BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Deja Vu all over again. (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/73631-deja-vu-all-over-again.html)

JimH September 7th 06 07:27 PM

Deja Vu all over again.
 

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On 7 Sep 2006 11:20:22 -0700, wrote:


JohnH wrote:
He obviously didn't **** off every single person here, as some still
communicate with him. Your continuing to do so is ****ing off just as
many
people.

Wake up, smell the coffee, and killfile the pferde apfel.
--
******************************************
***** Hope your day is great! *****
******************************************

John


Agreed. Unlike you bk, JimH has never bothered me at all. I've had many
a pleasant conversation with him, as well as JohnH, Harry, Smithers,
Wayne B, Chuck Gould, Bert, Calif. Bill and many more.

Maybe you need to rethink your views that everybody is a fool, but you


For several of us, the key word is 'had'.
--
******************************************
***** Hope your day is great! *****
******************************************

John


Continue to stir that pot Sheriff. Giddyup!



[email protected] September 7th 06 08:24 PM

Deja Vu all over again.
 
Understood, John, but to me it's still "has" or "have" depending on
the tense.....


JohnH wrote:
On 7 Sep 2006 11:20:22 -0700, wrote:


JohnH wrote:
He obviously didn't **** off every single person here, as some still
communicate with him. Your continuing to do so is ****ing off just as many
people.

Wake up, smell the coffee, and killfile the pferde apfel.
--
******************************************
***** Hope your day is great! *****
******************************************

John


Agreed. Unlike you bk, JimH has never bothered me at all. I've had many
a pleasant conversation with him, as well as JohnH, Harry, Smithers,
Wayne B, Chuck Gould, Bert, Calif. Bill and many more.

Maybe you need to rethink your views that everybody is a fool, but you


For several of us, the key word is 'had'.
--
******************************************
***** Hope your day is great! *****
******************************************

John



basskisser September 7th 06 08:34 PM

Deja Vu all over again.
 

wrote:
JohnH wrote:
He obviously didn't **** off every single person here, as some still
communicate with him. Your continuing to do so is ****ing off just as many
people.

Wake up, smell the coffee, and killfile the pferde apfel.
--
******************************************
***** Hope your day is great! *****
******************************************

John


Agreed. Unlike you bk, JimH has never bothered me at all. I've had many
a pleasant conversation with him, as well as JohnH, Harry, Smithers,
Wayne B, Chuck Gould, Bert, Calif. Bill and many more.

Maybe you need to rethink your views that everybody is a fool, but you


Where did I say such a thing? You are a lot like JimH, put some idea in
your own head, and it instantly becomes fact, at least in your own
little world. So are you saying that someone that consistently tells
lies about someone else, posts nothing but insults and petty name
calling, accusing someone of beating their wife and kids is some kind
of stand up man in your eyes? JimH has done all of the above, and done
it a lot. It amazes me the amount of people here that find that
behavior acceptable.


[email protected] September 7th 06 09:10 PM

Deja Vu all over again.
 

basskisser wrote:
wrote:
JohnH wrote:
He obviously didn't **** off every single person here, as some still
communicate with him. Your continuing to do so is ****ing off just as many
people.

Wake up, smell the coffee, and killfile the pferde apfel.
--
******************************************
***** Hope your day is great! *****
******************************************

John


Agreed. Unlike you bk, JimH has never bothered me at all. I've had many
a pleasant conversation with him, as well as JohnH, Harry, Smithers,
Wayne B, Chuck Gould, Bert, Calif. Bill and many more.

Maybe you need to rethink your views that everybody is a fool, but you


Where did I say such a thing? You are a lot like JimH, put some idea in
your own head, and it instantly becomes fact, at least in your own
little world.


1)So are you saying that someone that consistently tells
lies about someone else,


2) posts nothing but insults and petty name
calling,


3)accusing someone of beating their wife and kids is some kind
of stand up man in your eyes? JimH has done all of the above, and done
it a lot.


