European Jihad?
 

On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:25:23 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

Doug Kanter wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 06:44:49 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Jeff Rigby wrote:
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:22:17 -0500, Harry Krause

wrote:

Len wrote:
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 13:45:21 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

May the children of all the warmongers here suffer the same
horrific
fate.
Got a cold chill reading this Harry.
But I agree 100% with what you mean.

Regards, Len.
It is immoral to sit safe in your house while you urge that the sons
and
daughters of other families be sent off to foreign lands to fight and
die in a war based on a president's incompetency, stupidity, and
deceit.
Harry, are you really one who should be talking of sitting safely in
your
house
while others are being sent to foreign lands to fight and die?

I think not.

For a non-participant, you are quick with the moral judgements.
--
John H
I disagree, John. I think that if an elected official votes in favor of
the war, whether to signify agreement or to provide funding, that
person's
kids should be the first to enlist. They should have 7 days to do this,
or
be arrested. People who voted for a candidate who declared the war -
same
thing. Off with their children, or the voters themselves, if they're
otherwise eligible for service (age & health). A little over half the
country voted for Nookular Boy. Take away those who are too old to
serve
or have no kids and I'd imagine we could still come up with
what.....maybe
10-20 million new soldiers? End of recruiting problem.

If there's a good reason not to think this way, I haven't heard it yet.
Sounds good to me as long as the military funding has been directed by
those
same people long enough for it to be properly equipped so that we have
the
LOW mortality rates we have now.

Do you realize how concerned the military mind is about their guys.
Speed
limits and the belt law are RIGIDLY enforced on bases to prevent deaths
from
car accidents. You only heard about shaped charges in regards to taking
out
tanks in the past, now terrorists are using them against jeeps because
of
the armor the troop carriers have installed to protect the crew.


If the military leadership were so concerned about the troops on the
ground, the latter would have all the lightweight effective body armor
it needed, along with all the armored vehicles it needed, and it would
be spending as much on intel as it does on the overwrought contracts it
hands out.
The military spends its money as it is told to do so by civilians.

That's one of the lamest things you've said to date. Stop being lazy.
Civilians told the military to chill out and not worry so much about proper
body armor or fortified vehicles?




Herring comes up with any rationalization he thinks will work to
"protect" his boy Bush and its military establishment.

Harry, do your personal attacks add anything to any discussion?
--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, bride of mine, it's just a fetus!"

Hypocrital Liberal

European Jihad? Challenge?
 

Harry Krause wrote:

Harry,
That is not a lie, that is exactly what happened. You borrowed a picture
from a web site and said it was your boat. When someone posted a link to
the exact same picture, you said it was a picture of a "sistership".

It's not history at all. It's b.s. Some right-wing asswipe made such an
accusation, I called him on it, and asked him to produce a URL to the
website he claimed had the photo, and that was the end of that, because
he couldn't do it. Except, of course, his brother asswipe Skipper picked
up the original lie and repeated it about 1000 times so that it became
part of rec.boats history.

The Hatteras fiasco is fact, Krause. And now you're going to play that
same game with the "fab Zimmermanlike lobster boat."

--
Skipper

European Jihad? Challenge?
 

On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:02:26 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

John H. wrote:
Wow! Rec.boats history. Exciting stuff.


On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:13:36 -0500, "Dr. Dr. Smithers" Ask Me about my Phd @
Diploma Mill .com wrote:

Harry,
That is not a lie, that is exactly what happened. You borrowed a picture
from a web site and said it was your boat. When someone posted a link to
the exact same picture, you said it was a picture of a "sistership".

