|
Deja Vu all over again.
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Don White wrote: ..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial. He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?) Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as partial. If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get chastised. Sucks to be Kevin. YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved! Wrong again. His name is Dan. How do you know that? Oooh, somebody did a Krause on Kevin. oooh, somebody is still an idiot..... Were you able to make your brain actually work a tad to understand why I respond to posts that are replying to me?? You are still the punching bag of the group. You have been abandoned and or shuned by all of your friends. Why don't you stop being a JimH and be a normal person. I've never stooped to the low level of JimH, or you for that matter. But you didn't answer my question. Were you finally able to understand why I respond to posts that are a direct reply to ME? Kevin, you need to look at your recent posting history and figure out what you are trying to do and whether it is having the desired effect. |
Deja Vu all over again.
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Don White wrote: ..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial. He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?) Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as partial. If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get chastised. Sucks to be Kevin. YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved! Wrong again. His name is Dan. How do you know that? Oooh, somebody did a Krause on Kevin. oooh, somebody is still an idiot..... Were you able to make your brain actually work a tad to understand why I respond to posts that are replying to me?? You are still the punching bag of the group. You have been abandoned and or shuned by all of your friends. Why don't you stop being a JimH and be a normal person. I've never stooped to the low level of JimH, or you for that matter. But you didn't answer my question. Were you finally able to understand why I respond to posts that are a direct reply to ME? Kevin, you need to look at your recent posting history and figure out what you are trying to do and whether it is having the desired effect. I'm not Kevin, nitwit. |
Deja Vu all over again.
Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: JimH wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... Here we go again. Somebody has to teach these flyboys how to read a chart. http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/natio...nfriendly.html Sorry to hear about that Don. I am sure the US pilots involved in this accident feel worse than you can believe and will have a hard time forgetting it. You could be right, Bipolar Boy! Insert Kevin's signature phrase here --- "Grow up". Not quite bright enough to show some originality, huh? Why are you responding? Are you Kevin? It's quite simple. A person, using google groups can respond to any thread, whether or not it is a direct post to them. Understand? Take for instance if you were to post a question to JimH, aka Bipolar Boy, I could simply reply to it, just like I am replying to this post. Again, you just aren't great at originality, are you? Google groups have nothing to do with it. Yes, it certainly does! I'm using it, so it's quite relevant. Any news reader can post to the group. "aren't great at originality"?? What does that have to do with this thread or this group? Again, it's quite simple, even for you. It seems that you can't figure out that anyone can post to any thread. You are way out there, Kevin. Far out, man........ |
Deja Vu all over again.
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Don White wrote: ..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial. He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?) Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as partial. If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get chastised. Sucks to be Kevin. YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved! Wrong again. His name is Dan. How do you know that? Oooh, somebody did a Krause on Kevin. oooh, somebody is still an idiot..... Were you able to make your brain actually work a tad to understand why I respond to posts that are replying to me?? You are still the punching bag of the group. You have been abandoned and or shuned by all of your friends. Why don't you stop being a JimH and be a normal person. I've never stooped to the low level of JimH, or you for that matter. But you didn't answer my question. Were you finally able to understand why I respond to posts that are a direct reply to ME? Kevin, you need to look at your recent posting history and figure out what you are trying to do and whether it is having the desired effect. I'm not Kevin, nitwit. Kevin, why do you keep responding to posts that are not addressed to you? |
Deja Vu all over again.
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Don White wrote: ..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial. He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?) Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as partial. If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get chastised. Sucks to be Kevin. YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved! Wrong again. His name is Dan. How do you know that? Oooh, somebody did a Krause on Kevin. oooh, somebody is still an idiot..... Were you able to make your brain actually work a tad to understand why I respond to posts that are replying to me?? You are still the punching bag of the group. You have been abandoned and or shuned by all of your friends. Why don't you stop being a JimH and be a normal person. I've never stooped to the low level of JimH, or you for that matter. But you didn't answer my question. Were you finally able to understand why I respond to posts that are a direct reply to ME? Kevin, you need to look at your recent posting history and figure out what you are trying to do and whether it is having the desired effect. I'm not Kevin, nitwit. Kevin, why do you keep responding to posts that are not addressed to you? Why do YOU keep responding to posts that are not addressed to you? See how stupid you're being? |
Deja Vu all over again.