From what anybody can tell, you've been guilty of all the above, that

is, if on #3, you wish to constitute, your statement of JimH's mom
being a drunk that commited suicide the day he was born. And in many
cases one can tie #1 and #2 together as well.


Knowing that you are likely to come back at me, is some obnoxious
lashing,please remember that I really couldn't care less. Be hard
hearted in what you wish.

I hope boating goes well with you always.

It amazes me the amount of people here that find that
behavior acceptable.



JimH September 7th 06 09:16 PM

Deja Vu all over again.
 

wrote in message
ps.com...

basskisser wrote:
wrote:
JohnH wrote:
He obviously didn't **** off every single person here, as some still
communicate with him. Your continuing to do so is ****ing off just as
many
people.

Wake up, smell the coffee, and killfile the pferde apfel.
--
******************************************
***** Hope your day is great! *****
******************************************

John

Agreed. Unlike you bk, JimH has never bothered me at all. I've had many
a pleasant conversation with him, as well as JohnH, Harry, Smithers,
Wayne B, Chuck Gould, Bert, Calif. Bill and many more.

Maybe you need to rethink your views that everybody is a fool, but you


Where did I say such a thing? You are a lot like JimH, put some idea in
your own head, and it instantly becomes fact, at least in your own
little world.


1)So are you saying that someone that consistently tells
lies about someone else,


2) posts nothing but insults and petty name
calling,


3)accusing someone of beating their wife and kids is some kind
of stand up man in your eyes? JimH has done all of the above, and done
it a lot.


From what anybody can tell, you've been guilty of all the above, that

is, if on #3, you wish to constitute, your statement of JimH's mom
being a drunk that commited suicide the day he was born. And in many
cases one can tie #1 and #2 together as well.


Knowing that you are likely to come back at me, is some obnoxious
lashing,please remember that I really couldn't care less. Be hard
hearted in what you wish.

I hope boating goes well with you always.

It amazes me the amount of people here that find that
behavior acceptable.




Kevin jumped on me for wishing John a fun vacation. Amazing!



basskisser September 7th 06 09:30 PM

Deja Vu all over again.
 

wrote:
basskisser wrote:
wrote:
JohnH wrote:
He obviously didn't **** off every single person here, as some still
communicate with him. Your continuing to do so is ****ing off just as many
people.

Wake up, smell the coffee, and killfile the pferde apfel.
--
******************************************
***** Hope your day is great! *****
******************************************

John

Agreed. Unlike you bk, JimH has never bothered me at all. I've had many
a pleasant conversation with him, as well as JohnH, Harry, Smithers,
Wayne B, Chuck Gould, Bert, Calif. Bill and many more.

Maybe you need to rethink your views that everybody is a fool, but you


Where did I say such a thing? You are a lot like JimH, put some idea in
your own head, and it instantly becomes fact, at least in your own
little world.


1)So are you saying that someone that consistently tells
lies about someone else,


2) posts nothing but insults and petty name
calling,


3)accusing someone of beating their wife and kids is some kind
of stand up man in your eyes? JimH has done all of the above, and done
it a lot.


From what anybody can tell, you've been guilty of all the above, that

is, if on #3, you wish to constitute, your statement of JimH's mom
being a drunk that commited suicide the day he was born. And in many
cases one can tie #1 and #2 together as well.


Cite?


Knowing that you are likely to come back at me, is some obnoxious
lashing,please remember that I really couldn't care less. Be hard
hearted in what you wish.

I hope boating goes well with you always.

It amazes me the amount of people here that find that
behavior acceptable.


Can't answer the questions huh?


basskisser September 7th 06 09:32 PM

Deja Vu all over again.
 

JimH wrote:
wrote in message
ps.com...

basskisser wrote:
wrote:
JohnH wrote:
He obviously didn't **** off every single person here, as some still
communicate with him. Your continuing to do so is ****ing off just as
many
people.