The fact that you are now covering up your mistakes is reason enough to
doubt your "sistership" excuse.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Skipper wrote:
Netsock wrote:

Why are you getting so excited and upset, Krause? You have boats, and
plenty of them. And while we're on that subject, I will take you up on
that offer of a photo. I'm particularly interested in that 'get home'
engine you've bragged about. Can we see a pic?
BTW, I can send you winterizing instructions if your capable and in
good
enough health for DYI.
Don't buy it for a second Skipper. That boatless pea-brain has tried to
scam
me before too. He has been caught RED HANDED passing off internet photos
of
boats he claimed he owned. He also said he would "prove" he owned a
boat...but said I had to give him $1000.00, and I would be able to
"inspect"
that boat. He also said he wouldn't be there.
He's a boatless liar Skipper...and he *KNOWS*, that we know...end of
story.
I know. Many years ago he bragged of owning a custom Hatteras
upholstered in Corinthian leather. When pressed, he finally produced a
picture of a boat going under a bridge that he claimed was his boat.
Someone found the website where the ad photo originated from and he was
had. He then quickly fabricated a story about some mysterious sale of
the boat. I kinda feel sorry for the guy. His only life seems to be on
the internet...

--
Skipper

Nice try, Snippy, but that's just more of your b.s.


It's not history at all. It's b.s. Some right-wing asswipe made such an
accusation, I called him on it, and asked him to produce a URL to the
website he claimed had the photo, and that was the end of that, because
he couldn't do it. Except, of course, his brother asswipe Skipper picked
up the original lie and repeated it about 1000 times so that it became
part of rec.boats history.

That's the game you righties play around here.

It's entertaining and sometimes gratifying to **** off the right-wing
trash here. Consider the case of Smithers: his entire existence here is
caught up in trying to get to me, and the same with Nutsock. Delightful.

Harry, you pat yourself on the back too much. I seriously doubt if anyone takes
you seriously enough to let you disrupt there serenity very much.

But, if you think your impact is that great, that's all that counts (for you).
--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, bride of mine, it's just a fetus!"

Hypocrital Liberal

European Jihad? Challenge?
 

On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:02:46 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

John H. wrote:
Mine is now winterized. Come on spring!


About Labor Day for you, right?

The first week day after striper season opens, or a week or so earlier for
practice.
--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, bride of mine, it's just a fetus!"

Hypocrital Liberal

European Jihad?
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:25:04 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:07:11 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:02:52 +0100, Len

wrote:

On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:49:26 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:

Wake up, Europe, you've a war on your hands

What? where? Oh, now you mention it... Tought it were just some boys
having a bit of fun...

Well, we always turn to the US when it's to do with fighting, don't
we? So, what do you suggest...,
Make firearms more accessible to the people?
Say it's Al Qaeda and invade Pakistan?
Call 'm illegal warriors, open up some camp on an island and put all
these guys in there for years without a trial?

Surprise me,

Regards, Len.

What's the Netherlands doing about the problems they're having with
Muslims,
Len? My friend in Stolwyjk seems to think there *is* a developing
problem
over
there, and that taxes can be raised only so far to keep giving money
to
folks
who aren't earning it.

Your friend is right. There is a problem developing over there. It's
pretty
much the same problem that developed here in the early 1960s when we
were
ignoring them pesky Negroes in places like Watts and Detroit. Now,
there's
them pesky brown people who just happen to be Muslims.


Luckily, our media and politicians don't continuously call them
'racists'.

Of course not. And here, if a father "sort of prefers" that his white
daughter not date black guys, we politely say "he just prefers it that
way".


?????????

You definitely have gone way over my head, intellectually.

Here. Catch the life vest.

European Jihad? Challenge?
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:02:46 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
Mine is now winterized. Come on spring!


About Labor Day for you, right?

The first week day after striper season opens, or a week or so earlier for
practice.
--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, bride of mine, it's just a fetus!"

Hypocrital Liberal

I had a great test last Sunday on how my tarp setup will hold up to high
winds. We had close to 60 mph that morning. I checked the boat yesterday
and my cheap vinyl tarp on pvc pipe frame over my old mooring cover held up
just fine.

This setup with winter storage will cost me $25~$30/winter. Not bad.

European Jihad? Challenge?
 