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Don White wrote: ..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial. He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?) Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as partial. If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get chastised. Sucks to be Kevin. YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved! Wrong again. His name is Dan. How do you know that? Oooh, somebody did a Krause on Kevin. oooh, somebody is still an idiot..... Were you able to make your brain actually work a tad to understand why I respond to posts that are replying to me?? You are still the punching bag of the group. You have been abandoned and or shuned by all of your friends. Why don't you stop being a JimH and be a normal person. I've never stooped to the low level of JimH, or you for that matter. But you didn't answer my question. Were you finally able to understand why I respond to posts that are a direct reply to ME? Kevin, you need to look at your recent posting history and figure out what you are trying to do and whether it is having the desired effect. I'm not Kevin, nitwit. Kevin, why do you keep responding to posts that are not addressed to you? Why do YOU keep responding to posts that are not addressed to you? See how stupid you're being? Kevin, You have stumbled upon the the answer. This is USENET and there are essentially no rules. You can post what you want, when you want and with any content you want. The fact that you keep responding to posts that are directed to Kevin means that you are Kevin to many people. If you don't want to be known as Kevin then stop responding to posts directed to Kevin. It is as simple as that. |
Deja Vu all over again.
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Don White wrote: ..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial. He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?) Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as partial. If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get chastised. Sucks to be Kevin. YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved! Wrong again. His name is Dan. How do you know that? Oooh, somebody did a Krause on Kevin. oooh, somebody is still an idiot..... Were you able to make your brain actually work a tad to understand why I respond to posts that are replying to me?? You are still the punching bag of the group. You have been abandoned and or shuned by all of your friends. Why don't you stop being a JimH and be a normal person. I've never stooped to the low level of JimH, or you for that matter. But you didn't answer my question. Were you finally able to understand why I respond to posts that are a direct reply to ME? Kevin, you need to look at your recent posting history and figure out what you are trying to do and whether it is having the desired effect. I'm not Kevin, nitwit. Kevin, why do you keep responding to posts that are not addressed to you? Why do YOU keep responding to posts that are not addressed to you? See how stupid you're being? Kevin, You have stumbled upon the the answer. This is USENET and there are essentially no rules. You can post what you want, when you want and with any content you want. The fact that you keep responding to posts that are directed to Kevin means that you are Kevin to many people. If you don't want to be known as Kevin then stop responding to posts directed to Kevin. It is as simple as that. If you don't want to be known as "idiot", then stop responding to posts where I call you just that, idiot. You respond to posts to others also. So does that mean that if you respond to a post to, say, Harry, that you ARE Harry? Do you not see your absurdity? If not, you certainly aren't very bright. |
Deja Vu all over again.
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Don White wrote: ..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial. He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?) Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as partial. If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get chastised. Sucks to be Kevin. YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved! Wrong again. His name is Dan. How do you know that? Oooh, somebody did a Krause on Kevin. oooh, somebody is still an idiot..... Were you able to make your brain actually work a tad to understand why I respond to posts that are replying to me?? You are still the punching bag of the group. You have been abandoned and or shuned by all of your friends. Why don't you stop being a JimH and be a normal person. I've never stooped to the low level of JimH, or you for that matter. But you didn't answer my question. Were you finally able to understand why I respond to posts that are a direct reply to ME? Kevin, you need to look at your recent posting history and figure out what you are trying to do and whether it is having the desired effect. I'm not Kevin, nitwit. Kevin, why do you keep responding to posts that are not addressed to you? Why do YOU keep responding to posts that are not addressed to you? See how stupid you're being? Kevin, You have stumbled upon the the answer. This is USENET and there are essentially no rules. You can post what you want, when you want and with any content you want. The fact that you keep responding to posts that are directed to Kevin means that you are Kevin to many people. If you don't want to be known as Kevin then stop responding to posts directed to Kevin. It is as simple as that. If you don't want to be known as "idiot", then stop responding to posts where I call you just that, idiot. You respond to posts to others also. So does that mean that if you respond to a post to, say, Harry, that you ARE Harry? Do you not see your absurdity? If not, you certainly aren't very bright. If you direct the posts to Idiot, I will not respond because I, unlike you, am not an idiot. |
Deja Vu all over again.