Wake up, smell the coffee, and killfile the pferde apfel.
--
******************************************
***** Hope your day is great! *****
******************************************

John

Agreed. Unlike you bk, JimH has never bothered me at all. I've had many
a pleasant conversation with him, as well as JohnH, Harry, Smithers,
Wayne B, Chuck Gould, Bert, Calif. Bill and many more.

Maybe you need to rethink your views that everybody is a fool, but you

Where did I say such a thing? You are a lot like JimH, put some idea in
your own head, and it instantly becomes fact, at least in your own
little world.


1)So are you saying that someone that consistently tells
lies about someone else,


2) posts nothing but insults and petty name
calling,


3)accusing someone of beating their wife and kids is some kind
of stand up man in your eyes? JimH has done all of the above, and done
it a lot.


From what anybody can tell, you've been guilty of all the above, that

is, if on #3, you wish to constitute, your statement of JimH's mom
being a drunk that commited suicide the day he was born. And in many
cases one can tie #1 and #2 together as well.


Knowing that you are likely to come back at me, is some obnoxious
lashing,please remember that I really couldn't care less. Be hard
hearted in what you wish.

I hope boating goes well with you always.

It amazes me the amount of people here that find that
behavior acceptable.




Kevin jumped on me for wishing John a fun vacation. Amazing!


Kevin, didn't and neither did I. Please show where I "jumped on you". I
simply inserted YOUR COMMENT.


JimH September 7th 06 09:36 PM

Deja Vu all over again.
 

"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

wrote:
basskisser wrote:
wrote:
JohnH wrote:
He obviously didn't **** off every single person here, as some
still
communicate with him. Your continuing to do so is ****ing off just
as many
people.

Wake up, smell the coffee, and killfile the pferde apfel.
--
******************************************
***** Hope your day is great! *****
******************************************

John

Agreed. Unlike you bk, JimH has never bothered me at all. I've had
many
a pleasant conversation with him, as well as JohnH, Harry, Smithers,
Wayne B, Chuck Gould, Bert, Calif. Bill and many more.

Maybe you need to rethink your views that everybody is a fool, but
you

Where did I say such a thing? You are a lot like JimH, put some idea in
your own head, and it instantly becomes fact, at least in your own
little world.


1)So are you saying that someone that consistently tells
lies about someone else,


2) posts nothing but insults and petty name
calling,


3)accusing someone of beating their wife and kids is some kind
of stand up man in your eyes? JimH has done all of the above, and done
it a lot.


From what anybody can tell, you've been guilty of all the above, that

is, if on #3, you wish to constitute, your statement of JimH's mom
being a drunk that commited suicide the day he was born. And in many
cases one can tie #1 and #2 together as well.


Cite?


Knowing that you are likely to come back at me, is some obnoxious
lashing,please remember that I really couldn't care less. Be hard
hearted in what you wish.

I hope boating goes well with you always.

It amazes me the amount of people here that find that
behavior acceptable.


Can't answer the questions huh?


Get help Kevin. You are one sick dude.



basskisser September 8th 06 01:06 PM

Deja Vu all over again.
 

JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

wrote:
basskisser wrote:
wrote:
JohnH wrote:
He obviously didn't **** off every single person here, as some
still
communicate with him. Your continuing to do so is ****ing off just
as many
people.

Wake up, smell the coffee, and killfile the pferde apfel.
--
******************************************
***** Hope your day is great! *****
******************************************

John

Agreed. Unlike you bk, JimH has never bothered me at all. I've had
many
a pleasant conversation with him, as well as JohnH, Harry, Smithers,
Wayne B, Chuck Gould, Bert, Calif. Bill and many more.

Maybe you need to rethink your views that everybody is a fool, but
you

Where did I say such a thing? You are a lot like JimH, put some idea in
your own head, and it instantly becomes fact, at least in your own
little world.

1)So are you saying that someone that consistently tells
lies about someone else,

2) posts nothing but insults and petty name
calling,

3)accusing someone of beating their wife and kids is some kind
of stand up man in your eyes? JimH has done all of the above, and done
it a lot.

