Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think your suggustion would have been a good suggestion if you did
not provide any advice except: "Consult your attorney" Chuck prefixed his comments with "99% of the time you can get away with this". Insurance is designed to pay for the exceptions, if you provide your insurance company with a legal loophole not to pay off on any claims, why bother with paying for insurance in the first place. Next time someone asks you for legal advice, why don't you just tell them to "consult your attorney", and not give them a false sense of security by providing "free legal advice".. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 22 May 2006 11:50:12 -0700, "Reginald P. Smithers"
wrote: I think your suggustion would have been a good suggestion if you did not provide any advice except: "Consult your attorney" Chuck prefixed his comments with "99% of the time you can get away with this". Insurance is designed to pay for the exceptions, if you provide your insurance company with a legal loophole not to pay off on any claims, why bother with paying for insurance in the first place. Next time someone asks you for legal advice, why don't you just tell them to "consult your attorney", and not give them a false sense of security by providing "free legal advice".. Sounds as good as the advice I gave him! -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You advice was sound because the OP would not have been harmed if he
followed your advice. If someone thought they were covered because they had a "hold harmless contract" and/or they were covered by the companies insurance policy they would have been sadly mistaken. An insurance company would use this a proof that you were operating a illegal charter and you knew you were operating an illegal charter. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You advice was sound because the OP would not have been harmed if he
followed your advice. If someone thought they were covered because they had a "hold harmless contract" and/or they were covered by the companies insurance policy they would have been sadly mistaken. An insurance company would use this a proof that you were operating a illegal charter and you knew you were operating an illegal charter. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Having been on the loss side of this equation before... I will not
expense fuel again until I find an insurer that does not disallow this type of use. Better to get it in writing from the insurer upfront than have a surprise after a loss! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Pretext for marine insurance to drop customers? | General | |||
List of the most common marine insurance claims | General | |||
West Marine is Terrible | Cruising | |||
mighty budget cruisers,.. when/how do you dump your auto insurance? | Cruising | |||
Who Am I | General |