![]() |
European Jihad?
"DSK" wrote in message ... Nowhere does it say that diseases brought by Europeans wiped out 80% of the Indians. Jeff Rigby wrote: FIRST wave...was 50%, then the second wave more and the third wave, and on and on And yet, you made the claim that 80% of the North American Indians (even the Eskimos??) were wiped out by disease brought by the Spanish by 1700. That's ridiculous and the reason your cited web sites (interesting and fact-filled though they be) do not support your claim. "There was a vacumn here as 80% of the origional indians in the eastern and south easteren continental US were killed by dieases brought in by spanish explorers. When the english and dutch sought to colonize this country there were many unclaimed lands." No mention of Eskimos in my post, nor was there mention of the northeast where Dutch, English and French were very brutal in claiming, defending and exploiting their claims. We were talking about Americans killing off the indians and for the most part I identify with the south and have a greater grasp of our history than the northeast and Canada. The settlers in the northeast have been the most brutal unethical humans on this earth for hundreds of years. That culture I won't defend. The yankee traders of the 1800's gave us the reputation that we are still living down I suggest you look up some more history, like the Tuscarora War or King Phillip's War... wars in which the Indians drove white settlers out of large areas of their lands... temporarily, to be sure... doesn't really fit your picture, does it? I wonder why? Again, I was talking, or defending Americans not europeans. Now, if you had said that the Indians suffered massive depopulation, mostly from deisease, starting when the Spanish explorers arrived.... *that* would be truthful. Instead you have to make up some exaggerated claim and start hurling insults. That's what I did say and you for some reason twisted it. I didn't START hurling insults just responded to your comment that I should reread the 5th grade history books which contained many of the statements I made but which you seemed to have forgotten. And you wonder why you can't get any grown-ups to play. DSK Misquoting, distorting and hurling insults are not what I call adult behavior. |
European Jihad?
You expext adult behavior out of DSK?
"Jeff Rigby" wrote in message ... "DSK" wrote in message ... Nowhere does it say that diseases brought by Europeans wiped out 80% of the Indians. Jeff Rigby wrote: FIRST wave...was 50%, then the second wave more and the third wave, and on and on And yet, you made the claim that 80% of the North American Indians (even the Eskimos??) were wiped out by disease brought by the Spanish by 1700. That's ridiculous and the reason your cited web sites (interesting and fact-filled though they be) do not support your claim. "There was a vacumn here as 80% of the origional indians in the eastern and south easteren continental US were killed by dieases brought in by spanish explorers. When the english and dutch sought to colonize this country there were many unclaimed lands." No mention of Eskimos in my post, nor was there mention of the northeast where Dutch, English and French were very brutal in claiming, defending and exploiting their claims. We were talking about Americans killing off the indians and for the most part I identify with the south and have a greater grasp of our history than the northeast and Canada. The settlers in the northeast have been the most brutal unethical humans on this earth for hundreds of years. That culture I won't defend. The yankee traders of the 1800's gave us the reputation that we are still living down I suggest you look up some more history, like the Tuscarora War or King Phillip's War... wars in which the Indians drove white settlers out of large areas of their lands... temporarily, to be sure... doesn't really fit your picture, does it? I wonder why? Again, I was talking, or defending Americans not europeans. Now, if you had said that the Indians suffered massive depopulation, mostly from deisease, starting when the Spanish explorers arrived.... *that* would be truthful. Instead you have to make up some exaggerated claim and start hurling insults. That's what I did say and you for some reason twisted it. I didn't START hurling insults just responded to your comment that I should reread the 5th grade history books which contained many of the statements I made but which you seemed to have forgotten. And you wonder why you can't get any grown-ups to play. DSK Misquoting, distorting and hurling insults are not what I call adult behavior. |
European Jihad?