From what anybody can tell, you've been guilty of all the above, that
is, if on #3, you wish to constitute, your statement of JimH's mom
being a drunk that commited suicide the day he was born. And in many
cases one can tie #1 and #2 together as well.


Cite?


Knowing that you are likely to come back at me, is some obnoxious
lashing,please remember that I really couldn't care less. Be hard
hearted in what you wish.

I hope boating goes well with you always.

It amazes me the amount of people here that find that
behavior acceptable.


Can't answer the questions huh?


Get help Kevin. You are one sick dude.


I'm not Kevin, Bipolar Boy!
Hmm, I'm sick? Why, because I think that you are a low life piece of
crap for what you've done? Do you think that it's exceptable to accuse
someone of beating their wife and kids without any shred of evidence? I
think, and most would agree, that that is about as low as a human being
can go.
I'm sick because I asked some questions to someone, and they won't
answer them because they know that the answers will show that I'm
right? How is that?


basskisser September 8th 06 03:01 PM

Deja Vu all over again.
 

Harry Krause wrote:
basskisser wrote:


I'm not Kevin, Bipolar Boy!


No one gives a crap. Enough of this nonsense.


JimH apparently does, he's keeping it up! Why do you chastise me,
Harry? I'm not the one acting like a child and spreading lies about
others here. Go to the source, why don't you?


basskisser September 9th 06 12:13 AM

Deja Vu all over again.
 

Harry Krause wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
basskisser wrote:

I'm not Kevin, Bipolar Boy!
No one gives a crap. Enough of this nonsense.


JimH apparently does, he's keeping it up! Why do you chastise me,
Harry? I'm not the one acting like a child


Yeah, you are. Over and over and over, ad nauseum.


I rest my case. You don't mind pig piling on me, when the perpetrator
is JimH. Makes me wonder why everyone here is afraid of him. He does
the same thing "over and over and over, ad nauseum" and NO ONE except
me has the balls to say anything about it. I find it amazing that you
and most here find it acceptable to lie about things that could destroy
a person, and are complete fabrications without ANY evidence of such.
That is as low as a human being can go, and whomever finds THAT
acceptable is just as bad.


Dan Krueger September 9th 06 12:28 AM

Deja Vu all over again.
 
basskisser wrote:

Dan Krueger wrote:

basskisser wrote:

JimH wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
...


Here we go again.
Somebody has to teach these flyboys how to read a chart.
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/natio...nfriendly.html



Sorry to hear about that Don. I am sure the US pilots involved in this
accident feel worse than you can believe and will have a hard time
forgetting it.


You could be right, Bipolar Boy!


Insert Kevin's signature phrase here --- "Grow up".



Not quite bright enough to show some originality, huh?


Why are you responding? Are you Kevin?

Dan Krueger September 9th 06 12:29 AM

Deja Vu all over again.
 
basskisser wrote:

Don White wrote:


..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial.
He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to
his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?)
Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected
as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as
partial.



If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off
topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does
the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a
slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get
chastised.


Sucks to be Kevin.

Dan Krueger September 9th 06 12:32 AM

Deja Vu all over again.
 
basskisser wrote:

JimH wrote:

"basskisser" wrote in message
roups.com...

Don White wrote:


..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial.
He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to
his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?)
Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected
as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as
partial.

If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off
topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does
the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a
slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get
chastised.


You never answered my question from yesterday Kevin. Are you still beating
your wife and kids?



I'm not Kevin, so I don't know whether he is or not. But, if you are
talking to ME, then when you answer my question to you, then I'll
answer. The question was, you have posted the question in a form that
would make one think that you have some knowledge of me beating my wife
and kids. What IS that knowledge? You see, you aren't bright enough to
form it so as to not make you look like you have some evidence of such
ie: "still". If you were a man instead of a little jerkboy, then if you
had some shred of common decency and had knowledge of me doing such,
you'd contact the proper authorities. Or, perhaps you are projecting.
Is that why your wife is sick, from you beating her too much?


That's just sad.