On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 19:27:05 -0500, John H. wrote:

On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:02:26 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

John H. wrote:
Wow! Rec.boats history. Exciting stuff.


On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:13:36 -0500, "Dr. Dr. Smithers" Ask Me about my Phd @
Diploma Mill .com wrote:

Harry,
That is not a lie, that is exactly what happened. You borrowed a picture
from a web site and said it was your boat. When someone posted a link to
the exact same picture, you said it was a picture of a "sistership".

The fact that you are now covering up your mistakes is reason enough to
doubt your "sistership" excuse.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Skipper wrote:
Netsock wrote:

Why are you getting so excited and upset, Krause? You have boats, and
plenty of them. And while we're on that subject, I will take you up on
that offer of a photo. I'm particularly interested in that 'get home'
engine you've bragged about. Can we see a pic?
BTW, I can send you winterizing instructions if your capable and in
good
enough health for DYI.
Don't buy it for a second Skipper. That boatless pea-brain has tried to
scam
me before too. He has been caught RED HANDED passing off internet photos
of
boats he claimed he owned. He also said he would "prove" he owned a
boat...but said I had to give him $1000.00, and I would be able to
"inspect"
that boat. He also said he wouldn't be there.
He's a boatless liar Skipper...and he *KNOWS*, that we know...end of
story.
I know. Many years ago he bragged of owning a custom Hatteras
upholstered in Corinthian leather. When pressed, he finally produced a
picture of a boat going under a bridge that he claimed was his boat.
Someone found the website where the ad photo originated from and he was
had. He then quickly fabricated a story about some mysterious sale of
the boat. I kinda feel sorry for the guy. His only life seems to be on
the internet...

--
Skipper

Nice try, Snippy, but that's just more of your b.s.


It's not history at all. It's b.s. Some right-wing asswipe made such an
accusation, I called him on it, and asked him to produce a URL to the
website he claimed had the photo, and that was the end of that, because
he couldn't do it. Except, of course, his brother asswipe Skipper picked
up the original lie and repeated it about 1000 times so that it became
part of rec.boats history.

That's the game you righties play around here.

It's entertaining and sometimes gratifying to **** off the right-wing
trash here. Consider the case of Smithers: his entire existence here is
caught up in trying to get to me, and the same with Nutsock. Delightful.

Harry, you pat yourself on the back too much. I seriously doubt if anyone takes
you seriously enough to let you disrupt there serenity very much.

But, if you think your impact is that great, that's all that counts (for you).

Whoops - "their" serenity!
--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, bride of mine, it's just a fetus!"

Hypocrital Liberal

European Jihad? Challenge?
 

On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:35:13 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:02:46 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
Mine is now winterized. Come on spring!


About Labor Day for you, right?

The first week day after striper season opens, or a week or so earlier for
practice.
--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, bride of mine, it's just a fetus!"

Hypocrital Liberal

I had a great test last Sunday on how my tarp setup will hold up to high
winds. We had close to 60 mph that morning. I checked the boat yesterday
and my cheap vinyl tarp on pvc pipe frame over my old mooring cover held up
just fine.

This setup with winter storage will cost me $25~$30/winter. Not bad.


Cool. Glad it works. I'm thinking of moving my boat next year, out of the boatel
and onto the trailer. The $2100/year, likely to go up, is getting to me.
--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, bride of mine, it's just a fetus!"

Hypocrital Liberal

European Jihad? Challenge?
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:35:13 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:02:46 -0500, Harry Krause

wrote:

John H. wrote:
Mine is now winterized. Come on spring!


About Labor Day for you, right?

The first week day after striper season opens, or a week or so earlier
for
practice.
--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, bride of mine, it's just a fetus!"

Hypocrital Liberal

I had a great test last Sunday on how my tarp setup will hold up to high
winds. We had close to 60 mph that morning. I checked the boat yesterday
and my cheap vinyl tarp on pvc pipe frame over my old mooring cover held
up
just fine.

