT posts.


When one participates in a group called "rec.boats" the direction of
the group is predefined. Of course nobody owns the group. Some people
are free to post as much ridiculous, OT, inflammatory and personal
attack nonsense here as they want to- and others are free to comment
that it might be inappropriate to do so.

If appeals to remain on-topic make some individual posters
uncomfortable, so be it.


Thanks Chuck - The less pollution here the better.

Capt Jack R..

Deja Vu all over again.
 

Jack Redington wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:

JimH wrote:


Chuck, you and JohnH need to stop the netcopping and let the NG find it's
own direction. You don't own the group and the 2 of you cause more problems
with the netcopping than if you just ignored the OT posts.


When one participates in a group called "rec.boats" the direction of
the group is predefined. Of course nobody owns the group. Some people
are free to post as much ridiculous, OT, inflammatory and personal
attack nonsense here as they want to- and others are free to comment
that it might be inappropriate to do so.

If appeals to remain on-topic make some individual posters
uncomfortable, so be it.


Thanks Chuck - The less pollution here the better.

Capt Jack R..

What does this have to do with boats?

Deja Vu all over again.
 

On 7 Sep 2006 04:59:52 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


Jack Redington wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:

JimH wrote:


Chuck, you and JohnH need to stop the netcopping and let the NG find it's
own direction. You don't own the group and the 2 of you cause more problems
with the netcopping than if you just ignored the OT posts.


When one participates in a group called "rec.boats" the direction of
the group is predefined. Of course nobody owns the group. Some people
are free to post as much ridiculous, OT, inflammatory and personal
attack nonsense here as they want to- and others are free to comment
that it might be inappropriate to do so.

If appeals to remain on-topic make some individual posters
uncomfortable, so be it.


Thanks Chuck - The less pollution here the better.

Capt Jack R..

What does this have to do with boats?

Come up to the Chesapeake Bay, and you'll see what pollution has to do with
boats. It fouls them.
--
******************************************
***** Hope your day is great! *****
******************************************

John

Deja Vu all over again.
 

JohnH wrote:
On 7 Sep 2006 04:59:52 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


Jack Redington wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:

JimH wrote:


Chuck, you and JohnH need to stop the netcopping and let the NG find it's
own direction. You don't own the group and the 2 of you cause more problems
with the netcopping than if you just ignored the OT posts.


When one participates in a group called "rec.boats" the direction of
the group is predefined. Of course nobody owns the group. Some people
are free to post as much ridiculous, OT, inflammatory and personal
attack nonsense here as they want to- and others are free to comment
that it might be inappropriate to do so.

If appeals to remain on-topic make some individual posters
uncomfortable, so be it.


Thanks Chuck - The less pollution here the better.

Capt Jack R..

What does this have to do with boats?

Come up to the Chesapeake Bay, and you'll see what pollution has to do with
boats. It fouls them.
--
John, you need to read the blather before my reply. Has nothing to do
with boats.

Deja Vu all over again.
 

On 7 Sep 2006 06:49:58 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 7 Sep 2006 04:59:52 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


Jack Redington wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:

JimH wrote:


Chuck, you and JohnH need to stop the netcopping and let the NG find it's
own direction. You don't own the group and the 2 of you cause more problems
with the netcopping than if you just ignored the OT posts.


When one participates in a group called "rec.boats" the direction of
the group is predefined. Of course nobody owns the group. Some people
are free to post as much ridiculous, OT, inflammatory and personal
attack nonsense here as they want to- and others are free to comment
that it might be inappropriate to do so.

If appeals to remain on-topic make some individual posters
uncomfortable, so be it.


Thanks Chuck - The less pollution here the better.

Capt Jack R..

What does this have to do with boats?

Come up to the Chesapeake Bay, and you'll see what pollution has to do with
boats. It fouls them.
--
John, you need to read the blather before my reply. Has nothing to do
with boats.

Nor did your rant about Jimmy yesterday.

Capt Jack referred to the pollution here. "Here" is a boating newsgroup.
--
******************************************
***** Hope your day is great! *****
******************************************

John

Deja Vu all over again.
 

JohnH wrote:
On 7 Sep 2006 06:49:58 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 7 Sep 2006 04:59:52 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


Jack Redington wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:

JimH wrote:


Chuck, you and JohnH need to stop the netcopping and let the NG find it's
own direction. You don't own the group and the 2 of you cause more problems
with the netcopping than if you just ignored the OT posts.