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Don White wrote: ..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial. He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?) Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as partial. If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get chastised. Sucks to be Kevin. YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved! Wrong again. His name is Dan. How do you know that? Oooh, somebody did a Krause on Kevin. oooh, somebody is still an idiot..... Were you able to make your brain actually work a tad to understand why I respond to posts that are replying to me?? You are still the punching bag of the group. You have been abandoned and or shuned by all of your friends. Why don't you stop being a JimH and be a normal person. I've never stooped to the low level of JimH, or you for that matter. But you didn't answer my question. Were you finally able to understand why I respond to posts that are a direct reply to ME? Kevin, you need to look at your recent posting history and figure out what you are trying to do and whether it is having the desired effect. I'm not Kevin, nitwit. Kevin, why do you keep responding to posts that are not addressed to you? Why do YOU keep responding to posts that are not addressed to you? See how stupid you're being? Kevin, You have stumbled upon the the answer. This is USENET and there are essentially no rules. You can post what you want, when you want and with any content you want. The fact that you keep responding to posts that are directed to Kevin means that you are Kevin to many people. If you don't want to be known as Kevin then stop responding to posts directed to Kevin. It is as simple as that. If you don't want to be known as "idiot", then stop responding to posts where I call you just that, idiot. You respond to posts to others also. So does that mean that if you respond to a post to, say, Harry, that you ARE Harry? Do you not see your absurdity? If not, you certainly aren't very bright. If you direct the posts to Idiot, I will not respond because I, unlike you, am not an idiot. Uh, you have.... Many times in the past, idiot. |
Deja Vu all over again.
Harry Krause wrote: On 9/10/2006 12:12 PM, basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: If you direct the posts to Idiot, I will not respond because I, unlike you, am not an idiot. Uh, you have.... Many times in the past, idiot. Bert is several rungs lower than "idiot" on the IQ ladder. Sorry, you are right, and my remark was an insult to idiots everywhere! |
Deja Vu all over again.
Harry Krause wrote:
On 9/10/2006 12:12 PM, basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: If you direct the posts to Idiot, I will not respond because I, unlike you, am not an idiot. Uh, you have.... Many times in the past, idiot. Bert is several rungs lower than "idiot" on the IQ ladder. Harry, What is it like to have an idiot make more money than you? What is it like to have an idiot own a better house than you? What is it like to be an old doddering fool who's only happiness in life comes form denigrating others? |
Deja Vu all over again.
Bert Robbins wrote: Harry Krause wrote: On 9/10/2006 12:12 PM, basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: If you direct the posts to Idiot, I will not respond because I, unlike you, am not an idiot. Uh, you have.... Many times in the past, idiot. Bert is several rungs lower than "idiot" on the IQ ladder. Harry, What is it like to have an idiot make more money than you? What is it like to have an idiot own a better house than you? What is it like to be an old doddering fool who's only happiness in life comes form denigrating others? Only an idiot would make such allegations without any evidence at all. |
Deja Vu all over again.
Harry Krause wrote:
On 9/11/2006 8:29 AM, basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: Harry Krause wrote: On 9/10/2006 12:12 PM, basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: If you direct the posts to Idiot, I will not respond because I, unlike you, am not an idiot. Uh, you have.... Many times in the past, idiot. Bert is several rungs lower than "idiot" on the IQ ladder. Harry, What is it like to have an idiot make more money than you? What is it like to have an idiot own a better house than you? What is it like to be an old doddering fool who's only happiness in life comes form denigrating others? Only an idiot would make such allegations without any evidence at all. When you live down in the septic tank, as Bert does... Harry, when you try so hard to put me down I know it is due to your own inadequacies and insecurities. |
Deja Vu all over again.
Bert Robbins wrote: Harry Krause wrote: On 9/11/2006 8:29 AM, basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: Harry Krause wrote: On 9/10/2006 12:12 PM, basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: If you direct the posts to Idiot, I will not respond because I, unlike you, am not an idiot. Uh, you have.... Many times in the past, idiot. Bert is several rungs lower than "idiot" on the IQ ladder. Harry, What is it like to have an idiot make more money than you? What is it like to have an idiot own a better house than you? What is it like to be an old doddering fool who's only happiness in life comes form denigrating others? Only an idiot would make such allegations without any evidence at all. When you live down in the septic tank, as Bert does... Harry, when you try so hard to put me down I know it is due to your own inadequacies and insecurities. So, show us what evidence you have of any of the above! Simple as that. |
Deja Vu all over again.
