"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 25 May 2006 07:14:43 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Wed, 24 May 2006 21:32:26 -0400, Harry Krause

wrote:

JimH wrote:
I am once again the focus of JohnH's post, with his reply being
nothing
but inflamatory.

JohnH has been the cause/origan of most negative or argumentative
posts, this being one of them.


It's mildly humorous to watch the netcops netcopping, and pretending
that all the poops they plop in this newsgroup don't smell.
Harry, tell your buddy to quit calling me an 'origan'. That's not nice.



You can tell me directly John. Yep, my spell check missed that one.
Except for you the rest of us stopped making fun of people's typos long ago.
You will never change Sheriff.




I am glad to see you standing by your man, regardless.
--
'Til next time,

John H

You always seem to jump to the wrong conclusions, Johann. I'm merely
point out that netcopping is obnoxious.

Inflammatory political posts, name-calling, and lying are even more
obnoxious. However, these seem to phase you and yours not a bit.
--


Actually, Johann, since I skip 90% of the posts in here, neither matters
to me much. But I do find netcops, tattletales, holier-than-thous and
religious nutcases among the most obnoxious usenet posters.

You're in no position to castigate anyone for political posts,
name-calling and lying, by the way. But press on.


Amen to that!