Dan Krueger September 9th 06 12:40 AM

Deja Vu all over again.
 
basskisser wrote:

wrote:

JohnH wrote:

He obviously didn't **** off every single person here, as some still
communicate with him. Your continuing to do so is ****ing off just as many
people.

Wake up, smell the coffee, and killfile the pferde apfel.
--
******************************************
***** Hope your day is great! *****
******************************************

John


Agreed. Unlike you bk, JimH has never bothered me at all. I've had many
a pleasant conversation with him, as well as JohnH, Harry, Smithers,
Wayne B, Chuck Gould, Bert, Calif. Bill and many more.

Maybe you need to rethink your views that everybody is a fool, but you



Where did I say such a thing? You are a lot like JimH, put some idea in
your own head, and it instantly becomes fact, at least in your own
little world. So are you saying that someone that consistently tells
lies about someone else, posts nothing but insults and petty name
calling, accusing someone of beating their wife and kids is some kind
of stand up man in your eyes? JimH has done all of the above, and done
it a lot. It amazes me the amount of people here that find that
behavior acceptable.


I'm amazed that you type the crap you do and YOU find it acceptable.
Read and then click on send.

basskisser September 9th 06 01:41 PM

Deja Vu all over again.
 

Dan Krueger wrote:
basskisser wrote:

Dan Krueger wrote:

basskisser wrote:

JimH wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
...


Here we go again.
Somebody has to teach these flyboys how to read a chart.
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/natio...nfriendly.html



Sorry to hear about that Don. I am sure the US pilots involved in this
accident feel worse than you can believe and will have a hard time
forgetting it.


You could be right, Bipolar Boy!


Insert Kevin's signature phrase here --- "Grow up".



Not quite bright enough to show some originality, huh?


Why are you responding? Are you Kevin?


It's quite simple. A person, using google groups can respond to any
thread, whether or not it is a direct post to them. Understand? Take
for instance if you were to post a question to JimH, aka Bipolar Boy, I
could simply reply to it, just like I am replying to this post. Again,
you just aren't great at originality, are you?


basskisser September 9th 06 01:42 PM

Deja Vu all over again.
 

Dan Krueger wrote:
basskisser wrote:

JimH wrote:

"basskisser" wrote in message
roups.com...

Don White wrote:


..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial.
He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to
his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?)
Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected
as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as
partial.

If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off
topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does
the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a
slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get
chastised.


You never answered my question from yesterday Kevin. Are you still beating
your wife and kids?



I'm not Kevin, so I don't know whether he is or not. But, if you are
talking to ME, then when you answer my question to you, then I'll
answer. The question was, you have posted the question in a form that
would make one think that you have some knowledge of me beating my wife
and kids. What IS that knowledge? You see, you aren't bright enough to
form it so as to not make you look like you have some evidence of such
ie: "still". If you were a man instead of a little jerkboy, then if you
had some shred of common decency and had knowledge of me doing such,
you'd contact the proper authorities. Or, perhaps you are projecting.
Is that why your wife is sick, from you beating her too much?


That's just sad.


But you find it perfectly acceptable when JimH does the exact same
thing, only worse huh? THAT is "sad".


basskisser September 9th 06 01:43 PM

Deja Vu all over again.
 

Dan Krueger wrote:
basskisser wrote:

Don White wrote:


..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial.
He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to
his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?)
Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected
as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as
partial.



If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off
topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does
the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a
slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get
chastised.


Sucks to be Kevin.


YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved!


[email protected] September 9th 06 02:18 PM

Deja Vu all over again.
 

basskisser wrote:
Dan Krueger wrote:
basskisser wrote:

Don White wrote:


..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial.
He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to
his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?)
Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected
as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as
partial.


If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off
topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does
the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a
slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get
chastised.


Sucks to be Kevin.


YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved!



Wrong again.

His name is Dan.


Bert Robbins September 9th 06 02:47 PM

Deja Vu all over again.
 
basskisser wrote:
Dan Krueger wrote:
basskisser wrote:

Dan Krueger wrote:

basskisser wrote:

JimH wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
...