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote: Harry Krause wrote: On 9/11/2006 8:29 AM, basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: Harry Krause wrote: On 9/10/2006 12:12 PM, basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: If you direct the posts to Idiot, I will not respond because I, unlike you, am not an idiot. Uh, you have.... Many times in the past, idiot. Bert is several rungs lower than "idiot" on the IQ ladder. Harry, What is it like to have an idiot make more money than you? What is it like to have an idiot own a better house than you? What is it like to be an old doddering fool who's only happiness in life comes form denigrating others? Only an idiot would make such allegations without any evidence at all. When you live down in the septic tank, as Bert does... Harry, when you try so hard to put me down I know it is due to your own inadequacies and insecurities. So, show us what evidence you have of any of the above! Simple as that. What evidence do you have that you are not Kevin, Kevin? |
Deja Vu all over again.
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Don White wrote: ..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial. He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?) Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as partial. If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get chastised. Sucks to be Kevin. YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved! Wrong again. His name is Dan. How do you know that? Oooh, somebody did a Krause on Kevin. oooh, somebody is still an idiot..... Were you able to make your brain actually work a tad to understand why I respond to posts that are replying to me?? You are still the punching bag of the group. You have been abandoned and or shuned by all of your friends. Why don't you stop being a JimH and be a normal person. I've never stooped to the low level of JimH, or you for that matter. But you didn't answer my question. Were you finally able to understand why I respond to posts that are a direct reply to ME? Kevin, you need to look at your recent posting history and figure out what you are trying to do and whether it is having the desired effect. I'm not Kevin, nitwit. Kevin, why do you keep responding to posts that are not addressed to you? Why do YOU keep responding to posts that are not addressed to you? See how stupid you're being? Wait! Let me guess!!! This isn't email, it's a newsgroup!!! Did I win? |
Deja Vu all over again.
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote: Harry Krause wrote: On 9/11/2006 8:29 AM, basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: Harry Krause wrote: On 9/10/2006 12:12 PM, basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: If you direct the posts to Idiot, I will not respond because I, unlike you, am not an idiot. Uh, you have.... Many times in the past, idiot. Bert is several rungs lower than "idiot" on the IQ ladder. Harry, What is it like to have an idiot make more money than you? What is it like to have an idiot own a better house than you? What is it like to be an old doddering fool who's only happiness in life comes form denigrating others? Only an idiot would make such allegations without any evidence at all. When you live down in the septic tank, as Bert does... Harry, when you try so hard to put me down I know it is due to your own inadequacies and insecurities. So, show us what evidence you have of any of the above! Simple as that. Put up $5K and I'll take the bet. |
Deja Vu all over again.
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: Harry Krause wrote: On 9/11/2006 8:29 AM, basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: Harry Krause wrote: On 9/10/2006 12:12 PM, basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: If you direct the posts to Idiot, I will not respond because I, unlike you, am not an idiot. Uh, you have.... Many times in the past, idiot. Bert is several rungs lower than "idiot" on the IQ ladder. Harry, What is it like to have an idiot make more money than you? What is it like to have an idiot own a better house than you? What is it like to be an old doddering fool who's only happiness in life comes form denigrating others? Only an idiot would make such allegations without any evidence at all. When you live down in the septic tank, as Bert does... Harry, when you try so hard to put me down I know it is due to your own inadequacies and insecurities. So, show us what evidence you have of any of the above! Simple as that. What evidence do you have that you are not Kevin, Kevin? I'm not Kevin, idiot. But, I'll still answer your completely ignorant question. Driver's license Birth Certificate Social Security number PE license Registration in various professional organizations Registration in various Karate organizations Title to 3 cars, one boat House loan documents Public School records Marriage License BBB membership and many more. |
Deja Vu all over again.
Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: Harry Krause wrote: On 9/11/2006 8:29 AM, basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: Harry Krause wrote: On 9/10/2006 12:12 PM, basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: If you direct the posts to Idiot, I will not respond because I, unlike you, am not an idiot. Uh, you have.... Many times in the past, idiot. Bert is several rungs lower than "idiot" on the IQ ladder. Harry, What is it like to have an idiot make more money than you? What is it like to have an idiot own a better house than you? What is it like to be an old doddering fool who's only happiness in life comes form denigrating others? Only an idiot would make such allegations without any evidence at all. When you live down in the septic tank, as Bert does... Harry, when you try so hard to put me down I know it is due to your own inadequacies and insecurities. So, show us what evidence you have of any of the above! Simple as that. Put up $5K and I'll take the bet. What bet? |
Deja Vu all over again.
Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Don White wrote: ..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial. He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?) Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as partial. If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get chastised. Sucks to be Kevin. YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved! Wrong again. His name is Dan. How do you know that? Oooh, somebody did a Krause on Kevin. oooh, somebody is still an idiot..... Were you able to make your brain actually work a tad to understand why I respond to posts that are replying to me?? You are still the punching bag of the group. You have been abandoned and or shuned by all of your friends. Why don't you stop being a JimH and be a normal person. I've never stooped to the low level of JimH, or you for that matter. But you didn't answer my question. Were you finally able to understand why I respond to posts that are a direct reply to ME? Kevin, you need to look at your recent posting history and figure out what you are trying to do and whether it is having the desired effect. I'm not Kevin, nitwit. Kevin, why do you keep responding to posts that are not addressed to you? Why do YOU keep responding to posts that are not addressed to you? See how stupid you're being? Wait! Let me guess!!! This isn't email, it's a newsgroup!!! Did I win? No, it's just that again, you've shown that you can't comprehend anything. You see, your buddy Bert wanted to know why *I* respond to posts that aren't addressed to me, while he done the exact thing above. But, wait, I'm sure you won't get it still. |
Deja Vu all over again.
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: Harry Krause wrote: On 9/11/2006 8:29 AM, basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: Harry Krause wrote: On 9/10/2006 12:12 PM, basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: If you direct the posts to Idiot, I will not respond because I, unlike you, am not an idiot. Uh, you have.... Many times in the past, idiot. Bert is several rungs lower than "idiot" on the IQ ladder. Harry, What is it like to have an idiot make more money than you? What is it like to have an idiot own a better house than you? What is it like to be an old doddering fool who's only happiness in life comes form denigrating others? Only an idiot would make such allegations without any evidence at all. When you live down in the septic tank, as Bert does... Harry, when you try so hard to put me down I know it is due to your own inadequacies and insecurities. So, show us what evidence you have of any of the above! Simple as that. What evidence do you have that you are not Kevin, Kevin? I'm not Kevin, idiot. But, I'll still answer your completely ignorant question. Driver's license Birth Certificate Social Security number PE license Registration in various professional organizations Registration in various Karate organizations Title to 3 cars, one boat House loan documents Public School records Marriage License BBB membership and many more. Scan them in and post them, to rec.boats, so that we can see them. |
Deja Vu all over again.
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: Harry Krause wrote: On 9/11/2006 8:29 AM, basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: Harry Krause wrote: On 9/10/2006 12:12 PM, basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: If you direct the posts to Idiot, I will not respond because I, unlike you, am not an idiot. Uh, you have.... Many times in the past, idiot. Bert is several rungs lower than "idiot" on the IQ ladder. Harry, What is it like to have an idiot make more money than you? What is it like to have an idiot own a better house than you? What is it like to be an old doddering fool who's only happiness in life comes form denigrating others? Only an idiot would make such allegations without any evidence at all. When you live down in the septic tank, as Bert does... Harry, when you try so hard to put me down I know it is due to your own inadequacies and insecurities. So, show us what evidence you have of any of the above! Simple as that. What evidence do you have that you are not Kevin, Kevin? I'm not Kevin, idiot. But, I'll still answer your completely ignorant question. Driver's license Birth Certificate Social Security number PE license Registration in various professional organizations Registration in various Karate organizations Title to 3 cars, one boat House loan documents Public School records Marriage License BBB membership and many more. Scan them in and post them, to rec.boats, so that we can see them. Take the challenge, and I'll do just that! |
Deja Vu all over again.