When one participates in a group called "rec.boats" the direction of
the group is predefined. Of course nobody owns the group. Some people
are free to post as much ridiculous, OT, inflammatory and personal
attack nonsense here as they want to- and others are free to comment
that it might be inappropriate to do so.

If appeals to remain on-topic make some individual posters
uncomfortable, so be it.


Thanks Chuck - The less pollution here the better.

Capt Jack R..

What does this have to do with boats?

Come up to the Chesapeake Bay, and you'll see what pollution has to do with
boats. It fouls them.
--
John, you need to read the blather before my reply. Has nothing to do
with boats.

Nor did your rant about Jimmy yesterday.

I agree, but I never said it did. I find it quite interesting that
everyone doesn't have a problem pig piling on me, but JimH, the Bipolar
Boy can go on and on with lies about me, my family, etc. and everyone
seems to hold him to a higher standard. Take a look, he's posted dozens
of slanderous insults and lies about me in the last couple of days.
Nary a word has been said to him, even after this is the very behavior
that he's apologized for. But anything and everything I say here is
instantly fodder for the pig pilers and sheriffs. Odd, wouldn't you
say, after JimH went on such a rampage not long ago that he ****ed off
every single person here?

Deja Vu all over again.
 

On 7 Sep 2006 07:48:44 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 7 Sep 2006 06:49:58 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 7 Sep 2006 04:59:52 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


Jack Redington wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:

JimH wrote:


Chuck, you and JohnH need to stop the netcopping and let the NG find it's
own direction. You don't own the group and the 2 of you cause more problems
with the netcopping than if you just ignored the OT posts.


When one participates in a group called "rec.boats" the direction of
the group is predefined. Of course nobody owns the group. Some people
are free to post as much ridiculous, OT, inflammatory and personal
attack nonsense here as they want to- and others are free to comment
that it might be inappropriate to do so.

If appeals to remain on-topic make some individual posters
uncomfortable, so be it.


Thanks Chuck - The less pollution here the better.

Capt Jack R..

What does this have to do with boats?

Come up to the Chesapeake Bay, and you'll see what pollution has to do with
boats. It fouls them.
--
John, you need to read the blather before my reply. Has nothing to do
with boats.

Nor did your rant about Jimmy yesterday.

I agree, but I never said it did. I find it quite interesting that
everyone doesn't have a problem pig piling on me, but JimH, the Bipolar
Boy can go on and on with lies about me, my family, etc. and everyone
seems to hold him to a higher standard. Take a look, he's posted dozens
of slanderous insults and lies about me in the last couple of days.
Nary a word has been said to him, even after this is the very behavior
that he's apologized for. But anything and everything I say here is
instantly fodder for the pig pilers and sheriffs. Odd, wouldn't you
say, after JimH went on such a rampage not long ago that he ****ed off
every single person here?

bk, as I've mentioned several times, I've *kill filed* him. I don't see his
****, *unless* you stupidly respond to it. Why would I possibly want to
'take a look' at his dribble, and furthermore, why do you?

He obviously didn't **** off every single person here, as some still
communicate with him. Your continuing to do so is ****ing off just as many
people.

Wake up, smell the coffee, and killfile the pferde apfel.
--
******************************************
***** Hope your day is great! *****
******************************************

John

Deja Vu all over again.
 

JohnH wrote:
He obviously didn't **** off every single person here, as some still
communicate with him. Your continuing to do so is ****ing off just as many
people.

Wake up, smell the coffee, and killfile the pferde apfel.
--
******************************************
***** Hope your day is great! *****
******************************************

John

Agreed. Unlike you bk, JimH has never bothered me at all. I've had many
a pleasant conversation with him, as well as JohnH, Harry, Smithers,
Wayne B, Chuck Gould, Bert, Calif. Bill and many more.

Maybe you need to rethink your views that everybody is a fool, but you

Deja Vu all over again.
 

On 7 Sep 2006 11:20:22 -0700, wrote:


JohnH wrote:
He obviously didn't **** off every single person here, as some still
communicate with him. Your continuing to do so is ****ing off just as many
people.

Wake up, smell the coffee, and killfile the pferde apfel.
--
******************************************
***** Hope your day is great! *****
******************************************

John

Agreed. Unlike you bk, JimH has never bothered me at all. I've had many
a pleasant conversation with him, as well as JohnH, Harry, Smithers,
Wayne B, Chuck Gould, Bert, Calif. Bill and many more.

Maybe you need to rethink your views that everybody is a fool, but you

For several of us, the key word is 'had'.
--
******************************************
***** Hope your day is great! *****
******************************************

John