Here we go again.
Somebody has to teach these flyboys how to read a chart.
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/natio...nfriendly.html


Sorry to hear about that Don. I am sure the US pilots involved in this
accident feel worse than you can believe and will have a hard time
forgetting it.

You could be right, Bipolar Boy!

Insert Kevin's signature phrase here --- "Grow up".

Not quite bright enough to show some originality, huh?

Why are you responding? Are you Kevin?


It's quite simple. A person, using google groups can respond to any
thread, whether or not it is a direct post to them. Understand? Take
for instance if you were to post a question to JimH, aka Bipolar Boy, I
could simply reply to it, just like I am replying to this post. Again,
you just aren't great at originality, are you?


If you were not Kevin, then you would not respond to posts addressed to
Kevin.

Don White September 9th 06 02:57 PM

Deja Vu all over again.
 
basskisser wrote:
Dan Krueger wrote:

basskisser wrote:


Don White wrote:



..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial.
He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to
his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?)
Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected
as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as
partial.


If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off
topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does
the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a
slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get
chastised.


Sucks to be Kevin.



YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved!


I always thought his name was Freddy.

basskisser September 9th 06 03:47 PM

Deja Vu all over again.
 

Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Dan Krueger wrote:
basskisser wrote:

Dan Krueger wrote:

basskisser wrote:

JimH wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
...


Here we go again.
Somebody has to teach these flyboys how to read a chart.
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/natio...nfriendly.html


Sorry to hear about that Don. I am sure the US pilots involved in this
accident feel worse than you can believe and will have a hard time
forgetting it.

You could be right, Bipolar Boy!

Insert Kevin's signature phrase here --- "Grow up".

Not quite bright enough to show some originality, huh?

Why are you responding? Are you Kevin?


It's quite simple. A person, using google groups can respond to any
thread, whether or not it is a direct post to them. Understand? Take
for instance if you were to post a question to JimH, aka Bipolar Boy, I
could simply reply to it, just like I am replying to this post. Again,
you just aren't great at originality, are you?


If you were not Kevin, then you would not respond to posts addressed to
Kevin.


Man, you are dumber than a post! We've been over this and over this,
but you are too stupid to reason with! When somebody responds to MY
POST, then I reply, get it idiot? Example for the learning impaired:
Let's say that you respond to one of Bipolar Boy's posts, and in doing
so called him Kevin. I wouldn't respond, because you are talking to
Bipolar Boy, not me.


basskisser September 9th 06 03:48 PM

Deja Vu all over again.
 

wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Dan Krueger wrote:
basskisser wrote:

Don White wrote:


..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial.
He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to
his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?)
Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected
as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as
partial.


If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off
topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does
the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a
slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get
chastised.


Sucks to be Kevin.


YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved!



Wrong again.

His name is Dan.


How do you know that?


Bert Robbins September 9th 06 04:26 PM

Deja Vu all over again.
 
basskisser wrote:
wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Dan Krueger wrote:
basskisser wrote:

Don White wrote:


..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial.
He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to
his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?)
Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected
as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as
partial.

If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off
topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does
the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a
slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get
chastised.

Sucks to be Kevin.
YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved!


Wrong again.

His name is Dan.


How do you know that?


Oooh, somebody did a Krause on Kevin.


basskisser September 9th 06 04:38 PM

Deja Vu all over again.
 

Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:
wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Dan Krueger wrote:
basskisser wrote:

Don White wrote:


..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial.
He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to
his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?)
Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected
as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as
partial.

If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off
topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does
the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a
slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get
chastised.

Sucks to be Kevin.
YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved!

Wrong again.

His name is Dan.


How do you know that?


Oooh, somebody did a Krause on Kevin.


oooh, somebody is still an idiot.....
Were you able to make your brain actually work a tad to understand why
I respond to posts that are replying to me??


Bert Robbins September 9th 06 10:13 PM

Deja Vu all over again.
 
