Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
*This* chowda is delicious!
Looks good Harry, but I'm really not a chower eater. What could be
substituted for the Clams? Hmmmm Cream of Potato or Mushroom soup! now it's looking better! Harry Krause wrote: This is a TV show recipe, easy to make and delicious. Use raw potato with skins for grating. 8 slices of bacon, chopped 1 medium cooking onion, chopped 2 celery stalks, diced 1/2 cup of chardonnay or other white wine 1 cup of cream 1 cup of milk 2 five-ounce cans of clam meat 2 large bay leafs 1 teaspoon of fresh thyme leaves 1 cup of grated baking potato 1 can of unsweetened evaporated milk 1/4 cup of chopped flat leaf parsley Salt and pepper Brown the bacon until crisp in a thick-bottomed soup pot. Pour off half of the fat. Add the onions and celery with a splash of water and saute for a few minutes until soft. Add the white wine, cream, milk and the juice from the clams (reserve the actual clams for the end so they don't toughen). Add the bay leaf, thyme and grated potato; bring the mixture to a slow simmer. Continue simmering for fifteen minutes until the grated potato softens, releasing its starches and thickening the chowder base. Add the reserved clam meat, evaporated milk and parsley. Bring back to heat. Taste the chowder and add enough salt and pepper to season it. Serve immediately with your favorite biscuits! Yield: 4 servings with leftovers |
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
*This* chowda is delicious!
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
*This* chowda is delicious!
wrote in message
oups.com... Looks good Harry, but I'm really not a chower eater. What could be substituted for the Clams? Any fish that won't fall apart completely when cooked, especially if the chef isn't good at knowing when fish is done. Shrimp, too. |
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
*This* chowda is delicious!
wrote in message Looks good Harry, but I'm really not a chower eater. What could be substituted for the Clams? A chowda is, by definition, a hearty, chunky concoction. Replacing the clams with some other ingredient would still leave you with a chowda. :-) |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
*This* chowda is delicious!
John Gaquin wrote: wrote in message Looks good Harry, but I'm really not a chowder eater. What could be substituted for the Clams? A chowda is, by definition, a hearty, chunky concoction. Replacing the clams with some other ingredient would still leave you with a chowda. :-) Could be, John. I've always related "chowdah" with clam or any of many seafood or fish based soups. So I was thinking of a substitute for the clams/fish to make something more for my palate..... So without the seafood[s] would it still be "chowdah?" |
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
*This* chowda is delicious!
Mine either .
I'll use the recipe and do some potato "chowdah" .. Even though it doesn't sound quite right. the term may be satisfactory to some.... ?: ) Harry Krause wrote: wrote: John Gaquin wrote: wrote in message Looks good Harry, but I'm really not a chowder eater. What could be substituted for the Clams? A chowda is, by definition, a hearty, chunky concoction. Replacing the clams with some other ingredient would still leave you with a chowda. :-) Could be, John. I've always related "chowdah" with clam or any of many seafood or fish based soups. So I was thinking of a substitute for the clams/fish to make something more for my palate..... So without the seafood[s] would it still be "chowdah?" Not in my kitchen. |
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
*This* chowda is delicious!
wrote in message oups.com... John Gaquin wrote: wrote in message Looks good Harry, but I'm really not a chowder eater. What could be substituted for the Clams? A chowda is, by definition, a hearty, chunky concoction. Replacing the clams with some other ingredient would still leave you with a chowda. :-) Could be, John. I've always related "chowdah" with clam or any of many seafood or fish based soups. So I was thinking of a substitute for the clams/fish to make something more for my palate..... So without the seafood[s] would it still be "chowdah?" Lose the wine and the thyme. Substitute fresh tarragon and sherry, along with a sweeter seafood, like sea bass, scallops or shrimp, and the original recipe will be fine. Harvey's Bristol Cream's a good choice - a teaspoon for each bowl of soup, added 5 minutes before serving. |
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
*This* chowda is delicious!
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
*This* chowda is delicious!
wrote in message A chowda is, by definition, a hearty, chunky concoction. Replacing the clams with some other ingredient would still leave you with a chowda. :-) Could be, John. I've always related "chowdah" with clam or any of many seafood or fish based soups. So I was thinking of a substitute for the clams/fish to make something more for my palate..... So without the seafood[s] would it still be "chowdah?" Sorry, I must have misunderstood you. I thought you said you weren't much for chowder, and wanted to replace the clams, and I said well, without the clams it could still be a chowder. Of course you can replace the clams with lobster, other fish pieces, or non-seafood if that is your preference. Chowder is a style of soup if you will, regardless of the main ingredient, comprising a soup like liquid and hearty chunks of vegetables and main ingredient, usually seafood of some sort. Of particular import to New Englanders is the fact that the nature and character of New England Fish Chowder have been enshrined in law. Reference is made to Webster v. Blue Ship Tea Room, a 1964 decision of the Mass SJC. http://www.4lawschool.com/contracts/webster.shtml The decision, written by a Justice Reardon, is considered a classic piece of prose, wherein he delves into the history and nature of what constitutes a true "chowder". The following article is interesting: http://www.overlawyered.com/2006/04/...greatness.html It quotes parts of Judge Reardon's decision, which reads, in part: "No chef is forced to reduce pieces of fish in chowder to miniscule size in an effort to ascertain if they contain any pieces of bone, and a fish bone lurking in fish chowder, about the ingredients of which there is no other complaint, does not constitute a breach of implied warranty under the Uniform Commercial Code." [I can still remember my Dad talking about this case in 1964. Reardon's turn of phrase was marvelous throughout his decision - "...a fish bone lurking in fish chowder, about the ingredients of which there is no other complaint..." - and even as I type this, I can still hear my father saying it!] After noting the defendant's exhortation that "this court knows well that we are not talking of some insipid broth as is customarily served to convalescents" and quoting Daniel Webster's recipe for fish chowder in a footnote, the Court observed: "It is not too much to say that a person sitting down in New England to consume a good New England fish chowder embarks upon a gustatory adventure which may entail the removal of some fish bones from his bowl as he proceeds." |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
*This* chowda is delicious! | General | |||
This is positively delicious | General | |||
This is poisitively delicious | General | |||
This is positively delicious | General | |||
This is positively delicious | General |