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "DSK" wrote in message ... Nowhere does it say that diseases brought by Europeans wiped out 80% of the Indians. Jeff Rigby wrote: FIRST wave...was 50%, then the second wave more and the third wave, and on and on And yet, you made the claim that 80% of the North American Indians (even the Eskimos??) were wiped out by disease brought by the Spanish by 1700. That's ridiculous and the reason your cited web sites (interesting and fact-filled though they be) do not support your claim. I'm just sort of lurking in this part of the debate. Natives in places like Minnesota were wiped out by the Spanish? No that's a misquote, I mentioned that the east and southeast of the continental United States had this massive depopulation. DSK, misread and or misquoted. I can only guess that it's unconscious on his part. Climate has a lot to do with the spread of disease. The warmer climates spread typhus and cholera faster than the cold climates. |
European Jihad?
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 07:40:37 +0100, Len wrote:
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 16:39:35 -0500, John H. wrote: What's the Netherlands doing about the problems they're having with Muslims, Len? My friend in Stolwyjk seems to think there *is* a developing problem over there, and that taxes can be raised only so far to keep giving money to folks who aren't earning it. Locally: 1) The problem in our country comes from a very small minority of muslim-youngsters that later on are being influenced by foreign jihadist-recruters. Are the recruiters also youngsters? If not, from where do they get their hatred of the Netherlands? 2) The vast majority are muslims that want a normal life. These people don't live up to the "pure" islam taken literally. Seems everyone is forgetting this large group. Seems like everyone is forgetting the same group in Iraq. 3) These youngsters have trouble finding jobs cause economy is at a baisse over here. So there are only few employers and these are able to be picky. Perhaps you should try providing less welfare, lower the taxes, give people more money to spend, increase the demand for goods, produce more goods, and thereby give more people jobs. This attitude is one of the causes. It is over here and it is in France and in Germany and in.... The governments can't throw a switch here. It's up to us, the society itself to give the boys and sometimes girls a fair chance. I agree. But, you surely can't say that *any* of those problems are Bush's fault. Also the right wing attitude of "all muslims are extremists" is to be prevented/altered. In your eyes maybe a soft "therapy" but in the long run an essential one. I've never thought all Muslims were extremists. I was a teacher for a time. I had many Muslims as students and dealt with their parents. They were regular folk. Legislation is being adapted so the intention to use violence in the future can be dealt with properly. I see where your friend is coming from. He shouldn't be afraid of a tax-raise. Present government is increasing net income for the well to do and also increases costs like healthcosts for the poor and elderly. But spending taxpayers money to keep these people "working" is no solution, never is imo. And this is not what is planned. It's the expectability to get a real job that is to be improved. Ethnical discrimination *is* a fact amongst employers. In a sense it may be understandable but is causes immense trouble in the long run. Internationally: We're dependant of the world-leading nation: the us of a and the way it assesses the global situation, the wisdom and vision with which it applies measures. We suffer more from ethnic troubles when the us unintentionally feed the moral conviction of radical muslims by occupying muslim countries for the wrong reasons. The nuance between "lie" and "wrong intelligence" is of no importance here. Why do you say you're dependant on the US of A? Ah, here we go with the 'blame the USA' attitude again. "We suffer more from....when the us (sic) ..." Pferdeäpfel When the legitimation is altered from WMD to moral obligation to remove a fierce dictator, then a success in helping the freed population would be of great value. Why is there still no infrastructure, no electricity in Bagdad after such a period of time? Your exaggerations are false. There is infrastructure and there is electricity in Baghdad. It may not be perfect, yet, but it's there. But first people should accept the fact the Islam has many faces and there are a few radical muslims inside or better: next to a large group of kind, peace-seeking muslims. Just like there are fundamentalist-christians who are consumed by their hate against (in their eyes) non-christians who want to have a choice regarding fi abortion, gay-marriage and euthanasia. Geen probleem! Regards, Len. -- John H "It's *not* a baby kicking, bride of mine, it's just a fetus!" Hypocrital Liberal |
European Jihad? Challenge?
Harry Krause wrote:
Skipper wrote: Why are you getting so excited and upset, Krause? You have boats, and plenty of them. Several. And, of course, you have none. I'm tempted to inquire as to why you are so consistently wrong...but of course we know that answer...constant practice! And while we're on that subject, I will take you up on that offer of a photo. I'm particularly interested in that 'get home' engine you've bragged about. Can we see a pic? Sure, Snippy http://tinyurl.com/8lt3c A great get-home engine. 1005 Reliable to Date. So, you've finally found the courage to 'own up." If you want to confirm that, we can finally get off your ass about it. BTW, I can send you winterizing instructions if your capable and in good enough health for DYI. No thanks. I can afford to pay the dealer to handle the job properly. Properly? Got a newsflash for you, Krause. It's the newest kid on the lot who often gets tasked with winterizing. Best insurance for a job well done is DIY, if you're up to the challenge. -- Skipper |
European Jihad?
