Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Firefox
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:20:42 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: Eisboch - off to mess around with Thunderbird now. I love Thunderbird - it's a great client program. Firefox I've found has problems displaying non-embedded photos - by non-embedded, I mean photos that don't have the color curves and framework embedded into the image. I don't think they've ever fixed that. It's the same with Opera and that silly Mac program. Later, Tom Is there an example that's easy to provide a link for? |
#12
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Firefox
On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:11:49 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote: It does not - it never has. Take a image from my site - any one of them - http://www.swsports.org/images and look at it in Firefox. Then bring up that same image in Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro - you will see the difference. IE handles CSS well - Firefox, Opera and others don't. Otherwise, why would you have to embed data via Photoshop and PSP to make it display properly on Firefox or Opera? You got it backwards. http://www.positioniseverything.net/ -- Q |
#13
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Firefox
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 08:37:30 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:20:42 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: Eisboch - off to mess around with Thunderbird now. I love Thunderbird - it's a great client program. Firefox I've found has problems displaying non-embedded photos - by non-embedded, I mean photos that don't have the color curves and framework embedded into the image. I don't think they've ever fixed that. It's the same with Opera and that silly Mac program. Give me an example of a page with a non-embedded photo...thanks. Go to http://www.swsports.org/images and bring up a photo in Firefox. Then bring it up in Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro - you'll see the difference. Later, Tom Tom, I honestly don't see a difference. I'm using Paintshop Pro version 6.00 and Firefox 1.0.7. I viewed it in Paintshop by first saving the image to disk, then opening it as usual. |
#14
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Firefox
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... Know what? I screwed up. I can't at the moment, but I'll post an non-embedded image later. Later, Tom I don't have PhotoShop or PaintShop Pro installed on this computer yet, but I opened your pics in both IE and Firefox. Looked the same to me. One of them hesitated in loading for a sec (Firefox) and a brief message came up saying the image could not be displayed due to errors, but then the message went away and the image appeared. Eisboch |
#15
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Firefox
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:58:11 -0600, Q wrote: On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:11:49 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: It does not - it never has. Take a image from my site - any one of them - http://www.swsports.org/images and look at it in Firefox. Then bring up that same image in Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro - you will see the difference. IE handles CSS well - Firefox, Opera and others don't. Otherwise, why would you have to embed data via Photoshop and PSP to make it display properly on Firefox or Opera? You got it backwards. http://www.positioniseverything.net/ Well, I've already admitted that I'm wrong, I'm here in front of God and everybody that I'm wrong. Ok? I AM WRONG!!!! Firefox still sucks. :) Later, Tom Wrong again Tom. Twice in one night? |
#16
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Firefox
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... 'Tis the season to be jolly ...... fa la la la la..... la la la la. Eisboch :-) I like your attitude! ;-) Jim C. |
#17
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Firefox
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... Well, I've already admitted that I'm wrong, I'm here in front of God and everybody that I'm wrong. Ok? I AM WRONG!!!! Firefox still sucks. :) Later, Tom 'Tis the season to be jolly ...... fa la la la la..... la la la la. Eisboch :-) |
#18
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Firefox
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message news On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:53:46 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message . .. On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:58:11 -0600, Q wrote: On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:11:49 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: It does not - it never has. Take a image from my site - any one of them - http://www.swsports.org/images and look at it in Firefox. Then bring up that same image in Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro - you will see the difference. IE handles CSS well - Firefox, Opera and others don't. Otherwise, why would you have to embed data via Photoshop and PSP to make it display properly on Firefox or Opera? You got it backwards. http://www.positioniseverything.net/ Well, I've already admitted that I'm wrong, I'm here in front of God and everybody that I'm wrong. Ok? I AM WRONG!!!! Firefox still sucks. :) Wrong again Tom. Twice in one night? Hey - I'm man enough to admit it. Something a lot of people around here could practice on occasion I might add. :) Later, Tom I agree, and have either admitted to my errors and/or apologized for them. Did you miss those posts Tom? Regardless..............have a good one. |
#19
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Firefox
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:53:46 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:58:11 -0600, Q wrote: On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:11:49 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: It does not - it never has. Take a image from my site - any one of them - http://www.swsports.org/images and look at it in Firefox. Then bring up that same image in Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro - you will see the difference. IE handles CSS well - Firefox, Opera and others don't. Otherwise, why would you have to embed data via Photoshop and PSP to make it display properly on Firefox or Opera? You got it backwards. http://www.positioniseverything.net/ Well, I've already admitted that I'm wrong, I'm here in front of God and everybody that I'm wrong. Ok? I AM WRONG!!!! Firefox still sucks. :) Wrong again Tom. Twice in one night? Hey - I'm man enough to admit it. Something a lot of people around here could practice on occasion I might add. :) Later, Tom I'm man enough to admit when you are wrong, but I'm nice enough not to rub your face in it. Good one Harry. That was the funniest line I read over the past few nights. Thanks for the good laugh. ;-) |
#20
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Firefox
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... *JimH* wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:53:46 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:58:11 -0600, Q wrote: On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:11:49 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: It does not - it never has. Take a image from my site - any one of them - http://www.swsports.org/images and look at it in Firefox. Then bring up that same image in Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro - you will see the difference. IE handles CSS well - Firefox, Opera and others don't. Otherwise, why would you have to embed data via Photoshop and PSP to make it display properly on Firefox or Opera? You got it backwards. http://www.positioniseverything.net/ Well, I've already admitted that I'm wrong, I'm here in front of God and everybody that I'm wrong. Ok? I AM WRONG!!!! Firefox still sucks. :) Wrong again Tom. Twice in one night? Hey - I'm man enough to admit it. Something a lot of people around here could practice on occasion I might add. :) Later, Tom I'm man enough to admit when you are wrong, but I'm nice enough not to rub your face in it. Good one Harry. That was the funniest line I read over the past few nights. Thanks for the good laugh. ;-) We who sit and wait salute you. -- You (and your comrades) sit and wait? Indeed..............to be proved the fool again. ;-) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|