JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

JimH wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
ups.com...

Don White wrote:

..and I wouldn't mind if Sir Chuck could at least be impartial.
He's actually worse than John these days. (ever see him say a word
to
his west coast neighbours...such as Calif Bill?)
Surly someone as talented, experienced and knowledgeable and
connected
as his self can understand that he loses all credibility if he's
seen
as
partial.

If you want to see him be partial, he's tried to chastise me for off
topic posting, etc., but says absolutely nothing to JimH when he
does
the same thing! As a matter of fact, JimH can post nothing but a
slanderous, malicious post to me, and if I even DARE respond, I'll
get
chastised.


You never answered my question from yesterday Kevin. Are you still
beating
your wife and kids?

I'm not Kevin, so I don't know whether he is or not. But, if you are
talking to ME, then when you answer my question to you, then I'll
answer. The question was, you have posted the question in a form that
would make one think that you have some knowledge of me beating my wife
and kids. What IS that knowledge? You see, you aren't bright enough to
form it so as to not make you look like you have some evidence of such
ie: "still". If you were a man instead of a little jerkboy, then if you
had some shred of common decency and had knowledge of me doing such,
you'd contact the proper authorities. Or, perhaps you are projecting.


Going off the deep end again Kevin?

So did you stop beating your wife and kids?

Projecting again? Is your wife really sick or does she have internal
injuries from you beating her? Jim, you truly are nothing but a piece
of ****. Your posts here prove you are such a low life. Again, you
slimeball, SHOW ME SOME EVIDENCE that I've ever beat my wife or kids.
HAVE ANY?? You are such a pathetic **** stain that you hide behind
usenet like a scared little baby. I tried to meet up with you, you
didn't have the balls, little man. BUT you certainly have when you're
behind usenet. What happened to you apologizing to the group as a whole
for your actions? I guess that went the way of MOST of your bipolar
rants.
Now, go beat your wife. Maybe you'll have to sell THIS boat.....


Oh my. You need to control your emotions Kevin. Is this the type of anger
that causes you to beat your wife and kids?

what a petty, shallow, lying, childish low life piece of **** you are.
I hope your sickly wife isn't a low life piece of trash like you are.
Anger, what makes you think I'm angry, Jim? Are you that stupid that
you think you can judge a person's emotions on usenet? Quite the
contrary, I feel sorry for you and your mental condition(s). You've
single handedly ruined this newsgroup, once again. It was on the right
track until you started your idiotic childish bull**** again.

Chuck Gould wrote:

JimH wrote:


Chuck, you and JohnH need to stop the netcopping and let the NG find it's
own direction. You don't own the group and the 2 of you cause more problems
with the netcopping than if you just ignored the OT posts.


When one participates in a group called "rec.boats" the direction of
the group is predefined. Of course nobody owns the group. Some people
are free to post as much ridiculous, OT, inflammatory and personal
attack nonsense here as they want to- and others are free to comment
that it might be inappropriate to do so.

If appeals to remain on-topic make some individual posters
uncomfortable, so be it.


Thanks Chuck - The less pollution here the better.

Capt Jack R..

Jack Redington wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:

JimH wrote:


Chuck, you and JohnH need to stop the netcopping and let the NG find it's
own direction. You don't own the group and the 2 of you cause more problems
with the netcopping than if you just ignored the OT posts.


When one participates in a group called "rec.boats" the direction of
the group is predefined. Of course nobody owns the group. Some people
are free to post as much ridiculous, OT, inflammatory and personal
attack nonsense here as they want to- and others are free to comment
that it might be inappropriate to do so.

If appeals to remain on-topic make some individual posters
uncomfortable, so be it.


Thanks Chuck - The less pollution here the better.

Capt Jack R..

What does this have to do with boats?

On 7 Sep 2006 04:59:52 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


Jack Redington wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:

JimH wrote:


Chuck, you and JohnH need to stop the netcopping and let the NG find it's
own direction. You don't own the group and the 2 of you cause more problems
with the netcopping than if you just ignored the OT posts.


When one participates in a group called "rec.boats" the direction of
the group is predefined. Of course nobody owns the group. Some people
are free to post as much ridiculous, OT, inflammatory and personal
attack nonsense here as they want to- and others are free to comment
that it might be inappropriate to do so.

If appeals to remain on-topic make some individual posters
uncomfortable, so be it.


Thanks Chuck - The less pollution here the better.

Capt Jack R..

What does this have to do with boats?

Come up to the Chesapeake Bay, and you'll see what pollution has to do with
boats. It fouls them.
--
******************************************
***** Hope your day is great! *****
******************************************

John

JohnH wrote:
On 7 Sep 2006 04:59:52 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


Jack Redington wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:

JimH wrote:


Chuck, you and JohnH need to stop the netcopping and let the NG find it's
own direction. You don't own the group and the 2 of you cause more problems
with the netcopping than if you just ignored the OT posts.


When one participates in a group called "rec.boats" the direction of
the group is predefined. Of course nobody owns the group. Some people
are free to post as much ridiculous, OT, inflammatory and personal
attack nonsense here as they want to- and others are free to comment
that it might be inappropriate to do so.

If appeals to remain on-topic make some individual posters
uncomfortable, so be it.


Thanks Chuck - The less pollution here the better.

Capt Jack R..

What does this have to do with boats?

Come up to the Chesapeake Bay, and you'll see what pollution has to do with
boats. It fouls them.
--
John, you need to read the blather before my reply. Has nothing to do
with boats.

On 7 Sep 2006 06:49:58 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 7 Sep 2006 04:59:52 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


Jack Redington wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:

JimH wrote:


Chuck, you and JohnH need to stop the netcopping and let the NG find it's
own direction. You don't own the group and the 2 of you cause more problems
with the netcopping than if you just ignored the OT posts.