"John H." wrote in message
... 2) The vast majority are muslims that want a normal life. These people don't live up to the "pure" islam taken literally. Seems everyone is forgetting this large group. Seems like everyone is forgetting the same group in Iraq. Isn't it odd that in interviews with local officials on the news, they're not talking about this as a jihad? Where did you hear about a jihad, John? I'd like to follow the same news as you do. |
European Jihad? Challenge?
I know people who use a bilge heater to protect the engine, this makes it
very easy to winterize the boat, just drain the fresh water lines and fill them up with pink stuff. I have always shied away from it because as soon as there was a hard freeze I am sure the marina would have a power failure. ; ) The winter is a great time to boat, but I would find a 29' to be cramped for long term living. "P Fritz" wrote in message ... Must be nice.........mine was shrink wrapped over the weekend.....:-( I have one friend who is living aboard his 29' Four Winns over the winter............ "Dr. Dr. Smithers" Ask Me about my Phd @ Diploma Mill .com wrote in message ... JiminFl, Harry has a 25' Parker, he likes to talk about his custom built Lobster boat, but that is a fiction of a vivid mind. Harry is always willing to send photos, proof of bill of sale and offer to have to take people fishing on his Parker. No one has ever seen the Lobster Boat, except someone who was posting using Harry's IP. Someone made a $10,000 bet to prove ownership of the Lobster Boat, someone offered to make a $1000 contribution to the Salvation Army if Harry showed proof of ownership of the Lobster Boat. Harry cowered away from both of these offers. That aside, the odds are that Harry does own a Parker, he just never uses it. Yesterday, I had a great day on the boat. Picked up some chicken, slaw and potato salad and headed up to the lake. Did a little work on the boat, draining the fresh water lines and filling the lines with Pink Stuff. I then headed out for a beautiful day on the lake. Read a book, eat some lunch and got some sun. I have always though fall is the best time of the year. It is very quiet on the lake and it is more comfortable than the summer. I am still approximately 30 days from Winterizing the engine. If there is a unexpected freeze, I can winterize the engine in less than 2 hrs. "JIMinFL" wrote in message ink.net... Why don't you guys meet on some neutral turf and duke it out for bragging rights since it appears that neither one of you have boats. "Skipper" wrote in message ... Harry Krause wrote: Early on Krause was presented an opportunity to backup his assertions regarding certain boating and trailering products and verify his boating skills. As it came time for rubber to hit the road in this reasonable test, Harry whimpered off. That's the thing about Harry, when Challenged, he seems unable to stand tall. You still are trying to sell this b.s.? Your "challenge" required me to tow a boat what, 2000-2500 miles? For what? To meet up with an ass like you who allegedly owned a 22' Crappyliner? Maybe stupid works in Derby, Kansas, but not in my zipcodes. No doubt, taking on such a Challenge with your skill set and unsuitable equipment would indeed have been a stupid and futile undertaking. Point is, when given the opportunity to back up *your* words, you puked out. It's in the archives. -- Skipper |
European Jihad? Challenge?