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: Harry Krause wrote: On 9/11/2006 8:29 AM, basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: Harry Krause wrote: On 9/10/2006 12:12 PM, basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: If you direct the posts to Idiot, I will not respond because I, unlike you, am not an idiot. Uh, you have.... Many times in the past, idiot. Bert is several rungs lower than "idiot" on the IQ ladder. Harry, What is it like to have an idiot make more money than you? What is it like to have an idiot own a better house than you? What is it like to be an old doddering fool who's only happiness in life comes form denigrating others? Only an idiot would make such allegations without any evidence at all. When you live down in the septic tank, as Bert does... Harry, when you try so hard to put me down I know it is due to your own inadequacies and insecurities. So, show us what evidence you have of any of the above! Simple as that. What evidence do you have that you are not Kevin, Kevin? I'm not Kevin, idiot. But, I'll still answer your completely ignorant question. Driver's license Birth Certificate Social Security number PE license Registration in various professional organizations Registration in various Karate organizations Title to 3 cars, one boat House loan documents Public School records Marriage License BBB membership and many more. Scan them in and post them, to rec.boats, so that we can see them. Take the challenge, and I'll do just that! I accept the challenge where you post the documents, you described above, and I'll view then and give you my opinion as to their appropriateness and accuracy. |
Deja Vu all over again.
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: Harry Krause wrote: On 9/11/2006 8:29 AM, basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: Harry Krause wrote: On 9/10/2006 12:12 PM, basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: If you direct the posts to Idiot, I will not respond because I, unlike you, am not an idiot. Uh, you have.... Many times in the past, idiot. Bert is several rungs lower than "idiot" on the IQ ladder. Harry, What is it like to have an idiot make more money than you? What is it like to have an idiot own a better house than you? What is it like to be an old doddering fool who's only happiness in life comes form denigrating others? Only an idiot would make such allegations without any evidence at all. When you live down in the septic tank, as Bert does... Harry, when you try so hard to put me down I know it is due to your own inadequacies and insecurities. So, show us what evidence you have of any of the above! Simple as that. What evidence do you have that you are not Kevin, Kevin? I'm not Kevin, idiot. But, I'll still answer your completely ignorant question. Driver's license Birth Certificate Social Security number PE license Registration in various professional organizations Registration in various Karate organizations Title to 3 cars, one boat House loan documents Public School records Marriage License BBB membership and many more. Scan them in and post them, to rec.boats, so that we can see them. Take the challenge, and I'll do just that! I accept the challenge where you post the documents, you described above, and I'll view then and give you my opinion as to their appropriateness and accuracy. Great, put up the $5000 for JohnH to hold, we'll go from there!! |
Deja Vu all over again.
basskisser wrote:
Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Don White wrote: ..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial. He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?) Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as partial. If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get chastised. Sucks to be Kevin. YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved! Wrong again. His name is Dan. How do you know that? Oooh, somebody did a Krause on Kevin. oooh, somebody is still an idiot..... Were you able to make your brain actually work a tad to understand why I respond to posts that are replying to me?? You are still the punching bag of the group. You have been abandoned and or shuned by all of your friends. Why don't you stop being a JimH and be a normal person. I've never stooped to the low level of JimH, or you for that matter. But you didn't answer my question. Were you finally able to understand why I respond to posts that are a direct reply to ME? Kevin, you need to look at your recent posting history and figure out what you are trying to do and whether it is having the desired effect. I'm not Kevin, nitwit. Kevin, why do you keep responding to posts that are not addressed to you? Why do YOU keep responding to posts that are not addressed to you? See how stupid you're being? Wait! Let me guess!!! This isn't email, it's a newsgroup!!! Did I win? No, it's just that again, you've shown that you can't comprehend anything. You see, your buddy Bert wanted to know why *I* respond to posts that aren't addressed to me, while he done the exact thing above. But, wait, I'm sure you won't get it still. I "get" that "while he done" isn't English and your last sentence is a mess. I also get that you are finger pointing (again) as some sort of diversion or screwed up justification for your posts. And I don't know Bert so I can't consider him a buddy. Try harder next time, OK? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:35 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com