Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jeff Rigby" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message ... On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:22:17 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: Len wrote: On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 13:45:21 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: May the children of all the warmongers here suffer the same horrific fate. Got a cold chill reading this Harry. But I agree 100% with what you mean. Regards, Len. It is immoral to sit safe in your house while you urge that the sons and daughters of other families be sent off to foreign lands to fight and die in a war based on a president's incompetency, stupidity, and deceit. Harry, are you really one who should be talking of sitting safely in your house while others are being sent to foreign lands to fight and die? I think not. For a non-participant, you are quick with the moral judgements. -- John H I disagree, John. I think that if an elected official votes in favor of the war, whether to signify agreement or to provide funding, that person's kids should be the first to enlist. They should have 7 days to do this, or be arrested. People who voted for a candidate who declared the war - same thing. Off with their children, or the voters themselves, if they're otherwise eligible for service (age & health). A little over half the country voted for Nookular Boy. Take away those who are too old to serve or have no kids and I'd imagine we could still come up with what.....maybe 10-20 million new soldiers? End of recruiting problem. If there's a good reason not to think this way, I haven't heard it yet. Sounds good to me as long as the military funding has been directed by those same people long enough for it to be properly equipped so that we have the LOW mortality rates we have now. Do you realize how concerned the military mind is about their guys. Speed limits and the belt law are RIGIDLY enforced on bases to prevent deaths from car accidents. You only heard about shaped charges in regards to taking out tanks in the past, now terrorists are using them against jeeps because of the armor the troop carriers have installed to protect the crew. I'm not saying the military doesn't try and protect its people. I'm talking about the politicians who arrange for a prank like this war, and then go back to their fancy lunches while other peoples' kids are killed for absolutely no friggin' reason except to satisfy a president who had no chance of leaving any sort of positive legacy. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
European Jihad? | General | |||
The European Hunter and BMW | ASA |