"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
If she were elected, the day after she took office a massive
withdrawal of troops would begin.
Are you saying that she's lying when she says that Murtha's plan for
immediate withdrawal is wrong? She stated that we can't leave until
the country is stabilized, so it doesn't become a lawless training
ground for terrorists.


This is why it is useless to engage "your type" in discussion. If
Hillary were to be elected, she would not take office for more than
three years. It is doubtful she will have the same views on Iraq three
years hence as she does now.

Let's assume that the situation in Iraq hasn't improved...or has actually
worsened.

I think that's a safe assumption, and reason enough for us to get the hell
out of there.

You would think that Hillary would have a plan (other than cutting and
running) to reverse the situation so her prophecy about the terrorists
doesn't come true.

But you avoided the question:

If Hillary thinks that we should not leave until Iraq is stabilized so that
it doesn't become a terrorist training ground, how will she feel in 3 years
if it's still not stabilized?