| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
1) Should I go with dual 4.3 L (205 HP) mercruiser or a single 7,4 L
(454 HP) and what's the pros and cons of having 2 engines instead of one ? I can't make my mind about the fuel overall cost. For what it's worth, I've heard from owners their dual prop (e.g. bravo 3, volvo) gives improved efficiency/performance/tracking over a single prop ... or ... almost as good as having twin engines. So I'd test drive a dual prop. Plus there's a lot less to maintain/go wrong ... about 1/2 as much :-) |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Single 8.1, if available or 7.4 if not, with VP or Merc dual prop.
Sufficient performance with vastly better economy and much lower maint cost than with twins. DP sterndrive provides good manuverabilty as well. Butch "bowgus" wrote in message oups.com... 1) Should I go with dual 4.3 L (205 HP) mercruiser or a single 7,4 L (454 HP) and what's the pros and cons of having 2 engines instead of one ? I can't make my mind about the fuel overall cost. For what it's worth, I've heard from owners their dual prop (e.g. bravo 3, volvo) gives improved efficiency/performance/tracking over a single prop ... or ... almost as good as having twin engines. So I'd test drive a dual prop. Plus there's a lot less to maintain/go wrong ... about 1/2 as much :-) |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
I had a regal 242 cruser with a 350 and went to a wellcraft 3000 martinique with twin 350 this year and I can control this one better it close quarters than the smaller boat ever could and having 2 motors is so cool |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Chad" wrote in message news:iAwzg.110876$1i1.85950@attbi_s72... I had a regal 242 cruser with a 350 and went to a wellcraft 3000 martinique with twin 350 this year and I can control this one better it close quarters than the smaller boat ever could and having 2 motors is so cool The Martinique is built like a tank., or at least they were in the mid to late 1990's. We would have purchased their 32 foot model when we were looking for boats that size if not for the small aft cabin on the boat. And yes, having twin outdrives is very nice. The best is twin screws though. but you have to give up the aft cabin. ;-) |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
" JimH" jimhUNDERSCOREosudad@yahooDOTcom wrote in message . .. "Chad" wrote in message news:iAwzg.110876$1i1.85950@attbi_s72... I had a regal 242 cruser with a 350 and went to a wellcraft 3000 martinique with twin 350 this year and I can control this one better it close quarters than the smaller boat ever could and having 2 motors is so cool The Martinique is built like a tank., or at least they were in the mid to late 1990's. We would have purchased their 32 foot model when we were looking for boats that size if not for the small aft cabin on the boat. And yes, having twin outdrives is very nice. The best is twin screws though. but you have to give up the aft cabin. ;-) my wellcraft is a 2000 and the aft cabbin is big enough to sleep 3 |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Chad" wrote in message news:LSwzg.66713$FQ1.39800@attbi_s71... " JimH" jimhUNDERSCOREosudad@yahooDOTcom wrote in message . .. "Chad" wrote in message news:iAwzg.110876$1i1.85950@attbi_s72... I had a regal 242 cruser with a 350 and went to a wellcraft 3000 martinique with twin 350 this year and I can control this one better it close quarters than the smaller boat ever could and having 2 motors is so cool The Martinique is built like a tank., or at least they were in the mid to late 1990's. We would have purchased their 32 foot model when we were looking for boats that size if not for the small aft cabin on the boat. And yes, having twin outdrives is very nice. The best is twin screws though. but you have to give up the aft cabin. ;-) my wellcraft is a 2000 and the aft cabbin is big enough to sleep 3 I am talking queen size comfort for 2 adults and the 32 foot Martinique had nothing close to that...perhaps a double bed mattress size at best. I guess the aft cabins on their smaller boats are bigger and offer far more room. ;-) |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Chad,
My question to you is : "How much more fuel does the dual 350 engines cost compared to your single 350 in Regal for the same speed and ride ?" I know that the baby is more weight, but just to help me figure out. Thanks, Guy JimH wrote: "Chad" wrote in message news:iAwzg.110876$1i1.85950@attbi_s72... I had a regal 242 cruser with a 350 and went to a wellcraft 3000 martinique with twin 350 this year and I can control this one better it close quarters than the smaller boat ever could and having 2 motors is so cool The Martinique is built like a tank., or at least they were in the mid to late 1990's. We would have purchased their 32 foot model when we were looking for boats that size if not for the small aft cabin on the boat. And yes, having twin outdrives is very nice. The best is twin screws though. but you have to give up the aft cabin. ;-) |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey Butch,
Could you translate those "VP" and "DP Sterndrive" which are unfortunately chinese to me but look like relevant advise ? Thanks, Guy Butch Davis wrote: Single 8.1, if available or 7.4 if not, with VP or Merc dual prop. Sufficient performance with vastly better economy and much lower maint cost than with twins. DP sterndrive provides good manuverabilty as well. Butch "bowgus" wrote in message oups.com... 1) Should I go with dual 4.3 L (205 HP) mercruiser or a single 7,4 L (454 HP) and what's the pros and cons of having 2 engines instead of one ? I can't make my mind about the fuel overall cost. For what it's worth, I've heard from owners their dual prop (e.g. bravo 3, volvo) gives improved efficiency/performance/tracking over a single prop ... or ... almost as good as having twin engines. So I'd test drive a dual prop. Plus there's a lot less to maintain/go wrong ... about 1/2 as much :-) |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Guy,
VP=Volvo Penta DP=Duo Prop or Dual Prop Sorry, Butch "pailleg" wrote in message ups.com... Hey Butch, Could you translate those "VP" and "DP Sterndrive" which are unfortunately chinese to me but look like relevant advise ? Thanks, Guy Butch Davis wrote: Single 8.1, if available or 7.4 if not, with VP or Merc dual prop. Sufficient performance with vastly better economy and much lower maint cost than with twins. DP sterndrive provides good manuverabilty as well. Butch "bowgus" wrote in message oups.com... 1) Should I go with dual 4.3 L (205 HP) mercruiser or a single 7,4 L (454 HP) and what's the pros and cons of having 2 engines instead of one ? I can't make my mind about the fuel overall cost. For what it's worth, I've heard from owners their dual prop (e.g. bravo 3, volvo) gives improved efficiency/performance/tracking over a single prop ... or ... almost as good as having twin engines. So I'd test drive a dual prop. Plus there's a lot less to maintain/go wrong ... about 1/2 as much :-) |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Question about ethanol fortified gas and boat engines | General | |||
| Sailboat engine rebuild, replace, fix question | General | |||
| Huh? Diesel engines don't last 800 hours before major repairs?? | General | |||
| Another strip-plank question - a bit long | Boat Building | |||
| Evinrude FICHT beats out Yamaha in JD Powers survey | General | |||