"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in
:

"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...

Thanks for acknowledging that NO INFORMATION HAS BEEN PRESENTED
LINKING HUMAN ACTIVITY TO GLOBAL WARMING.

Are you absolutely, 100% positive about that? Let's say I had a gun to
your head, and a briefcase full of paper. Would you be willing to bet
your life on the contents of the briefcase?

You don't even have one sentence.


BAM! Time for you to start reading news sources aimed at adults. Hint: Time
Magazine isn't one of those.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...

Thanks for acknowledging that NO INFORMATION HAS BEEN PRESENTED LINKING
HUMAN ACTIVITY TO GLOBAL WARMING.

Are you absolutely, 100% positive about that? Let's say I had a gun to
your head, and a briefcase full of paper. Would you be willing to bet your
life on the contents of the briefcase?

Dougie, you need to take a break and let your head clear. When you can't
argue fact you resort to stupid questions like the one above.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...


The envirolunatics have no interest in the environment - they want to
stop
economic progress, mostly due to jealousy that many others are smarter
than they.


Right. Within seconds of waking up every morning, I start thinking of
ways to stop economic progress. You're a ****ing genius. You figured
this all out. You and Mr. Smirnoff.

You want to control everyone elses choices by removing the choices that
you determine are not in your best interests.


Last week, I considered it to be possible that after almost 75 messages, I
could allow that a simpleton could completely screw up conclusions like
this. But, in this case, you're responding to just 3 or 4. Where did you
come up with the conclusion above, beginning with "You want to
control...." ? Hint: That was YOUR sentence. You wrote it.

Now you want to go back to our discussion where you wanted to determine who
could and who couldn't own a particular vehicle.

Did you buy a hybrid, any hybrid, vehicle yet? If no, then why are you waist
gasoline instead of money?

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

Did you buy a hybrid, any hybrid, vehicle yet? If no, then why are you
waist gasoline instead of money?

That's "waste", not "waist", moron. And, I wasn't in the market for a
vehicle. Again, your addled mind has tossed the words into a paper bag,
shaken it, and spilled the contents onto the floor.

"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in
:

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...


The envirolunatics have no interest in the environment - they want
to stop
economic progress, mostly due to jealousy that many others are
smarter than they.


Right. Within seconds of waking up every morning, I start thinking
of ways to stop economic progress. You're a ****ing genius. You
figured this all out. You and Mr. Smirnoff.

You want to control everyone elses choices by removing the choices
that you determine are not in your best interests.


Last week, I considered it to be possible that after almost 75
messages, I could allow that a simpleton could completely screw up
conclusions like this. But, in this case, you're responding to just 3
or 4. Where did you come up with the conclusion above, beginning with
"You want to control...." ? Hint: That was YOUR sentence. You wrote
it.

Bert stated this:

There is no information at this time that would convince me that
global warming is a man made phenomena.

Can you refute Bert's statement?

Bertie took a detour: "You want to control everyone elses choices by
removing the choices that you determine are not in your best interests."
Fight the vodka. Try and stay on the road.

"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...

Post one sentence. C'mon you little faggot. Show us how smart your momma
made you when you had your head up her skirt after your classmates beat
your snot-nosed little face into a pussified pulp.

Fight the vodka.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

Did you buy a hybrid, any hybrid, vehicle yet? If no, then why are you
waist gasoline instead of money?

That's "waste", not "waist", moron. And, I wasn't in the market for a
vehicle. Again, your addled mind has tossed the words into a paper bag,
shaken it, and spilled the contents onto the floor.

Ooooh, the spelling policeman is at it again. You won't win a spelling bee
either, Moron.

So, you agree with me that anyone can buy any vehicle they desire, thanks
for supporting me and my ilk.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
news
"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in
:

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Fred Dehl" wrote in message
...


The envirolunatics have no interest in the environment - they want
to stop
economic progress, mostly due to jealousy that many others are
smarter than they.


Right. Within seconds of waking up every morning, I start thinking
of ways to stop economic progress. You're a ****ing genius. You
figured this all out. You and Mr. Smirnoff.

You want to control everyone elses choices by removing the choices
that you determine are not in your best interests.


Last week, I considered it to be possible that after almost 75
messages, I could allow that a simpleton could completely screw up
conclusions like this. But, in this case, you're responding to just 3
or 4. Where did you come up with the conclusion above, beginning with
"You want to control...." ? Hint: That was YOUR sentence. You wrote
it.

Bert stated this:

There is no information at this time that would convince me that
global warming is a man made phenomena.

Can you refute Bert's statement?

Bertie took a detour: "You want to control everyone elses choices by
removing the choices that you determine are not in your best interests."
Fight the vodka. Try and stay on the road.

Are you porjecting Dougie.

Fred Dehl wrote:

Post one sentence. C'mon you little faggot. Show us how smart your momma
made you when you had your head up her skirt after your classmates beat
your snot-nosed little face into a pussified pulp.

One sentence.

One.

Now.

Here.

Come on faggot.

Show us what you've got in your pants besides air and ****.


Are you always interested in what schoolboys have in their pants?
You should get help before you act on your impulses.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/m...9/ixworld.html

It appears that one of the legacies of the Clinton administration is that
global warming stopped in 1998.



And the sun revolves around the earth.

And someone moved those WMD's.

Seriously Harry, it's something to watch and making our energy systems more
efficient (reducing our carbon dioxide output) makes sense on many levels.
The uneducated alarmist can destroy our economy by insisting on unnecessary
restrictions.