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
basskisser wrote:
wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Dan Krueger wrote:
basskisser wrote:

Don White wrote:


..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial.
He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to
his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?)
Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected
as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as
partial.
If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off
topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does
the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a
slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get
chastised.

Sucks to be Kevin.
YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved!
Wrong again.

His name is Dan.
How do you know that?

Oooh, somebody did a Krause on Kevin.


oooh, somebody is still an idiot.....
Were you able to make your brain actually work a tad to understand why
I respond to posts that are replying to me??


You are still the punching bag of the group. You have been abandoned and
or shuned by all of your friends. Why don't you stop being a JimH and
be a normal person.


JimH September 9th 06 10:31 PM

Deja Vu all over again.
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 9/9/2006 5:13 PM, Bert Robbins wrote:


You are still the punching bag of the group. You have been abandoned and
or shuned by all of your friends.



Who left the cover off the septic tank so Bert could crawl out?



Sorry Harry. I guess I forgot to put the top back on last time I checked to
make sure he was still in there. ;-)



Don White September 9th 06 10:55 PM

Deja Vu all over again.
 
Harry Krause wrote:
On 9/9/2006 5:13 PM, Bert Robbins wrote:


You are still the punching bag of the group. You have been abandoned
and or shuned by all of your friends. Why don't you stop being a
JimH and be a normal person.


Who left the cover off the septic tank so Bert could crawl out?



More likely, he crawled up from under the outhouse.

Bert Robbins September 9th 06 11:01 PM

Deja Vu all over again.
 
Don White wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
On 9/9/2006 5:13 PM, Bert Robbins wrote:


You are still the punching bag of the group. You have been abandoned
and or shuned by all of your friends. Why don't you stop being a
JimH and be a normal person.


Who left the cover off the septic tank so Bert could crawl out?



More likely, he crawled up from under the outhouse.


I see that the Jr. High School let you all go home for the weekend.


Don White September 9th 06 11:59 PM

Deja Vu all over again.
 
Bert Robbins wrote:

I see that the Jr. High School let you all go home for the weekend.



....and you were kept back for remedial attention?

Bert Robbins September 10th 06 12:42 AM

Deja Vu all over again.
 
Don White wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:

I see that the Jr. High School let you all go home for the weekend.



...and you were kept back for remedial attention?


Very witty Don. Did you think of that all by yourself or did you do what
you usually do and follow Harry's lead?

Bert Robbins September 10th 06 12:47 AM

Deja Vu all over again.
 
Harry Krause wrote:
On 9/9/2006 6:59 PM, Don White wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
I see that the Jr. High School let you all go home for the weekend.



...and you were kept back for remedial attention?



I figured Bert for "antisocial" promotions. The teachers didn't want him
for another year.


It is more fun interacting with Joe Spare Bedroom than you or Don. You
and Don are just too juvenile.

Dan Krueger September 10th 06 12:57 AM

Deja Vu all over again.
 
basskisser wrote:
Dan Krueger wrote:

basskisser wrote:


Dan Krueger wrote:


basskisser wrote:


JimH wrote:



"Don White" wrote in message
...



Here we go again.
Somebody has to teach these flyboys how to read a chart.
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/natio...nfriendly.html



Sorry to hear about that Don. I am sure the US pilots involved in this
accident feel worse than you can believe and will have a hard time
forgetting it.


You could be right, Bipolar Boy!


Insert Kevin's signature phrase here --- "Grow up".


Not quite bright enough to show some originality, huh?


Why are you responding? Are you Kevin?



It's quite simple. A person, using google groups can respond to any
thread, whether or not it is a direct post to them. Understand? Take
for instance if you were to post a question to JimH, aka Bipolar Boy, I
could simply reply to it, just like I am replying to this post. Again,
you just aren't great at originality, are you?


Google groups have nothing to do with it. Any news reader can post to
the group.

"aren't great at originality"?? What does that have to do with this
thread or this group?

You are way out there, Kevin.