This setup with winter storage will cost me $25~$30/winter. Not bad.


Cool. Glad it works. I'm thinking of moving my boat next year, out of the
boatel
and onto the trailer. The $2100/year, likely to go up, is getting to me.
--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, bride of mine, it's just a fetus!"

Hypocrital Liberal

The yard I store at is free (for now). That obviously cuts down my storage
fees considerably.

I put the basic mooring cover on, a cover in marginal condition.

I them purchased a vinyl tarp from http://tinyurl.com/7ph6z.

I used two 10' pieces of 1 1/4" PVC pipe, connected them together with a
union using PVC cleaner and cement (now a little over 20' long) and adding
elbows on the ends (I used the elbows at the end to prevent a harsh edge
cutting into the cover that goes over it.), I drilled holes through it at
the center and ends, raised it, centered it on the windshield, flexed it
down to meet the bow rail and stern and tied it off at the ends and center
in such a way as to prevent it from shifting. I was able to throw the
vinyl tarp over that modest frame.

The cover then fit neatly over that modest frame. I tied the cover to the
trailer every 18" using cheap 1/4" poly rope.

Extra tarp material was tucked in and taped it to form a nice fit.

I cut some vent holes (reinforced with heavy duty all purpose tape and coned
with the tape to prevent rain and snow from entering).

I figure I will get at least 2 years out of this cover with a total
investment of $60. Of that amount, $23 is in the frame and ropes which I
will use for many years to come.

Here it is:

http://tinyurl.com/9loro

I was thinking about getting a cover from Fisher Canvas but after seeing how
this basic cover performed in high winds I will pass and save the $708
(based on a quote from them).

European Jihad? Challenge?
 

On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:34:34 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:35:13 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
...
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:02:46 -0500, Harry Krause

wrote:

John H. wrote:
Mine is now winterized. Come on spring!


About Labor Day for you, right?

The first week day after striper season opens, or a week or so earlier
for
practice.
--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, bride of mine, it's just a fetus!"

Hypocrital Liberal

I had a great test last Sunday on how my tarp setup will hold up to high
winds. We had close to 60 mph that morning. I checked the boat yesterday
and my cheap vinyl tarp on pvc pipe frame over my old mooring cover held
up
just fine.

This setup with winter storage will cost me $25~$30/winter. Not bad.


Cool. Glad it works. I'm thinking of moving my boat next year, out of the
boatel
and onto the trailer. The $2100/year, likely to go up, is getting to me.
--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, bride of mine, it's just a fetus!"

Hypocrital Liberal

The yard I store at is free (for now). That obviously cuts down my storage
fees considerably.

I put the basic mooring cover on, a cover in marginal condition.

I them purchased a vinyl tarp from http://tinyurl.com/7ph6z.

I used two 10' pieces of 1 1/4" PVC pipe, connected them together with a
union using PVC cleaner and cement (now a little over 20' long) and adding
elbows on the ends (I used the elbows at the end to prevent a harsh edge
cutting into the cover that goes over it.), I drilled holes through it at
the center and ends, raised it, centered it on the windshield, flexed it
down to meet the bow rail and stern and tied it off at the ends and center
in such a way as to prevent it from shifting. I was able to throw the
vinyl tarp over that modest frame.

The cover then fit neatly over that modest frame. I tied the cover to the
trailer every 18" using cheap 1/4" poly rope.

Extra tarp material was tucked in and taped it to form a nice fit.

I cut some vent holes (reinforced with heavy duty all purpose tape and coned
with the tape to prevent rain and snow from entering).

I figure I will get at least 2 years out of this cover with a total
investment of $60. Of that amount, $23 is in the frame and ropes which I
will use for many years to come.

Here it is:

http://tinyurl.com/9loro

I was thinking about getting a cover from Fisher Canvas but after seeing how
this basic cover performed in high winds I will pass and save the $708
(based on a quote from them).


Looks good, but I'd sure check it after every snow fall.

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes