| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Deja Vu all over again.
basskisser wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Don White wrote: ..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial. He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?) Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as partial. If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get chastised. Sucks to be Kevin. YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved! Wrong again. His name is Dan. |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Deja Vu all over again.
|
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Deja Vu all over again.
|
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Deja Vu all over again.
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Don White wrote: ..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial. He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?) Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as partial. If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get chastised. Sucks to be Kevin. YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved! Wrong again. His name is Dan. How do you know that? Oooh, somebody did a Krause on Kevin. oooh, somebody is still an idiot..... Were you able to make your brain actually work a tad to understand why I respond to posts that are replying to me?? You are still the punching bag of the group. You have been abandoned and or shuned by all of your friends. Why don't you stop being a JimH and be a normal person. |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Deja Vu all over again.
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Don White wrote: ..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial. He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?) Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as partial. If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get chastised. Sucks to be Kevin. YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved! Wrong again. His name is Dan. How do you know that? Oooh, somebody did a Krause on Kevin. oooh, somebody is still an idiot..... Were you able to make your brain actually work a tad to understand why I respond to posts that are replying to me?? You are still the punching bag of the group. You have been abandoned and or shuned by all of your friends. Why don't you stop being a JimH and be a normal person. I've never stooped to the low level of JimH, or you for that matter. But you didn't answer my question. Were you finally able to understand why I respond to posts that are a direct reply to ME? |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Deja Vu all over again.
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Don White wrote: ..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial. He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?) Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as partial. If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get chastised. Sucks to be Kevin. YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved! Wrong again. His name is Dan. How do you know that? Oooh, somebody did a Krause on Kevin. oooh, somebody is still an idiot..... Were you able to make your brain actually work a tad to understand why I respond to posts that are replying to me?? You are still the punching bag of the group. You have been abandoned and or shuned by all of your friends. Why don't you stop being a JimH and be a normal person. I've never stooped to the low level of JimH, or you for that matter. But you didn't answer my question. Were you finally able to understand why I respond to posts that are a direct reply to ME? Kevin, you need to look at your recent posting history and figure out what you are trying to do and whether it is having the desired effect. |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Deja Vu all over again.
|
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Deja Vu all over again.
Dan Krueger wrote: wrote: basskisser wrote: Dan Krueger wrote: basskisser wrote: Don White wrote: ..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial. He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word to his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?) Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and connected as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's seen as partial. If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he does the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll get chastised. Sucks to be Kevin. YOU'RE Kevin?? The mystery is solved! Wrong again. His name is Dan. Legally, it's Daniel. And we here would presume that to be true., that is , except for one, who uses some alias |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| déjà vu all over again | General | |||
| OT - Deja Vu | ASA | |||
| OT- Deja vu, McDiarmid all over again. | ASA | |||
| Deja Vu | ASA | |||
Hybrid Mode