"Dr. Dr. Smithers" Ask Me about my Phd @ Diploma Mill .com wrote in message ... I know people who use a bilge heater to protect the engine, this makes it very easy to winterize the boat, just drain the fresh water lines and fill them up with pink stuff. That is basically what he is going to do. I have always shied away from it because as soon as there was a hard freeze I am sure the marina would have a power failure. ; ) And where the live aboards stay is way out there The winter is a great time to boat, but I would find a 29' to be cramped for long term living. Me too, but he is a single ex marine.......now a cop in Detroit ( I think the marine gig was safer) The one positive thing about the Four Winns, it is the only boat of that size that I have been on that I can stadn straight up in with room to spare (I'm 6'6") "P Fritz" wrote in message ... Must be nice.........mine was shrink wrapped over the weekend.....:-( I have one friend who is living aboard his 29' Four Winns over the winter............ "Dr. Dr. Smithers" Ask Me about my Phd @ Diploma Mill .com wrote in message ... JiminFl, Harry has a 25' Parker, he likes to talk about his custom built Lobster boat, but that is a fiction of a vivid mind. Harry is always willing to send photos, proof of bill of sale and offer to have to take people fishing on his Parker. No one has ever seen the Lobster Boat, except someone who was posting using Harry's IP. Someone made a $10,000 bet to prove ownership of the Lobster Boat, someone offered to make a $1000 contribution to the Salvation Army if Harry showed proof of ownership of the Lobster Boat. Harry cowered away from both of these offers. That aside, the odds are that Harry does own a Parker, he just never uses it. Yesterday, I had a great day on the boat. Picked up some chicken, slaw and potato salad and headed up to the lake. Did a little work on the boat, draining the fresh water lines and filling the lines with Pink Stuff. I then headed out for a beautiful day on the lake. Read a book, eat some lunch and got some sun. I have always though fall is the best time of the year. It is very quiet on the lake and it is more comfortable than the summer. I am still approximately 30 days from Winterizing the engine. If there is a unexpected freeze, I can winterize the engine in less than 2 hrs. "JIMinFL" wrote in message ink.net... Why don't you guys meet on some neutral turf and duke it out for bragging rights since it appears that neither one of you have boats. "Skipper" wrote in message ... Harry Krause wrote: Early on Krause was presented an opportunity to backup his assertions regarding certain boating and trailering products and verify his boating skills. As it came time for rubber to hit the road in this reasonable test, Harry whimpered off. That's the thing about Harry, when Challenged, he seems unable to stand tall. You still are trying to sell this b.s.? Your "challenge" required me to tow a boat what, 2000-2500 miles? For what? To meet up with an ass like you who allegedly owned a 22' Crappyliner? Maybe stupid works in Derby, Kansas, but not in my zipcodes. No doubt, taking on such a Challenge with your skill set and unsuitable equipment would indeed have been a stupid and futile undertaking. Point is, when given the opportunity to back up *your* words, you puked out. It's in the archives. -- Skipper |
European Jihad?
I'm just sort of lurking in this part of the debate. Natives in places
like Minnesota were wiped out by the Spanish? Jeff Rigby wrote: No that's a misquote, I mentioned that the east and southeast of the continental United States had this massive depopulation. Actually, I don't believe you specified *where* 80% of the native Americans had been been wiped out. And you certainly did not say anything about long term depopulation. .. DSK, misread and or misquoted. Yeah, that must be it! You don't ever actually say untruthful or stupid things, you just get misunderestimated! Climate has a lot to do with the spread of disease. The warmer climates spread typhus and cholera faster than the cold climates. Duh. Funny how there's little malaria in Canada, eh? OTOH diseases like smallpox, which is among most deadly and is documented to have ripped thru the New England tribes in several waves, is virulent in all climates and is contagious for years. In fact, one of the web sites you gave links to mentioned a smallpox epidemic caused by digging a pipeline thru a graveyard of smallpox victims, decades later. It is possible... not very likely, but possible... that by the early 1800s the overall Indian population was down to 20% of what it had been at peak, before the arrival of Europeans. But since we don't know how many there were at either time, there's not much point in insisting on it. One thing we agree on, the white man's diseases (including alcoholism) killed a lot more Indians than bullets ever did. DSK |
European Jihad? Challenge?
"Skipper" wrote in message ... No doubt, taking on such a Challenge with your skill set and unsuitable equipment would indeed have been a stupid and futile undertaking. Point is, when given the opportunity to back up *your* words, you puked out. It's in the archives. So true...so very true. Just like when caught in many of his lies, when confronted with the undisputable facts that prove he lied...he just silently fades away. Of course, that is why he marks his post with "xarchive-no"...what other possible reason could there be? What a poor excuse for a man he is...sheesh... -- -Netsock "It's just about going fast...that's all..." http://home.columbus.rr.com/ckg/ |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com