"RCE" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message


Yes, if I were the vice president of the United States and I "accidently"
shot someone, I would hold a brief public conference immediately after
the victim was in the hospital, explain what happened, apologize for my
stupidity, and ask everyone to pray for the victim's recovery.

But, then, I don't suffer from the hubris of Bush or Cheney.

In this we agree 100%. It is stupid, arrogant and boorish to do nothing.

RCE


He reported it to the local police. He is going to be pilloried whatever he
does.

Harry Krause wrote:

Harry doesn't know the first thing about sporting clays. Compare his
statements to this description of sporting clays:

http://www.clay-shooting.com/A-Z/A-ZFitasc.pdf

Let's see. *I* was supposed to be furiously searching for info on
sporting clays, but Snipper is the one who was out searching so he could
post something?

Believe Hoodoo said it for us in his 'Frank' post, you are a fraud.

--
Skipper

wrote:
JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Oh shoot! Veep had no license for quail hunt
BY KENNETH R. BAZINET
DAILY NEWS WASHINGTON BUREAU
Monday, February 13th, 2006

WASHINGTON - Vice President Cheney had no license to kill - quail, that
is.
BFD. Yawn

Jim, do you think that it's okay for people to poach? Or is it just
that you think it's okay for Cheney to poach? Laws are laws. If I were
hunting in Texas without a license and shot someone in the face, I'll
bet I'd get a fine for doing so.

Actually the law is only 5 months old, so they are issuing warning
tickets to everyone.

--
Reggie
************************************************** *************
That's my story and I am sticking to it.

************************************************** *************

Gene Kearns wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:45:59 -0600, Skipper penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:


Harry Krause wrote:


Harry's out furiously trying to find the difference between rabbits,
rockets, and birds.

Say what?

Harry doesn't know the first thing about sporting clays. Compare his
statements to this description of sporting clays:



Simply amazing! Skipper, the "traditional values" guru posts, as
example, how the French shooting clays work.

Here's a heads up... you are in America... and we don't necessarily
use the French as our role models, so for how Americans do it, see
he
http://www.mynsca.com/about.shtml


Is Skipper a '5th Columnist' for the French? Pity!

Gene Kearns wrote:

Skipper penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

Harry doesn't know the first thing about sporting clays. Compare his
statements to this description of sporting clays:

Here's a heads up... you are in America...

I maintain a membership and shoot sporting clays regularly. You and
Krause do not. Here's a test. You are at a shooting station with two (2)
sets of doubles. One trap throws the bird directly at your forehead, the
other is a distant tower throwing the bird away. If you shoot the tower
bird first the other bird will be no more than 30' away when you finally
pull the trigger on it. Which bird do you shoot first?

--
Skipper

Harry Krause wrote:

Skipper wrote:

I maintain a membership and shoot sporting clays regularly.

Bullship.

That the name of your fab lobstaboat, Krause?

--
Skipper

Harry Krause wrote:

Skipper wrote:

Here's a test.

No one's playing your idiot games.

Ready for your test score, Krause?

--
Skipper

Gene Kearns wrote:

I maintain a membership and shoot sporting clays regularly. You and
Krause do not. Here's a test. You are at a shooting station with two (2)
sets of doubles. One trap throws the bird directly at your forehead, the
other is a distant tower throwing the bird away. If you shoot the tower
bird first the other bird will be no more than 30' away when you finally
pull the trigger on it. Which bird do you shoot first?

I'll shoot the one going away. Even if a bird *did* fly at my forehead, I'd
let it go

Then there's no reason to ask the follow up question as to which barrel
you'd select for each shot as you failed at the double.

The barrel selection question will be reserved for someone who actually
shoots sporting clays. Unlike you, they will know the correct answer and
the reason it is pertinent.

--
Skipper

Harry Krause wrote:

Then there's no reason to ask the follow up question as to which barrel
you'd select for each shot as you failed at the double.

The barrel selection question will be reserved for someone who actually
shoots sporting clays. Unlike you, they will know the correct answer and
the reason it is pertinent.

Everyone is *on* to you.

Good. And we can assume everyone now understands you lied about shooting
sporting clays.

--
Skipper

Harry Krause wrote:

Good. And we can assume everyone now understands you lied about shooting
sporting clays.

Sorry, "Wile," but all that happened here is that I once again declined
to play.

Ah yes, the plausible deniability ruse again, eh, Krause?

--
Skipper