"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 16 May 2006 08:30:36 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

Reginald P. Smithers wrote:
What I think is so funny is JimH was all upset when JohnH made a few
comments about Race for Renee, but look at the number of comments JimH
has made concerning the "Scandal behind the Race for Renee".

I think he might want to forward this to the NYT or the Washington Post
for a more detailed follow up concerning Reneegate.



Do you have some ulterior motive for sustaining this?

Harry, did JimH have some ulterior motive for *starting* this? As you
know,
you were the only person whose donation I offered to triple, yet JimH has
implied otherwise. Is there some reason you've not corrected him?
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

For your information John it was *you* who started this nananana booboo Jim
is a liar thread.