When one participates in a group called "rec.boats" the direction of
the group is predefined. Of course nobody owns the group. Some people
are free to post as much ridiculous, OT, inflammatory and personal
attack nonsense here as they want to- and others are free to comment
that it might be inappropriate to do so.

If appeals to remain on-topic make some individual posters
uncomfortable, so be it.


Thanks Chuck - The less pollution here the better.

Capt Jack R..

What does this have to do with boats?

Come up to the Chesapeake Bay, and you'll see what pollution has to do with
boats. It fouls them.
--
John, you need to read the blather before my reply. Has nothing to do
with boats.

Nor did your rant about Jimmy yesterday.

Capt Jack referred to the pollution here. "Here" is a boating newsgroup.
--
******************************************
***** Hope your day is great! *****
******************************************

John

JohnH wrote:
On 7 Sep 2006 06:49:58 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 7 Sep 2006 04:59:52 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


Jack Redington wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:

JimH wrote:


Chuck, you and JohnH need to stop the netcopping and let the NG find it's
own direction. You don't own the group and the 2 of you cause more problems
with the netcopping than if you just ignored the OT posts.


When one participates in a group called "rec.boats" the direction of
the group is predefined. Of course nobody owns the group. Some people
are free to post as much ridiculous, OT, inflammatory and personal
attack nonsense here as they want to- and others are free to comment
that it might be inappropriate to do so.

If appeals to remain on-topic make some individual posters
uncomfortable, so be it.


Thanks Chuck - The less pollution here the better.

Capt Jack R..

What does this have to do with boats?

Come up to the Chesapeake Bay, and you'll see what pollution has to do with
boats. It fouls them.
--
John, you need to read the blather before my reply. Has nothing to do
with boats.

Nor did your rant about Jimmy yesterday.

I agree, but I never said it did. I find it quite interesting that
everyone doesn't have a problem pig piling on me, but JimH, the Bipolar
Boy can go on and on with lies about me, my family, etc. and everyone
seems to hold him to a higher standard. Take a look, he's posted dozens
of slanderous insults and lies about me in the last couple of days.
Nary a word has been said to him, even after this is the very behavior
that he's apologized for. But anything and everything I say here is
instantly fodder for the pig pilers and sheriffs. Odd, wouldn't you
say, after JimH went on such a rampage not long ago that he ****ed off
every single person here?

On 7 Sep 2006 07:48:44 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 7 Sep 2006 06:49:58 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 7 Sep 2006 04:59:52 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


Jack Redington wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:

JimH wrote:


Chuck, you and JohnH need to stop the netcopping and let the NG find it's
own direction. You don't own the group and the 2 of you cause more problems
with the netcopping than if you just ignored the OT posts.


When one participates in a group called "rec.boats" the direction of
the group is predefined. Of course nobody owns the group. Some people
are free to post as much ridiculous, OT, inflammatory and personal
attack nonsense here as they want to- and others are free to comment
that it might be inappropriate to do so.

If appeals to remain on-topic make some individual posters
uncomfortable, so be it.


Thanks Chuck - The less pollution here the better.

Capt Jack R..

What does this have to do with boats?

Come up to the Chesapeake Bay, and you'll see what pollution has to do with
boats. It fouls them.
--
John, you need to read the blather before my reply. Has nothing to do
with boats.

Nor did your rant about Jimmy yesterday.

I agree, but I never said it did. I find it quite interesting that
everyone doesn't have a problem pig piling on me, but JimH, the Bipolar
Boy can go on and on with lies about me, my family, etc. and everyone
seems to hold him to a higher standard. Take a look, he's posted dozens
of slanderous insults and lies about me in the last couple of days.
Nary a word has been said to him, even after this is the very behavior
that he's apologized for. But anything and everything I say here is
instantly fodder for the pig pilers and sheriffs. Odd, wouldn't you
say, after JimH went on such a rampage not long ago that he ****ed off
every single person here?

bk, as I've mentioned several times, I've *kill filed* him. I don't see his
****, *unless* you stupidly respond to it. Why would I possibly want to
'take a look' at his dribble, and furthermore, why do you?

He obviously didn't **** off every single person here, as some still
communicate with him. Your continuing to do so is ****ing off just as many
people.

Wake up, smell the coffee, and killfile the pferde apfel.
--
******************************************
***** Hope your day is great! *****
******************************************

John

JohnH wrote:
He obviously didn't **** off every single person here, as some still
communicate with him. Your continuing to do so is ****ing off just as many
people.

Wake up, smell the coffee, and killfile the pferde apfel.
--
******************************************
***** Hope your day is great! *****
******************************************

John

Agreed. Unlike you bk, JimH has never bothered me at all. I've had many
a pleasant conversation with him, as well as JohnH, Harry, Smithers,
Wayne B, Chuck Gould, Bert, Calif. Bill and many more.

Maybe you need to rethink your views that everybody is a fool, but you

On 7 Sep 2006 11:20:22 -0700, wrote:


JohnH wrote:
He obviously didn't **** off every single person here, as some still
communicate with him. Your continuing to do so is ****ing off just as many
people.

Wake up, smell the coffee, and killfile the pferde apfel.
--
******************************************
***** Hope your day is great! *****
******************************************

John

Agreed. Unlike you bk, JimH has never bothered me at all. I've had many
a pleasant conversation with him, as well as JohnH, Harry, Smithers,
Wayne B, Chuck Gould, Bert, Calif. Bill and many more.

Maybe you need to rethink your views that everybody is a fool, but you

For several of us, the key word is 'had'.
--
******************************************
***** Hope your day is great! *****
******************************************

John