![]() |
a bystanders view on the us noise that is made here
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Jim Carter" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... Plutonium from the destroyed missile would be ingested by Northern pike, make them glow at night, and that would be fantastic for remote fly-in fishing lodges, which are always looking for a new way to attract new business. Doug, have you been to one of our fly in fishing lodges? They are fantastic! Great fishing! Tasty food! Jim I'd like to, but I will not set foot in a single engine plane unless I have first hired two suspicious men who will kill the pilot's family if the plane crashes. I don't trust mechanics, except mine. Grab a parachute and site in the co-pilot's seat. |
a bystanders view on the us noise that is made here
Skipper wrote:
Don White wrote: That was the problem with the 'Star Wars' program.The US would intercept Soviet missles over Canadian territory. Why would we want that? Most of Canada a few miles north of the US border is desolate tundra. Would you rather that *fundamentalist* missile come down on New York? -- Skipper Maybe a thousand miles north of the border...... You asking me if I'd rather a missle land on a foreign country, or on my own countries soil...? Give me 5 seconds to think about that... |
a bystanders view on the us noise that is made here
"Jim Carter" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... I'd like to, but I will not set foot in a single engine plane unless I have first hired two suspicious men who will kill the pilot's family if the plane crashes. I don't trust mechanics, except mine. You don't have to go by single engine plane. Some Outfitters have twin Otters on floats. A great aircraft. My brother had a Cessna 185 on floats but he traded that for a 210. He didn't like the statistics of float planes. He should have gotten a turbine 208, that's a nice ride to altitude. |
a bystanders view on the us noise that is made here
"Jim Carter" wrote in message ... "Skipper" wrote in message ... Most of Canada a few miles north of the US border is desolate tundra. Would you rather that *fundamentalist* missile come down on New York? Skipper Now here is one ignorant American. Skipper, did you not take a geography course in school? You have better take a look at the map of Canada to see where the tundra is located. I can give you some help. It's more than 1000 miles north of the Canada/USA border Why do 95% of the Canadians live within 100 miles of the US border? |
a bystanders view on the us noise that is made here
"thunder" wrote in message ... On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 08:04:31 -0500, Smith Smithers wrote: Jim C. You are wearing blinders if you don't think Canada benefits from a strong US Military. Sometimes, just sometimes, I wonder if we benefit from a strong military. ;-) Bullets or butter? World's policeman doesn't come without a cost. It keeps your from harm. |
a bystanders view on the us noise that is made here
"Tamaroak" wrote in message ... And if we had listened to Carter we sure as hell wouldn't be in the pickle we are in today with most of the world hating our collective guts. (And with good reason, I might add; we are the ugly Americans.) Carter was the worst US president. We wouldn't have this chickenhawk AWOL deserter presidummy for one thing. We might be somewhere on the road to self-sufficiency and conservation regarding our energy needs, for another, instead of only worrying how we can return value to the BP & Exxon shareholders. Let's crack open ANWR, the coast of Calif. and Fla. We can then get some wind farms off of Cape Cod. This administration is a lot like others before them, only more stupid, selfish and shortsighted. You are an idiot. |
a bystanders view on the us noise that is made here
Don White wrote:
You asking me if I'd rather a missle land on a foreign country, or on my own countries soil...? Give me 5 seconds to think about that... Actually, I asked you "Most of Canada a few miles north of the US border is desolate tundra. Would you rather that *fundamentalist* missile come down on New York?" So, is it remote tundra or New York where you'd prefer to see that missile fall? -- Skipper |
a bystanders view on the us noise that is made here
In terms of who deserves the most credit it is unmistakenly
Gorbatsjov. Why is it there is such a need to blow up the part Reagan played? Don't you think any president with a smart advisor would have done not exactly the same but would have added in the same amount? No, Reagan was the drivinig force in tearing down the iron curtain. And don't forget that he personally designed built & flew the first rocket to the moon, right after he finished taming the west. And he proved scientifically that trees cause air pollution! Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: Actually, history was on both their sides. The borders were already porous as a screened hatch in a submarine, the economies of the various Baltic states were becoming more Westernized with a healthy open black market fueled by some really good smugglers (a story of whom has never been written but I wish would be), Poland and Hungary had already become democratized - the forces of history. They were in the right place in the right time for it all to come crashing down. The fact that Reganites took credit for it is an accident of that same history. No doubt Reagan helped. But I thought it was funny that he is supposed to have intimidated the Russians thru our superior submarine force... at that time, the Russians had over 1,000 submarines alone, and President Reagan's 600 ship Navy was just a pipe dream. DSK |
a bystanders view on the us noise that is made here
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message ... "Jim Carter" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... I'd like to, but I will not set foot in a single engine plane unless I have first hired two suspicious men who will kill the pilot's family if the plane crashes. I don't trust mechanics, except mine. You don't have to go by single engine plane. Some Outfitters have twin Otters on floats. A great aircraft. My brother had a Cessna 185 on floats but he traded that for a 210. He didn't like the statistics of float planes. He should have gotten a turbine 208, that's a nice ride to altitude. Right now he is looking for a good 310 Turbo, with the Lycoming Engines. Service ceiling of 35,000 ft. Jim |
a bystanders view on the us noise that is made here
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. "Jim Carter" wrote in message ... "Skipper" wrote in message ... Most of Canada a few miles north of the US border is desolate tundra. Would you rather that *fundamentalist* missile come down on New York? Skipper Now here is one ignorant American. Skipper, did you not take a geography course in school? You have better take a look at the map of Canada to see where the tundra is located. I can give you some help. It's more than 1000 miles north of the Canada/USA border Why do 95% of the Canadians live within 100 miles of the US border? Well, way back in history, the only way to travel was by water and that's where the Great Lakes Area is. The cities were started there and they grew and grew. The main east & west highways were easier to construct along this corridor. That's way. Also, it's a hell of a lot warmer the further south you are. ;-) Jim |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:10 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com