Dan Krueger September 10th 06 01:13 AM

Deja Vu all over again.
 
basskisser wrote:

Dan Krueger wrote:

basskisser wrote:


JimH wrote:


"basskisser" wrote in message
egroups.com...


Don White wrote:



..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial.
He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to
his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?)
Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected
as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as
partial.

If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off
topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does
the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a
slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get
chastised.


You never answered my question from yesterday Kevin. Are you still beating
your wife and kids?


I'm not Kevin, so I don't know whether he is or not. But, if you are
talking to ME, then when you answer my question to you, then I'll
answer. The question was, you have posted the question in a form that
would make one think that you have some knowledge of me beating my wife
and kids. What IS that knowledge? You see, you aren't bright enough to
form it so as to not make you look like you have some evidence of such
ie: "still". If you were a man instead of a little jerkboy, then if you
had some shred of common decency and had knowledge of me doing such,
you'd contact the proper authorities. Or, perhaps you are projecting.
Is that why your wife is sick, from you beating her too much?


That's just sad.



But you find it perfectly acceptable when JimH does the exact same
thing, only worse huh? THAT is "sad".


Spoken like a typical five year old looking for a net cop. I would say
"grow up" but that's your line. Does one person's actions allow another
to follow?

What makes this even more ridiculous is that it's the internet. Your
response sounds like something I would hear from one of my employees..
"I know I was late but Sam is always late". That would be the real
world. This is the internet so it's just pathetic.



Dan Krueger September 10th 06 01:17 AM

Deja Vu all over again.
 
basskisser wrote:

Dan Krueger wrote:

basskisser wrote:


Don White wrote:



..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial.
He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to
his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?)
Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected
as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as
partial.


If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off
topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does
the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a
slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get
chastised.


Sucks to be Kevin.



YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved!



Start with this: I use my name when I post. Try harder next time.

Dan Krueger September 10th 06 01:18 AM

Deja Vu all over again.
 
wrote:

basskisser wrote:

Dan Krueger wrote:

basskisser wrote:


Don White wrote:



..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial.
He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to
his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?)
Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected
as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as
partial.


If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off
topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does
the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a
slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get
chastised.


Sucks to be Kevin.


YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved!




Wrong again.

His name is Dan.


Legally, it's Daniel.

Dan Krueger September 10th 06 01:19 AM

Deja Vu all over again.
 
Don White wrote:

basskisser wrote:

Dan Krueger wrote:

basskisser wrote:


Don White wrote:



..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial.
He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to
his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?)
Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected
as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's
seen as
partial.



If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off
topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does
the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a
slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get
chastised.


Sucks to be Kevin.




YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved!


I always thought his name was Freddy.


That wasn't funny 5 years ago. If you still like it, great.

Eisboch September 10th 06 01:34 AM

Deja Vu all over again.
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
On 9/9/2006 5:13 PM, Bert Robbins wrote:


You are still the punching bag of the group. You have been abandoned and
or shuned by all of your friends. Why don't you stop being a JimH and be
a normal person.


Who left the cover off the septic tank so Bert could crawl out?


Holy Crap, Harry. Why do you continue to encourage this BS?

Eisboch



[email protected] September 10th 06 03:26 AM

Deja Vu all over again.
 

Dan Krueger wrote:
wrote:

basskisser wrote:

Dan Krueger wrote:

basskisser wrote:


Don White wrote:



..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial.
He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to
his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?)
Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected
as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as
partial.


If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off
topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does
the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a
slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get
chastised.


Sucks to be Kevin.

YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved!




Wrong again.

His name is Dan.


Legally, it's Daniel.


And we here would presume that to be true., that is , except for one,
who uses some alias


Don White September 10th 06 04:09 AM

Deja Vu all over again.
 
Bert Robbins wrote:
Don White wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:


I see that the Jr. High School let you all go home for the weekend.



...and you were kept back for remedial attention?



Very witty Don.


Why thank you Bert.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com